Category Praxis Manned Spaceflight Log 1961-2006

Flight Crew

WILCUTT, Terence Wade, 50, USMC, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-68 (1994); STS-79 (1996); STS-89 (1998)

ALTMAN, Scott Douglas, 41, USN, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-90 (1998)

LU, Edward Tsang, 37, civilian, mission specialist 1, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-84 (1997)

MASTRACCHIO, Richard Alan, 40, civilian, mission specialist 2 BURBANK, Daniel Christopher, 39, USCG, mission specialist 3 MALENCHENKO, Yuri Ivanovich, 38, Russian Air Force, mission specialist 4, 2nd mission

Previous mission: Soyuz TM19 (1994)

MORUKOV, Boris Vladimirovich, 49, civilian, Russian, mission specialist 5

Flight Log

The Russian Service Module Zvezda docked to the aft port of Zarya on 26 July 2000, and was followed by Progress M1-3 at the aft port of Zvezda on 8 August. Zvezda was critical to the early occupation of ISS because it provided flight control and orbit maintenance functions. Zvezda also included the crew quarters for the early resident crews, and EVA facilities prior to the arrival of the airlock modules. With the arrival of Zvezda, a resident crew could remain on the station without the Shuttle being docked to it.

STS-106 docked to Unity on 10 September and remained there for 189 hours, during which the hatches were opened for over 129 hours. On the mission’s only EVA on 10 September (6 hours 14 minutes), Lu (EV1) and Malenchenko (EV2) connected nine power and data communication cables between Zvezda and Zarya as well as installing the station’s compass, a 1.82-metre magnetometer which showed the station in respect to the Earth. They also ventured farther than any tethered crew member had

during a Shuttle EVA, over 30.4 metres above the cargo bay along the side of Zvezda and Zarya.

Work inside the station focused on reconfiguring Zvezda for operational use by removing launch bolts and restraints and installing voltage and current stabilisers inside the module. To save weight at launch, only five of the eight batteries had been installed, and the STS-106 crew installed the other three. They also installed com­ponents of the Elektron system designed to separate water into oxygen and hydrogen. The three tons of logistics transfers and numerous maintenance tasks took up most of the crew’s time during the docked phase. Managers monitoring onboard consumables were able to approve an extra day of docked operations to help ease the burden. The items transferred included six water containers, all of the food stores for the first resident crew, office supplies, onboard environmental supplies, a vacuum cleaner and a computer with monitor.

Atlantis undocked, after a further re-boost to the station’s orbit, on FD 11. This was followed by a fly-around of the station before commencing the preparations for the flight home. This undocking and fly-around manoeuvre, like those during the undocking of the Shuttle from Mir, is normally performed by the Shuttle pilot, giving

them experience in flying the orbiter in preparation for a future rendezvous and docking mission as commander.

Milestones

218th manned space flight 129th US manned space flight 99th Shuttle mission 22nd flight of Atlantis

43rd US and 76th flight with EVA operations 3rd Shuttle ISS mission 2nd Atlantis ISS mission

Flight Crew

DUFFY, Brian, 47, USAF, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-45 (1992); STS-57 (1993); STS-72 (1996)

MELROY, Pamela Ann, 39, USAF, pilot

CHIAO, Leroy, 40, civilian, mission specialist 1, 3rd mission

Previous mission: STS-65 (1994); STS-72 (1996)

McARTHUR Jr., William Surles, 49, US Army, mission specialist 2,

3rd mission

Previous missions: STS-58 (1993); STS-74 (1995)

WISOFF, Peter Jeffrey Karl, 42, civilian, mission specialist 3, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-57 (1993); STS-68 (1994); STS-81 (1997) LOPEZ-ALEGRIA, Michael Eladio, 42, USN, mission specialist 4, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-73 (1995)

WAKATA, Koichi, 37, civilian, Japanese, mission specialist 5, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-72 (1996)

Flight Log

The original launch date for this mission (5 October) was rescheduled to 9 October when film reviews of the STS-106 launch revealed that the right-hand ET-to-orbiter attach bolt had failed to retract correctly. While this problem was being resolved, an orbiter LO pogo accumulator re-circulation valve located in the MPS failed to respond correctly and required replacement. The second launch attempt was post­poned due to high winds at the pad area preventing the safe fuelling of the ET. The following day, a ground support equipment pin and tether, used on access platforms, was observed on the ET-to-orbiter LO feed line. Because of the risk of potential damage during launch, a further 24-hour delay was called.

Discovery docked with ISS on 13 October and remained there for the next 165 hours. However, such was the EVA demand on this crew that only 27 hours

As Discovery separates from ISS, a crew member records this view with the new additions visible. At the top, most of the Z1 Truss is visible, while in the centre is the PMA-2 on the Unity Node, and beneath is the newly installed PMA-3 also on Unity. The solar arrays are on the Russian segment was spent with internal hatches into ISS open. With the docking achieved, the crew used the RMS to lift the Zenith (Zl) Truss from the payload bay and onto the uppermost (zenith) docking port of Unity. Once completed, the crew confirmed the integrity of the seals and then opened the internal upper hatch to secure grounding connections between the Truss and the station. With that task completed, the EVA programme could begin.

The EVAs were completed by two pairs of astronauts. Chiao (EVl) and McArthur (EV2) performed the first and third excursions (15 Oct for 6 hours 28 minutes, and 17 Oct for 6 hours 48 minutes), while Wisoff (EV3) and Lopez-Alegria (EV4) completed the second and fourth (16 Oct for 7 hours 7 minutes, and 18 Oct for 6 hours 56 minutes). Both teams supported each other’s EVAs from inside the orbiter. During the EVAs, the crews connected electrical umbilicals for power to heaters and electrical conduits in the Zl Truss, relocated two communication antennas and installed a tool box for use during future on-orbit construction activities. On the second EVA, the PMA-3 was installed on Unity and the Zl Truss was prepared for the future attachment of solar arrays, beginning with the flight of STS-97. The astronauts also installed two DC-to-DC-converters on top of the Zl Truss which converted electricity generated by the solar arrays to the correct voltage. They tested a manual berthing mechanism, deployed a tray that would provide power for the US Labora­tory Module (scheduled for delivery on STS-98) and remove a grapple feature from Zl. They also performed further tests of the SAFER units.

Following the completion of the EVAs, the crew began work inside the station, continuing the transfer of supplies and logistics for the first resident crew, who were scheduled to be the next docking mission at the station. The STS-92 crew also successfully tested the four control moment gyros used to orientate the station as it orbits the Earth. Microbial samples were taken from surfaces inside the station to check for contamination and they cleaned surfaces and storage containers with fungicidal wipes to inhibit microbial growth.

The original landing attempts on 22 October were waived off due to excessive crosswinds at the SLF. The winds remained high for the aborted 23 October landing attempt at the Cape and rain within the 50 km limit at Edwards meant the crew had to spend another day in space. With excessive winds still preventing any landing at the Cape, the rain at Edwards held off to allow the Shuttle to land there instead.

Milestones

2l9th manned space flight

l30th US manned space flight

l00th Shuttle mission

28th flight of Discovery

44th US and 77th flight with EVA operations

5th Shuttle ISS mission

2nd Discovery ISS mission

Flight Crew

MALENCHENKO, Yuri Ivanovich, 41, Russian Air Force, ISS-7 and Soyuz commander, 3rd mission

Previous missions: Soyuz TM19 (1994); STS-101 (2000)

LU, Edward Tsang, 39, civilian, US ISS-7 science officer, 3rd mission Previous mission: STS-84 (1997); STS-101 (2000)

Flight Log

With the loss of Columbia in February 2003, it would be necessary to use the Soyuz TMA spacecraft to launch and return resident crews to the station for the time being until the Shuttle was declared operational again. Due to the limited supply capability for replenishing logistics on the station with the Shuttle fleet grounded, it was also determined that resident crews would now consist of only two persons, launched to the station every six months. The pairing would consist of one American and one Russian crew member, rotating the command position with each mission. The pre­viously identified three-person ISS crews were reassigned as two-person teams, and the third seat was assigned to European astronauts flying short visiting missions during the exchange of crews for the time being. As the crews and launch manifest were changed and America began the investigation into the STS-107 accident, ESA announced that they had delayed the launch of their next astronaut to ISS for six months under agreement with Russia. Therefore, TMA2 would fly with only the two ISS-7 crew members aboard for six-month residency, with no planned EVAs and no other visitors.

The two crew members would be known as “caretaker” crews, able to maintain the systems of the complex, to prevent unmanned loss of control and to sustain consumables, but with limited capacity to conduct science programmes. The work programme of ISS-7 was designed not to overload the crew, as no two-person crew had resided on the station before. The ISS predecessors, Salyut and Mir, had been operated by two-person crews, but ISS was much larger and more complex. The crew

operated what science experiments were already aboard and continued the pro­gramme of Earth observations, with Lu officially designated the NASA science officer. There were also regular maintenance and housekeeping chores to be accomplished and the crew would receive the Progress Ml-10 and M48 re-supply vehicles. Ed Lu continued the series of personal recollections of events on the station, which were posted on the web.

A demonstration of American EMU suiting was completed on 28 May, proving that the two men could suit up and remove suits without the assistance of a third person, should they be required to complete an emergency EVA. Some of the tasks were postponed due to problems with Lu’s suit that required further investigation, but it was a useful training exercise. In late June, Lu communicated by radio with former ISS-5 science officer Peggy Whitson, who was commanding a diving expedition to the NEEMO undersea habitat. This is used to develop extreme environment exploration techniques, with diving crews including NASA astronauts (both with and without flight experience) and engineers or flight controllers, to compare space flight training and flight experiences to undersea exploration.

On 10 August, “space history” was made when Malenchenko was “married” via a TV a link to his fiancee who was in Houston, Texas. The marriage had been arranged for August prior to Malenchenko being reassigned to the flight as a result of crew reshuffling after Columbia was lost. It was too late to cancel the legalities, so the wedding was authorised, with Lu acting as best man. This history-making event would be the first and last such ceremony according to officials at TsUP, and subsequent cosmonaut contracts would be amended to include a clause that no wedding would be performed while they were in space.

The ISS-8 two-person resident crew arrived at the station in October, along with ESA astronaut Pedro Duque. He would return in TMA2 with the ISS-7 crew. Their landing occurred without incident.

Milestones

238th manned space flight 95th Russian manned space flight 88th manned Soyuz mission 2nd manned Soyuz TMA mission 6th ISS Soyuz mission (6S)

1st resident caretaker ISS crew (2 person)

1st resident crew with no planned EVAs since ISS-1 Lu celebrates 40th birthday in space (1 Jul)

1st space “wedding” (10 Aug)

2003-045A

15 October 2003

Jiuquan Satellite Launch Complex, Gobi Desert region, northwest China

16 October 2003

Dorbod Xi, Siziwang grasslands of the Gobi Desert, Inner Mongolia

CZ-2F Shenjian (Long March) (flight 5)

21 hours 26 minutes Unknown

Man-rating of the Shenzhou spacecraft for human flight; qualification and man-rating of the launch complex, launch spacecraft compatibility, orbital flight re-entry, flight control, and land-based recovery with a human passenger aboard

Flight Crew

YANG, Liwei, 38, Chinese PLA Air Force, command pilot

Flight Log

On 16 October 2003, after years of speculation and months of expectation, China became the third nation to achieve its own manned space flight capability with the launch of Yang Liwei aboard Shenzhou 5. The historic 21.5-hour flight was preceded by four unmanned test flights between November 1999 and January 2003. At the time, China had always stated that its first manned flight would occur before 2005. As the flight of Shenzhou 4 approached, it was indicated that this would be the final unmanned test flight and if successful, the first manned launch would occur before the end of 2003. Following the successful flight of Shenzhou 4, several reports revealed that the hardware was in preparation to support the first manned flight. From the team of yuhangyuans selected for the programme in 1998, a training team of three were selected, one of which would make the initial flight.

In late August 2003, the Shenzhou 5 spacecraft and its CZ-2F launch vehicle were delivered to the vehicle assembly building at the Jiuquan launch site. On 11 October, the stacked vehicle was moved to the launch pad, an operation that took 1 hour and 25 minutes. On 14 October, the training team of three yuhangyuan candidates were revealed to the Chinese press, but only after the prime pilot had been selected. The back-ups were Zhai Zhigang and Nie Haisheng, while the man destined to be the first Chinese national in space was Yang Liwei.

The Fifth Decade: 2001-2006

The final preparations for launch occurred in the early hours of 15 October, with Yang, suited up for the flight, travelling in a transfer bus to the launch site. Yang’s entry into the spacecraft inside the launch shroud was similar to that of the Soyuz cosmonauts, through the Orbital Module and down into the Descent Module. Unlike the Russians however, this event was filmed. In Soyuz, there is simply no room in the crew access area for a camera system to be installed and this process has thus never been seen. For American missions, the launch has always been in full public view; during the Soviet era of launches, everything was kept secret. For the first Chinese manned launch, although the event was well publicised, the launch would not be covered live.

The launch occurred at 09: 00 Beijing Time (BT — GMT + 8 hours). After two minutes, the launch escape tower ejected, no longer needed as the spacecraft could make an emergency return on its own. Sixteen seconds later, the strap-on boosters separated from the first-stage core. At 2 minutes 39 seconds into the flight, the first – stage core was shut down and separated from the vehicle as the second-stage engine and vernier engines took over, propelling the vehicle towards orbit. At 3 minutes 20 seconds, the two halves of the launch shroud used for aerodynamic purposes through the atmosphere were separated. The shut-down of the second stage occurred at 7 minutes 41 seconds Ground Elapsed Time (GET) and for the next 2 minutes 2 seconds, the vernier engines gave the Shenzhou the final nudge into orbit, before shutting down as the spacecraft separated. The launch had taken about 10 minutes. After 22 minutes in orbit, the two pairs of solar panels were deployed by ground command to generate electrical power. One pair was located on the rear Instrument Module, with the other pair on the forward Orbital Module. It had taken 12 years and one month after authorising the Project 921 programme for the first yuhangyuan to finally reach orbit.

Though an Orbital Module was present, it was announced for this flight that Yang would remain in the DM. His flight programme included the operation of a set of instruments and monitoring of space systems and functions. The spacecraft operated primarily on pre-set programmes with little input from the pilot. Tests of the communications system were combined with TV views from inside the spacecraft and outside the window. The flight duration was announced as only one day for this first manned test, but included three meals and two rest periods for the yuhangyuan. Attached to Yang’s body were medical sensors which recorded his condition and transmitted the data to a medical team on Earth. The primary purpose of this mission was to man-rate the spacecraft and system, so extensive operations would wait for later missions. The next important stage was to get Yang home.

On 16 October, following his second rest period, preparations for re-entry and landing began during the fourteenth orbit of the spacecraft. At 05:04 a. m. bt, the command for retrofire to initiate the return to Earth programme was issued from a tracking ship located in the South Atlantic Ocean. About 332 minutes later the OM separated from the spacecraft and continued in orbital flight. Two minutes later, retro – rockets on the spacecraft fired, bringing the spacecraft out of orbit. The Instrument Module was separated about 21 minutes later, as the DM containing Yang plummeted to Earth. Following re-entry, the drogue parachute was deployed 11 minutes after the separation of the modules. The main parachute was deployed five minutes after the drogue and 2 minutes after the heat shield separated from the base of the vehicle. Seven minutes later, at 06: 23 a. m. bt, the Descent Module of Shenzhou 5 landed safely after a flight of 21 hours 26 minutes.

Yang was taken back to Beijing for medical examination and mission debriefings. Now a national hero, from November he began a programme of public appearances as a major personality and the face of China’s manned space programme. While Yang took the Chinese space programme to the public, behind the scenes work continued both for the next flight and also with the OM of Shenzhou 5. The OM, unlike that of Soyuz, was capable of independent manoeuvrable flight for some months, and Shenzhou 5’s OM was packed with instruments and equipment that were tested after the yuhangyuan had returned to Earth, for about six months. These modules are expected to be of significance on future flights in the series, and are linked to the expected Chinese national space station programme.

Milestones

239th manned space flight

1st Chinese manned space flight

1st manned flight of CZ-2F launch vehicle

3rd nation to develop independent manned orbital flight

5th flight of Shenzhou spacecraft

1st manned flight of Shenzhou

Table В.1. Duration log April 1961-September 2006.

Order of most spaceflight experience, up to 29 September 2006 and the end of ISS Expedition 13.

Notes

1 Does not include September 1983 launch pad abort

2 In Space aboard ISS-14

3 Includes STS-107 duration up to loss of signal

4 Includes 5 Apr Anomaly – Soyuz 18-1 launch abort

5 Includes X-15 flights, three times 10 minutes

6 Includes Mercury 3 sub-orbital flight

7 Inclusive of STS 51-L time through loss of signal

8 Includes Mercury 4 sub-orbital flight

9 Includes Spaceship One flight two times 24 minutes

10 Includes Spaceship One flight

11 Includes X-15 flight, two times 10 minutes

12 Includes X-15 flight, 10 minutes

All flights into space from 12 April 1961 (over 50 miles or 80m) or accidents of intended orbital missions in progress are included. Launch pad aborts prior to launch are not included.

All data correct up to 29 September 2006.

Listings include

1961 Mercury 3 and Mercury 4 completed NASA sub-orbital flights

1962-1968 Thirteen X-15 missions that exceeded 50 mile (80 km) altitude 1975 Soyuz 18-1 launch abort – Mission in progress

1986 STS 51-L Challenger. Mission in progress

2003 STS 107 Columbia – Mission in progress

2004 3 Spaceship One test and X-Prize private commercial flights that exceeded 100-km altitude

Listings do not include

X-15 flights that did not exceed 50 miles (80 km) altitude. Apollo 1 pad fire – pre-mission training simulation Soyuz T10-1 pad abort – mission aborted prior to lift off. Five Shuttle pad aborts prior to SRB ignition

Table В.2. EVA duration log April 1961-September 2006.

Order of most spaceflight experience, up to 29 September 2006 and the end of ISS Expedition 13. Includes all IVAs.

The X-15, whose programme operated between June 1959 and October 1968, was a rocket-powered aircraft built by North American Aviation. The programme was operated as a joint NASA/USAF/USN venture, for aeronautical research at speeds in excess of Mach 6 and altitudes up to and beyond 50 miles. The fastest recorded speed was eventually 4,520 mph (Mach 6.7) and the highest altitude achieved was 354,200 feet (66.8 miles).

Date Free-flight Pilot Aircraft Altitude (miles)

1962 Jul 17 62 White 3 59.16 (95.18km)

First FAI-certified world altitude record; 3 aborts preceded the attempt. The rocket engine fired for one second longer than planned resulting in a speed 248mph (399kph) faster than planned. At peak altitude White could see a panorama that stretched from San Francisco in California down to Mexico.

1963 Jan 17 77 Walker 3 51 (82.05km)

Walker’s flight was to study the handling of the X-15 without its ventral fin at extreme altitudes and to conduct an infra-red experiment.

1963 Jun 27 87 Rushworth 3 55 (88.49km)

This flight was aimed at providing the pilot with experience of high-altitude handling and phenomena.

1963 Jul 19 90 Walker 3 65.3 (105.06 km)

On this flight, Walker was to study the expansion of the airframe during re-entry with the ventral fin removed. He also deployed and towed a nitrogen-filled balloon and conducted horizon-scanning, photo­metric, infra-red and ultraviolet observations, all in ten minutes.

1963 Aug 22 91 Walker 3 66.75 (107.40km)

Walker’s third “astro-flight’’ reached the highest altitude attained by an X-15 in 199 free-flights. He also attained a speed of Mach 5.58 (3,794mph or 6,104.5kph).

1965 Jun 29 138 Engle 3 53.14 (85.50 km)

Engle’s first “astro-flight’’ included a horizon-scanning experiment.

1965 Aug 10 143 Engle 3 51.7 (83.18km)

Engle’s second ‘‘astro-flight’’ occurred just 8 months prior to his selection as a NASA astronaut. He was the first astronaut selected who already held ‘‘astronaut-pilot wings’’.

1965 Sep 29 150 McKay 3 56 (90.10km)

After surviving a crash of the X-15 #2 aircraft that almost killed him in 1962, McKay finally completed an ‘‘astro-flight’’ which investigated boundary-layer noise and structural loads on the horizontal tail, as well as horizon-scanning experiments.

1965 Oct 14 153 Engle 1 50.17 (80.72km)

In his third ‘‘astro-flight’’, Engle completed a programme that included taking measurements of atmo­spheric pressure and further experiments in the scanning of Earth’s horizon.

1966 Nov 1 174 Dana 3 58 (93.32km)

This flight included the objectives of collecting micrometeorites, and tests of a dual-channel radiometer and a tip-pod accelerometer. Precise measurements of the attitude and density of the atmosphere were also taken.

1967 Oct 17 190 Knight 3 53.4 (85.92km)

Further collection of micrometeorites, the recording of wing-tip pod deflection during re-entry, observations of the ultraviolet plume of the XLR99 rocket exhaust, and studies of the solar spectrum above 200,000ft (60,960 metres) were all objectives assigned to this mission.

1967 Nov 15 191 Adams 3 50.4 (81.09 km)

The scientific objectives of this 12th ‘‘astro-flight’’ of the programme, included a UV study of the rocket exhaust plume, observations of the solar spectrum and the bow shockwave of the wing-tip pod. Nose-gear loads were to be observed, micrometeoroids collected and an ablative material tested for use on the Saturn 5 booster. Adams was killed on this flight and was awarded his USAF Astronaut Wings posthumously.

1968 Aug 21 197 Knight 1 50.7 (81.57km)

The final X-15 ‘‘astro-flight’’ was just two missions prior to the end of the programme. The planned 200th flight was cancelled. In 199 free-flight missions, the three X-15s had logged 30 hours 13 minutes 49.4 sec­onds in flight and had flown 41,763.8 miles (67,197.95 km). Pilot experience at Mach 4 was almost 6 hours, with a further 90 minutes at Mach 5 and 78 seconds at Mach 6.

Fifteen pilots were selected to fly the X-15, although there was no formal selection process. They were all qualified test pilots prior to assignment to the programme. Eventually, only twelve flew X-15 missions, of which there were 199 completed by the three X-15 vehicles. In addition, several captive flights were executed, where the X-15 was not released from under the wing of the B-52 launch aircraft.

Although not considered as a spacecraft, the X-15 did operate in a region of the upper atmosphere whose conditions were only fractionally different from those encountered by a vehicle in Earth orbit. In the early 1960s, the USAF had declared that flights above 50 miles (80.45 km) would be classified as a space flight. They would award USAF Astronaut Wings to honour those USAF pilots that attained this altitude. In contrast, the Federation Aeronautique International (FAI), the inter­national aeronautical record-keeping body, decided that flights over 100 kilometres (or 62 miles) would be classified as space flights.

Of the 199 X-15 flights, thirteen surpassed the 50-mile altitude barrier, and these have been designated astro-flights, rather than space flights. Eight of the X-15 pilots (Walker, White, Rushworth, Engle, McKay, Dana, Knight and Adams) flew these thirteen missions. Of these, only five (White, Rushworth, Engle, Knight and Adams) were USAF pilots who received the USAF wings. The remaining three (Walker, McKay and Dana) were civilians and did not qualify for the USAF title. However, Walker completed two X-15 flights in excess of the FAI qualification altitude.

The core module of Mir was launched in February 1986 and the fully assembled multi­module station was de-orbited fifteen years later in March 2001. In between, it housed 28 main crews and a host of visiting crews, including 16 international guest cosmo­nauts and 7 NASA astronauts on long-duration missions. A total of 41 Russian cosmonauts also visited, lived and worked on the station, as did 37 Shuttle astronauts during 9 docking missions. The station eventually acted as the link between Russia and the USA. The spiralling cost of the original US-led Space Station Freedom programme, and the collapse of the Soviet Union, led to Russia becoming part of the International Space Station programme which, despite national calls for extending the life of the station or launching a second Mir, eventually took over from the historic Mir station in 2000 as the main focus for Russian space efforts.

Mir’s base block was 13.13 m long with a maximum diameter of 4.15 m. It featured a forward docking node, with five other ports allowing transport craft to dock at the forward or aft ports of the module. Four separate science modules were later added. Kvant was docked permanently at the rear port and had its own aft facility to allow continued docking at the rear of the complex by Soyuz and Progress craft. The other modules were located around the forward docking node. Extensive EVA work from the node, and then from Kvant 2 enhanced and supported Mir’s research programme and capabilities.

Flight Crew

BEREGOVOY, Georgy Timofeyevich, 47, Soviet Air Force, pilot

Flight Log

The remarkable statistic regarding the Soyuz 1-2 debacle was that, had it been successful, the first Soviet space docking would have been achieved on a manned mission, against all previous Soviet traditions. The Soviets brought things back to normal with the unmanned, automatic docking flights of Cosmos 186-188 and 212­213 in late 1967 and the spring of 1968. It was assumed, naturally, that a manned docking was to follow. First Soyuz 2 was launched (from Pad 1) – on 25 October – secretly and unmanned. Then the following day, the oldest man in space to date, Georgy Beregovoy, boarded Soyuz 3, which was launched at 13: 34hrs local time from the other Soyuz pad (31), the first time this was used for a manned launch, and injected into a 51.6° inclination orbit. By the time it arrived, recorded pictures of his ascent appeared on Soviet television, together with the delayed announcement of the launch of Soyuz 2.

The manned docking seemed to be on, but it was not to be. Beregovoy’s Soyuz merely made an automatic approach to within 167 m (548 ft). It was revealed in 1989 that the test pilot cosmonaut had been trying to dock with Soyuz 2 while flying Soyuz 3 upside down! He had to be “rescued’’ by ground control from his precarious pre­dicament and further attempts to dock were called off. A further rendezvous was conducted before Soyuz 2 returned to Earth on 28 October. Beregovoy spent the rest of the mission making observations and showing television viewers around his space­ship, which even featured little curtains on the window of the Orbital Module. It was no coincidence that Apollo 7 had just returned to Earth having featured the “Wally, Donn and Walt’’ television shows that had earned them accolades from the US TV industry. Beregovoy, who had reached a maximum altitude of 252 km (157 miles) during the mission, the twenty-fifth manned orbital space flight, fired his retros for

145 seconds on 30 October and landed safely near Karaganda, after a flight of 3 days 22 hours 50 minutes 45 seconds.

Milestones

27th manned space flight

10th Soviet manned space flight

2nd Soyuz manned space flight

1st manned launch from Pad 31

1st Soviet launch to be shown on network television

Flight Crew

TRULY, Richard Harrison, 45, USN, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-2 (1981)

BRANDENSTEIN, Daniel Charles, 40, USN, pilot GARDNER, Dale Allan, 34, USN, mission specialist 1 BLUFORD, Guion Stewart, 40, USAF, mission specialist 2 THORNTON, William Edgar, 54, civilian, mission specialist 3

Flight Log

An awe-inspiring lift-off from the Kennedy Space Center at 02: 32 hrs local time, the first night launch in the Shuttle programme and only the second in US manned space flight history, was seen within a radius of 720 km (447 miles), but was lucky to have been given the go-ahead. Lightning had struck the launch tower hours before the launch and rain swept conditions delayed it for 17 minutes until mission controllers felt that they had found a hole in the weather and that conditions would be good enough for Challenger to actually make it back to the KSC in one piece following any return to launch site abort.

Already delayed from 4 August due to technical problems including an in-orbit check of TDRS-1, Challenger headed through the clouds as a fuzzy orange halo while the moisture-laden air reflected and amplified the sound, making it the noisiest affair. Inside the Shuttle, the visual effects were both spectacular and a bit frightening. During the SRB burn, unbeknown to NASA at the time, ablative material on one of the SRB nozzles, designed to burn through to 4cm (1jin) in the 3,200°C tem­peratures, actually burned through to just 1.3 cm (2- in). Complete burn through, NASA discovered later, could have caused side-thrusting exhaust to put Challenger out of control. The problem delayed the next mission, STS-9, which had its SRBs replaced as a precautionary measure.

Once on orbit, with an inclination of 28.4° and a maximum altitude of 265 km (165 miles), the commercial objectives of STS-8 were achieved quickly when India’s Insat 1A was deployed from the payload bay, with a slight clinking sound which may have been the result of it knocking against a Shuttle fixture. This probably caused the damage to the satellite that was discovered later when one of the solar panels would not deploy properly at first. Challenger was originally to have carried TDRS-2 but this was replaced by Insat and a 3,383 kg (7,458 lb) Payload Test Article, brought forward from STS-11 and shaped like a giant dumb-bell. This was unberthed and held in various positions to evaluate the performance of the RMS in handling heavy payloads.

Challenger appraised the use of the TDRS-1 satellite to communicate with mission control and the new link enabled the first in-flight press conference since ASTP to be staged and excellent TV coverage to be beamed to Earth. Communica­tions during re-entry via TDRS were not possible, however, due to a computer fault. Commander Truly concentrated on a programme of the most detailed Earth photography since Skylab, while the other astronauts concentrated on their special­ities, including Bluford’s operation of the McDonnell Douglas electrophoresis machine to process living cells for the first time. Meanwhile, the oldest man in space, Dr. Bill Thornton, aged 54 – who was only added to STS-8 at a late stage to study space motion sickness – operated “Dr. Bill’s Clinic’’, learning more in an hour than all the previous years he had put in on the Earth, he said.

After a smooth re-entry, during which Truly performed a series of hypersonic turns and banks, the crew got their first site of Edwards at Mach 2 and 22,860 m (75,000 ft), illuminated by the six xenon lights of runway 22, which greeted Challenger’s first US night landing in manned space flight history, at T + 6 days 1 hour 8 minutes 43 seconds.

Milestones

93rd manned space flight

39th US manned space flight

8th Shuttle mission

3rd flight of Challenger

1st US manned space flight to end at night

1st African American space traveller

Oldest first time space traveller (Thornton), aged 54

In between the flights of STS-8 and STS-9, the Soviet Union attempted to launch Soyuz T10. The mission was aborted following a launch pad fire and is covered in detail in the chapter Quest for Space.

Flight Crew

SHAW, Brewster Hopkinson Jr., 40, USAF, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-9 (1983)

O’CONNOR, Bryan Daniel, 38, USMC, pilot

ROSS, Jerry Lynn, 37, USAF, mission specialist 1

CLEAVE, Mary Louise, 38, civilian, mission specialist 2

SPRING, Sherwood Clark “Woody’’, 41, US Army, mission specialist 3

WALKER, Charles David, 37, civilian, payload specialist 1, 3rd mission

Previous missions: STS 41-D (1984); STS 51-D (1985)

NERI VELA, Rudolpho, 33, civilian, payload specialist 2

Flight Log

Such was the apparently routine nature of Space Shuttle flights by November 1985 that the 61-B mission’s extraordinary EVA operations were left unheralded. The flight got off to a spectacular start at 19: 29 hrs local time at the KSC, the third night launch in the US manned space programme and the second by the Shuttle. Unlike Challenger’s ascent into thunder clouds on STS-8, Atlantis began the 61-B mission in skies so clear that the ascent could be seen over 640 km (398 miles) away. Riding the mid-deck were two payload specialists with a difference, Mexico’s Rudolpho Neri Vela, flying courtesy of his country’s booking of the Shuttle to deploy the Morelos national communications satellite – and who was to become the last international passenger on the Shuttle – and McDonnell Douglas’s Charlie Walker, who was flying for the third time – more than any of the professional NASA crew. Indeed, by the end of the mission, Walker had clocked up more Shuttle flight experience than all the NASA astronauts, except Crippen and Hartsfield.

Atlantis reached a 28° inclination orbit and a maximum height of 334 km (208 miles) during the mission, which included the routine deployments of Morelos,

Aussat and a Satcom Ku-band satellite, and the remarkable EASE-ACCESS EVA experiments. These were performed by astronauts Jerry Ross (EV1) and Sherwood Spring (EV2), who erected a series of truss frames in a rehearsal of proposed space station construction procedures. The photography of the two EVAs on 1 and 3 December was splendid, one showing Spring standing at the end of a 13.7 m (45 ft) long tower, erected over the payload bay. The EVAs lasted 5 hours 34 minutes and 6 hours 46 minutes.

Probably the best Shuttle flight in the pre-Challenger era of the programme, 61-B came home to Edwards Air Force Base’s runway 22 at T + 6 days 21 hours 4 minutes 49 seconds, after a mission shortened by one orbit because of concerns over landing lighting conditions.

Milestones

113th manned space flight

54th US manned space flight

23rd Shuttle flight

2nd flight of Atlantis

1st manned space flight by a Mexican

23rd US and 33rd flight with EVA operations

The Fourth Decade: 1991-2000 Posted by admin in Praxis Manned Spaceflight Log 1961-2006 on November 2, 2015 STS-37 Int. Designation 1991-027A Launched 5 April 1991 Launch Site Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida Landed 11 April 1991 Landing Site Runway 33, Edwards Air Force Base, California Launch Vehicle OV-104 Atlantis/ET-37/SRB BI-042/SSME #1 2019; #2 2031; #3 2107 Duration 5 days 23hrs 32 min 44 sec Call sign Atlantis Objective Deployment of the Gamma Ray Observatory (GRO), the second of NASA’s four great observatories; EVA Development Flight Experiments Flight Crew NAGEL, Steven Ray, 44, USAF, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS 51-G (1985); STS 61-A (1985) CAMERON, Kenneth Donald, 41, USMC, pilot GODWIN, Linda Maxine, 38, civilian, mission specialist 1 ROSS, Jerry Lynn, 43, USAF, mission specialist 2, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS 61-B (1985); STS-27 (1988) APT, Jerome “Jay”, 41, civilian, mission specialist 3 Flight Log Atlantis left the pad almost on time with low-level clouds causing the only delay, of four minutes. Atlantis now carried newly upgraded general purpose computers. The primary payload, the Gamma Ray Observatory, was deployed during FD 3 (7 April), but its high-gain antenna failed to deploy on command. Ross (EV1) and Apt (EV2) performed an unscheduled EVA, the first since April 1985 (STS 51-D) to manually deploy the antenna, permitting the observatory to be successfully released into orbit. The two EVA astronauts had been preparing to exit the Shuttle in the event of something going wrong with the deployment, and as the GRO was lifted out of the payload bay by the RMS, they were checking out their suits. The solar panels of the GRO were opened to their full span of 21 m, although the high-gain antenna it unlatched did not deploy its 5-metre boom. As the procedures for the contingency EVA were faxed up to the crew, Ross and Apt donned their suits and prepared to exit the vehicle. Meanwhile, the crew fired the thrusters on the Shuttle to try to shake the boom loose, but without success. During the 4 hour 26 minute EVA, Ross tried to push the boom free. When that did not work, they set up a work platform to proceed with the manual deployment sequence they had practised four times in the Weightless Still in the grasp of the RMS the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory is held above Jay Apt during the successful 7 April EVA to free its high-gain antenna Environment Training Facility, or WETF, during training. Finding adequate hand holds was a problem, especially during the night time pass of the orbit. While Apt checked to ensure they were not damaging the boom, Ross removed a locking pin and pulled the antenna boom to its deployment position, then used a wrench to lock it into position. While they were outside, they also took the opportunity to perform some of the planned EVA Development Flight Experiment activities by evaluating hand rails, measuring the forces imparted on the foot restraints during the performance of simple tasks, and performing translation exercises. When the GRO was ready for deployment they returned to the airlock, but did not re-pressurise it in case they were needed again. They watched the deployment from the vantage point of the airlock hatch. The following day (8 April), both men were back outside for the scheduled EVA (5 hours 47 minutes). This time, the two astronauts assembled a 14.6-metre track down the port side of the payload bay and fixed the Crew and Equipment Translation Aid (CETA) cart to it. This was an evaluation of the type of cart that would be installed on the space station to aid movement over long distances, saving the astronauts’ energy. They also evaluated using the RMS out over the aft of the payload bay at varying speeds, using strain gauges to measure the slippage of the arm’s brakes. They found that RMS-based tasks took longer to perform than expected and also they found themselves suffering from the cold due to excessive EMU cooling, giving rise to concerns that the same might occur during space station construction EVAs, especially on the night-side passes. New EVA gloves that were tested proved disappointing, despite excellent results obtained on Earth. The crew also recom­mended that back-to-back EVAs should be avoided due to crew fatigue. During the post-flight debriefing, Apt reported that the right-hand index finger of his EVA glove had sustained an abrasion and inspections revealed that the palm bar had penetrated the glove bladder by about 1 cm. Had the palm bar come out of the glove again during EVA, it was estimated that the leakage rate would not have been sufficient to activate the secondary oxygen pack, but it was clear that more work was needed on the glove design before the more arduous EVAs planned for the space station. With the GRO deployed and two EVAs accomplished, the crew worked on their mid-deck experiments, including testing components of the Space Station Heat Pipe Advanced Radiator Element, to better understand the fluid transfer process at work in microgravity. They also processed chemicals with the BioServa apparatus, operated the Protein Crystal Growth apparatus, and made contact with several hundred amateur radio operators across the world. Due to unacceptable winds at the primary site at Edwards in California, and bad weather at the Cape, the homecoming of Atlantis was delayed by a day from 10 April, with the crew taking the opportunity to photograph the Earth. The Gamma Ray Observatory included four instruments that observed the electromagnetic spectrum from 30keV to 30GeV. Subsequently renamed after Dr. Arthur Folly Compton, who won the Nobel Prize in physics for his work on the scattering of high-energy photons by electrons, the observatory initially worked well, but after six months problems developed in the onboard tape recorders, with high error rates in the data. This forced NASA to use the TDRS to relay data to Earth in real time instead of storing it and downloading it later. Despite the reduction in the amount of data returned, this problem did not prevent the completion of a planned all-sky survey by November 1992. The Compton Observatory’s results have been important, but are less well known than the high-profile images from Hubble. Its studies of solar flares, pulsars, X-ray binary systems, and numerous high-energy emissions have all contributed to a better understanding of gamma ray sources in deep space. The observatory was safely de-orbited and re-entered Earth’s atmosphere on 4 June 2000, nine years after its deployment from Atlantis. Milestones 139th manned space flight 69th US manned space flight 39th Shuttle mission 8th flight of Atlantis (OV-104) 24th US and 42nd flight with EVA operations Mission completed first decade of STS flight operations 1st US EVA since December 1985 Flight Crew COATS, Michael Lloyd, 45, USN, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS 41-D (1984), STS-29 (1989) HAMMOND Jr., Blaine Lloyd, 38, USAF, pilot HARBAUGH, Gregory Jordan, 34, civilian, mission specialist 1 McMONAGLE, Donald Ray, 38, USAF, mission specialist 2 BLUFORD, Guion, 48, USAF, mission specialist 3, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-8 (1983); STS 61-A (1985) VEACH, Charles Lacy, 46, civilian, mission specialist 4 HIEB, Richard James, 35, civilian, mission specialist 5 Flight Log The launch of this unclassified DoD mission was originally scheduled for 9 March, but significant cracks were discovered on all four hinges on the two ET umbilical door mechanisms during processing at Pad 39A. The stack was rolled back to the VAB on 7 March and the tank sent to the OPF for repairs. After the stack was returned to the pad on 1 April, the launch attempt scheduled for 23 April was postponed due to problems with a high-pressure oxidiser turbo-pump for SSME # 3 during pre-launch loading. After replacement and testing, launch was rescheduled again, this time to 28 April. STS-39 was one of the most complicated Shuttle missions to date. The purpose of the mission was to fly an unclassified DoD programme to enhance US national security by gathering scientific data that was essential to the development of advanced missile detection systems. The crew, working a two-shift system (Red Team: Ham­mond, Veach, Heib; Blue Team: Harbaugh, McMongagle, Bluford – Coats working This view of the payload bay of Discovery reveals some of the STS-39 payload, including the top of the STP-1 payload on the Hitchhiker carrier, and the AF-675 package comprising CIRRIS – 1A, FAR UV, HUP, QIMMS and the URA with either as required), also completed a variety of sophisticated experiments, including the deployment of five separate spacecraft. The Shuttle Pallet Satellite II (SPAS-II) supported both an infrared and an imaging telescope that studied the Earth’s limb, the aurora, the orbiter’s environment, and the stars both during free-flight and while attached to the RMS. Also aboard SPAS-II was the Infrared Background Signature Survey (IBSS), which was used to image and measure the spectral nature of rocket exhaust plumes by observing both firings of Discovery’s RCS from different attitudes, and the ejection of three sub-satellites deployed from can­isters in the payload bay which released chemical gases. Simultaneous observations of these gas releases were made by Earth-based instruments at Vandenberg AFB in California. The other classified deployable payload was designated the Multi-Purpose Release Canister. Space Test Payload 1 (AFP-675) comprised five instruments designed to observe the atmosphere, aurora and stars in the infrared, far ultraviolet and X-ray wave­lengths. The Cryogenic Infrared Radiance Instrument for Shuttle (CIRRIS) used an infrared detector chilled by super-cold (cryogenic) liquid helium to study airglow and auroral emissions form Earth’s upper atmosphere. The coolant was used faster than anticipated, which made this experiment a priority over SPAS II/IBSS and delayed the latter by 24 hours. Mike Coats reported that passing through the auroral displays was “just like flying through a curtain of light’’. The rescheduled experiment returned 50 per cent more data than planned. STP-1 also included the FAR UV Cameras, the Uniformly Redundant Array, the Horizon UV Program and the Quadruple Ion – Neutral Mass Spectrometer. When two tape recorders failed these instruments were adversely affected, but the crew demonstrated the value of humans in space by performing a complicated bypass repair, rerouting data via an orbiter antenna and via TDRS to the ground, fulfilling the objectives for these experiments. The crew also took advantage of their orbital inclination to take colour and infrared pictures of important surface features and phenomena on Earth, including Lake Baikal in Russia, oil field fires in Kuwait, and the results of a devastating typhoon in the Indian Ocean and fires in Central America, whose smoke palls had drifted over Texas and as far east as Florida. The crew landed at the SLF in Florida due to unacceptably high winds at Edwards AFB. Milestones 140th manned space flight 70th US manned space flight 40th Shuttle mission 12th mission of OV-103 Discovery 8th DoD Shuttle mission 1st unclassified DoD Shuttle mission 1st flight crew to comprise 7 NASA astronauts STS-53 Posted by admin in Praxis Manned Spaceflight Log 1961-2006 on November 2, 2015 Int. Designation 1992-086A Launched 2 December 1992 Launch Site Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida Landed 9 December 1992 Landing Site Runway 22, Edwards AFB, California Launch Vehicle OV-103 Discovery/ET-49/SRB BI-055/SSME #1 2024; #2 2012; #3 2017 Duration 7 days 7 hrs 19 min 47 sec Call sign Discovery Objective Deployment of classified DoD payload (DOD-1); operation of two secondary and nine mid-deck experiments Flight Crew WALKER, David Mathiesan, USN, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS 51-A (1984); STS-30 (1989) CABANA, Robert Donald, USMC, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-41 (1990) BLUFORD Jr., Guion Stewart, USAF, mission specialist 1, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-8 (1983); STS 61-A (1985); STS-39 (1991) VOSS, James Shelton, US Army, mission specialist 2, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-44 (1991) CLIFFORD, Michael Richard Uram, US Army, mission specialist 3 Flight Log STS-53 was Discovery’s 15th mission, its first since STS-42 the previous year. During the intervening 23 months, 78 major modifications had been made to the orbiter while still at KSC. These included the addition of a drag parachute for landing and the capability of redundant nose wheel steering. The launch was delayed by one hour 25 minutes to allow the sunlight to melt ice on the ET that had accumulated thanks to overnight temperatures of —4°C. The initial activity after reaching orbit was the deployment of a military satellite on FD 1. The satellite remains classified, although the payload was later identified as the third Advanced Satellite Data Systems Intelligence Relay Satellite. Once that deployment had been completed, the remainder of the mission became declassified. The crew continued with their experiment programme of two cargo bay and nine mid­deck experiments, most of which were instigated by the Defense Department Space Test Program Office, headquartered at Los Angeles AFB in California. The experiment payload on Discovery included the Shuttle Glow Experiment/ Cryogenic Heat Pipe Experiment, which measured and recorded electrically charged The end of one phase of Shuttle operations as Discovery lands on Runway 22 at Edwards AFB, signalling the final flight of dedicated DoD Shuttle missions. Almost eight years earlier in January 1985, the Discovery orbiter completed the first dedicated DoD mission STS 51-C landing at Kennedy particles as they struck the tail of the orbiter. The second part of this experiment provided research into the use of super-cold LO pipelines for spacecraft cooling. Also in the payload bay was the NASA Orbital Debris Radar Calibration Spheres (ODERACS) experiment, designed to improve the accuracy of ground-based radars in detection, identification and tracking of orbital space debris. In the mid-deck, the Microcapsule in Space and Space Tissue Loss experiments were devoted to medical research, while the Vision Function Test measured the changes in astronauts’ vision that might occur in the microgravity environment. The Cosmic Radiation Effects and Activation Monitor (CREAM) recorded levels of radiation inside the mid-deck, as did the Radiation Monitoring Experiment. There was a joint USN, US Army and NASA experiment for the crew to locate 25 preselected ground sites with a one nautical mile accuracy. This was an evaluation of detecting laser beams from space and the use of such beams in ground-to-spacecraft communications. Other experiments included a photographic assessment of cloud fields for DoD systems, while the Fluid Acquisition and Resupply Experiment studied the motion of liquids in microgravity during simulated refuelling of propellant tanks with distilled water. There were also seven medical tests, including a re-flight of the rowing machine rather than the treadmill for physical exercise. This crew dubbed themselves “the Dogs of War Crew’’, as they represented all four branches of the US armed forces. Their training team had been called “Bad Dog’’ and these combined to have the STS-53 crew become known as the “Dog Crew” (and they often quipped that they were “working like dogs” throughout their mission). Walker was known as “Red Dog”, Cabana was known as “Mighty Dog” and Clifford, being the rookie, was known as “Puppy Dog”. Bluford became “Dog Gone” and Voss became “Dog Face”. The crew mascot was known as “Duty Dog” and a stowaway that looked over the crew during the mission (a rubber dog mask hung over an orange launch and entry suit) was known as “Dog Breath”. The landing was originally scheduled for KSC but was diverted to Edwards due to clouds in the vicinity of the SLF. Following the landing, a small leak was detected in the forward thrusters, delaying the egress of the crew until fans and winds dissipated the leaking gas. Milestones 156th manned space flight 82nd US manned space flight 52nd Shuttle mission 15th flight of Discovery 10th and final dedicated DoD Shuttle mission « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 20 Next » Tweet Copyright © 2024 Aviation – airports, aircraft, helicopters … - Everything about aviation. Aviation News from around the world. Commercial and General Aviation, airports, airplanes, helicopters and other aircraft.