Category JAPANESE SECRET PROJECTS

Deployment

None. A wooden mock-up was built before the Taizan project was cancelled.

was rounded and fully glazed, a style unlike any Japanese bomber then in service. The wings were mounted mid-fuselage, each wing sporting the Nu engine in a well-stream – lined nacelle. On top of the fuselage, fore and aft of the wings, was a turret for a portion of the defensive armament. A fairly spacious tail gunner position was fitted beneath the verti­cal stabiliser on the underside of the fuselage with a rear facing ventral gun station. A rela­tive rarity in Japanese bomber design was the tricycle landing gear. Takahashi’s perfor­mance estimates put the normal operational range at 6,412km (3,984 miles) which, with a lighter payload, could meet the 16-shi specifi­cation. The maximum speed would have been 555km/h (345mph) with a relatively light defensive weapon armament of two Type 99 20mm cannons and two Type 97 7.7mm machine guns.

Unfortunately for Takahashi, Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941, would prevent the required machine tools and equipment to produce the Nu engine from being exported to Japan. Without the powerplant, the design was doomed. With Takahashi’s proposal hav­ing fallen by the wayside, Kiro Honjo resumed control of the M-60 project. This time, instead of a four-engine bomber, Honjo would utilise two engines and base his design heavily on the G4M.

The G7M Taizan (meaning ‘Great Mountain’) as the design was later designated was to use two 18-cylinder, air-cooled radial engines, the Mitsubishi MK10A (Ha-42-11), developing 2,000hp each. The wings were mounted mid­way on the fuselage and the aircraft was to be constructed of metal with fabric covering the ailerons and rudders. It was anticipated that the Taizan would carry the same 800kg (1,7641b) bomb load as the G4M1 but unlike the Hamaki, the Taizan would have a far more potent defensive armament as the bomber would operate far from fighter protection. This step also took into account the shortcomings in the G4Ml’s protection. Of course, using less powerful engines and a heavier weapon fit caused a revision in performance when com­pared to Takahashi’s design. A 31 October 1942 performance estimate gave the G7M1 a range of 5,559km (3,454 miles) at a speed of 518km/h (322mph) at 5,000m (16,404ft) with a weapon fit of two Type 99 20mm cannons, two Type 2 13mm machine guns and two Type 1 7.9mm machine guns. However, as work on the G7M1 proceeded and the design underwent further testing, these estimates would continue to be revised. Unfortunately for Mitsubishi, the revised estimates did not see any expected improvements to the performance but rather some deterioration.

By 1942, Mitsubishi had completed the bomber’s design and were ready to construct a full size wooden mock-up of the G7M1 Taizan, which was in due course completed. Unfortunately, the Kaigun Koku Hombu had now issued a 17-shi specification for a bomber that Kawanishi was developing as the K-100 (which some sources designate as the G9K Gunzan, meaning ‘Mountain Group’, but this has never been verified; other sources have the G9K as a 1944 19-shi bomber project). Mitsubishi was instructed to halt all further work on the G7M1 until the K-100 could be evaluated.

Kawanishi completed the initial design of the K-100 bomber and the Kaigun Koku Hombu reviewed it along with the G7M1 in the summer of 1943. By this time, the G7M1 had suffered further range performance reductions, dropping from a proposed nor­mal range of 3,705km to 2,778km (2,302 miles to 1,726 miles). This was caused in part by the heavier armament compared to the initial fit, removing the two Type 1 machine guns and adding three more Type 2 machine guns to make a total of six Type 2s. This was, to a degree, tempered by a higher speed of 544km/h (344mph) at 5,000m (16,404ft).

Based on the projected performances of both aircraft, it was felt that neither design would be suitable either for the 16-shi or the

17- shi specifications. The Kaigun Koku Hombu was critical of the G7Ml’s design for concen­trating much of the defensive weaponry in the frontal arc of the bomber, thereby reducing the aircraft’s defences in the side and rear arcs. In addition, it was considered that the actual per­formance of the G7M1 would likely have been little, if at all, better than the operational G4M1. Another nail in the coffin for the G7M1 was the fact that the Kaigun Koku Hombu was looking to four-engine bombers as the real means to achieve the necessary range (at least 8,816km/5,478 miles, allowing for a one way trip from Tokyo to Los Angeles). In fact as early as 1938 the UN had asked Nakajima to produce a four-engine bomber, the G5N Shinzan (‘Mountain Recess’) which was based on an imported Douglas DC-4E.

With the Kaigun Koku Hombu showing no interest in the G7M, Mitsubishi shelved all fur­ther work on the bomber. Ironically, the G5N Shinzan would prove a failure and had a worse range than the G4M. Only with the con­struction of the four-engine Nakajima G8N1 Renzan (‘Mountain Range’) which first flew in October 1944 would the original 16-shi range specification be met. By then, the need for such bombers had passed as attention had turned to defending Japan and fighters/inter – ceptors were required.

The concept of the J4M Senden (‘Flashing Lightning’) was bom of the need for a high performance interceptor that could operate at high altitude. The main catalyst for this was the American Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress. The bomber, in action in the Pacific Theatre from 1941 to 1943, proved to be difficult to intercept since it normally flew at heights that operational Japanese fighters could not reach or attain with difficulty. Even if an interception was achieved, the B-17 carried a formidable defensive armament with which to protect itself. To a lesser extent, the Consolidated B-24 Liberator was also a factor when it began to replace the B-17s still remaining in the Pacific. In 1942, two companies, Mit­subishi and Kawanishi, were given a 17-shi Otsu specification by the Kaigun Koku Hombu to develop an aircraft to meet the need for a high altitude, high performance aircraft.

Mitsubishi Jukogyo K. K.’s response to the 17-shi Otsu directive was anything but con­
ventional when compared to Kawanishi’s design, the J3K1. The proposed plane, known within the company as the M-70, was a mono­plane pusher design that featured twin booms connected to vertical stabilisers by a low mounted horizontal stabiliser. The booms were slung under the low, fuselage mounted wings. The heart of the aircraft was to be the Mitsubishi [Ha-43] 12 MK9D tur­bocharged, radial engine. Rated at 1,650hp at 8,000m (26,246ft), it was projected that this engine would push the Senden to a top speed of 704km/h (437mph) via its six bladed pro­peller. For weapons, there was a Type 5 30mm cannon and two Type 99 20mm can­nons. All three were arranged in the fuselage nose with the Type 5 being centrally mounted and the two Type 99 cannons on either side of the fuselage. If required, the aircraft could carry a small bomb load of up to 120kg (2641b). Mounted across the top of the fuse­lage behind the cockpit were inlets to feed air to the turbocharger and engine. The purpose
of the turbocharger was to boost the manifold pressure on the engine over and above oper­ating pressures at sea level as a means to maintain and improve performance at alti­tude. For landing gear, the Senden had a tri­cycle arrangement with the nose gear retracting into the fuselage and the main wheels being housed in the booms. The pilot sat in the glazed nose of the aircraft in a cock­pit that was blended into the fuselage. The majority of the Senden was constructed of metal with fabric being used on the rudders and ailerons.

The Senden came in two versions. The first was the project described above while the second variation replaced the blended cock­pit with a bubble canopy to improve the pilot’s radius of vision. It also removed the protruding inlets and replaced them with two bands of flush inlets that wrapped around the fuselage, the first being directly behind the cockpit and the second around the engine area just past the wings. Finally, the horizon-

tal stabiliser was moved to the top of the ver­tical stabilisers. The remainder of the aircraft was basically the same between the two ver­sions. The blended cockpit version is credited as the J4M1 Project 1 while the second, with the bubble canopy and modified inlets, is sometimes referred to as the J4M4 Project 2.

After analysing the two designs, Mitsubishi selected the original configuration, the J4M1, to develop further. To confirm their initial pro­jections, a full scale model was constructed in 1943 and put to the test in a wind tunnel. Unfortunately for Mitsubishi, the tests proved to be a disappointment. Performance projec­tions based on the testing were below the ini­tial calculations and problems with the MK9D in terms of not reaching its horsepower rating only added to the concerns.

However, the Kaigun Koku Hombu and the UN ensured that Mitsubishi would not have to concern themselves further with the Senden. In 1943 as Mitsubishi was working on the Senden, the Kaigun Koku Hombu issued an

18- shi Otsu specification. From it, the Kyushu J7W Shinden resulted (page 84 for details). With the 18-shi Otsu requirements being simi­lar to the 17-shi Otsu specifications and with the J7W showing far more promise and having
the support of the UN, Mitsubishi were told to cease work on the Senden and instead further develop the Mitsubishi A7M ReppQ (‘Hurri­cane’) to meet the 17-shi Otsu standards. The result was the A7M3-J Model 34 Rifuku (Land Wind) that had not advanced beyond the design phase before the war ended.

Despite the fact that the J4M Senden did not progress past a wind tunnel model, US air intelligence was aware of the design mainly through captured documentation. In the Jan­uary 1945 issue of the US Recognition Journal, the J4M Senden was announced as a possible adversary in the coming weeks of the war. No artist renderings of the Senden were included in the article. The J4M was given the codename Luke in anticipation of Allied pilots encountering the aircraft in combat, something which was never to occur.

As a note, although there are artist impres­sions of a jet-powered Senden (as shown here) there is no evidence to support the notion the J4M was ever revived or consid­ered for turbojet power as there were other designs being considered (for example, the J7W2 and the Ki-201) which offered better prospects and capability.

In 1943, the Japanese were only too well aware of a threat looming on the horizon. That threat was the Boeing B-29 Super­fortress. With the development of the B-29 starting in 1939, the Japanese were in no doubt that once the bomber entered produc­tion it would eventually appear over Japan. The problem for the Japanese was that they did not have an effective countermeasure against the B-29 and feared they would not be able to have one ready in time for its antici­pated arrival. Fortunately, the answer was found in one of the most radical fighters ever to achieve operational status.

Towards the middle of 1943, representa­tives of the Japanese military in Berlin were notified of the development and progress of the Messerschmitt Me 163, a point defence interceptor powered by a rocket engine. Interest was expressed immediately. In short order Japanese attaches from the UN and the IJA visited Bad Zwischenahn in Germany where Erprobungskommando 16 was sta­tioned. This unit had been created earlier in 1943 to develop Me 163 combat tactics,
deployment and training as well as the coor­dination of the various contractors and test centres involved in development and pro­duction of the Me 163. During the tour EKdo 16 personnel explained to the Japanese the temperamental nature of the Walther HWK 509A rocket motor and the dangerous and explosive properties of the two fuels the motor used. This did nothing to dissuade the Japanese who saw the answer to their needs right before their eyes. To them, the benefits of an interceptor able to climb rapidly and possessing a very high speed overrode any concerns about the fuels or the engine. The Japanese wasted no time in entering negoti­ations to obtain the Me 163B.

However, not everyone was in agreement about the value of the Me 163. Detailed reports had been sent to Japan from Germany regard­ing the findings of the attaches which overall were positive; nevertheless, some argued that it would not be possible to produce the fuels the aircraft required in sufficient quantity to support operational requirements. Others criticised the unorthodox nature of the Me 163
and that developing such a plane and its engine would consume much needed resources. Despite these objections, the sup­porters for the Me 163 won out.

The Japanese swiftly and successfully negotiated the licences to manufacture both the Me 163B as well as its HWK 509A rocket motor. The motor licence alone cost the Japanese 20 million Reichsmarks. In addition to the two licences, Germany was to provide complete blueprints for the Me 163B and the HWK 509A, manufacturing data for the air­craft and engine, one complete МеІбЗВ, three HWK 509A motors, and two sets of sub – assemblies and components by no later than 1 March 1944. Also, Japanese military attaches in Berlin were to be notified of any improvements to the Me 163 design so changes could be incorporated into the Japanese version. The Japanese also requested to oversee the manufacturing processes for the Me 163B and the rocket motor as well as being allowed to study and review Luftwaffe operational procedures for the fighter. Three submarines were tasked
with shipping the materials to Japan – the RO-500, RO-501 and 1-29.

RO-500 was still named U-511 when it departed from Lorient in France on 10 May 1943 bound for Penang, Malaysia. Aboard were four Japanese including Vice Admiral Naokuni Nomura and Major Tam Otsu Sugita of the IJA medical service. Also aboard was the data for the Me 163B. During the transit, U-511 was named Satsuki 1 (‘satsuki’ mean­ing the month of May). On 16 July, U-511 reached Penang where Nomura, Sugita and the other Japanese passengers disembarked and returned to Japan by air. U-511 departed Penang for Kure, Japan, on 24 July 1943 and arrived in Kure on 7 August 1943 where the submarine was presented to the UN as the RO-500.

RO-501, a Type IXC/40 submarine, was for­mally U-1224. On 15 February 1944, U-1224 was handed over to the UN who gave it the name Satsuki 2, and on February 28, it was commissioned into the Imperial Navy as RO-501 with Lieutenant Commander Norita as captain. On 30 March 1944, RO-501 departed from Kiel, Germany, with the man­ufacturing data and blueprints for the Me 163B among other cargo. At 7.00pm on 13 May 1944, north west of the Cape Verde Islands, the USS Francis M. Robinson, a Buck – ley class destroyer escort, reported a sonar contact 755m (825 yards) from the ship. The Francis M. Robinson immediately initiated an attack, launching 24 Mark 10 Hedgehog bombs and five salvos of Mark 8 depth charges. Sonar reported four explosions sig­nifying the death of the RO-501.

1-29 of the Imperial Japanese Navy departed from Lorient, France, on 16 April 1944. She carried on board a HWK 509A rocket motor, the fuselage of a Fieseler Fi 103 and a Junkers Jumo 004A turbojet, again with other cargo. Technical Commander Eiichi Iwaya, a passenger, carried with him the plans for the МеІбЗВ and Me 262 while another passenger, Captain Matsui, had plans for accelerators used for rocket launching. Between the two of them, they also had plans for a glider bomb and radar equipment. On 14 July 1944, the 1-29 arrived safely in Singapore. Here, Iwaya and Matsui disembarked, along with a portion of their documents, and con­tinued on to Tokyo by air. On 15 July, Allied code breakers intercepted a message from Berlin to Tokyo regarding the cargo that the 1-29 carried and on 26 July 1944 at 5:00pm near the western entrance of the Balintang Channel, Luzon Strait, the USS Sawfish spot­ted the 1-29 on the surface. She fired four tor­pedoes and three struck the Japanese submarine. 1-29 sank almost immediately and only one sailor survived who swam to a nearby Philippine island and reported the loss.

Technical Commander Eiichi Iwaya, upon leaving the 1-29, did not take all of the docu­mentation he had for the Me 163B (or the Me 262) and the loss of the 1-29, along with that of the RO-501, delivered a major blow to the development program. However, the information Iwaya had preserved, combined with what was received from the RO-500, was enough to keep the project alive and in July 1944 the UN issued a 19-shi specification fora rocket powered interceptor. This decision was based on the analysis of the documenta­tion on hand for the Me 163B and the current construction capacity and capability of the air industry, and also down to the drive of Vice Admiral Misao Wada who supported the development of the rocket aircraft.

Upon issuing their 19-shi specification, the Kaigun Koku Hombu assigned the project to Mitsubishi. Mitsubishi were initially reluctant to accept the design, but further considera­tion and the need to adapt the Me 163B design to Japanese production capability saw the manufacturer agree. Even though the UN was behind the aircraft, the IJA would also be involved in the development of both the air­craft and rocket motor. The Japanese rocket interceptor was to be called the J8M1 Syusui (which means ‘Autumn Water’) and in IJA service the Syusui was to be designated Ki-200.

On 27 July 27 1944, all personnel involved met to discuss the Sytisui and it was agreed to follow the design plan of the Me 163B as much as possible. The key reason was that the design was proven and worked and thus critical time could be saved. The same applied to the rocket motor. A second reason for adhering to the Me 163B design was that Japanese fabricators had almost no experi­ence with the type of aircraft that the Me 163B was. But not everyone was in full agreement.

The IJA saw flaws in the Me 163B and felt that Japanese industry could not fully pro­duce the Syusui to the specifications of the German aircraft. Modifications to meet the current capabilities of the Japanese aviation industry would be required to both the rocket motor and the aircraft which, as a conse­quence, would force changes to the design. As such the IJA argued that in the end a new design would be required anyway. The UN, however, would hear none of it and was adamant that the Me 163B design would be followed.

Mitsubishi forged ahead with assembling a team to develop the J8M1. The project was led by Mijiro Takahashi at Mitsubishi’s Nagoya plant. Under Takahashi was Tetsuo Hikita who would be the lead designer for the air­frame. In addition to the Mitsubishi men, rep­resentatives of the Yokosuka Kokutai were involved, namely Captain Kumamoto and Commander One, who was tasked with test flying the J8M1 upon completion. Technical Commander Eiichi Iwaya was also a part of the overall development team given his famil­iarity with the МеІбЗВ acquired during his time in Germany. One last meeting was held on 7 August 1944 to finalise the development of the Syusui and then work began.

The first stage was the wooden mock-ups. On 8 September 1944, the full scale mock-up of the cockpit was completed and on 26 Sep­tember 1944, the mock-up of the Syusui was completed. Both the UN and the IJA inspected them and suggestions were made for possible alterations to the design. These changes were incorporated and Takahashi’s team laboured day and night to produce the detailed blueprints for the J8M1. Three proto­types were to be built; the first would be for load testing while the remaining two would be used for the flight test program. As the rocket motor was not yet available, two of the prototypes would be weighted to simulate the motor and fuel. To hasten construction, when one portion of the aircraft was drafted and Finalised, a copy was sent to the assem­bly shop assigned to construct the compo­nent so work could begin without delay.

Externally, the J8M1 was unmistakable in its lineage but Takahashi and his group had to make modifications as they adapted the МеІбЗВ design. For example, the МеІбЗВ used two MK 108 30mm cannons which were heavier and shorter than the 30mm cannons the Japanese were to use. Fuel capacity was similar to the German aircraft and so were the dimensions, although the J8M1 was slightly longer due its more pointed nose and had a wider span and smaller wing area. (The Syusui unlike the Me 163B did not use a nose – installed generator, the space being used for radio equipment.) The wing thickness was also increased. The main difference, how­ever, was the weight: the Sytisui was 363 to 408kg (800-900lb) lighter than the МеІбЗВ. This was not due to any effort to purposely lighten the Sytisui as it lacked armour protec­tion for the pilot and carried less ammunition for its cannons than the German interceptor. For weapons, the J8M1 was to be equipped with two Type 5 30mm cannons in the wings while the IJA’s Ki-200 would use two Ho-155 30mm cannons or two Ho-5 20mm cannons.

Because the Japanese lacked the experi­ence in flying tailless aircraft, Kugisho was tasked with creating a glider version of the Syusui. In part, the glider would provide per­formance data, findings from which could be incorporated into the Syusui, but would also serve as a trainer for rocket aircraft pilots. Therefore, the MXY8 Akigusa and MXY9 Shuka were developed, as described else­where in this book on page 77.

While work was underway on the first three prototypes, a production plan for the fighter was put together and was completed by October 1944. By March 1945, 155 SyQsui were to be produced with another 1,145 built by September 1945. Ultimately, by March 1946 at least 3,600 SyQsui were anticipated to be in service.

In addition to developing the Syusui, Mit­subishi was also assigned the task of creating the Japanese version of the Walther HWK 509A rocket motor and both the UN and the IJA were involved in the motor program. To assist the engineers in Mitsubishi’s engine department, personnel from the IJA’s First Army Air Arsenal engine section were assigned to the firm. The resulting motor was called the KR10 but was also known as the Toku-Ro.2. Components for the KR10 were constructed by four companies: Hitachi, Ishikawajima, Mitsubishi and Washimo. Washimo, for example, was responsible for the fuel flow control mechanisms and the relief valve for the Ко fuel tank.

Mitsubishi faced several problems in build­ing the KR10, the main issue being that the HWK 509A used a nickel-chromium alloy in the fuel injector atomiser, regulating valves and relief valves. Since the Japanese did not have access to this alloy they had to use plain chromium steel. It was expected that the KR10 would be ready for testing by October 1944, but the first prototype exploded imme­diately when it was started for the first time, partly believed to have been caused by the metal used. A deviation was made from the original HWK 509A plan in that the KR10 motor used wider supports and included a bearing in the middle for the Ко fuel com­pressor. This revision in the KR10 resulted in the KR12 but the addition of a second version of the motor risked compounding any pro­duction problems. Indeed, testing of the KR12 also resulted in an explosion. Mitsubishi engi­neers discovered that a bearing seal had failed that allowed the Ко fuel to leak into the motor and then come into contact with the bearing lubricant with catastrophic results. Given that it offered no real advantage, the KR12 was shelved and work focused solely on the KR10. These accidents, their subse­quent investigations and the resulting revi­sions put the KR10’s development further and further behind.

For fuel, the Syusui used two ingredients which, when combined, provided the com­bustion and resultant thrust. The First, Ко, was the Japanese version of the German fuel

T-Stoff formed from eighty per cent hydrogen peroxide with the remainder Oxyquinoline and pyrophosphates to act as stabilisers. Ко was the oxidising fuel. The second, Otsu, was the Japanese equivalent of C-Stoff. Otsu was the reductant fuel and was composed of thirty per cent hydrazine hydrate with the remainder being methanol, water and potas­sium-copper cyanides. Together, Ко and Otsu were a hypergolic fuel combination, which meant that when the two fuels were combined they spontaneously ignited. The problem with Ко and Otsu was that they were colourless and, of course, when they came together, the result was explosive. This required strict handling procedures and con­tainment methods. Both fuels were stored in special ceramic pots. To produce both fuels, three chemical companies were contracted. They were the UN’s First Fuel Arsenal, Mit­subishi Kasei and Edogawa Kagaku. In the Syusui, the fuels were stored in wing and fuselage mounted tanks. The pilot sat between two 91 litres (24 gallons) tanks of Ко while behind him in the fuselage was a 961 litres (254 gallons) tank and a 8 litre (2 gallon) tank of Ко. Each wing housed two tanks of Otsu, the capacity of each tank in each wing being 64 and 197 litres (17 and 52 gallons) in the two tanks respectively.

By December 1944, the second and third J8M1 s had been completed but as no engines were ready for installation, ballast was used to simulate the weight of the KR10 with full fuel tanks. Earlier, the first J8M1 had been completed and load tested on 1 December 1944. However, the 7.9 magnitude Tonankai earthquake that struck the Tokai region of Japan at 1.30pm on 7 December 1944 destroyed the aircraft and the testing facility that housed it. The remaining J8M1 aircraft were transferred to the UN’s First Naval Air Technical Arsenal. From there, the aircraft were shipped to Hyakurigahara, located about 79km (49 miles) northeast of Tokyo. December would also see delays due to the increasing B-29 bomber raids. Attacks against Mitsubishi’s Nagoya facility resulted in the KR10 program being moved to the Dai-Juichi Kaigun Kokusho complex at the Hiro Naval Arsenal in Kure, Hiroshima. Here, work con­tinued on the motor supervised by Professor Kasai of the Kyushu University (although another source states the entire engine devel­opment group was moved to an underground facility in Natsushima in Yokosuka prefec­ture, overseen by the Dai-Juichi Kaigun Kokusho).

During testing, the KR10 delivered less thrust than the HWK 509A. Although the SyQsui was lighter than the Me 163B, when Takahashi and Hikita completed perfor­mance calculations for the SyQsui based on the thrust rating of the KR10, they found that the lighter weight did not totally offset the lower thrust. Regardless, the estimated speed and climb rate was considered exceptional.

On 8 January 1945, a Nakajima B6N1 (known as Jill to the Allies) towed the SyQsui into the air from the Hyakurigahara airfield and after a successful flight the design was vali­dated. Work quickly proceeded on further production of the SyQsui, this time with the KR10. However, the motor program was at least three months behind schedule and it was not until 11 April 1945 that the KR10 was suffi­ciently developed to enable it to function with some measure of reliability. With the possibil­ity of powered flight, Captain Shibata, com­mander of the 312 KokQtai due to be equipped with the J8M1, sought to speed up the process for testing. In discussions with the SyQsui development team it was decided that if the KR10 could produce thrust for at least two minutes without mishap, the motor should be Fitted to the SyQsui so that powered flight test­ing could commence. 22 April 1945 was set as the deadline for the first powered flight.

Meanwhile, Germany made another attempt to send more material to Japan including documents and parts for the Me 163. These items and other cargo were loaded onboard U-864 that departed from the Bruno U-boat pen located in Bergen, Norway, on 5 February 1945. However, having past Fedje the submarine developed a misfire in one of her two MAN diesel engines and it was necessary to return to Bergen to effect repairs. The British submarine HMS Venturer, dispatched to deal with U-864, spotted the German submarine’s periscope on 9 Febru­ary 1945. Korvettenkapitan Ralf-Reimar Wol­fram realised he was being followed and began to take evasive action, moving in a zig­zag fashion. James S. Launders, Venturer’s captain, decided to press home the attack and fired all four of his loaded torpedoes in a spread pattern. U-864 crash dived, dodged three of the torpedoes but turned into the fourth which struck the submarine. The resulting explosion split U-864 into two.

Unfortunately for the SyQsui, the deadline for the KR 10 would not be met. In exhaustive testing, another motor detonated after having achieved two minutes of burn time. In addi­tion, fears of B-29 raids saw the KR10 team being moved to the Yamakita factory com­plex in Hakome prefecture while the Mit­subishi SyQsui development group was relocated to the IJA research and develop­ment centre in Matsumoto in Nagano Prefec­ture. These moves consumed precious research time throughout April and May 1945. Both groups were eventually able to continue

work on the KR10 in an attempt to enhance its reliability and, in June, success was achieved. A KR10 from the Yamakita group functioned for four minutes while the Mit­subishi group in Matsumoto managed three minutes. With these motors now meeting the

two minute requirement, plans were swiftly prepared to install the Yamakita KR10 into a J8M1 while the Matsumoto motor was to be placed into another airframe that would be completed as a Ki-200.

The J8Ml’s installation was completed first

in the second week of June 1945 at Mit­subishi’s Number One Plant in Nagoya. The Syusui lacked much of its operational equip­ment including weapons and was trans­ported to Yokoku airfield. This site was favoured because it was situated along a shoreline, which meant that if the pilot had to ditch the aircraft he could do so into the ocean, offering a better chance for survival as well as possibly lessening the damage to the Syusui. The Syusui arrived at Yokoku at the beginning of July and ground testing began immediately. Secured to the tarmac, the tail of the Syusui was removed exposing the KR10 and motor running tests commenced. It was found that the motor did not burn fuel evenly, generating plumes of light red smoke from the combustion chamber as it ran. By 5 July 1945, technicians and engineers had cor­rected the burn problem to the point that the KR10 was deemed ready and the Syusui’s first powered flight was scheduled for 7 July 1945.

In front of a crowd of onlookers, the Syusui was moved to the start of the 1,200m (3,937ft) runway, the longer of the two at Yokoku. It was then fuelled with 568 litres (150 gallons) of Ко into the fuselage tanks and 159 litres (42 gallons) of Otsu into the wing tanks as the mixture ratio was approximately 10 to 3.6. At 4:55pm, the pilot, Lieutenant-Commander Toyohiko Inuzuka, fired the engine and within 11 seconds and after only 320m (1,049ft) of runway, the Syusui lifted off the ground and into the air, Inuzuka releasing the dolly and raising the nose to provide a 45° angle climb. Then, at 350m (1,148ft), a puff of black smoke issued from the motor, sput­tered and went out. The speed that had been built up carried the Syusui up to 500m (1,640ft) where Inuzuka levelled off and banked to the right ready to return to the run­way and land. As Inuzuka continued his right hand bank, the Syusui began to drift and air­speed rapidly dropped off. As he approached the runway, Inuzuka raised the nose of the Syusui to try and avoid colliding with a build­ing but it was too late. A wing clipped the side of the building, putting the Syusui into a crash so forceful that it broke apart, scattering pieces across the south-west edge of the air­field. Both wings were ripped away and the front of the aircraft was completely destroyed. Inuzuka survived the impact and was extracted from the wreckage. However, the extent of his injuries was so severe that he died the following day.

No time was wasted in trying to find the cause of the motor failure. Mechanical issues were ruled out and it was surmised that the puff of smoke and the subsequent loss of power from the KR10 was due to fuel being cut off from the motor. Miraculously, the fuel

tanks did not explode on impact and it was found that at least half of the fuel loaded prior to take-off remained. It was determined that the culprit was the fuel line from the Ко tank. Due to poor design, when the Sytisui went into its climb the fuel in the tank shifted away from the line which starved the motor of the needed oxidiser and thus the KR10 cut out. While the investigation was being carried out, bench tests of two additional KR10 motors (one each at Matsumoto and Yamakita) resulted in both exploding. This left a single KR10, the one slated for the Ki-200.

Flight testing of the Sytisui was suspended until the problem with the fuel system could be resolved. A further four Sytisui aircraft had been completed by Mitsubishi by the time a solution was found. These changes were incorporated into the KR10 engines then under development and flight testing was scheduled to resume in late August 1945. However, on 15 August 1945, Japan surren­dered. All further work on the Sytisui ceased and no further flights were made. At the end of the war the Ki-200 remained engineless, its KR10 never having been installed. Aside from the seven J8M1 aircraft built – including the one to be finished as the Ki-200 – another six were in various stages of completion. A fur­ther four KR10 motors had been completed with another two nearly finished. Enough components had been constructed to assem­ble a further twenty motors.

Another variant of the J8M had been planned which was called the J8M2 Syusui – Kai. The J8M2 lost one of the Type 5 30mm cannons/ammunition to be replaced by addi­tional fuel tankage. It was hoped that this would increase the endurance of the aircraft. The end of hostilities would see the J8M2 remain only a preliminary design though pro­duction of the J8M2 was a certainty had it been completed. As mentioned earlier, the IJA was not pleased with the Ki-200 and it would undertake development of its own ver­sion of the J8M, the Ki-202 Syusui-Kai, to right the wrongs it felt were evident in the Sytisui. For more details, please see the chapter on the Ki-202 (page 40).

A note regarding the use of Sytisui as the name for the J8M. The kanji for the aircraft (SyO and Sui) translate as ‘Autumn Water’. However, Shtisui has been used in many sources with translations ranging from ‘Sword Stroke’ or ‘Swinging Sword’ to ‘Rigor­ous Sword’, but the name Shtisui is not cor­rect. The use of Shiisui evolved from the metaphor that Sytisui represents – the wavy pattern on the metal blade of a highly sharp­ened sword as well as the brightness of the polished metal which reminds one of the waves on a body of clear water.

Contemporaries

Messerschmitt Me 163B Komet (Germany)

Specifications in parenthesis pertain to the J8M2 only and are based on Mitsubishi’s estimated data.

Type Interceptor/Fighter

Crew One

Powerplant

One Toku-Ro.2 (KR10) bi-fuel rocket motor developing 1,500kg (3,307 lb) of thrust

Dimensions

Span Length Height Wing area Wing loading

(J8M2)

9.47m

6.03m

2.68m

17.72m2

219.22kg/m2

219.70kg/m!

31.1ft 19.8ft 8.8ft 190.8ft2 44.9 lb/ft2 45 lb/fl2

Weights

Empty

1,445kg

3,1851b

(J8M2)

1,510kg

3,3281b

Loaded

3,000kg

6,6131b

(J8M2)

3,650kg

8,0461b

Maximum

3,870kg

8,5311b

(J8M2)

3,900kg

8,5981b

Useful load

1,545kg

3,4061b

(J8M2)

2,140kg

4,7171b

Performance

Max speed

900km/h at 10,000m

559mph at 32,810ft

Cruise speed

699km/h

434mph

Landing speed

150km/h

93mph

Range

3 min 6 sec of powered flight at 599km/h 372mph

Max range

5 min 30 sec of powered flight

Climb

40 sec to 2,000m (6,561ft)

2 min 8 sec to 4,000m (13,123ft)

3 min 8 sec to 8,000m (26,246ft)

3 min 50 sec to 10,000m (32,808ft)

Ceiling 12,000m 39,370ft

Fuel capacity 1,181 litres (312 gallons) of Ко and

522 litres (138 gallons) of Otsu

Armament

Two Type 5 30mm cannons with 53 rounds of ammunition per gun (one Type 5 cannon with 53 rounds of ammunition)

Deployment

None. A total of seven J8M1 aircraft were completed with one to be finished as a Ki-200. The 312 Kokutai were to receive the J8M1 had it entered production. No J8M2 was ever built nor were any Ki-200 aircraft.

Survivors

Mitsubishi J8M1 Sytisui (FE-300)

One of three brought from Yokosuka on 3 November 1945, this Sytisui is aircraft No.403 and is thought to have been captured at Mitsubishi’s No. l plant in Nagoya. Appearing on the 10 March 1946 report for aircraft releasable to the aviation industry, the Sytisui would be made available for display purposes on 1 August 1946 appearing to the public in Hollywood, California. The aircraft was later obtained and restored by Edward Maloney for display at the Planes of Fame Museum in Chino, California, where it remains to this day.

Mitsubishi J8M1 Sytisui (tail number 24)

After being received at NAS Patuxent River, the aircraft was moved to NAS Glenview in Glenview, Illinois (a suburb of Chicago, Illinois), where it was on display by 3 October 1946. This Sytisui eventually reached a derelict state and was scrapped.

Mitsubishi J8M1 Sytisui (tail number A-25)

Nothing is known about this particular Sytisui other than it likely ended up as scrap.

Mitsubishi J8M1 Sytisui

Mitsubishi has recently restored a J8M1 and it is currently on display at the company’s Komaki Plant Museum. A portion of the restoration contains components from a badly damaged J8M1 fuselage found in a cave but it still required significant custom fabrication of new parts to finish the project. Prior to Mitsubishi obtaining the fuselage, the remains had been on display on the grounds of the Japanese Air Self-Defence Force’s Gifu Air Base.

Ki-200 – data (estimated)

Type

Interceptor/Fighter

Crew

One

Powerplant

One Toku-Ro.2 (KR10) bi-fuel rocket motor

developing 1,500kg (3,3071b) of thrust

Dimensions

Span

9.47m

31.1ft

Length

5.88m

19.3ft

Height

2.68m

8.8ft

Wing area

17.69m2

190.5ft"

Weights

Empty

1,505kg

3,3171b

Maximum

3,870kg

8,5311b

Performance

Max speed

800-900km/h

497-559mph

at 10,000m

at 32,808ft

Cruise speed

351 km/h

218mph

Range

2 min 30 sec of powered flight

Max range

7 min of powered flight

Climb

3 min 40 sec to 10,000m (32,808ft)

Fuel capacity

1,181 litres (312 gallons) of Ко

and 522 litres (138 gallons) of Otsu

Armament

Two Ho-155 30mm cannons (or two Ho-5 20mm cannons)

Dornier Do C transport

In 1927, Kawasaki imported seven aircraft from Dornier including the Do C Komet. Although rejected by the Japanese military, Kawasaki used the Komet to fill an order for three passenger transports from the newspa­per service Asahi Shimbun Sha. The three air­craft, known as the Kawasaki-Dornier Komet, were built from imported components. Kawasaki later imported a Dornier Merkur, an updated Komet, leasing the aircraft as the Kawasaki-Dornier Merkur to Asahi Shimbun. However, this Merkur would instead see ser­vice with the Army as the Aikoku No. 2 after its conversion to an ambulance. Used during the Manchurian Incident, the Aikoku No. 2 was very active in casualty evacuation and upon retirement became a monument. When the Russians invaded Manchuria in 1945, the plane was burned by the retreating Japanese troops.

Dornier Do J Wal flying boat

In 1929, Kawasaki received an order for a pas­senger flying boat. As they already had an imported Dornier Wal flying boat from which to source a design, Kawasaki essentially pro­duced their own version using imported com­ponents from Dornier. A total of three were built by 1930, being flown as liners for regular passenger services.

Dornier Do N heavy bomber

In 1924, the Army asked Kawasaki to produce a bomber to replace types already in service. To this end, Kawasaki enlisted Dornier and BMW as collaborators on what would become the Type 87 Heavy Bomber. Dornier designed the Do N and the plane was built by Kawasaki, the first completed in 1927. After a year of test­ing, the bomber, now called the Type 87, was accepted into army service, the last of the 28 bombers being delivered in 1932. Kawasaki produced the BMW VI for the Type 87 under licence. Equipping a handful of bomber chutai, the Type 87 would see brief action dur­ing the Manchurian Incident of 1931.

Heinkel HeS 011 turbojet

The HeS was to be the next generation of tur­bojet and was to be the powerplant of choice for a great number of German project designs, and also the first of the second gen­eration jet fighters such as the Messerschmitt P 1101 and the Focke-Wulf Та 183 ‘Hucke – bein’. Only 19 were built before the close of the war and the engine never attained pro­duction status. Allied intelligence cited a 12 March 1945 letter from Kurt Fammertz to Director Wolff of Heinkel-Hirth stating that the 1JN should be supplied with complete plans for the HeS 011 engine and that it should be transferred via submarine. There is no evi­dence to show this transfer was completed.

Henschel Hs293 guided bomb

The Hs 293 was an SC500 bomb onto which wings, a tail and a rocket engine were mated. The Hs293A-l, which was the only opera­tional model, used radio signals to direct its bomb to the target. Later test versions used
wire-guidance as a means to defeat jamming. The weapon entered service in 1943 and, early in that year, a Japanese delegation was given a demonstration of the Hs293A-l at a field in Gartz in Germany. The Germans kept information on the improved, wire-guided Hs 293A-2 from the delegation. It is unknown if the Japanese acquired further information on the weapon and Allied intelligence reports suggest that, if they had, the Hs 293 would not have reached service until the fall of 1945. In addition, one report makes the assumption that the Hs293 was an influence on the Kugisho MXY7 Oka in so far as a human oper­ator, in the weapon itself, would have over­come the lengthy research and development of a radio guided munitions.

Henschel Hs 294 guided bomb

This was an improved version of the He 293, incorporating a longer, more pointed nose, heavier warhead and two rocket engines. The Hs294A used radio guidance, the Hs 294B wire guidance and the Hs 294D used television guidance. The Hs294 failed to see service. However, in December 1944, UN rep­resentatives met with German Air Ministry officials to discuss the Hs 294 but with what results is unknown.

Rheinmetall-Borsig MK 108 30mm aircraft cannon

Known as the ‘pneumatic hammer’, the MK 108 cannon was a very successful weapon encompassing heavy hitting power, ease of manufacturing and compactness in one package. Despite having a low muzzle veloc­ity which reduced range, it was used on a number of operational German aircraft and secret projects. The Japanese were very interested in manufacturing the cannon and studied the requirements to produce it. Cap­tured documentation in June 1943 suggested production was soon to be underway as the Japanese had received examples of the MK 108A-2 cannon. The MK 108 was not built in Japan.

Ruhrstahl-Kramer PC 1400X Fritz-X guided bomb

The Fritz-X was a guided munition made from the unguided PC 1400 ‘Fritz’ bomb. Using a cruciform tail arrangement with guidable fins, the Fritz-X was directed to the target via radio signals sent by the operator in the launch aircraft. To help visibility, flares were installed in the tail. The munition saw service from August 1943 to the end of the war in April 1945, being relatively successful in the anti­shipping role. The Japanese were aware of the Fritz-X and information on the bomb was available to Japan in September 1944. It is unknown if any examples were provided or if the Japanese pursued the weapon further.

SECRET PROJECTS

If you browse any major book seller, you tend to see a good many works on the experimen­tal aircraft developed by Germany both before and, particularly, during World War 2. Also, you’d find a fine selection of books on the topic of American experimental planes. From time to time, you could find mention of such ‘X-planes’ of other nations amongst the text describing more well known aircraft. But you did not often see, if at all, books dedi­cated to Japanese experimental aircraft. Usu­ally, one had to visit specialty book dealers, hobby shops, or be fortunate enough to be able to read another language in order to find books on the subject of Japanese X-planes.

I was first exposed to the world of Japanese experimental aircraft in 1988 through the classic book Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War by Rene J. Francillon. I found the book on the shelf in your typical mall bookstore. Sure, before then, I knew about the classic Japanese planes such as the Mitsubishi A6M Reisen and the Nakajima Ki-43 Hayabusa. But Francillon’s book brought to me such planes as the Nakajima Kitsuka, Mitsubishi J8M Syusui and the Tachikawa Ki-94.

My interest in military technology sat on the kerb through my college years but afterwards it slowly ramped back up. I found that I focused my reading on the military machine of Germany and the sheer breadth of techno­logical innovation their engineers and scien­tists churned out. Small arms, armour, artillery, missiles, submarines, aircraft, rock­etry and much more – no stone was left unturned by Germany’s scientists. It was dur­ing my studies of German aviation that I would see the Japanese pop up from time to time. Most often, it was the acquisition of Ger­man technology for development in Japan, or German plane designs offered for the Japan­ese to purchase. This piqued my interest in learning about what the Japanese had brew­ing in their aviation cauldron.

By this time, the World Wide Web was becoming the engine of information that it is today. While I was able to find bits of infor­mation regarding Japanese X-planes, it was never anything substantive. Stops into the local hobby shop or major book retailers did not turn up anything above and beyond what I already knew. I found a rather large gap in the online data pool on Japanese X-planes, at least in English, and so I sought about cor­recting that.

In 1998, I began to assemble a website inspired by Dan Johnson’s Luft ’46 which started in 1997 as a one-stop site about Ger­man X-planes. In 1999, my site, Hikoki: 1946, went live to the world. During its first few years, Hikoki: 1946 expanded to encompass 31 Japanese experimental aircraft and sec­tions on engine specifications, German air­craft the Japanese were interested in or bought, missiles and more. Support for the site was great. Such people as artist Ted Nomura, Polish author Tadeusz Januszewski and J-Air – craft. com contributors Mike Goodwin, George Elephtheriou and D. Karacay helped the site by providing both artwork and data on some of the planes presented. By 2002, I felt that I’d exhausted what there was on the subject and the site entered a state of finality with no fur­ther updates having been done since.

Fast forward to the fall of 2007. Jay Slater of Ian Allan Publishing e-mailed me to discuss the prospect of writing a book on Japanese experimental aircraft. This was not the first time someone had approached me to do so. But unlike the others, Jay had a well known publisher behind him who had a number of X-plane books in print, many of which 1 had in my own library. It seemed natural to him that a book on Japanese X-planes would be a wel­come complement to their existing titles as well as providing the English aviation histo­rian or enthusiast with a ready source of ded­icated information on Japanese X-planes. I certainly agreed.

The work you hold is not simply my Hikoki: 1946 website in book form. Yes, some of the aircraft in these pages can be found on the site but the information here has been further researched and revised. This means the data in these pages is far more up to date than the site. And for sure, the outstanding artwork provided makes this a spectacular publica­tion and investment for your library.

Because of the constraints on the number of pages, there had to be a process of select­ing aircraft for inclusion. The planes selected for this volume have been chosen based on several factors. The first was the nature of the plane in terms of being a conventional or a more radical design. Thus, while the Kugisho D3Y Myojo may be a relatively obscure plane of which only two were built, it was a very conventional aircraft in terms of design. The same applied to the Mitsubishi Ki-83. There­fore, these more conventional designs or pro­totypes received a lower selection priority over more advanced concepts. Another fac­tor concerned aircraft which were derivatives of established production planes in the Japanese arsenal. As such, designs such as the Ki-116, which was derived from the Naka­jima Ki-84 Hayate, are also excluded. A third factor revolved around the pool of informa­tion available for a certain design. The more obscure or unknown the design was, the higher it was considered over other planes. For example, the scope of the Rikugun Kogiken designs were of far more interest and of a lesser known nature than the proto­types of the Nakajima G8N Renzan or the Aichi SI A Denko of which more information is readily available. Finally, X-planes that were purely research aircraft such as the Kawasaki Ki-78, those experimental planes constructed prior to the start of the war, and most of the non-combat aircraft (transports, gliders and the like) were generally excluded from contention. Perhaps in a future publica­tion, those designs that did not make the cut for this book will get their chance.

It may appear that few aircraft remained with such pruning but it still left a significant number of planes to choose from, from the historically important Nakajima Kitsuka and Mitsubishi J8M Syusui, to more unknown types such as the Kugisho Tenga and Kawan – ishi K-200.

In so far as the book layout, aircraft are sep­arated by service (IJA and UN) and then alphabetised by manufacturer. Those aircraft that were not of either service (or were joint projects) are listed last. Missiles and a selec­tion of some of the more interesting aircraft munitions that were deployed or were in development are included along with a brief discourse on German technical exchange with Japan before and during World War 2. A feature in each aircraft chapter is the inclu­sion of a ‘Contemporaries’ section. The pur­pose of this is to illustrate to the reader that designs didn’t occur in a vacuum and similar concepts could be found in other Allied nations as well as Axis ones. This section should not in any way be construed as point­ing to the Japanese as simply copying the work of other nations. While it is true that the Japanese air forces prior to the war were very keen on obtaining as much information on aviation technology as possible (and, in some cases, built and flew versions of foreign air­craft), once hostilities began Japan knew she could no longer rely on outside assistance for their aircraft industry and ensured it could stand on its own. This it did, producing many successful aircraft that were indigenous. The influx of German technology during the war can be viewed as another means by which Japanese aviation technology was boosted through a wartime ally, but more often than not it was an expediency to rapidly increase the capability of Japanese aircraft in the face of a worsening war situation and ever improv­ing Allied fighters and bombers. It is hoped the information in this section will be a cata­lyst to learn more about the aircraft presented to expand one’s knowledge of aviation by other nations. Also keep in mind that this sec­tion does not list each and every plane that could be considered a contemporary. Instead, I have picked the more interesting and have intentionally listed only the aircraft name(s) in order to not take away from the main topic at hand. The reader will also find with certain aircraft a section called ‘Sur­vivors’. Listed here are those aircraft that sur­vived the war and what their fates were, either being scrapped or escaping the cutting torch. Where known, the Hepburn Romani – sation system is utilised for Japanese words.

Every attempt has been made to ensure

accuracy in the information provided in this book. Even as the writing of the book was underway, I was acquiring additional sources and checking and rechecking data to make sure nothing was amiss. Of course, at some point I had to ‘let it go’. If I held on to chapters waiting on the next titbit of information to appear, the book would never get finished and you wouldn’t be holding it in your hands. Thus, invariably, there is the risk of omitting something, interpreting a translation or source incorrectly, or just plain making an error. To that end, corrections, new informa­tion and any and all comments can be directed to the author at the e-mail address below.

I hope you, the reader, enjoy the book and find it a worthwhile addition to your library as a ready resource on some of the most inter­esting Japanese airplanes of the war.

Regards,

Edwin M. Dyer III

japanesesecretprojects@gmail. com

Mitsubishi-Payen Pa.400 and Suzukaze 20

When Allied intelligence discovered an illus­tration of the Suzukaze 20 in a Japanese mag­azine, it was unlike anything so far seen in Japanese aviation design. Despite the radical appearance, it was felt the Suzukaze 20 was a bona fide aircraft and might be encountered in action. As it was, the plane was a work of fiction and so the Suzukaze 20 was later stricken from the publications on Japanese aircraft identification and coding. However, Allied intelligence may or may not have been aware of the very real inspiration for the artist of the Suzukaze 20.

At the time, because of the relative difficulty in obtaining information on Japanese military matters, intelligence services relied on vari­ous publications such as newspapers and magazines as a means to glean data on the Japanese military machine. In April 1941, the Japanese magazine Sora (translated as ‘Sky’) published a number of illustrations of various aircraft in a section entitled ‘Dreams of Future Designers’. Included in the selection of art­work was the rendition of the Suzukaze (‘Cool Breeze’) 20. The 25 December 1941 issue of the US magazine Flight would also feature the Suzukaze 20, along with three other aircraft: the Nakajima AT27 (codenamed Gus), the Mitsubishi T. K.4 Type 0 (codenamed Frank then Harry) and the T. K.19 (codenamed Joe). The Suzukaze 20 would receive the code – name Omar.

The illustration of the Suzukaze 20 depicted a single-seat fighter with the striking feature of having a cockpit blended into the vertical sta­biliser that was itself in the form of a half-delta. Another notable feature was the use of two radial engines, one mounted behind the other, driving two, contra-rotating propellers. Armament appeared to be heavy with four weapons fitted in each wing. Its speed was given as 769km/h (478mph), loaded weight 2,858kg (6,3001b), wing area 13.37m2 (144ft2) and wing loading 214.82kg/m2 (44 lb/ft2).

As the war dragged on it became evident that the Suzukaze 20, along with the other three aircraft illustrated with it, were works of fantasy and thus all four were removed from Japanese aircraft intelligence bulletins, the last of them disappearing by June 1943. Despite the Suzukaze 20 being a fictional air­craft, there was a kerne! of truth behind it that perhaps germinated in the mind of the artist that drew the Suzukaze 20. The kernel could have been the works of the French aircraft designer, Nicholas Roland Payen.

Payen was born in France in 1914 and became interested in aviation early in life. By the 1930s, he had begun to focus on the use of delta planforms as well as canards and ogival (bullet shaped) flight surfaces. Throughout his life, Payen would design a large number of air­craft in a wide array of configurations but, despite the prolific nature of his studies, only two were built before the end of World War 2. Both used Payen’s Flechair (an English con­traction of avion fleche or ‘arrow aircraft’) configuration that consisted of a trapezoidal fore-wing that housed the ailerons and a rear delta wing which contained the horizontal control surfaces. Payen had to rely on his salesmanship to gain access to material, wind tunnel time and other resources to build his aircraft as he had little money of his own to fund projects. Of course, the nature of his designs often made it a hard sell to the more conservative aviation industry. The Payen Pa. 100 Fleche Volante (‘Flying Arrow’) was his first aircraft to be built and was intended to be a racer to compete in the Coupe Deutsch de la Meurthe. Payen was able to borrow a 180hp Regnier R6 but the engine was later returned. He was then able to acquire a larger engine, a 380hp, 7-cylinder radial Gnome – Rhone 7KD Titan Major, but was too large for the Pa. 100. Payen had to seek donations (which he received) and rebuilt the Pa. 100 around the 7KD to create the Pa. 101. Unfortu­nately for Payen, the Pa. 101 failed to meet expectations. It finally took to the air on 17 April 1935, but on 27 April a hard landing broke the port landing gear and a fire broke out in the resulting crash gutting the Pa. 101. The accident saw Payen’s flight insurance revoked and so he went to work at the Bloch factory constructing a mock-up of the Pa. l 12 fighter that used two 150hp Salmson engines in tandem buried in the fuselage. The out­break of World War 2 saw the French military show no interest in this design.

The second aircraft was the Pa.22 which was the test bed for Payens proposed Pa. l 12 fighter. Originally to be powered by a ramjet, no such engine was available and a 180hp Regnier R6 engine was used instead. Payen constructed the Pa.22 in 1939 and the Ger­mans would later capture it after the invasion of France on 12 June 1940. The Germans, showing some interest in the design, test flew it on 18 October 1941 and found modifications were needed to correct poor longitudinal sta­bility. The aircraft was moved to Rechlin in Germany and after adjustments had been made to the cockpit position and the vertical stabiliser had been rebuilt the Pa.22 flew in the summer of 1942. After a number of short flights, the aircraft was wrecked in a crash landing. The Pa.22 was returned to France for repairs and was consequently abandoned by the Germans.

Prior to the outbreak of war, the Japanese had civilian and military personnel in France who studied and reviewed French aviation progress for possible use by Japan. This prac­tice went as far back as 1919 when Japan invited French military aviation instructors to teach the fledgling Japanese Army air force. The French also brought with them some of the latest aircraft that their country had avail­able. This training would forge a link between Japan and France that would last for many years, and it was by these means that the Japanese would learn of Payen’s work.

In 1938, Payen received a letter from Mit­subishi expressing an interest in his designs, notably the delta wing so often used in his air­craft concepts. A meeting was held between Payen, Commander Koshino and the captain of the UN corvette Sumikawa to talk about the Pa. l 12. During the discussions the UN inquired as to whether the Flechair design could be adapted to that of a two-seat, carrier borne, light bomber. The specifications required the aircraft to have the ability to take­off from and land on a deck space 80m (262ft) long, to have a range of at least 800km (497 miles), be capable of carrying a 800kg (1,7631b) torpedo or bomb and be Fitted with up to 180kg (396 lb) of armament.

Payen took the specifications and worked up a study to meet the UN requirements. The design was called the Payen-Mitsubishi Pa.400. This would have used two 670hp radial engines mounted one behind the other driving two, two-bladed, contra-rotating pro­pellers. For weapons, in addition to carrying the required torpedo or bomb, a nose mounted cannon (firing through the propeller hub), two machine guns per rear wing and a tail mounted machine gun were proposed. Endurance was to be 11-12 hours with a max­imum speed of 580km/h (360mph). Unlike his other Flechair designs, Pa.400 used staggered wings (his earlier offerings had the two wings level with each other). The study was reviewed and Payen was asked by Japanese representatives to obtain from the French gov­ernment the authorisation to export the tech­nical information for the Pa.400 study. This would have allowed the Japanese to further develop the Pa.400 in Japan. The authorisa­tion was granted on 28 September 1938, signed by the head of the cabinet of the Min­istry of Air. However, with the cloud of war on the horizon, Payen decided not to send the requested documents to Japan and it would appear the Japanese did not follow this up. To

DANIEL UHR

all intents and purposes, the Japanese seemed to have lost interest in the Pa.400.

Why would the Japanese show an interest in the Pa. l 12 and the Pa.400 only to abandon it on the brink of receiving the technical infor­mation? There were several factors which the Japanese may have become aware of upon further review of Payen’s initial Pa.400 study. The first was that Japanese radial engines of the time did not have sufficient horsepower and, more importantly, were not of the correct size to fit into the Pa.400’s fuselage. Thus, the Japanese would have had to either construct a new radial engine or adapt the Pa.400 to use a Japanese engine, radial or not. A more per­tinent problem was the use of tandem radial engines. To make such an arrangement work­able required a considerable feat of engineer­ing and such designs making it to prototype form were exceedingly rare. Another factor concerned the poor visibility afforded the pilot given that the cockpit was situated far back in the fuselage which made landing a challenge at the best of times, let alone landing on a moving and rolling aircraft carrier. The rear wings and the long nose blocked side and downward vision, a serious liability in aerial combat, and the relatively short wingspan of the Pa.400 would not have offered much agility, a trait favoured by Japanese pilots and designers. In addition, the Japanese may have learned that the Pa. 101 was a flawed design and since the French military paid Payen no attention may have concluded there was nothing worth pursuing where the Pa.400 was concerned. Finally, it may have been the rad-

The Pa.400 depicted here is in the colours and markings as used on a Nakajima B5N2 torpedo bomber (known as Kate to the Allies) flown by Petty Officer First Class Toshio Takahashi from the carrier Hiryti during the attack on Pearl Harbor.

ical design of the Pa.400 that saw more con­servative UN officials directing Mitsubishi to focus their efforts on more conventional air­craft projects.

Enter the Suzukaze 20. A photograph of what was likely the Pa. 101 appeared in Japan in a printed document in the late 1930s. The caption for the photograph read ‘French Brand New Model Pey-yan 266th. Airplane No – mu 400 Horse Power’. The ‘Pey-yan’ was the phonetic spelling in Japanese of Payen while ‘No-mu’ was the phonetic spelling for Gnome. How it got to Japan is open to speculation but the two prevailing theories are that Payen, in trying to drum up funds for his work, made it available to a French diplomat to take to Japan to shop around to Japanese industry. Alternatively, the photograph was given to the UN by Payen during the discussions over the Pa.400.

The photograph – and perhaps other sources because Payen’s aircraft were shown in publications such as Bill Barnes: Air Adven­turer (from April 1935) – likely played a part in the rendering of the Suzukaze 20. The similar­ities to Payen’s designs cannot be ignored. For one, the Suzukaze 20 utilised two radial engines in tandem driving two, contra-rotat­ing propellers. Also, the Suzukaze 20’s cockpit was blended into the large, half delta-shaped vertical stabiliser, another Payen trait seen in the Pa. IOO/Pa. IOl and Pa.22. The artist likely removed the rear delta wing and slid the for­ward wings back and enlarged them since their shape is reminiscent of the Pa.400. With the exception of the nose, the fuselage shape of the Suzukaze 20 was similar to that of the Pa.400. Even the horizontal stabilisers of the Suzukaze 20 had a delta shape, perhaps a nod to the Pa. 101. However, whether or not the artist based the Suzukaze 20 on Payen’s designs may never be known for certain.

Contemporaries

Horton HoX (Germany), Messerschmitt P. l 106 (Germany), Lippisch PI3a (Germany), BMW 803 engine (Germany), Wright R-2160 Tornado engine (US), Pratt & Whitney R-4360 Wasp Major engine (US), Butler – Edwards ‘Steam Dart’ (UK), Scroggs ‘Dart’ (US)

For the Mitsubishi-Payen Pa.400, based on the design study conducted by Payen.

Type Light Carrier Bomber

Crew Two

Powerpiant

Two Gnome-Rhone 14 M4/5 radial engines, each developing 670*680hp maximum, driving two contra-rotating, two-bladed propellers

Dimensions

Span Length Height Wing area

6.58m

10.00m

2.68m

25.00m2

21.6ft

32.8ft

8.8ft

269ft!

Weights

Empty

2,179kg

4,7841b

Loaded

5,860kg

12,9191b

Speed

Max speed

570km/h

360mph

at 4,950m

at 16,240ft

Max speed (one engine)

447km/h

278mph

at 4,950m

at 16,240

Landing speed

89km/h

55mph

Endurance

12-14 hours

Ceiling

4,950m

16,240ft

Armament

Five machine guns, two in each wing and one in the tail; one cannon firing through the propeller hub; one 800kg (1,764 lb) torpedo or bomb

Deployment

None. The Suzukaze 20 was a fictional aircraft while the Pa.400 remained a design only.

Focke-Wulf Fw42 bomber

The Fw42 was a design for a canard – equipped twin-engine bomber. Various revi­sions of the design were made with wind tunnel models undergoing testing from 1932 to 1933. Once the final revision was settled, a full scale mock-up was built. The Japanese were invited to review the mock-up, Focke – Wulf hoping to entice sales of the bomber or licence rights. The Japanese showed no inter­est and the Fw42 was soon cancelled.

Focke-Wulf Fw200S-l

Announced with a major publicity stunt, the Fw200S-l ‘Brandenburg’ took off for Japan from Berlin, Germany, on 28 November 1938 and arrived in Tokyo in a little under 48 hours. The Japanese were impressed by the Fw200 and early in 1939 the Dai Nippon Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan-Manchuria Aviation Company) contracted Focke-Wulf for five Fw200B Con­dors. Attached to this was an order for a sin­gle Fw200B for the UN as a maritime reconnaissance aircraft. However, with the outbreak of the war in Europe, none of these orders were fulfilled. The Allies felt, with good reason, that Japan would soon be using the Fw200 and gave it the codename Trudy.

Hansa-Brandenburg float plane

Four were built between 1925 and 1926 as the Aichi Type 15-ko Mi-go. Based on the German plane, Aichi refined the design but failed to win the Navy’s competition for a reconnais­sance seaplane and so work ceased.

Hansa-Brandenburg W 33 float plane

As part of reparations from World War 1, Ger­many sent Japan a single W 33 float plane. Highly impressed with the W 33, the UN requested a copy which resulted in the Type Hansa. 310 were built and served with the IJN from 1926 to 1928 before being retired; many were converted to passenger float planes for civilian use.

Ruhrstahl-Kramer X4 air-to-air guided missile

Considered to be the first air-to-air missile to be used successfully in World War 2, the X4 was a short range, wire-guided, rocket-pow­ered AAM that was extensively tested after being conceived at the start of 1943. The X4 was test launched from a number of aircraft such as the Junkers Ju 188L and Focke-Wulf Fwl90F-8 and was envisioned that the Messerschmitt Me 262 would carry the X4 into operational service. Despite 1,300 being built – and suggestions that some were test fired in action against American bombers – no X4 saw active service. Allied intelligence ser­vices assumed that the Japanese were aware of the X4 development but no evidence has surfaced to confirm this.

Acknowledgements

This book would not be what it is without the assistance and support of a good number of individuals and I would like to recognise them here.

First and foremost, Jay Slater and his team at Ian Allan Publishing. It was Jay who reached out to me and first proposed this book and through him it became a reality.

To the artists whose work you will see in this publication: Peter Allen, Kelcey Faulkner, Muneo Hosaka, Gino Marcomini, Ted Nomura, Ronnie Olsthoorn and Daniel Uhr. Through their hard work, the aircraft within these pages come to life in spectacular fash­ion. To Tim Hortman who graciously pro­vided his photographs of the Kyushu J7W1 Shinden, Nakajima Ki-115 Ко Tsurugi and the Nakajima Kitsuka currently in store at the National Air and Space Museum and which are no longer available to the public.

During the information gathering phase of the book, research support and material was provided by several individuals. Their assis­tance helped to confirm or deny data, pro­vided a sounding board for theories, offered comments on the information or brought new information to the table. These folks are Shorzoe Abe, David Aiken, Paul Deweer,

Tadeusz Januszewski, James Long, Robert C. Mikesh, Nicholas Millman, Ronnie Olsthoorn, Masafumi Sawa and Akio Takahashi. As some of the works used in researching the book were in Japanese, Ryuki Arceno, Nanae Konno, Lara Law and Tekla Munobe pro­vided translations. For those works in Polish, Michal Sporzyriski was the key translator.

Last but certainly not least, my parents, Edwin and Margaret, for their support and encouragement. Also to Gail Lashley for always making sure I had my nose to the grindstone.

Mizuno Shinryu II

In June 1944, the first Boeing B-29 Super­fortresses appeared over Japan. It was the start of a bombing campaign that would see key Japanese cities, infrastructure and indus­tries reduced to ashes through conventional and firebombing raids. With the aircraft industry being a priority target, the Kaigun Koku Hombu looked to ways to combat the B-29 menace. One concept was a point defence interceptor that could quickly rise to meet the bombers and so the Mizuno Shinryu II was born. However, the development of the Shinryu II (Shinryu meaning ‘Divine Dragon’) began with designs for a far more conven­tional craft.

In November 1944, the Kaigun Koku Hombu looked into the possibilities of an air­craft to undertake shimpu missions. While the mission was not unique, the fact that the
aircraft being investigated would be a glider was. The Kaigun Koku Hombu envisioned that gliders would be launched with rocket boosters from caves or shore positions and pilots would guide the aircraft and the 100kg (220 lb) explosive payload inside it into Allied ships or tanks should the Japanese home islands be invaded.

The Kaigun Koku Hombu assigned the Dai – Ichi Kaigun Koku Gijutsu-sho at Yokosuka the task of turning the glider into reality. The pro­ject was led by Shigeki Sakakibara who staffed a number of teams that would each be responsible for one part of the glider. The dif­ferent sections were the wings, the fuselage, control surfaces, aerodynamic testing and test flights once the prototype was complete. The Kaigun Koku Hombu gave instructions that the glider must be built from as much

wood as possible. This restriction was imposed for two reasons. The first was that in using wood and keeping the use of metal to an absolute minimum, the glider could be manufactured in any small shop using only wood working tools, and secondly, as a con­sequence, what metals were available would be conserved for other military uses.

Much of the glider’s design was conceived by Yoshio Akita. A number of concepts were discussed and sketched and after much deliberation among Akita and his teams the design was complete by May 1945, and Mizuno, a small aircraft manufacturer, had almost finished the prototype. The glider was very simple and used a high-wing monoplane form. The straight and flat wings were wide but had a short span and were designed to ensure that the glider was easy to handle given that inexperienced pilots would be at the controls. Also, the planform would be able to accommodate the rocket engines that were to be used to boost the glider into the air. The pilot sat in an open cockpit.

The design was sent to the Kaigun Koku Hombu for review. Sakakibara studied the plans and projections and after his analysis it was felt the glider was flawed and changes were necessary. After these had been made the design was approved. Work began on the revised JinryQ as the glider was now called by the middle of June 1945. To hasten the con­struction, the finalised blueprints and work plans for the Jinryti were drawn up even as the components for the first prototype were being built. Construction of the JinryQ was again given to Mizuno. Working around the clock, the company completed two proto­types with such speed that wind tunnel test­ing of the design was still underway. In fact, the first flight of the Jinryti occurred even before the results of the testing had been pro­vided to Tonsho and Sakakibara.

Tashiichi Narabayashi was the pilot who flew the maiden flight in mid-July 1945 at the airfield in Ishioka, a city located in Ibaraki pre­fecture, about 90km (56 miles) northeast of Tokyo. The Jinryti was towed into the air by a Tachikawa Ki-9 (known to the Allies as Spruce) piloted by SaburO Fujikura, a man known for his skill in flying gliders prior to the beginning of the war.

For the first test, Narabayashi assessed the Jinryti’s handling. On landing, his opinion was that the glider was stable and possessed good handling characteristics. For the second flight Narabayashi would investigate the Jinryti’s diving capability and after a few bounces on the ground the Ki-9 and the Jinryti took off. At a height of 2,300m (7,545ft), Narabayashi went to cast off from the Ki-9 but found that the tow rope release had stuck; however, he was able to cut the rope and proceed with the test flight. When Narabayashi put the Jinryti into a dive and had reached 300km/h (186mph), the glider began to vibrate to such a degree that he was unable to read the gauges. Pulling the nose up to bleed off speed, Narabayashi discovered that the vibra­tions ceased. During his descent Narabayashi examined the vibrations and after landing the issue was reviewed. The conclusion was that the tail was not sufficiently reinforced and the vertical stabiliser was too small. The JinryQ was modified by adding some strengthening in the tail and the fitting a second stabiliser. The changes were later validated both in the air and in the wind tunnel testing of the mod­ified JinryQ model. Interestingly, before flying the JinryQ, Narabayashi had suspected that the aircraft would have stability problems which, as was seen, proved to be the case.

With the handling and flight characteristics of the JinryQ proven, the testing moved to the next phase – that of powered flight. The glider was relocated to an airfield in Kasumigaura, about 19km (12 miles) north of Ishioka. Here, the JinryQ was modified to accept a group of three Toku-Ro 1 Type 1 rocket engines that together would produce 661 lb of thrust dur­ing a 10 second burn. Testing of the rocket array showed two serious flaws. The first was the quality of the rockets that resulted in a number of failures. The second was the inconsistency of the burn times. Narabayashi noted his concerns and forwarded them to Major Suganuma who had been placed in charge of the JinryQ project. In addition to expressing his doubts about the rocket engines, he also stated that the JinryQ would be unsuited for shimpQ missions because, despite the changes made to the glider to improve the flight characteristics, it was a challenging aircraft to fly. Narabayashi sug­gested that instead of being used for shimpQ operations the glider should be modified to take six rocket engines each with a 30 second burn time. He estimated that at maximum burn the JinryQ could attain a speed of 750km/h (466mph), and for weapons he envi­sioned that it could carry ten explosive charges adapted from artillery shells used by the IJA in their 100mm guns (likely the Type 92). Not only did Narabayashi agree that the JinryQ could be used against tank and ships but added that it could also be used to attack US B-29 bombers. Despite the issues with the rockets work continued on preparing the Jin­ryQ for powered flight.

Major Suganuma, however, would become the catalyst for the ShinryQ II’s continued development. Taking Narabayashi’s concerns onboard, Suganuma formed a team to revise the JinryQ and produce a design for an inter­ceptor rather than a glider; Suganuma was especially interested in this idea since he had access to rocket engines that promised 32 sec­ond burn times. Two people were retained from the JinryQ project: Sakakibara, the lead designer, and Yoshio Tonsho who would over­see the construction of the prototype. YQjiro Murakami was tasked with the aerodynamic testing of the ShinryQ II. All of those assigned to develop the ShinryQ II were ordered by Sug­anuma to maintain the utmost secrecy.

Unlike the JinryQ, the ShinryQ II was to be built from the outset as an interceptor. Sakak­ibara would use a canard design that made this the second Japanese aircraft to be devel­oped during the war with such a feature (the first was the KyQshQ J7W Shinden on page 84). In addition, the main wings had a plan – form similar to a cropped delta. These design features were included as a means of ensur­ing stability in flight as well as good handling characteristics. Since the average Japanese pilot had little experience with canard equipped aircraft, the ShinryQ II had spoilers fitted into the top of each main wing. Each spoiler was able to rotate between 60° and 90° and if the mechanism for controlling the spoilers was damaged, they would automati­cally return to the closed position. The pilot was provided with a canopy covered cockpit.

For power, the ShinryQ II was to use four Toku-Ro 1 Type 2 rocket engines located in the rear of the fuselage. Each engine provided a 30 second burn time and all together up to 600kg (1,3221b) of thrust could be delivered. Two rockets would be used to get the ShinryQ II airborne while the other two engines would be used when making the attack. There was a concern regarding the operating tempera­tures of the Toku Ro rockets and two meth­ods of cooling the engines were considered. The first would have utilised an air-cooled combustion chamber that would have required an air inlet using a bayonet mecha­nism in order to maintain air flow across the chamber. It also would have required specific positioning of the fuel injectors so as not to have the air flow disrupt the injection process. The second method would use injectors which sprayed a water and alcohol mixture onto the rocket nozzle, cooling it. In reviewing the two solutions for cooling, it was determined that the water/alcohol system would be the simplest to implement.

No provision was made for a wheeled land­ing gear system and design skids were used. A nose skid was provided with a basic spring suspension to absorb the landing forces. Under each wing was a non-sprung skid arrangement supported by two struts. For take-off the ShinryQ II was to use a two­wheeled dolly similar to the one used by the

Mitsubishi J8M SvOsui. Once airborne the pilot could jettison the dolly. In addition to con­ventional runway take-off procedures, other methods for launching the Shinryd II were considered but what exactly these were is not known. It can be speculated that towing the Shinryu II aloft was one consideration. Another may have been air dropping the Shin – гуй II in the same manner as the Kugisho MXY7 Oka. In both cases this may have pre­served two of the rocket engines which would have been used up had the Shinryu II taken off from the ground.

In order to combat the B-29, which could operate at altitudes up to 10,241m (33,600ft), the Shinryu II was to be equipped with a pres­surised cockpit or, if such a cockpit proved problematic, the pilot would wear a pressure suit. For weapons, the Shinryu II was to be armed with eight rockets. Attached to the inside of the rear landing skid arrangement were four tubes, one on top of the other and angled downwards, which contained the rockets.

There has been some conjecture as to the mission objective of the Shinryu II. Some sources make the case that the Shinryu II was to be used like the Oka while others come to the conclusion that the Shinryu II was to attack armoured ground targets such as tanks. In both cases these sources state that the nose of the Shinryu II contained an impact fused explosive warhead and once the rocket arma­ment was expended, the pilot would crash the aircraft into his final target using the war­head to deliver the coup de grace. However, analysis of the Shinryu II shows that neither mission was likely. The aircraft would have been far more complex to build than the Showa Тока or Oka and the Shinryu II was constructed for manoeuvrability, high altitude operation and the means to land. In addition, using the Shinryu II for shimpfr missions against tanks makes little sense when there were other simpler and more effective means (both already in service and under develop­ment) to eliminate armour. Perhaps this is a case of the Jinryu glider’s role being applied to the ShinryCi II, or an assumption based on the fact that, like the UN’s other special attack air­craft such as the Nakajima Kitsuka, Kawanishi Baika and Showa Тока, the Shinryti II pos­sessed no letter/numerical designation. So, by extension, the Shinryu II must also have been a special attack weapon. This, of course, is not to say that the pilot could not choose to use the Shinryti II as a shimpti aircraft.

As an interceptor, the Shinryu II had a simi­lar role to the Mitsubishi J8M Syusui and the German Bachem Ba349 Natter for which the Japanese were aware of and obtained data on (although the plans never made it to

Japan). Like the J8M and Ba349 and due to the limited range afforded by the rocket engines, the Shinryu II would have to be posi­tioned close to targets that were likely to be bombed. And like the J8M, the Shinryti II would have used a jettisonable wheeled dolly to take-off while firing a pair of its rocket engines. Unlike the J8M which burned up all of its fuel at once, the Shinryti II had a second set of rocket engines which could be used to sustain flight endurance or to increase speed during the attack. In the same way as the Ba349, the Shinryti II would be armed with rocket projectiles, likely fired as a group to affect a spread pattern, to bring down the bomber target. Finally, akin to the J8M, once the fuel and ammunition were expended, the Shinryu II would glide back to its base to be recovered, refuelled and rearmed.

The Shinryti II would never be built because the end of the hostilities in August 1945 terminated any further work on the design. Likewise, the Jinryu glider would never fly under power. After the failure of the rocket motors during ground tests, the war came to a close before more suitable and reli­able motors could be acquired and tested. Mizuno completed a total of five Jinryu glid­ers. As a note, Jinryu is the known name for the first Mizuno glider. For the purposes of this text, the author used Shinryti II to differentiate the interceptor from the glider. The kanji is the same for both spellings but is pronounced differently. Both translations of Jinryu and Shinryti mean ‘Divine Dragon’. Shinryti II is also used in contemporary texts and as such, is used here for recognition purposes. Whether the interceptor would have carried the same name as the glider is unknown.

Contemporaries

Blohm und Voss BV40 (Germany), Zeppelin Fliegende Panzerfaust (Germany), Heinkel P. 1077 Julia (Germany), Junkers EF127 Walli (Germany), Messerschmitt Me 163B (Germany), Bereznyak-Isayev BI (Russia)

Specifications in parenthesis are for the Shinryu II and are estimates only.

Type

Special Attack Glider (Interceptor)

Crew

One

Powerplant

Three Toku-Ro Type 1 rockets with a total combined

thmst of 400kg (881 lb) with a bum time of 10 seconds (Four Toku-Ro

Type 2 rockets with a total combined thmst of 600kg/l ,322 lb with a bum

time of 30 seconds)

Dimensions

Span

7.00m

22.9ft

Length

7.60m

24.9ft

Height

1.80m

5.9ft

Wing area

11m2

118.4ft!

Wing loading

N/A

(N/A)

Power loading

N/A

(N/A)

Weights

Empty

N/A

(N/A)

Loaded

N/A

(N/A)

Maximum

N/A

(N/A)

Performance

Max speed

300km/h

186mph

Cruise speed

110km/h

68mph

Range

4km

2 miles

Endurance

(Shinryti II) 1.3 minutes

Ceiling

400m

1,312ft

Armament

100kg (2201b) of explosive (8 unguided rockets)

Deployment

None. A total of five protoptype Jinryu gliders were

built by Mizuno. The Shinryti II remained a design board aircraft.

Imperial Japanese Navy

Japan shared a fundamental flaw with Ger­many in regards to not developing a bomber capable of long range missions. The lack of this capability is considered by some to be a pivotal nail in the coffins of each country dur­ing the war. In both cases, efforts to develop such a bomber came too late to affect the out­come of the conflict. Although the Japanese had considered the need for such a bomber at the outset of hostilities – as had the Ger­mans with the disastrous Heinkel He 177 Greif – very little happened until the need was dire, and by then the noose was tight, chok­ing any hope for putting a long range bomber into service.

The main cause of this apathy was the early success in the Pacific theatre where the short and medium range bombers then in use by the Japanese were adequate to fulfil the needs of the IJA and UN. With the entry of the United States into the war a formidable prob­lem arose. Geography put the military machine of the US far out of reach of Japan.

When the tide of war turned against the Japanese, it was soon realised that some means to attack the US mainland had to be acquired, not only to destroy the war industry of America but to ravage the civilian popula­tion centres to reduce morale and bring the war to the US doorstep. In consequence, the US would have to allocate or divert resources to increase the defence of the homeland which would affect the war on other fronts. As history was to show, the Japanese did suc­ceed in launching attacks against America, but only in the form of the Fu-Go balloon bombs and isolated attacks on the west coast from submarine-launched float planes. None had much of an effect.

There were some early attempts to pro­duce a long range bomber – for example, the Mitsubishi G7M1 Taizan (a 16-shi project) – plus designs that were actually built such as the Nakajima G5N Shinzan and Nakajima G8N Renzan. The Shinzan was not a success and the Renzan failed to reach operational
service as a combat aircraft, let alone reach America and return.

It was to be Nakajima who would attempt to provide a strategic long range bomber capable of bringing the war to America. The man behind the project was Chikuhei Nakajima, chairman and engineer of Nakajima Hikoki K. K. Motivated by his fears over the inability of the Japanese to reach and destroy US indus­trial capacity, Chikuhei tried to convince the UN and the IJA of the need for a strategic bomber. However, officials from both services refused to consider his ideas. Thus, without official sanction or request, Chikuhei invested a portion of Nakajima’s resources to draft designs for a bomber that could take-off from Japanese bases, cross the Pacific, attack tar­gets on the West Coast of America and return to either their original bases or elsewhere in Japanese or Axis held territory. Nakajima gave the design work the name ‘Project Z’.

On 29 January 1943, Nakajima began the task of assembling drafts and studies for the

design of the bomber, along with reports which studied the feasibility and problems of production. On the completion of this stage in April 1943, he again pitched the concept to both the IJA and the UN. This time, neither service turned Nakajima away. However, despite the information Nakajima had assem­bled for the proposed bomber, and despite both services now accepting the need for such an aircraft, the IJA and the UN also pro­duced their own ideas. Not surprisingly, the two services had differing opinions on the requirements for the bomber. The IJA desired a type that could operate at 9,998m (32,800ft) and carry a heavy defensive armament. By contrast, the UN wanted a bomber capable of flying at a height of 14,996m (49,200ft), an alti­tude where interception would be minimal and thereby allowed a lighter defensive weapon load to be carried. Furthermore, the IJN wanted the bomber to take-off from Japan, bomb any target within the US, then utilise bases in Germany or German held ter­ritory to land, as opposed to making a round trip.

Though there were a number of variations of the aircraft during the Project Z develop­ment, three basic designs of what became the Fugaku emerged. The project presented by the IJA used a ‘tail sitter’ undercarriage, featured dual vertical stabilisers and bore some resemblance to German designs. It also had a rounded off nose similar to the Boeing B-29 Superfortress and Messerschmitt Me 264 ‘Amerika’ bomber. The UN’s proposed design used a tricycle landing gear arrange­ment and rounded nose but utilised a single vertical stabiliser. Nakajima’s proposal kept the single vertical stabiliser but had a stepped nose much like that used on the G5N Shinzan which the company had previously worked on.

By June 1943, Nakajima had received plans from the IJA and IJN, reviewed them and begun work on drafting a final design. To con­tinue the research and further development and study the Project Z aircraft, the Army and Navy Aviation Technical Committee was formed on 9 August 1943. The IJA delegation was headed by Captain Ando. Later in August, Chikuhei Nakajima prepared a thesis entitled ‘Strategy for Ultimate Victory’. Chikuhei used his personal clout to make sure his document reached not only IJA and IJN officials, but also politicians and even Prime Minister Hideki Tojo. His thesis was laid out in six chapters and contained Chikuhei’s plan for defeating the US as well as defending Japan. The key component was the Project Z bomber which he proposed could be used to destroy US air­fields as a means to deny the US the ability to launch raids against Japan. This suggestion was in part due to his belief that Japanese air forces were not strong enough to repel a bombing raid. Another facet of the thesis was the use of the bomber to attack the US war industry. Without materials and oil, the US could not produce aircraft, tanks and other weapons. More importantly, he added, the Japanese should use the bomber to destroy the Soviet military industry as a means to sup­port Germany. This implied that Nakajima could provide Germany with such long range bombers.

The Project Z bomber would employ an all metal stmcture with the wings mounted in the mid-fuselage position. The plane was envisioned to be powered by the Nakajima Ha-54, 36-cylinder radial engine, also known as the D. BH. The Ha-54 was, in fact, two Ha-44 18-cylinder radials paired together. It was pro­jected that the Ha-54 engine could produce up to 5,000hp and that six of these would be sufficient to propel the bomber to a generous maximum speed of 679km/h (422mph). Each engine would drive two contra-rotating, three-bladed propellers with a 4.5m (14.7ft) diameter. The Ha-54 engine, however, would not be ready for some time (and as events turned out, by war’s end it was still only a pro­totype engine and problems with cooling the power unit through the use of a ducted cowl­ing were never solved). Therefore, Nakajima had to settle for the experimental NK11A (Ha-53) which, while also in development, was expected to be ready for trials. The draw­back was that the NKUA was expected to muster only 2,500hp and this would certainly have lowered the performance estimates. The introduction of the NK11A meant that a revision of the Project Z airframe became necessary.

The bomber’s ceiling was estimated to be 15,000m (49,212ft) and it was believed that a heavy defensive armament was not neces­sary as the high altitude would offer protec­tion from fighter opposition. To a lesser extent the projected speed would also reduce vul­nerability. Consequently, the bomber would carry at least four Type 99 20mm cannons, but contemporary illustrations of the bomber often show a much heavier armament. This may be a result of having to settle for the less powerful NK11A and any speed/altitude advantage would have been lost, so an increased weapon load would have been necessary to protect the aircraft. Typically, illustrations show two cannon mounted in the tail, two in the nose, two twin-cannon tur­rets placed in the front and rear of the fuse­lage top and at least one belly turret. Variations included waist gunner stations. For a normal bomb load, the bomber was expected to carry up to 20,000kg (44,092 lb) of

Contemporaries

Convair B-36 Peacemaker (US), Convair XC-99 (US), Messerschmitt Me 264 and Me 264B (Germany), Junkers Ju 390 (Germany), Junkers EF100 (Germany), Messerschmitt Me P 08.01 (Germany), Tupolev Tu-4 (NATO codename Bull) (Russia), Tupolev Tu-85 (NATO codename Barge) (Russia), Tupolev Tu-70 (Russia), Vickers-Armstrong Victory Bomber (UK)

Specifications in parentheses refer to the Fugaku specifically. All other specifications refer to the primary Nakajima Project Z design.

Type Long range strategic bomber

Crew Six to ten (seven to eight)

Powerplant Six Nakajima Ha-54 36-cylinder, air-cooled radials developing 5,000hp at engine start, each driving two alternating stroke, contra-rotating three bladed propellers of 4.5m (14.7ft) diameter/Six Nakajima NK11A [Ha-53] 18-cylinder, air-cooled radials developing 2,500hp at engine start and each driving a alternating stroke, four-bladed propeller of 4.8m (15.7ft) diameter

Dimensions

Span

64.98m

213.2ft

(Fugaku) 62.97m

206.6ft

Length

44.98m

147.6ft

(Fugaku) 39.98m

131.2ft

Height

8.77m

28.8ft

(Fugaku) 8.77m

28.8ft

Wing area

352.01m!

3,766.8ft2

(Fugaku) 330.00m2

3,552ft2

Wing loading,

348.60kg/m!

71.4 lb/ft2

normal

(Fugaku) 126.94kg/m2

26 Ib/ft2

Wing loading,

456.99kg/m2

93.6 lb/ft2

loaded

(Fugaku) 211.89kg/m2

43.4 lb/ft2

Power loading,

5.44kg/hp

12 Ib/hp

normal

(Fugaku) 3.76kg/hp

8.31b/hp

Power loading,

7.21kg/hp

15.9 lb/hp

loaded

(Fugaku) 6.30kg/hp

13.9 lb/hp

Aspect Ratio

12.1

(N/A)

Weights

Empty

65,000kg

143,3001b

(Fugaku) 33,800kg

74,5161b

Loaded

122,000kg

268,9631b

(Fugaku) 42,000kg

92,5941b

Max loaded

160,000kg

352,7391b

(Fugaku) 70,000kg

154,3231b

Performance

Max speed

679km/h

422mph

at 10,000m

at 32,80811

779km/h

484mph

(Fugaku) at 10,000m

at 32,808ft

Take-off run

(Fugaku) 1,020m

3,347ft

Range

16,499km

10,252 miles

(Fugaku) 16,499km

10,252 miles

Max range

17,999km

11,184 miles

(Fugaku) 19,400km

12,054 miles

Ceiling

15,000m

49,212ft

(Fugaku) 15,000m

49,212ft

Armament

Four Type 99 20mm cannons (up to 12 cannons depending on the source) and a maximum bomb payload of 20,000kg/44,092 lb

Deployment

None. The ‘Project T and Fugaku aircraft existed only as paper designs.

bombs, but in the case of anti-shipping mis­sions, torpedoes could be carried (see below). For attacks on the United States, the bomber would carry only up to 5,000kg (11,023 lb) of bombs.

As work continued on the Project Z, plans were made to assemble and house the bomber’s production line. By the fall of 1943, these plans had been completed and con­struction of the new facility had begun. By January 1944, the Project Z moniker was dropped and changed to the Fugaku which means ‘Mount Fuji’.

As it was, more pressing demands on Nakajima resulted in less and less work being done on the Fugaku. To compound the prob­lem, by the time the design was nearing com­pletion, Japan was on the defensive and chances of producing the Fugaku, let alone using it to attack America, were about nil. The IJA believed that there was no probability of the Fugaku being built and therefore aban­doned the project, leaving the UN as the sole remaining party involved. Even the Gunjusho (the Ministry of Munitions) felt the Fugaku was impossible to realise and ordered Kawanishi to design a new long range bomber. Unfortunately, the Gunjusho failed to inform the IJA, UN and Nakajima about the Kawanishi bomber, which was known as the ТВ. When the new bomber project was dis­covered, a hail of protests and arguments erupted that hampered not only the develop­ment of the Fugaku but all long range bomber projects including the ТВ which was soon cancelled.

However, it was the fall of Saipan in 1944 that sealed the Fugaku’s fate. The Japanese air forces no longer had need of a super long range bomber and demanded more perti­nent aircraft to protect the mainland. As such, all work on the Fugaku was stopped and the plans, calculations and drafts were shelved. Work on the production facility was halted prior to completion and left unfinished. With the Japanese surrender, all documentation
for the Fugaku was to be destroyed to prevent the information being handed over to the Allies. Papers on the Fugaku that survive to this day, including a number of drafts for var­ious Project Z/Fugaku proposals, were mis­laid or kept for safe-keeping by individuals. Since the war it has been claimed that the Misawa Air Base would have been used by Fugaku bombers to launch raids against the US. While Misawa was used by the IJA and operational IJA bombers flew from this facil­ity, there has been no definitive evidence to support or refute Misawa being considered as a Fugaku base.

Bombing was not the only mission that was envisioned for the Fugaku and during the Pro­ject Z brainstorming three other concepts arose and later formed part of Chikuhei’s the­sis. The first was an attack design that had 400 Type 97 7.7mm machine guns crammed into the aircraft. The front and the back of the bomber would accommodate 40 machine guns arranged in ten rows. The intention was to rain thousands of rounds of bullets down on to enemy ships with the theory that a swath of destruction 45m (148ft) wide and 10km (6.2 miles) long could be achieved by 15 Fugaku aircraft. Once the decks of these ships were swept of personnel, nine Fugaku bombers, each with twenty 907kg (2,0001b) bombs or torpedoes, would deliver the coup de grace, covering a path 200m (656ft) wide and 1km (0.62 miles) in length with high explosive.

Another version had the Fugaku loaded with 96 Type 99 20mm cannons. The front and the back of the aircraft would contain 12 cannons arranged in eight rows while another 36 cannons were fitted on each side of the aircraft. This particular variant was to target enemy bombers flying missions against Japan and would use hidden bases untouched by the Japanese airfield bombing campaign. By flying over the enemy bomber formation and unleashing a withering fusil­lade of cannon fire, it was speculated that ten
of the cannon equipped Fugaku could bring down 100 bombers, the area covered by the cannons from one plane being 2.5m (8.2ft) and 3km (1.86 miles) long. A system of ground radar stations would give advance warning of the incoming enemy bomber force, allowing time for the Fugaku to inter­cept and destroy the bombers before they reached Japan. This was all very impressive on paper but had it been put into practice the results were likely to have been less than stel­lar, especially when considering the failure of the Mitsubishi G6M1 heavy escort fighter (a G4M converted into a gunship to provide cover for bomber formations). Finally, the Fugaku was considered as a transport which would have provided a significant heavy lift capability. It was estimated that one Fugaku transport would be able to carry 300 soldiers with full equipment, about equal to one infantry rifle company with a heavy weapon platoon. Chikuhei envisioned a grand scheme of a raid against America where four hundred transports would deposit 120,000 men (equivalent to a Japanese Army, which equates to a US and British Corps) on US soil to take over the Seattle-Tacoma airport located in Washington. After landing the troops would move overland to attack and destroy Boeing’s B-29 producing Renton Fac­tory in Renton before returning to Japan.

There is no evidence to suggest any of these concepts made it to the final Fugaku designs. However, if any of the three ideas were supported, a transport may have topped the list for possible consideration given the late war need for aircraft capable of bringing raw materials into Japan to feed the war industry that was slowly being starved. As a note, although the designations G10N and G1 ON 1 have been used in print for this aircraft for many years, there has been no confirma­tion in historical sources that confirms this was the case.

In the spring of 1938, the UN issued a 13-shi specification for a long range fighter. This came about as a result of combat experience in China that showed that Japanese fighters did not have the range to escort bombers on missions deep into Chinese territory, the result of which were high losses. What Naka­jima produced to answer the specification would have been a complete failure had it not been for one redeeming feature.

The 13-shi specification was a very strict one with a number of very demanding crite­ria. Nakajima’s Katsuji Nakamura would pro­duce the initial prototype. It was an aerodynamically clean З-seat monoplane with low mounted wings. Each wing housed a Nakajima Sakae radial, developing 1,130hp. However, one wing was fitted with a Sakae 21 engine, the other with the Sakae 22, and their propellers rotated in opposite directions to reduce torque. To complement the nose armament, twin remote controlled barbettes, each with two 7.7mm Type 97 machine guns, were placed behind the pilot’s cockpit. Des­ignated the J1N1, the first two prototypes were delivered and put under test. A myriad of problems were noted – the plane was over­weight, the novel propeller arrangement caused numerous difficulties, the hydraulic system was too complex, the barbettes were too difficult to aim and the entire arrange­ment was too heavy. To top it all off, manoeu­vrability was poor and all the J1N1 had going for it was its range.

Rejected as a heavy fighter, the JIN was given new lease of life as a reconnaissance aircraft. Nakajima stripped the aeroplane of its weapons and the barbettes, cut the fuel capacity (which, in part, was made up by using drop tanks) and replaced the Sakae 22 engine with another Sakae 21 powerplant. The armament was a single, rear firing 12.7mm Type 2 machine gun to be was used by the radio operator. Now called the J1 Nl-C, following successful trials the aircraft received approval and entered service with reconnaissance units from August 1942. On encountering it in combat, the Allies code – named the plane Irving, thinking it was a fighter. The 1JN renamed the plane J1N1-R, equipping some examples with a turret mounting a 20mm Type 99 Model 1 cannon.

In early 1943, Commander Yasuna Kozono, who led the 251st Koktttai operating from Vunakanau Airfield in Rabaul, Papua New Guinea, believed that the J1N1 – C would make an excellent night fighter. Mechanics replaced the observer’s station and installed two 20mm Type 99 cannons that fired upward and forward at a 30° angle and two additional cannons firing downward and for­ward at a similar angle. Called the J1N1 – C Kai, the field modification proved a success and with that success, the UN became interested.

In short order, Nakajima was instructed by the UN to produce a dedicated night fighter version of the J1 N. By August 1943, the assem­bly of the first model, the J1N1-S Gekko (meaning ‘Moonlight’), had begun at Naka­jima’s Koizumi plant. The main changes saw the glazing over the crew compartment reduced and the step removed. The ring exhaust collector was also removed and the engines used individual exhaust stacks. In addition, it was realised that the downward firing cannons were ineffective and in the JINl-Sa were removed. Both the J1N1-S and JINl-Sa were sometimes fitted with a centi- metric radar in the front of the aircraft, the external antenna for the set being situated on the tip of the nose. Others had a searchlight in the nose while a number lacked the radar and searchlight to be replaced by a single for­ward-firing 20mm Type 99 cannon.

In combat, the Gekko proved satisfactory against the Consolidated B-24 Liberator, but against the faster Boeing B-29 Superfortress was hard pressed to make a single attack. Therefore, it should not be surprising that the JIN was considered as a candidate to be equipped with two turbojets. Successful as a reconnaissance platform as well as a night fighter, replacing the radial engines with tur­bojets would have provided the JIN with a superior speed that would have served it well in either role. A contemporary illustration of the turbojet equipped J1N shows the fuselage of a J1N1 – Sa. The illustration lacks the upward firing cannon and radar which suggests it was equipped with the nose mounted cannon as its armament. Perhaps it may have worked in conjunction with radar and/or searchlight equipped J1N1 -S and J1N1 – Sa during combat missions, or it may have been considered as a fast special attacker fitted with two 551 lb bombs (as surviving JIN aircraft were at the end of the war). The wings seem to have been unaltered outside of the required mod­ifications to fit the nacelles for the turbojets. As to what jet engines were to be introduced is not known. The Kugisho Ne20 was cer­tainly a candidate as was the Nakajima Ne 230. The adaptation of the J1N to jet power would likely have been an easier task than that faced by Kugisho in adapting the P1Y1 Ginga into the turbojet bomber Tenga.

Exactly when the proposal to modify the JIN to a turbojet aircraft was made is unknown. What is known is that it did not progress past the drafting board.

Nakajima JIN Gekko – data

Contemporaries

Curtiss XP-87 Blackhawk (US), Messerschmitt P.1099 (Germany)

No exact specifications are known for the turbojet powered J1 N. The specifications given below are for the J1N1-S.

Type

Night Fighter

Crew

Two

Powerplant

Two Nakajima NK1F Sakae 2114-cylinder, air-cooled radial, each rated

at 1,130hp for take-off, 1,1 OOhp at 2,850m (9,350ft) and 980hp at 6,000m

(19,685ft), driving a three-bladed, constant speed metal propeller

Dimensions

Span

16.97m

55.7ft

Length

12.74m

41.8ft

Height

4.54m

14.9ft

Wing area

40.00nT

430.5ft2

Wing loading

175.27kg/m!

35.9 lb/ft2

Power loading

3.62kg/hp

8 Ib/hp

Weights

Empty

4,840kg

10,6701b

Loaded

7,010kg

15,4541b

Maximum

8,184kg

18,0431b

Performance

Speed

507km/h

315mph

at 5,840m

at 19,160ft

Cruise speed

333km/h

207mph

at 4,000m

at 13,125ft

Climb

9 min 35 sec to 5,000m (16,405ft)

Range

2,544km

1,581 miles

Max range

3,779km

2,348 miles

Ceiling

9,330m

30,610fl

Armament

Two upward firing 20mm Type 99 cannons and two downward firing

20mm Type 99 cannons installed in the fuselage

Deployment

None. The turbojet powered JIN remained a paper project.

Even though the genesis of the turbojet began long before World War 2, it would take the war to accelerate the development of this new powerplant to the point that by the close of hos­tilities jet aircraft had been blooded in battle. Germany can, by some, be considered the leader in turbojet technology during the war, but the US and Britain were not far behind. Japan, too, was not idle in producing its own turbojet but it would take German knowledge to give their industries a boost. One such results was was an historic aircraft in the annals of Japanese aviation history: the Naka­jima Kitsuka.

Because the Kitsuka (which in Japanese means ‘Wild Orange Blossom’) was probably the most important Japanese aircraft to use a jet engine as its powerplant, it seems apt to provide a general overview of Japanese turbo­jet development in this section. The first axial – flow turbojet was patented in 1921 by Frenchman Maxime Guillaume. However, the technology of his day was not enough to realise a working model, in 1930, Englishman Frank Whittle designed a turbojet using a centrifugal
compressor and, despite relatively little inter­est being shown in it, he patented his concept. In 1933, German Hans von Ohain designed a turbojet similar to Whittle’s but it would not be until 1936 that Ernst Heinkel took an interest in the engine and hired von Ohain to continue his work. By March 1937, this resulted in the Heinkel HeS 1, the first German jet engine although in fact a hydrogen demonstrator. The following month Whittle tested his first jet engine, the WU or Whittle Unit.

Around this time, Rear Admiral Koichi Hana – jima became aware of Whittle’s work as well as that of Secondo Campini, an Italian who began work on a thermojet and an aircraft to use it: the Campini Caproni N. l in 1934. This rekindled his interest in jet propulsion and using his position as head of the engine division of the Dai-Ichi Kai – gun Koku Gijutsu-sho, saw to it that studies were conducted in such engines. Hanajima reached out to the Tokyo Imperial University and Mit­subishi Jukogyo K. K. and together all manner of rocket and jet engines were investigated such as ramjets. To Hanajima’s disappointment, little official interest was generated from the results.

1938 saw German firm BMW begin their research into turbojets and the Heinkel He 178 VI prototype was built to test the HeS 3 turbo­jet that was being developed from the earlier HeS 1. In late 1938, Messerschmitt started work on what would become the world’s first jet fighter to enter squadron service, the Me 262. In Japan, and despite the lack of interest being shown in jet propulsion, Captain Tokiyasu Tanegashima was appointed as the head of the Engine Test and Field Support Shop of KQgisho. He was issued with a meager sum to fund jet engine research although, with the assistance of Professor Fukusaburo Numachi, he would initially focus his efforts on turboprops. Both men were able to source the Ishikawajima – Shibaura Turbine Company and Ebara Seizo K. K. to help build a number of test engines that used compressors and gas turbines, but these labours did not bear fruit.

By 1939, BMW had tested its first axial-flow turbojet design and on 27 August of that year the He 178 VI made its first flight, the first tur­bojet powered aircraft to fly. In February 1940, the British Air Ministry ordered two examples

of the E.28/39 research aircraft from the Gloster Aircraft Company to serve as testbed aircraft for Whittle’s engines. 1940 also saw the Italian N. 1 fly for the first time and Heinkel began glid­ing tests of the He 280 jet fighter prototype as it waited for its two HeS 8 turbojets now under development (the He 280 did not enter pro­duction). November would see Junkers test the Jumo 004 turbojet and Gloster’s jet fighter proposal, the Meteor, was ordered in February

1941. Also in November, Lockheed com­menced work on the L-1000 axial-flow turbo­jet, the first American jet. Finally, in December, Whittle’s W.1X turbojet, a flight ready engine, was tested for the first time.

Japan though, was not idle in 1940. Early in the year, Tanegashima, with the help of the Mit­sui Seiki Kogyo K. K., created a free piston com­pressor for a gas turbine based on a Junkers design, but it was not a success as a means for aircraft propulsion. Another attempt was tried by a different department. Under the leader­ship of Lieutenant Commander Osamu Nagano, head of the Kugisho aircraft engine division, and Masanori Miyata, who led the Kugisho electric parts section, built a tiny free piston compressor gas turbine, generating one tenth of a horsepower at 12,000rpm that drove a magneto that lit a lamp. Despite this measure of success, apathy on the part of the UN con­tinued to stymie progress. Tanegashima soon realised that the Japanese industry was not capable of constructing a free piston engine and switched his studies to axial flow jets.

On 15 May 1941, the Gloster E.28/39 flew for the first time, but previously in April, Heinkel’s He 280 VI had flown under jet power on its maiden flight, the first jet fighter to fly. 1942 saw the Junkers Jumo 004 under test while BMW focused efforts on the BMW 003 Sturm. Heinkel was instructed to concentrate on developing the HeS 011, a turbojet that was to power the second generation of German jets. On 18 July, the Messerschmitt Me 262 flew under turbojet power, becoming the second jet fighter to fly, and on 2 October, the American Bell XP-59 Airacomet jet fighter made its maiden flight. By this time, Japanese engineers and scientists had learned of the flight of the He 178 as proof that an aircraft powered by a jet engine was feasible. This was just the boost the flagging Japanese jet engine research desperately needed.

As a result two different paths were taken with renewed vigour. The first employed the principle of the thermojet (as used by Secondo Campini) and was called the Tsu-11. While this engine was to be selected for use in the Kugisho Oka Model 22, it was found to be unsuited as a powerplant for a jet aircraft. The second route, that of a pure jet engine, was pursued further. Kugisho’s Vice Admiral Misao

Wada was the man who oversaw the develop­ment of a turbojet and the first result was the TR-10. This had a single stage, centrifugal com­pressor with a single stage turbine and was, in essence, built by adapting a turbosuper­charger. The engine was constructed by Ebara Seizo K. K. When the TR-10 was first tested in the summer of 1943 its performance did not meet expectations. The TR-10 was renamed the NelO and the engine was further devel­oped by adding four axial stages in front of the engine inlet. This reduced the load on the cen­trifugal compressor, lowered the engine RPM and produced more thrust. The revised jet engine was designated the Ne 12. The problem with the Ne 12, however, was its great weight and so steps were taken to lighten the engine, which resulted in the Ne 12B.

1944 was an ominous year for Japan. When the Mariana Islands of Saipan and Tinian were wrestled from the Japanese by US forces in July and August, Japan found herself well within striking distance of the Boeing B-29 Super­fortresses. Prior to this, B-29 raids had to fly from remote bases in China and India and so the bombing of Japanese targets was relatively rare. Staging from Saipan and Tinian, B-29s were far closer, could be more active and the Japanese were only too aware of this. In addi­tion, it was surmised that it would only be a matter of time before the main Japanese islands were targeted for invasion. In August 1944, the Kaigun Koku Hombu called for a meeting to discuss changes in air strategy to combat the air and land threat as well as to consider the aircraft that would be used. The Kaigun Koku Hombu invited aircraft designers from both Nakajima and Kawanishi to attend and the outcome of this meeting was the pro­posal for three classes of aircraft termed Kokoku Heiki (one literal translation being ‘Empire Weapon’). The first class, or Kokoku Heiki No. l, was the adaptation of current air­craft to accept a 800kg (1,7601b) bomb with which their pilots would undertake shimpQ missions and target enemy invasion ships. If the bomb overloaded the carrying capacity of the aircraft, then RATO (Rocket Assisted Take – Off) units would be used to get them airborne. Kokoku Heiki No.3 was to be a conventional, radial engine aircraft designed by Kawanishi as the TokkO-ki, which would be used for shimpii missions, but this project was soon abandoned (perhaps because the UN was to build the sim­ilar Nakajima Ki-115 as the Showa Тока). It would be Kokoku Heiki No.2 which provided the seed for the Nakajima Kitsuka. This ‘Empire Weapon’ was to be an aircraft that used the Tsu-11 and, when available, the Ne 12 turbojet.

However, three months prior to the meeting, efforts were underway to obtain the Me 262 from Germany. In May 1944, the Japanese negotiated for the manufacturing rights to the Me 262 and the Germans initially agreed to the release. However, the deal was not concluded due to the large number of modifications that the design was found to require after its flight testing. It was not until July 1944 that orders were given to provide the Japanese with blue­prints of the Me 262 fighter and the Junkers Jumo 004 and BMW 003 turbojets.

On 22 July 1944, Reichsmarschall Hermann Goring authorised the licensing of the Me 262 to Japan and the delivery of one sample air­craft. However, the Japanese submarine 1-29 had left Lorient, France, on 16 April with a sam­ple Junkers Jumo 004 turbojet and plans for the Me 262 and BMW 003 turbojet among its cargo. Also aboard the submarine was Technical Commander Eiichi Iwaya who carried on his person a portion of the documentation on the German fighter and turbojets. By 14 July, the 1-29 had arrived in Singapore. Iwaya, seeking to reach Japan as soon as possible, disembarked from 1-29 and took only a portion of the German documentation. From Singapore, Iwaya flew to Tokyo. On 26 July, Allied code intercepts pin­pointed the location of 1-29 and the USS Saw­fish sent her to the bottom near the Balintang Channel in the Luzon Strait, taking the precious cargo with her.

When Iwaya arrived in Japan, all he pos­sessed of the German files with regards to the Me 262 and turbojets was a single copy of a cross-section of the BMW 003A turbojet. The subsequent news of the loss of 1-29 was a crushing blow, but not a fatal one by any means. In studying the BMW 003A document, the Japanese found it to be of a similar design to the Ne 12 but instead of the centrifugal com­pressor the German engine used an eight stage axial-flow compressor. It was adjudged that this method was superior to the Ne 12 and as such, efforts should be concentrated on build­ing the Japanese equivalent to the BMW 003A. Despite the decision against it, work on the Ne 12B continued. Four companies were involved in the development of the new turbo­jet. Each was to be provided with a copy of the BMW 003A cross-section and other available data and to build their own versions. Ishikawa – jima-Shibaura Turbine Company was to develop the Ne 130, Nakajima Hikoki K. K. the Ne 230, Mitsubishi Jukogyo K. K. the Ne 330, and Kugisho would move forwards with the Ne 20.

Following the August conference with the Kaigun Koku Hombu, Ken’ichi Matsumura, chief designer for Nakajima and with the assis­tance of Kazuo Ono, produced a number of concept drawings for the Kokoku Heiki No.2. Within Nakajima, the new aircraft was given the codename Maru-Ten. On 14 September 1944, UN representatives met with Nakajima at their Koizumi plant to discuss the concepts which had been put forward. The design that stood out was based on a description of the Me 262 as provided by Technical Commander Eiichi Iwaya who, while in Germany, was able to view and study the German jet. Thus, Mat – sumura’s drawing bore an outward resem­blance to the Me 262. After reviewing the concept, the design was approved as the Kokoku Heiki No.2. In keeping with the shimpu mission of the aircraft, the initial design had no landing gear and was to be launched from cat­apult ramps, boosted with RATO units. The cal­culated range was a mere 204km (127 miles) due to the designated engine, the Ne 12, which burned fuel at a rapid rate. At sea level the esti­mated speed was 639km/h (397mph). A single bomb fixed to the aircraft was the only arma­ment. Another feature was the inclusion of folding wings to allow the aircraft to be hidden in caves and tunnels and protected from bombing attacks.

On 8 October, Kugisho ordered Kazuo Yoshida, plant director for Nakajima, to have a wooden mock-up of the aircraft completed and ready for inspection by the end of the month. In addition Nakajima was told to have the initial structural plans finished by the same date. This was ordered so that production of the aircraft could begin without delay. Unfortu­nately, delays would be a major problem. The UN promised that the Ne 12 would be ready for testing by November 1944 and in short order thereafter, production engines would be avail­able. Based on this assumption, Nakajima was to construct thirty aeroplanes by the end of December 1944. Because of the rush to pro­duce the aircraft, a myriad of problems arose with the design which necessitated changes. A major issue was the lack of critical war materi­als which required the use of substitutes and brought additional delays. To compound the problem, Nakajima was concerned that the Ne 12B would not be ready despite the UN’s promises.

Meanwhile, Kugisho proceeded with the Ne 20. The engineers were forced to use alloys which were not to the standards of the German engine and would be a source of problems dur­ing testing. The design of the Ne 20 was smaller than the BMW 003A but it retained the com­bustion chamber shape of the German engine. While it used the same size of burner as the BMW 003A, it only used twelve instead of six­teen due to the smaller size. Kugisho would draft and refine the design of the Ne 20 through December.

On 9 December 1944, the UN called a meet­ing to discuss the progress and outlook of the Kokoku Heiki No.2. Based on the problems Nakajima were having with the aircraft, not to mention the doubts about the Ne 12, the pro­duction schedule was revised. Nakajima were requested to produce the first prototype by February 1945 for use in static testing. It was also during this meeting that the aircraft’s spec­ifications underwent a revision. Instead of a fixed bomb, the bomb could now be released by the pilot. The role of the aircraft was also changed. No longer was it to be used for a shimpu mission but instead for close air sup­port, the aircraft acting as a fast attack bomber. As a consequence of these changes, the design had to incorporate a landing gear. The UN issued its specifications for the new jet, which was now called the Kitsuka, and the docu­ments requested:

Span: no more than 5.3m (17.3ft) with the wings folded

Length: no more than 9.5m (31.1ft)

Height: no more than 3.1m (10.1ft)

Powerplant: Two Ne 12 jet engines Maximum Speed: 513km/h (319mph) with 500kg (1,102 lb) bomb Range: 204km (127 miles) with a 500kg (1,1021b) bomb or 278km (173 miles) with a 250kg (551 lb) bomb Landing Speed: 148km/h (92mph)

Take-off Run: 350m (1,148ft) using two 450kg (992 lb) RATO bottles

Manoeuvrability: The aircraft had to be highly manoeuvrable, have a short turn radius and be stable at speed to facilitate target tracking Protection: Shatter proof glass for the canopy. Front windscreen to have 70mm of bullet proof glass. 12mm of steel armour plate below and behind the pilot. Fuel tanks to be 22mm sandwich types

Basic Instrumentation: Tachometer, altimeter, artificial horizon, airspeed indicator, Model 0 Type 1 flux gate compass, fuel pressure gauge, oil pressure gauge, oil temperature gauge, tail pipe temperature gauge and a pitot tube electric heater

Basic Equipment: Type 0 parachute, automatic fire extinguisher, Type 3 dry battery, Type 3 radio receiver, Type 1 life raft and a reserve weight of 30kg (66.1 lb)

1945 would open with more misfortune for the Japanese war machine. Japanese troops were pushed out of Burma from 5 January and B-29s would bomb Tokyo the next day. Two days ear­lier, Matsumura and Ono, along with others involved in the Kitsuka project, discussed the possibility of using the Ne 20 turbojet in place of the Ne 12. In the debate, some suggested that the Ne 20 was not as far in development than the Ne 12 and would delay progress if used. On the other hand, some argued that the Nel2 was not achieving significant results. In the end, the consensus was that the Ne 12 should remain as the powerplant only because it was projected to be ready before the Ne 20.

On 28 January 1945, the wooden mock-up of the Kitsuka was finally ready for inspection at Nakajima’s Koizumi plant. Vice Admiral Misao Wada and his staff visited the plant and inspected the mock-up with both Matsumura and Ono in attendance. It was made clear to the Kugisho inspectors that the Kitsuka was a very simple aircraft that could be constructed in 7,500 man-hours. By comparison, it took 15,000 man-hours to build a Mitsubishi A6M Reisen. Following the inspection, Nakajima was told to make two slight adjustments to the Kitsuka. The first involved the windscreen. Originally, the front windscreen was rounded but now it was desired that it should be flat panelled. This change may have been sug­gested to allow for the future installation of a reflector gun sight because such a sight requires flat panels to avoid sighting problems due to canopy distortion. The second alteration was to make the canopy slide to the rear instead of opening to the side. At the conclu­sion of the meeting, Nakajima was told to cease all work on the Nakajima J5N1 Tenrai and the company was also informed that they could expect the Nakajima G8N1 Renzan to be terminated as well. These changes in produc­tion and development were done to speed the coming production of the Kitsuka. The close of January also saw the final design draft of the Ne20 completed and almost immediately work began to build the first engine. Kugisho’s Aero Engine Division provided 400 machine tools and engineers and labourers began to toil day and night to realise the Ne 20.

February 1945 opened with the Japanese naval docks in Singapore targeted and destroyed by B-29 bombers along with contin­ued fighting in the Philippines. A second inspection of the Kitsuka was called for on 10 February. Present at the inspection, among the other engineers and Kugisho personnel, were Technical Commander Iwaya and the man who was destined to fly the Kitsuka, Lieutenant Commander Susumu Takaoka. The Kitsuka was given final approval and production was to commence at once, even before the Kitsuka had been flight tested. The first five Kitsuka air­craft, No. l through No.5, were to serve as pro­totypes and none would be fitted with armour plating or self-sealing fuel tanks. In addition the first two aircraft would not to be equipped with the bomb carrying apparatus. February would also see the Ne 12B tested for the first time.

Unfortunately for the Kitsuka, US bombing ensured that production did not go smoothly. Due to the ever increasing number of strikes against the industrial centres of Japan, it was felt that it was only a matter of time before the Nakajima Koizumi plant would attract the attention of US bombers. Therefore, on 17 Feb­ruary, engineering staff for the Kitsuka was moved to Sano in Tochigi Prefecture. Despite the move, a sizable portion of the Kitsuka com­ponent construction remained at Koizumi while the wings, tail assembly and the centre and aft portion of the fuselage were con­structed by Kugisho in Yokosuka. In the face of further bombing attacks, production was dis­persed among silkworm factories and build­ings in Gunma Prefecture (northwest of Tokyo).

March arrived in a blaze of smoke and fire as the US ramped up their incendiary bomb cam­paign against Japan’s cities. Tokyo and Nagoya were particular targets, the burning cities light­ing the night sky. On March 26, the first Ne 20 engine was successfully test run from a cave set into a cliff in Yokosuka. With the success of the Ne 20, the Kitsuka engineering team began to seriously consider replacing the Ne 12B with the Ne 20. It was clear that the Ne 20 outper­formed the Ne 12B and, based on the higher thrust potential, it was decided that the Kitsuka should use the Ne 20 even if it meant a longer delay while the engine became available. Although the current Kitsuka production did not yet involve the engine mountings, a revi­sion of the aircraft design plans was required to accommodate the Ne20. By March 31, these revisions were complete and the Kitsuka pro­gram entered a stage of finality.

With the revised Kitsuka, some of the speci­fications were adjusted as follows:

Maximum Speed: 620km/h (385mph) with a 500kg (1,1021b) bomb at sea level Range: 351km (218 miles), at sea level, at full power

Take-off Run: 500m (1,640ft) with two 450kg (992 lb) RATO bottles Landing Speed: 92km/h (57mph)

Bomb Load: 500kg (1,102 lb) as normal with the ability to carry a 800kg (1,763 lb) bomb; a Type 3 rack would be used for the larger bomb Protection: Reduce the bullet proof glass thickness to 50mm and add 12mm of armour to the front of the cockpit, while the fuel tanks would incorporate an automatic fire suppression system

Engineers working on the Ne20 found that, although the initial test of the engine was a suc­cess, there were many issues to solve. At first, the blades were prone to cracking but this was soon overcome. An electric starter was fitted into the compressor spinner that could spin the engine at 2,250rpm; the engine would reach maximum RPM within 10-15 seconds of engine start. Gasoline was used to start the engine and once running the fuel was switched to a pine root distillate using 20-30 per cent gasoline. What was becoming a problem was how to position the tail cone. Lieutenant Commander Osamu Nagano and his team, along with Cap­tain Tokiyasu Tanegashima, laboured to refine the Ne 20. The worsening bombing situation saw the Ne 20 team moving to Hadano in Kanagawa Prefecture, a three hour drive from Yokosuka.

Set up in warehouses belonging to a tobacco factory, the Ne 20 group comprised 10 officers and 200 men. Here, two bench testing stations were created and Ne 20 devel­opment and testing continued. The process revealed numerous flaws. At one stage the pressure of the axial-flow compressor was found to be too low. Nagano came to the con­clusion that the camber of the stators was not correct and so he took them out, bent them on an anvil and then reinstalled them. These were tested in the second Ne 20 to be built. Yet another difficulty arose with the thrust bearings on the compressor which was burn­ing out very quickly. Nagano solved the prob­lem by revising the bearings and bearing rings. One problem that reappeared was blade cracking. The blades were made from manganese-chromium-vanadium steel and not the more suitable nickel alloy. These blades were then welded to the disk and, as such, the blades did not have the strength to withstand the operating stresses of the motor. After one to two hours of operation, cracks would appeare on the blade roots at the point where they connected to the disk. The solu­tion was to thicken the blades but this low­ered the efficiency of the engine. However, the Ne 20 was able to run for four or five hours before cracks appeared and while the engine could have run longer, there was no guaran­tee when blade failure would occur. With these improved results, work began to pro­duce a small number of engines.

25 April 1945 would see the first Kitsuka fuse­lage completed. This was then subjected to stress and load testing which began on 20 May, but with the stipulation that the fuselage was not to be damaged during tests. Nakajima was scheduled to produce 24 Kitsuka aircraft by June 1945 and with the availability of six Ne 20 engines. On the surface, the Kitsuka project looked to be moving along. The reality was a far different story.

On 13 June, Vice Admiral Wada held a meet­ing to discuss the Kitsuka. Wada addressed a number of issues that were becoming prob­lematic. Nakajima’s G8N1 Renzen program had to be stopped in order to free up produc­tion capacity for the Kitsuka as both a special attack aircraft and an interceptor. More trou­bling was that unless the stock of aluminium was conserved the supply would be exhausted by September 1945. At best, even with conser­vation, by the close of 1945 there would be no more aluminium available. As a result, only steel and wood would be left and to use such materials would, again, have caused a revision to the Kitsuka design. The final blow was that high grade aviation fuels would only be avail­able for the Homare series of radial engines. All other engines, including the Ne 20, would have to make do with poorer quality fuel. This, cou­pled with defeat after defeat for the Japanese military, cast a very serious cloud over the Kit­suka project and some no longer saw value in continuing with the aircraft. Others however, had a strong desire to see the Kitsuka taken to completion because it would put Japan into the jet age.

On 25 June 1945, the first Kitsuka was com­pleted but without its engines. Although exter­nally the Kitsuka bore a resemblance to the Me 262, that was as far as it went. The wings of the Kitsuka had a total of 13° sweepback, the centreline of the wings being at 9°. Wing tip slots eliminated the tip stall discovered during wind tunnel testing and split flaps and droop ailerons were fitted to compensate for the heavy wing loading. Nakajima К series airfoils were used – а К 125 airfoil at the wing root and a К 309 airfoil at the wing tip. The wings were

Interceptor initial concepts – data

The specifications in parenthesis refer to the modified wing variant.

Type

Interceptor

Crew

One

Powerplant

Two Kugisho Ne 20 axial-flow turbojets,

each developing 490kg (1,0801b) of thrust

Dimensions

Span

10.00m

32.8ft

Length

9.23m

30.3ft

Height

3.04m

10ft

Wing area

13.19m!

142ft2

(modified) 14.51m2

156.2ft2

Weights

Empty

3,920kg

8,642.11b

(modified) 2,980kg

6,569.71b

Loaded

4,152kg

9,153.51b

Useful load

(modified) 945kg

2,083.31b

Fuel capacity

725 litres

191.5 gallons

with drop tanks

1,450 litres

383 gals

Performance (estimated)

Max speed

698km/h

434mph

at 6,000m

at 19,68511

684km/h

425mph

(modified) at 6,000m

at 19,68511

Range

608km

378 miles

at 6,000m

at 19,68511

594km

369 miles

(modified) at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

Service ceiling

12,100m

39,698ft

(modified) 12,300m

40,354ft

Armament

One Type 5 30mm cannon with 50 rounds of ammunition

PHOTOGRAPHS BY TIM HORTMAN

of double spar construction with nine main support ribs, all covered with steel and duralu­min skinning. Mitsubishi A6M Reisen flap hinges were used on the trailing edge flaps and the wing tips were fabricated from wood and steel sheeting. The outer wing folded upwards. The Kitsuka had a slight gull wing form thanks to 5° dihedral of the centre span and 2° dihedral of the outer wing. All control surfaces were fab­ric covered. The fuselage had a slight triangu­lar shape, being composed of three sections (nose, centre section and aft). The centre sec­tion had the centre wing span built into it and much of this and the other two sections were constructed from sheet steel due to the unavailability of duralumin in quantity. Twenty – four bulkheads were contained within the complete fuselage with two bulkheads coming together where each section met, which were then bolted together to complete the fuselage. Two fuel tanks were fitted, one in front of and the other behind the cockpit. The tail of the Kit­suka was fairly conventional and the aft fuse­lage line was kept high so that the stabiliser would not be effected by the jet efflux. For the tricycle landing gear, the main gear (to include the brake system) from a Mitsubishi A6M Reisen was modified to suit the Kitsuka and the 600mm x 172mm-sized wheels retracted into the wing. The 400mm x 140mm-sized nose wheel was taken from the tail wheel of a Kugishd P1Y Gingaand it retracted into the rear of the nose.

After being assembled the Kitsuka was then broken down, loaded into trucks, and moved to Nakajima’s Koizumi plant where two Ne 20 engines awaited it. By 27 June, the Kitsuka had been put back together and the engines installed, and two days later weight and bal­ance checks had been completed. The Kitsuka was then declared ready for flight testing. On 30 June 30 1945, both Ne 20 engines on the Kit­suka were started and run for a short time. Flight testing could not be conducted at the air­field at Koizumi because the runway was too short and had many approach restrictions. Mis – awa Air Base (Misawa Hikojo), in Aomori Pre­fecture 684km (425 miles) north of Tokyo, was also considered since it had open approaches and was rarely visited by Allied long range fight­ers. However, because of the great distance it was ruled out. Finally, it was settled that the air­field at Kisarazu Air Base (Kisarazu Hikojo) would be the location for the first flight because it was far closer to Yokosuka than Mis­awa. Once more the Kitsuka was disassem­bled, loaded into trucks, and moved to the Kisarazu airfield, adjacent to Tokyo Bay.

On arrival, the Kitsuka was reassembled and made ready for its first flight. Unfortunately, on 14 July, during engine testing, a loose nut was ingested which completely shattered the blades in one of the compressors. The damage to the engine was so extensive that repairs were simply not possible and replacement the only option. This delayed the flight for many days. As the Kitsuka was being repaired, the personnel for the 724 Kokutai, which had been designated a special attack unit and which would fly the Kitsuka in service, had been assembled at Yokosuka after its formation on 1 July 1945. On 15 July, the new unit moved to Misawa Air Base where it began training using Aichi D3A1 and D3A2 carrier bombers (known as Val to the Allies), which had been relegated to the training role.

On 27 July, Lieutenant Wada conducted some successful taxi tests with the Kitsuka. High speed taxi tests, however, were prepared by appointed Kitsuka test pilot Lieutenant Commander Susumu Takaoka. Two days after the initial taxi tests, Takaoka ran the Kitsuka up to 129km/h (80mph) and then applied the brakes to test their effectiveness. He found that their stopping power was not adequate, though he felt the problem was not so severe that flight testing had to be stopped. Ground testing was finally completed on 6 August, the same date that Hiroshima was devastated by the ‘Little Boy’ atomic bomb dropped from the B-29 ‘Enola Gay’. News of this strike soon reached the Kitsuka crews, technicians and engineers.

7 August 1945 would see excellent flying conditions and the Kitsuka was made ready for flight. Weather reports stated a 24km/h (15mph) southwest wind and a crosswind blowing from the right across the 1,692m (5,550ft) length of Runway 20 that pointed towards Tokyo Bay. The Kitsuka was only given a partial fuel load to keep the weight to 3,150kg (6,9451b); this allowed for approximately 16 minutes of flight time. No RATO bottles were fitted so that the take-off characteristics of the aircraft could be assessed. Takaoka climbed into the cockpit and made ready to take-off. On his signal the Ne 20 turbojets were started and he was soon taxiing out to the start of the run­way. Once there, he extended the flaps to 20° and kept the brakes set. So as not to cause a compressor stall, Takaoka slowly eased the engine throttles forward and when both had reached ll. OOOrpm, he released the brakes and the Kitsuka began to roll. Twenty-five sec­onds later and after a run of 725m (2,378ft), the Kitsuka was airborne and went into the history books as the first Japanese jet to fly.

At 610m (2,000ft), Takaoka levelled off. He was instructed to not retract the landing gear nor exceed 314km/h (195mph). As a test pilot he was used to hearing the roar of a conven­tional aircraft engine and used such noise as a means to detect problems. However, Takaoka was not prepared for the whine of the turbojets

Specifications in parenthesis refer to the rail launched version.

Type

Special Attacker

Crew

One

Powerplant

Two KOgisho Ne 20 axial-flow turbojets,

each developing 490kg (1,0801b) of thrust

Dimensions

Span

10.00m

32.8ft

Length

9.23m

30.3ft

Height

3.04m

10ft

Wing area

13.19m!

142ft2

Wing loading

(Rail)

270.00kg/m2

55.31b/ft!

Weights

Empty

2,300kg

5,070.61b

Loaded

3,550kg

7,826.41b

(Rail)

4,080kg

8,994.81b

Performance (estimated)

Max speed

676km/h

420mph

at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

888km/h

552mph

(Rail)

at 10,000m

at 32,808ft

Landing speed

(Rail)

171km/h

106mph

Range

583km

362 miles

at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

(Rail)

814km

506 miles, max

Climb

(Rail)

11 min 50 sec to 6,000m (19,685ft)

Ceiling

10,700m

35,104ft

12,100m

39,698ft

Armament

One 250kg (551 lb) bomb,

one 500kg (1,1031b)

bomb, or two Type 99 20mm cannons

Trainer Kitsuka –

data

Type Trainer

Crew Two (Student and Instructor)

Powerplant Two KOgisho Ne 20 axial-flow turbojets,

each developing 490kg (1,0801b) of thrust

Dimensions

Span

10.00m

32.8ft

Length

9.23m

30.3ft

Height

3.04m

10ft

Wing area

13.19m!

142ft2

Weights

Loaded

4,009kg

8,838.31b

Performance (estimated) Max speed

721 km/h

448mph

at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

Landing speed

166km/h

103mph

Range

66km at

414 miles

6,000m

at 19,685ft

Ceiling

12,000m

39,370ft

Service ceiling

10,700m

35,104ft

Armament

Likely to cany the payload as per the Kitsuka

Type

Crew

Reconnaissance Two (Pilot and Observer)

Powerplant

Two KOgisho Ne20 axial-flow turbojets,

each developing 490kg (1,0801b) of thrust

Dimensions

Span

10.00m

32.8ft

Length

9.23m

30.3ft

Height

3.04m

10ft

Wing area

13.19m!

142ft2

Weights

Loaded

4,241kg

9,349.81b

Performance (estimated)

Max speed

721 km/h

448mph

at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

Landing speed

169km/h

105mph

Range

666km

414 miles

at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

Ceiling

12,000m

39,370ft

Service ceiling

10,700m

35,104ft

Armament

None (possibly two Type 5 30mm cannons)

Interceptor definitive version – data

Type

Interceptor

Crew

One

Powerplant

Two Ishikawajima Ne 130 or two Mitsubishi Ne 330

axial-flow turbojets, each developing 900 or

1,300kg (1,9841b or 2,8661b)

of thrust respectively

Dimensions

Span

10.00m

32.811

Length

9.23m

30.3ft

Height

3.04m

10ft

Wing area

13.19m2

142ft2

Wing loading

302.71kg/m!

62 lb/ft2

Weights

Empty

3,060kg

6,746.11b

Loaded

4,232kg

9,329.91b

Useful load

940kg

2,072.31b

Performance (estimated)

Max speed

713km/h

443mph

(Ne 130) at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

Landing speed

154km/h

96mph

Range

594km

369 miles

792km

492 miles at cruise

speed

Climb

11 min 18 sec to 6,000m (19,685ft)

Ceiling

12,300m

40,354ft

Armament

Two Type 5 30mm cannons or two Ho-155 30mm cannons (IJA); one

500kg (1,1021b)

or 800kg (1,763 lb) bomb (if used as a fighter-bomber)

that told him almost nothing outside of what his instruments reported. He circled Kisarazu airfield, keeping it in sight in case of a failure and because the airspeed kept rising, Takaoka had to constantly throttle back to keep from exceeding the gear down speed limit. A brief test of the control sensitivity showed that the rudder was stiff, the ailerons were heavy but were working and the elevators were overly responsive. When his flight time was up, Takaoka was wary of how he would land. He did not want to drop the turbojets to below 6,000rpm since that risked a flameout from which he would likely not recover in time. Therefore, he chose a long, shallow drop, low­ered his flaps 40° and brought the turbojets down to 7,000rpm. On touchdown, he only needed moderate braking to bring the Kitsuka to a stop using only a little under 61 Om (2,000ft) of runway. Takaoka brought the Kitsuka back to the ramp amid throngs of cheering men. The total flight time was 11 minutes. In his immedi­ate report on the flight, Takaoka stated he had experienced no problems with the engines and had no recommendations for improving the aircraft. During his debriefing, technicians had removed the cowlings to the Ne 20 turbo­jets and examined each engine. They found no faults and so gave the Kitsuka clearance for another flight, scheduled for 10 August 1945.

For the second flight, more fuel was to be stored and RATO bottles used; this would allow for a longer flight and test the RATO units as boosters. Takaoka would again pilot the Kit­suka. Prior to the flight Takaoka examined the RATO bottles which were fitted to the under­side of the fuselage and found fault with the angle at which they were set. However, to adjust them would have taken too much time and so instead of 800kg (1,7631b) of thrust, the bottles were reduced to 400kg (881 lb) each.

On the day of the second flight, Allied air power was highly active and any flight attempt was bound to be spotted putting the Kitsuka at risk. Consequently, it was decided to wait until the following day on 10 August. However, it would be remembered for the drafting of the Imperial Rescript on the Termination of the War by the Japanese cabinet at the behest of Emperor Hirohito, though the populace had no knowledge of this.

11 August 1945 shared a similar weather pat­tern to the day the Kitsuka had first flown. The difference was that several UN and IJA officials of high rank had arrived to witness the second flight. Once more Takaoka climbed into the cockpit, signalled for engine start and taxied out to the runway. As before he extended the flaps 20°, and after receiving the signal to take­off, he slowly opened the throttles until the engines had reached 11,000rpm before releas­ing the brakes and the Kitsuka rolled forwards.

At four seconds into the take-off roll, Takaoka activated the RATO units. Immediately, the acceleration caused the nose of the Kitsuka to pop up, the tail slamming onto the runway. Takaoka fought to get the nose down by jam­ming the stick forwards but he received no response from the aircraft’s elevators. The two RATO units burned for a total of nine seconds and during eight of those seconds Takaoka was helpless and unable to correct the nose up condition. One second prior to the units burn­ing out, the elevators finally took effect and the nose came down so hard Takaoka was sure the front tyre had blown when it contacted the runway. Takaoka felt a sense of deceleration as the Kitsuka reached the halfway point on the runway – his speed at that point was 166km/h/l 03mph. A second later, with the feel­ing of deceleration still present, Takaoka decided to abort the take-off and he cut the power to the engines. Unfortunately, the brake issue Takaoka had discovered during high­speed taxi tests now came back to haunt him.

Despite maximum application of the brakes, the Kitsuka showed no signs of slowing and Takaoka was rapidly running out of runway. As he neared one of the taxiways, Takaoka held the left brake in an attempt to make the Kitsuka bring its left wing down into the ground to bleed off speed (known as a ground loop). The Kitsuka’s nose turned slightly but this then put the aircraft on a crash course with a group of hangars and buildings. Takaoka reversed the braking, holding the right brake. The Kitsuka came back around onto the runway and despite Takaoka working the brakes, it was to no avail. The aircraft ran out of tarmac and crossed the 100m (328ft) of grass overrun before the landing gear caught in a drainage ditch and collapsed. The Kitsuka slid along its belly until finally coming to a halt by the edge of the water of Tokyo Bay. The damage to the Kitsuka was extensive. In addition to the man­gled landing gear, the two Ne 20 engines were badly damaged, having been jarred from their mounts but still remaining attached to the wings. Initial assessments suggested that the damage was so severe the Kitsuka could not be repaired. On the positive side, the aircraft did not catch fire and causes of the accident were swiftly looked into. UN Captain Ito, who was present for the flight, was thankful that the Kitsuka did not become airborne with the nose high attitude during the RATO burn. Had that happened and once the RATO bottles cut out, the Kitsuka would have most likely crashed into the ground. A motion picture camera cap­tured the flight and the film developed to see if it could shed any light on the crash.

On 15 August, the film of the ill-fated flight was studied but proved inconclusive as to whether or not the Kitsuka was airborne once

the RATO bottles were exhauasted, as was suspected. This would have explained the heavy impact of the front landing gear on the runway and the sense of deceleration experi­enced by Takaoka. In any case, the Kitsuka would never fly again for at 12.00pm the Impe­rial Rescript on the Termination of the War was broadcast on the radio bringing World War 2 to a conclusion.

The end of the war would see none of the Kitsuka production plans realised. Nakajima, by the close of December 1945, was to have produced 200 Kitsukas. In reality, Nakajima completed only one with a further 22 under construction. The Kyushu Hikoki K. K. was, also by the end of the year, to have turned out 135 Kitsuka aircraft but was only able to begin con­struction of two aircraft, started in July 1945, which remained unfinished by the close of hostilities. A third producer, the Sasebo Naval Arsenal (Sasebo Kaigun Kosho), was sched­uled to have begun production of the Kitsuka in September 1945 with 115 completed by the close of December. The fourth production line was to be at the Kasumigaura Naval Air Arsenal with the commencement of Kitsuka construc­tion scheduled for October 1945; 80 aircraft were to have been completed by the end of December.

A number of variants of the Kitsuka were planned, none of which would see completion come the capitulation. One of these was a two – seat trainer. Given the nature of the Kitsuka, it was appreciated that a trainer would be required to help the conversion of pilots used to conventional piston engined aircraft to the peculiarities of a turbojet powered aircraft. Five of the Kitsuka airframes under production by Nakajima were modified by including a sec­ond cockpit for the instructor. Outside of the inclusion of the additional cockpit, it is unknown exactly what other changes were made in the Kitsuka to accommodate it. If there were a parallel to the German Me 262B-la two-seat trainer, the rear fuel tank would have been removed to make room for the instructor’s cockpit. The German solution to the loss of fuel was to utilise the two front bomb racks for drop tanks. Whether Nakajima considered the use of drop tanks (as the Kit­suka could use them) or simply accepted the reduced endurance for the sake of expediency is not known. The two-seat trainer would be the only variant of the Kitsuka to reach the pro­duction phase.

It was planned that some of the two-seaters were to be modified for reconnaissance roles. The instructor’s cockpit was to be removed and replaced with a crew position for an observer. He was to have a Type 96 Model 3 radio set at his disposal for use in relaying tar­get information to other aircraft. It is unknown

Contemporaries Messerschmitt Me 262A-1 a/U3 and Me 262A-5a (Germany), Messerschmitt Me 262A-2a/U2 (Germany), Messerschmitt Me 262B-la (Germany), Messerschmitt Me 262C-la, Me 262C-2b, and Me262C-3 (Germany)

Type

Attack Bomber

Crew

One

Powerplant

Two Ktigishb Ne 20 axial-flow turbojets,

each developing 490kg (1,0801b) of thrust

Dimensions

Span

10.00m

32.8ft

5.24m

17.2ft (wings folded)

Length

9.23m

30.3ft

Height

3.04m

10ft

Wing area

13.19m2

142ft2

Wing loading

268.53kg/m2

55 lb/ft2

Power loading

1.6kg/kg

3.7 lb/lbst

Weights

Empty

2,300kg

5,070.61b

Loaded

3,550kg

7,826.41b

Max loaded

4,312kg

9,506.31b

Useful load

1,249kg

2,753.51b

Performance

Max speed

621 km/h

386mph at sea level

679km/h

422mph

at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

695km/h

432mph

at 10,000m

at 32,808ft

Max speed

509km/h

316mph

at sea level, with 500kg (1,102 lb) bomb

Take-off speed

148km/h

92mph

at a weight of 3,950kg (8,708.2 lb)

Landing speed

158km/h

98mph

at a weight of 2,570kg (5,665.8 lb)

Take-off length

504m

1,653.5ft

with RATO with zero wind at

a weight of 4,200m (9,259.4 lb)

1,363m

4,471.7ft

without RATO with zero wind at

a weight of 3,950kg (8,708.21b)

Range

583km

362 miles

at 6,000m

at 19,685ft

888km

552 miles

at 10,000m

at 32,808ft

203km

126 miles

with maximum bomb load

555km

345 miles

with 551 lb bomb load

948km

589 miles at cruise speed

Climb

12 min 16 sec to 6,000m (19,685ft)

32 min 42 sec to 10,000m (32,808ft)

Ceiling

12,000m

39,370ft

Service ceiling

10,700m

35,104ft

Fuel capacity

725 litres

191.5 gallons

1,450 litres

383 gals with drop tanks

Armament

One 500kg (1,1021b) or 800 (1,7631b) bomb

Deployment

None. One finished aircraft was built by Nakajima (two if one counts the airframe completed for load testing) with a further 24 in various stages of construction by war’s end.

Survivors

Nakajima Kitsuka (tail number A-103)

With the loss of the only completed Kitsuka following its crash on 11 August 1945, examples captured by the US following the war were from the stocks of incomplete Kitsuka aircraft found in Nakajima and KyQshu’s plants. This particular Kitsuka arrived at NAS Patuxent River and on 18 October 1946 was shipped to San Diego, California. The aircraft eventually found its way back to the Paul. E. Garber facility where it is believed to be the second Kitsuka held in storage there.

Some sources have the serial for this Kitsuka as 7337.

Nakajima Kitsuka (tail number A-104)

Also at NAS Patuxent River with A-103, it was later shipped to NAS Willow Grove in Willow Grove, Pennsylvania on 23 October 1946. Following its arrival, no further trace of the Kitsuka is known.

Nakajima Kitsuka (no tail number assigned)

This Kitsuka was received in the US and appeared on a storage manifest in 1950 being housed at NAS Norfolk in Norfolk, Virginia. In 1960, it was shipped to the Paul E. Garber facility. From 1972 until the facility closed to the public, it was on display hanging from the ceiling (see page 118).

if any cameras were to be fitted but it would not be unreasonable to conclude that the observer would at least have had a hand-held camera.

An interceptor version of the Kitsuka was discussed, as previously mentioned, and a number of general arrangements for it were considered. One of these was the inclusion of a single Type 5 30mm cannon with 50 rounds of ammunition installed in the nose. A second design was to feature enlarged and extended wings incorporating flaps and double-edged leading slots. A more definitive interceptor was to replace the Ne 20 engines with either Ne 130 or Ne 330 turbojets. A second cannon was to be added in the nose. Interestingly, it appears that if the IJA had used the Kitsuka, the Type 5 can­nons would be replaced with two Ho-155 30mm cannons. This may have been a stopgap or fallback if the IJA’s own Ki-201 Karyti failed to materialise. With the heavier weight the structure of the Kitsuka, including the landing gear, would have been strengthened. A fighter – bomber model was envisioned for the defini­tive interceptor by including a fitting for a single 500kg (1,1021b) or 800kg (1,7631b) bomb.

As originally planned, a model of the Kitsuka was proposed for shimpti missions. Similar to the Kitsuka as constructed, this version was to carry either a 500kg (1,1021b) bomb, a 250kg (551 lb) bomb or two Type 99 20mm cannons. With the latter, it could be assumed the can­nons would be used for self-defence and for fir­ing at the target before ramming the aircraft into the victim using any remaining fuel and ammunition as the secondary explosive ele­ment. A variant of this Kitsuka was to utilise a 200m (656ft) launch rail that Kugisho had been designing and which they expected to have ready for testing by September 1945. Using a rocket booster, the Kitsuka would leave the launch rail at 220km/h (137mph) at an acceler­ation of between three to four ‘g’.

In regards to the 724 Kokutai, with the end of the war they would never see their Kitsuka air­craft. It was planned that by November 1945 the unit would have been based near Yokosuka at a site along the Miura Peninsula, west of Tokyo Bay. It was expected that by then the unit would have received sixteen Kitsukas. In addition, the unit was to use one of the handfuls of Kawan – ishi El 5K1 Shiun (meaning ‘Violet Cloud’; code – named Norm by the Allies) reconnaissance floatplanes, which were removed from active service following their disastrous combat debut in 1944. The Shiun, operating from a nearby har­bour, would locate the shipping targets, mark them and then loiter in the area to broadcast radio signals. The Kitsukas would then be rapidly launched and, by means of the radio sig­nals received through the Kuruku system, attack the ships at low level with bombs and ramming tactics. Had the reconnaissance ver­sion of the Kitsuka gone into production, the 724 KokQtai was to receive it as a replacement for the far more vulnerable Shiun.

Finally, with the close of the war, none of the projected turbojet successors to the Ne20 would enter production. One prototype of the Ishikawajima Ne 130 had been completed by June 1945 but testing was unfinished by the time the war ended. Nakajima started devel­opment of the Ne230 in May 1945 and had three under construction by August 1945. How­ever, none of the engines were completed or tested. Mitsubishi was unable to construct a Ne 330 and so it remained on the design board.

A note about the use of the name Kitsuka as opposed to the more commonly used Kikka. Kitsuka is the proper translation of the kanji characters. However, it is pronounced ‘kikka’. Kikka was used in post-war reports as phonet­ically it approximated to Kitsuka and thus has become the accepted name of the aircraft. Neither name is incorrect. Also, some sources use the J9Y1 (or sometimes J9N1) designation for the Kitsuka. While logical for the intercep­tor version of the Kitsuka, there is no evidence in wartime Japanese sources to support the designation. One may also find the designation J8N1 used but this is not supported.

Helnkel HD 23 carrier fighter

In 1926, Aichi contracted Heinkel to design a carrier fighter for entry into a Navy competi­tion to replace the Mitsubishi Type 10 fighter then in service. Called the HD 23 by Heinkel, it was known as the Aichi Type-H Carrier Fighter in Japan. Two were built by 1927 and much emphasis was placed on the capability of the plane to ditch at sea, including jettison – able landing gear and the ability for the engine to stop the propeller in the horizontal position. However, performance-wise, the Aichi Type-H Carrier Fighter showed up poorly and lost the competition to Nakajima.

Heinkel HD 25 two-seat float plane

Licence-built in Japan as the Aichi Navy Type 2, this aircraft saw service on a number of heavy cruisers from 1926 onwards, though their service life was short due to the advent of catapult launched seaplanes. The few Aichi Navy Type 2 aircraft were then sold to the civilian market. Later, in 1930, three Type 2 aircraft were converted to transports for civilian use.

Heinkel HD 25 transport

Built as the AB-1, Aichi used the Heinkel HD 25 as the basis for their entry into a ‘made in Japan’ passenger/transport contest operated by the Aviation Bureau of the Department of Communications. The AB-1 could be con­verted to a seaplane if required and proved its worth going on to win the contest and seeing several years’ service in private hands.

Heinkel HD 26 single-seat float plane

A single example was built by Aichi (also as the Aichi Navy Type 2) while the Navy also acquired a Heinkel constructed HD 26. Both were tested in 1926, but like the two-seater, the model was made obsolete by catapults. Both aircraft were turned over for civilian use.

Heinkel HD 28 three-seat float plane

The Navy purchased one HD 28 from Heinkel in 1926. Tested by the Navy, problems with the Lorraine-Dietrich engine saw the HD 28 failing to meet expectations and in 1928 the Navy withdrew their interest in the design.

Heinkel HD 56 seaplane

To meet a 1929 Navy need for a catapult launched seaplane, Aichi once more turned to Heinkel and imported the HD 56. Meeting the needs of the Navy after modification, it was accepted into service in 1931 as the Aichi E3A1 beginning with the first deliveries out of an eventual total of 12 aircraft. The E3A1 saw combat during the Sino-Japanese conflict, operating from Jintsu-class cruisers. It did not, however, remain in service long, being replaced with superior aircraft. Some E3A1 seaplanes were retained by the Navy as train­ers with the remainder released to the civilian market.