Category Praxis Manned Spaceflight Log 1961-2006

The Next Steps

With the successful flight of STS-114 in July 2005 and the second Return-to-Flight mission of STS-121 in July 2006, NASA revised the Shuttle manifest pending the retirement of the vehicle in 2010. There is also another servicing mission planned for the Hubble Space Telescope in 2008.

Table 9.1. ISS Assembly Manifest

Launch

Date

Assembly

Flight

Launch

Vehicle

Element(s)

2006 Dec 14

12A

Discovery

STS-116

P5 Truss

SpaceHab single module Integrated Cargo Carrier (ICC)

2007 Feb 22

13A

Atlantis

STS-117

S3/S4 Truss with Photovoltaic Radiator 3rd set of solar arrays and batteries

2007 May 1

ATV1

Ariane 5

European Automated Transfer Vehicle

2007 Jun 11

13A.1

Endeavour

STS-118

SpaceHab single module S5 Truss

External Stowage Platform 3 (ESP 3)

2007 Aug 9

10A

Atlantis

STS-120

Node 2

Sidewall – Power and Data Grapple Fixture (PGDF)

2007 Oct

1E

Shuttle

STS-122

Columbus European laboratory Multi-Purpose Experiment Support Structure – Non-Deployable (MPESS-ND)

2007 Dec

1J/A

Shuttle

Kibo Japanese Experiment Logistics Module – Pressurised Section (ELM-PS)

Spacelab Pallet – Deployable 1 (SLP-D1) with Canadian Special Purpose Dextrous Manipulator, Dextre

2008 Feb

1J

Shuttle

Kibo Japanese Experiment Module – Pressurised Module (JEM-PM)

Japanese Remote Manipulator System (JEM RMS)

2008 Jun

15A

Shuttle

STS-119

S6 Truss

Fourth set of solar arrays and batteries

2008 Aug

ULF2

Shuttle

Multi-Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM)

2008 Oct

2J/A

Shuttle

Kibo Japanese Experiment Module Exposed Facility (JEM EF)

Kibo Japanese Experiment Logistics Module – Exposed Section (ELM-ES)

Spacelab Pallet – Deployable 2 (SLP-D2)

Dec 2008

3R

Proton

Multipurpose Laboratory Module with

European Robotic Arm (ERA)

Table 9.1 (cont.)

Launch

Assembly

Launch

Element(s)

Date

Flight

Vehicle

2009 Jan

17A

Shuttle

Multi-Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM) Lightweight Multi-Purpose Experiment Support Structure Carrier (LMC)

Three crew quarters, galley, second treadmill (TVIS2)

Crew Health Care System (CHeCS 2)

Establish Six Person Crew Capability

2009 Feb

HTV-1

H-IIA

Japanese H-II Transfer Vehicle

2009 April

ULF3

Shuttle

EXPRESS Logistics Carrier 1 (ELC 1) EXPRESS Logistics Carrier 2 (eLC 2)

2009 July

19A

Shuttle

Multi-Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM) Lightweight Multi-Purpose Experiment Support Structure Carrier (LMC)

2009 Oct

ULF4

Shuttle

EXPRESS Logistics Carrier 3 (ELC 3) EXPRESS Logistics Carrier 4 (ELC 4)

2010 Jan

20A

Shuttle

Node 3 with Cupola

2010 July

ULF5

Shuttle

EXPRESS Logistics Carrier 5 (ELC 5) EXPRESS Logistics Carrier 1 (eLC 1)

ISS Assembly Complete

Under Review

9R

Proton

Research Module

Dates listed are subject to change. There will continue to be additional Progress and Soyuz flights for crew transport, logistics and re-supply.

Manned variants

8K72K (Vostok 1961-3). This version featured an upper stage (Blok E) with a single RO-7 engine, burning LOX/kerosene with a thrust of 5.6 tons and a 430-second burn time. Used to launch the six manned Vostok missions, its design was not revealed to the west until it appeared at the 1967 Paris Air Show.

11A57 (Voskhod 1964-5). This was an improved variant of the Vostok launcher, with an upper stage powered by the RD-108 engine with a vacuum thrust of 30.4 tons and 240-second burn time. This was used to launch the two manned Voskhod spacecraft.

11A511 (Soyuz 1967-76). This version was developed from 1963 to specifically launch the Soyuz spacecraft. The upper stage (Blok I) had an RD-110 engine with a 30.4 ton thrust and 246-second burn time. These vehicles launched the early Soyuz missions, starting with Soyuz 1 in 1967. Its final use was for the Soyuz 23 spacecraft in 1976. With the Soyuz payload and launch shroud, this vehicle measured about 49.3 m (162 ft) in height.

11A511U (Soyuz-U). An upgraded variant of the standard Soyuz booster, this was first used for the launch ofSoyuz 16in 1974 and was in service for over 27 years. Itwas used for launching the Soyuz, Soyuz T and Soyuz TM variants, as well as the Progress and Progress M re-supply vessels. It was also used to deliver the Pirs facility to ISS in September 2001. This vehicle used improved engines, ground and support facilities, increasing the payload mass and orbital delivery altitude.

11AIIU2 (Soyuz U2). Further improvements to payload delivery mass led to this variant of launcher being used for the first time on a Soyuz launch with Soyuz T12 in July 1984. It was last used on Soyuz TM22, after which the production of Sintin (synthetic kerosene) for improved first-stage launch performance ceased in 1996.

Soyuz FG. Upgrades to the engines resulted in the RD-108A central core engine, which developed a vacuum thrust of 101,931 kg and had a 286-second burn time. The RD-107A engines provided a thrust of 104.1 tons and a 120-second burn time. Both engines burned LOX/kerosene. This variant was first used for manned launches on Soyuz TMA1 in October 2002 and is the variant currently in use.

Soviet lunar plans

The Soviet Union had an even more ambitious plan for a manned landing on the Moon. An N1 mega-booster would launch two cosmonauts to the Moon aboard a combined Soyuz orbiter-lander vehicle. After entering orbit, one cosmonaut would spacewalk from the orbiter to the attached lunar lander inside the upper stage and enter the lander. He would then separate the lander and descend to the surface, spending a few minutes on the ground planting a flag and collecting some rocks before heading back for a rendezvous with the mother ship, where he would spacewalk

back to the cabin. The orbiter would then fly home for a Soyuz-type landing. The N1 programme was a disaster, with catastrophic launch failures, and the Moon landing plan was simply over-ambitious. A series of unmanned Zond missions tested various elements of the circumlunar manned programme with varying success between 1968 and 1970, but the whole thing was left without a purpose after the Americans reached the Moon in 1969.

STS-4

Int. Designation

1982-O65A

Launched

27 June 1982

Launch Site

Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Landed

4 July 1982

Landing Site

Runway 22, Edwards Air Force Base, California

Launch Vehicle

OV-1O2 Columbia/ET-5/SRB A13; A14/SSME #1 2OO7; #2 2OO6; #3 2OO5

Duration

7 days 1 hr 9 min 31 sec

Callsign

Columbia

Objective

Fourth and final orbital flight test (OFT-4); first DoD classified payload

Flight Crew

MATTINGLY, Thomas Kenneth II, 46, USN, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: Apollo 16 (1972)

HARTSFIELD, Henry Warren “Hank” Jr., 48, USAF, pilot

Flight Log

The first military payload to fly aboard a US manned spacecraft was designated DoD – 82-1. Not much detail was released and because of this secrecy, the STS-4 mission marked a change in media relations. The openness of NASA was restricted by the Department of Defense. Conversations with the crew would be classified for most of the mission and photographs taken during it would be limited to those that did not show any classified hardware. STS-4, which was the first US mission to be flown by astronauts without a back-up crew, was not entirely classified because apart from the range of science and declassified payloads, the DoD-82-1 was known to be the Cirris cryogenic infrared radiance instrument to obtain spectral data on the exhausts of vehicles powered by rocket and air breathing engines, and an ultraviolet horizon scanner. Cirris would not perform well, because its lens cap didn’t come off!

The first on-time Shuttle launch, at 11: OOhrs local time, was handled extremely matter-of-factly by young Mark Hess, the NASA press officer, making his first launch commentary. Commander Ken Mattingly and his sidekick Hank Hartsfield sailed into 28.5° inclination orbit, the lowest for a manned space flight but one that would become fairly usual for a Shuttle mission, with a maximum altitude during the mission of 275 km (127 miles). This was still 7 km (4 miles) shorter than planned after the heavier than planned launch weight, caused by water under the heat shield tiles which had collected after a thunderstorm days before launch, and which resulted in an increased SSME burn time of 3 seconds and several OMS burns. In addition, the

STS-4

The STS-4 crew is greeted by President and Mrs Reagan after completing their mission on America’s 206th birthday

two SRBs were lost in the Atlantic rather than recovered as planned, as a result of parachute failures.

The first US commercial payload in space, more than nine experiments from Utah University crammed inside Getaway Special (GAS) canisters in the payload bay, began operating together with over 20 others packed aboard the busy Columbia orbiter. The mission seemed to have been a spectacular success, despite the Cirris lens cap saga, which Mattingly tried to knock off with the RMS and even suggested that he make a spacewalk to rectify. He did try out the EVA suit in the airlock as planned, however. President Reagan was waiting at Edwards Air Force Base to greet the returning crew, which landed on the concrete runway 22 at a speed of 374 kph (232 mph), at main gear touchdown time of 7 days 1 hour 9 minutes 40 seconds. The Independence Day celebrations seemed complete amid the patriotic fervour but were left a little damp by the President’s lacklustre support for a space station. The Shuttle was rather too enthusiastically declared “operational” as from its next flight.

Milestones

86th manned space flight

35th US manned space flight

4th Shuttle flight

4th flight of Columbia

1st US manned military space flight

1st US manned space flight without a back-up crew

1st manned space flight to carry an official commercial payload

Подпись:

Подпись: SOYUZ T7
Подпись: 1982-080A 19 August 1982 Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 27 August 1982 (in Soyuz T5) 112 km northeast of Arkalyk R7 (11A511U); spacecraft serial number (7K-ST) #12L 7 days 21hrs 52 min 24 sec Dnieper (Dnieper) All-Soviet visiting mission to Salyut 7; Soyuz exchange mission

Flight Crew

POPOV, Leonid Ivanovich, 36, Soviet Air Force, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: Soyuz 35 (1980); Soyuz 40 (1981)

SEREBROV, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich, 38, civilian, flight engineer SAVITSKAYA, Svetlana Yevgenyevna, 34, civilian, research engineer

Flight Log

A Soyuz with a difference lit up the Baikonur skies at 23: 12hrs local time on 19 August, when a crew of three lifted off for a visiting mission to Salyut 7. This crew included the first female in space for 19 years, since the first, Valentina Tereshkova, was launched. While Tereshkova’s mission was mere propaganda, the inclusion of Svetlana Savitskaya, bona fide test pilot and a world aerobatic champion, seemed logical and acceptable – except that she just happened to beat the first American female, Sally Ride, into space.

Amid much ballyhoo and publicity, as well as live TV coverage, Savitskaya and her two seemingly anonymous male colleagues docked with Salyut about 25 hours after launch. The Salyut 7 resident, Valentin Lebedev, gave her an apron and told her to start work. Savitskaya’s main task was not to do the washing up, but to operate a series of life sciences experiments to study the cardiovascular system, motion sickness and eye movement. She also operated an electrophoresis experiment to separate cells. Popov, Serebrov and Savitskaya landed in Soyuz T5 at T + 7 days 21 hours 52 minutes 24 seconds, 112 km (70 miles) northeast of Arkalyk. Maximum altitude reached during the 51.6° mission was 315 km (196 miles).

Milestones

87th manned space flight 52nd Soviet manned space flight

45th Soyuz manned space flight 6th Soyuz T manned space flight

Подпись: Berezovoy and Savitskaya in Salyut 7

1st manned space flight by mixed female and male crew

Int. Designation

1985-063A

Launched

29 July 1985

Launch Site

Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Landed

6 August 1985

Landing Site

Runway 23, Edwards Air Force Base, California

Launch Vehicle

OV-099 Challenger/ET-19/SRB BI-017/SSME #1 2023; #2 2020; #3 2021

Duration

7 days 22 hrs 45 min 26 sec

Callsign

Challenger

Objective

Spacelab 2 research programme; verification of Spacelab Igloo/pallet configuration

Flight Crew

FULLERTON, Charles Gordon, 48, USAF, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-3 (1982)

BRIDGES, Roy Dunbard Jr., 42, USAF, pilot HENIZE, Karl Gordon, 58, civilian, mission specialist 1 MUSGRAVE, Franklin Story, 49, civilian, mission specialist 2 ENGLAND, Anthony Wayne, 43, civilian, mission specialist 3 ACTON, Loren Wilbur, 49, civilian, payload specialist 1 BARTOE, John-David, 40, civilian, payload specialist 2

Flight Log

The highly esoteric astronomical observation Spacelab 2 science payload had been proposed a decade before and the mission itself had been in preparation for over five years and, at last, 51-F was ready. On 12 July, on Pad 39A all three main engines were up and running with three seconds to go before lift-off, when the hydrogen chamber coolant valve on engine 2 failed to close. A computer ordered a redundant command to be made but mission rules dictated a launch pad abort, called an RCLS abort. As an abort had already occurred on STS 41-D, the event was not greeted with so much drama, although to the crew, which included Karl Henize (who was waiting to be the new oldest man in space after an 18-year wait for a flight), it was a bitter disappointment.

It was also a disappointment to the scientists, because a later launch in less than perfect lighting conditions, as there would be more moon shine, would degrade three of the thirteen primary experiments, mounted on pallets in the payload bay. Challenger tried again on 29 July, and until T + 4 minutes 55 seconds, the launch went well, after a 1 hour 37 minute hold due to incorrect telemetry. The crew had a close eye on the centre engine which was apparently overheating early after lift-off and watched

Подпись: Humorous crew photo by the STS 51-F crew. Clockwise from top: Acton, England, Fullerton, Bartoe, Musgrave, Bridges and Henize

helplessly as an indicator showed it had shut down, just 33 seconds after Challenger would have had to have performed a transatlantic abort, possibly ditching into the sea and sinking. As it was, an abort-to-orbit was ordered, and at the flick of a switch commander Fullerton initiated a new flight programme. Later, another engine appeared to be overheating and if the crew had not been told to inhibit what was suspected to have been an over-zealous sensor, a worse abort would have resulted.

Challenger struggled into a 49.5° orbit and its OMS engines placed it at a peak altitude of 276 km (171 miles), much lower than had been planned for the Spacelab mission. The use of the OMS engines also restricted flight experiments using the free – flying Plasma Diagnostic Package payload. Nonetheless, the Shuttle had at least reached orbit, in which the busy crew worked in two 12-hour shifts on the vast array of science experiments. These included the Instrument Pointing System (IPS), which did not quite achieve its advertised 1 arc-second of pointing accuracy.

Despite the abort-to-orbit situation, the significant mission re-planning allowed the flight to be deemed a success. As well as verification of the IPS, the flight also featured part of the modular Spacelab system called the Igloo, which was placed at the front of the three-pallet “train” in the payload bay and designed to provide in-flight support to the instruments that were installed on each of the pallets. The main objective of STS 51-F was to verify the Igloo, pallet and IPS system and its interface with the orbiter, in addition to monitoring the immediate environment around the orbiter, which may or may not interfere in the gathering of scientific data. The experiment programme for the flight encompassed life sciences, plasma physics,
astronomy, high-energy astrophysics, solar physics, atmospheric physics, and tech­nology research. This latter category included an evaluation of new beverage contain­ers by the crew. Coke and Pepsi cans, with specially adapted mouth dispensers to both retain the carbonated drinks’ condition and prevent it leaking into the cabin, were evaluated. The system worked but the taste did not, and according to the astronauts who tried the drinks, having extra gas in the digestive system when in space is not the most enjoyable feeling or experience.

Challenger’s performance was so good that an extra day was offered to the crew, which turned it down and came home to runway 23 at Edwards Air Force Base, at T + 7 days 22 hours 45 minutes 26 seconds.

Milestones

108th manned space flight

50th US manned space flight

19th Shuttle flight

8th flight of Challenger

1st Spacelab pallet only science mission

Henize becomes oldest person to fly in space (58)

. SOYUZ TM10

Flight Crew

MANAKOV, Gennady Mikhailovich, 40, Soviet Air Force, commander STREKALOV, Gennady Mikhailovich, 49, civilian, flight engineer, 4th mission Previous missions: Soyuz T3 (1980), Soyuz T8 (1983), Soyuz T10-1 (1983); Soyuz T11 (1984)

Flight Log

The two Gennadys comprised the seventh Mir resident crew and were launched with four live Japanese quails for the Inkubator 2 experiment on board Mir. They would be used in “adaptation to weightlessness” experiments. During the two-day flight to Mir, one of the older quails “laid” an egg and this was returned to Earth with the TM9 crew. The TM10 spacecraft docked with the rear port of Kvant 1 on 3 August. Following the period of handover from the TM9 crew, which included a rather extensive review of where everything was stored, the new crew had a relatively quiet residency aboard the station. Their mission had been delayed ten days to allow the Mir-6 crew to complete their commissioning of systems aboard the Kristall module.

During their residency aboard Mir, Manakov and Strekalov had the primary engineering task of rewiring the base block’s power supply, as well as attempting to repair the Kvant 2 EVA hatch that had been damaged during the previous mission. They would also continue the wide programme of scientific work aboard the complex. After a long and frustrating wait, Strekalov finally achieved his goal of a long – duration mission, having previously flown to Salyut 6 and 7 on short visiting missions. He was also a hardened veteran space explorer, having been a crew member of the 1983 Soyuz T8 docking abort and the T10-1 launch pad abort. In boarding Mir, he became one of the first cosmonauts to visit three separate space stations. The only EVA of the mission had been planned for 19 October, but Strekalov developed a head cold, delaying it until 30 October. When the two cosmonauts inspected the damaged

. SOYUZ TM10

The crew of Soyuz TM10: Manakov (left) and Strekalov

hinge plate they were scheduled to replace, it was found to be deformed beyond repair. Instead, they installed a special latch to ensure that the hatch could be closed and used until fully repaired. With the repair task not deemed to be urgent, it was deferred to the next resident crew, who would fit a replacement unit. The EVA lasted 3 hours 45 minutes.

During this mission, the station was supplied by two Progress cargo craft. Progress M4 docked on 17 August, delivering power cables and TV equipment for the upcoming Japanese commercial mission. Before it was undocked, the crew attached a small experiment to the docking assembly, which was activated on 17 September when the ferry undocked. During station keeping, about 100 metres from Mir, artificial plasma was created around the Progress and this was filmed by the cosmonauts. Progress M5, which arrived on 29 September, carried more TV equipment for the Japanese mission. It also featured the first Raduga recoverable capsule system that could return about 150 kg of experiment material, the trade-off being a reduction in the cargo capacity of the vehicle. The Raduga capsule featured a truncated cone that would eject from the descending Orbital Module at about 120 km, just prior to the module’s fiery destruction in the atmosphere. At 15,000 metres, air pressure sensors successfully triggered the parachute deployment and Raduga was successfully retrieved. It returned 115 kg of payload.

The 7th expedition completed their mission on 10 December, returning to Earth in the TM10 capsule along with the first Japanese cosmonaut, TV journalist Toyohiro Akiyama, who had arrived with the 8th expedition crew in Soyuz TM11 on 4 December.

Milestones

134th manned space flight

69th Soviet/Russian manned space flight

62nd Soyuz manned space flight

9th Soyuz TM manned space flight

17th Soviet and 40th flight with EVA operations

7th Mir resident crew

1st use of the Raduga return capsule

Strekalov celebrates his 50th birthday in orbit (28 October)

. SOYUZ TM15

Flight Crew

SOLOVYOV, Anatoly Yakovlevich, 44, Russian Air Force, commander,

3rd mission

Previous missions: Soyuz TM5 (1988); Soyuz TM9 (1990)

AVDEYEV, Sergei Vasilyevich, 36, civilian, flight engineer

TOGNINI, Michel Ange Charles, 42, French Air Force, cosmonaut researcher

Flight Log

The Kurs system failed once again during the automated docking approach of Soyuz TM15 to Mir, forcing commander Solovyov to conduct a manual docking. During Tognini’s twelve days on Mir, a programme of ten experiments were com­pleted, encompassing medical and technological experiments under the French Antares programme. This was the third French flight to a space station, but the first commercial one. The earlier flights had proven so productive that CNES had arranged a series of missions every two years, building up a valuable database of orbital operations experience that could be applied to future programmes, such as the Freedom Space Station or dedicated French Shuttle/Spacelab missions that were under consideration (but which did not materialise). Tognini would return with the EO-11 crew in TM14.

The two Russian cosmonauts continued the rotation of resident crew teams on Mir, operating the onboard instruments during their work shifts, and ensuring that some would continue to operate autonomously while they were busy doing other things or were sleeping. Progress M14 docked on 18 August and its cargo included a 700 kg Vynosnaya Dvigatyelnaya Ustanovka (Outer Engine Unit), which was located in place of the tanker unit on the supply vessel. After it was automatically unloaded by commands from the ground on 2 September, the cosmonauts’ task would be to install

. SOYUZ TM15

The international Soyuz TM15 crew of Tognini (left), Solovyov (centre) and Avdeyev

it on top of the Sofora girder that was mounted on Kvant. This new unit would improve the attitude control capabilities of the complex. The cosmonauts’ first excursion (3 September, 3 hours 56 minutes) saw them relocate the VDU unit from Progress to the worksite and prepare the girder for accepting the device. Four days later, the crew were back at the worksite (7 September, 5 hours 8 minutes) and bent the Sofora girder at a hinge point, one-third of the way down its length, to make the area where the unit would be placed more accessible. They fitted a communications cable along the girder and also took the opportunity to remove the USSR flag (or what was left of it after orbital debris and UV deterioration had taken their toll) that had been deployed the previous year. Four days later, the crew went outside for their third EVA (11 September, 5 hours 44 minutes) to attach the VDU atop the Sofora girder, which they then straightened to its full length. The final EVA of this residency (15 September, 3 hours 33 minutes) saw the cosmonauts relocate the Kurs antenna to the Kristall module. This would enable the next crew to arrive (aboard Soyuz TM16) to dock there, as the Progress M15 spacecraft would still be attached at the aft port when the new crew arrived. Solovyov and Avdeyev also took the opportunity to remove solar cells and material samples from the exterior of the station for return to Earth.

Towards the end of their residency, the crew used the base block airlock to eject a 16.5 kg satellite, called MAK-2, which would study the characteristics of the iono­sphere. On 8 November, there was a “near miss” when the 55 kg Cosmos 1508 satellite (launched in 1983) passed within 300 metres of Mir. The end of the Progress M14 mission also saw the return of the fifth Raduga (Rainbow) payload recovery system, carrying approximately 150 kg of samples from Mir back to Earth.

Milestones

152nd manned space flight

74th Russian manned space flight

22nd Russian and 47th flight with EVA operations

15th Soyuz flight to Mir

12th main Mir crew

10th visiting crew (Tognini)

67th Soyuz manned mission 14th Soyuz TM manned mission Avdeyev celebrates his 37th birthday in space (1 Jan) Solovyov celebrates his 45th birthday in space (16 Jan)

Int. Designation

1994-020A

Launched

9 April 1994

Launch Site

Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Landed

20 April 1994

Landing Site

Runway 22, Edwards AFB, California

Launch Vehicle

OV-105 Endeavour/ET-63/SRB BI-063/SSME #1 2028;

#2 2033; #3 2018

Duration

11 days 5 hrs 49 min 30 sec

Call sign

Endeavour

Objective

Operation of the Space Radar Laboratory (SRL)-1

Flight Crew

GUTIERREZ, Sidney McNeill, 42, USAF, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-40 (1990)

CHILTON, Kevin Patrick, 39, USAF, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-49 (1992)

APT, Jerome “Jay”, 44, civilian, mission specialist 1, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-37 (1991); STS-47 (1992)

CLIFFORD, Michael Richard Uram, 41, USAF, mission specialist 2, 2nd mission

Previous mission: STS-53 (1992)

GODWIN, Linda Maxine, 41, civilian, mission specialist 3, payload commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-37 (1991)

JONES, Thomas David, 39, civilian, mission specialist 4

Flight Log

In 1991, NASA expanded its many-faceted programme of Earth studies into a global examination of how Earth’s systems (air, water, land and life) interact with each other and affect or influence changes in the global climate. The new programme was designated Mission to Planet Earth and was divided into phases. The initial phase began in 1991, using satellites such as UARS (deployed from STS-48) and dedicated Shuttle missions (such as the ATLAS series) supported by airborne and ground-based studies. Part of this first phase was the Space Radar Laboratory series. Originally a programme of three missions, STS-59 was the first of the eventual two that actually flew.

The primary advantage of radar imaging is the ability to gather data over virtually any region of the Earth regardless of weather conditions. A similar programme was undertaken by the Magellan probe at the shrouded planet Venus. Observational

STS-59

Mission specialist Tom Jones monitors a number of cameras on the aft night deck which are fixed on targets of opportunity in support of the SRL instruments in the payload bay

imaging radar had been carried previously on STS-2 in 1981 (SIR-A) and STS 41-G in 1984 (SIR-B), and it was the latest variety (SIR-C) that was carried aboard STS-59. The system comprised C-Band (6 cm wavelength) and L-band (23 cm wavelength) radars – four in total – with separate horizontally (H) and vertically (V) polarised units for both bands, and steered electronically. In addition, the mission carried X-SAR, a mechanically-pointed single radar unit (X-band, 3 cm wavelength). There was also an experiment that analysed ocean radar data supplied by SIR-C, as well as MAOS, a carbon monoxide monitoring, sensing and Earth photography package that had flown previously on STS-2 and STS 41-G.

The 7 April launch of STS-59 was postponed for a day at the T — 27 hour mark in order to facilitate an inspection of the metal vanes inside the SSME high-pressure oxidiser pre-burner pumps. The 8 April launch was scrubbed due to bad weather, with low clouds and high crosswinds at the SLF and cloud around the launch pad, but Endeavour launched without incident the following day. Once in orbit, the spacecraft was configured for orbital operations and the crew split into their two shifts, with the Red Shift (Gutierrez, Chilton and Godwin) starting their sleep period and the Blue Shift (Apt, Clifford and Jones) commencing the first series of data gathering. They worked from the aft flight deck as the mission carried no Spacelab or SpaceHab module. After some initial set-up problems, the information came streaming in and was stored on VCR data cassettes. There were 180 such cassettes aboard the Shuttle, enough to support the planned 50 hours of data collection while covering an estimated 50 million square km of the Earth.

This was an international mission, with 49 science investigators and over 100 scientists from 13 nations making up the international science team. The mission focused on the “dry season”, with SRL-2 (STS-68) planned to cover the “wet season” later in the year. This allowed the scientists to compare data from the same sites under different global climate conditions. STS-59 obtained over 133 hours of data (32 terabits, or 32 trillion bits). With SIR-C/X-SAR eventually examining approximately 70 million km of the Earth – representing 12 per cent of the Earth’s total surface and 25 per cent of its land masses – there was enough data to fill 20,000 encyclopaedic volumes. The data-gathering operations were the equivalent of 45 TV stations operat­ing at the same time. Even with advances in digital processing, it would still take five months to process a complete set of images and another nine months of detailed processing after that. At the close of the mission the crew had imaged over 400 sites, including 19 primary observation sites (called super-sites) in Brazil, Michigan, North Carolina and Central Europe.

The crew also found time to work on a variety of secondary and mid-deck payloads and to use the SAREX equipment to talk with both the Russian cosmonauts on Mir and with US astronauts Norman Thagard and Bonnie Dunbar, who were training at TsPK in Moscow. STS-59 also carried three GAS candidate experiments, sponsored by researchers in France, Japan and New Mexico. Perhaps most impor­tantly, the mission also carried the Toughened Uni-piece Fibrous Insulation (TUFI), an improved Thermal Protection System (TPS) tile. Scheduled for a six-flight evalu­ation on all four orbiters, if successful, it was hoped that this fibrous insulation would prove more resilient to impacts in specific areas of the orbiter, such as between the engines, near the landing gear doors and around the orbital manoeuvring thrusters. Several of these new tiles were placed on the base heat shield of Endeavour between the three main engines, for evaluation during the flight and primarily during entry. Post-flight examination revealed no damage on the six tiles installed for the test. The tests ultimately proved successful and TUFI was added to the TPS on the Shuttle from 1996.

Two landing opportunities at Kennedy were cancelled on 19 April due to bad weather. A third chance of bringing Endeavour home to the Cape on 20 April was also waived off, in favour of landing at Edwards.

Milestones

169th manned space flight

92nd US manned space flight

62nd Shuttle mission

6th flight of OV-105

1st flight of SRL payload configuration

1st flight of TUFI – improved thermal protection tile samples

. SOYUZ TM24

Flight Crew

KORZUN, Valery Grigoryevich, 46, Russian Air Force, commander KALERI, Alexandr Yuriyevich, 40, civilian, flight engineer, 2nd mission Previous mission: Soyuz TM14 (1992)

ANDRE-DESHAYS, Claudie, 39, civilian, cosmonaut researcher

Flight Log

The original crew for this mission were supposed to have been Expedition 22 crew members Gennady Manakov (commander) and Pavel Vinogradov (flight engineer), along with French cosmonaut Claudie Andre-Deshays. However, just one week before launch, Manakov failed a regular medical check and the back-up crew of Korzun and Kaleri took the place of the Russian prime crew. Since she was not part of the main crew, Andre-Deshays was able to remain on the mission. The change did not have much effect on Shannon Lucid, who was nearing the end of her stay on Mir, but the next US resident astronaut, John Blaha, had not trained with either Korzun or Kaleri. This would prove a challenging hurdle for the American to overcome after he replaced Lucid on Mir in September.

The French Cassiopee programme included cardiovascular and neurosensory investigations. There was also a technology experiment that recorded vibrations aboard the station while there were more than the normal resident crew aboard, as well as a materials-processing experiment. After two weeks aboard Mir, Andre – Deshays returned with the EO-21 crew, leaving Lucid to complete her residency with the new cosmonauts prior to the arrival of Blaha on STS-79. Andre-Deshays com­mented that two weeks was nowhere near sufficient time to adjust to life on Mir and to complete all her experiment programme, but with two more French long-duration visits already booked, this was not expected to be a problem for future French cosmonauts.

. SOYUZ TM24

The Soyuz TM24 crew of Kaleri (left), Korzun and Andre-Deshays

On 7 September, Lucid surpassed Kondakova’s record for the longest female space flight. Ten days later, with her return Shuttle flight already in space, she surpassed Reiter’s 179-day record for a visiting cosmonaut. When Blaha took over, he continued the programme of experiments started by Lucid, but also brought some new ones. During his stay on Mir, it appeared he was enjoying his residency, and it was only after he came home that he revealed it had been a difficult mission. He was replaced on Mir in January 1997 by Jerry Linenger, who would remain with the EO-22 crew for a month before the next resident crew took over.

The EO-22 cosmonauts completed two EVAs during their stay on Mir; the first on 2 December lasted 5 hours 58 minutes, and the second, a week later, lasted 6 hours 38 minutes. Their work outside included the completion of MCSA cable installation. They also relocated the Rapana girder to the top of the new Stombus girder on the underside of Kvant and on their second EVA, they had to reinstall antennae they had dislodged during their first excursion. Back inside the station, in addition to the regular maintenance and housekeeping chores, the cosmonauts continued the research programme and assisted their various visitors with their research objectives.

One of the more challenging events at the end of their residency was the fire on 24 February 1997, which was the result of a split chemical burner in the Vika unit in Kvant 1. The use of “candles” to supplement the oxygen output of the Elektron regeneration system was typical when more than three cosmonauts were aboard Mir. But this time, the unit had split and released oxygen into the electronics, causing a jet of flame to shoot across the area. For an hour or so, the crew (by this point including Linenger) wore oxygen masks until the station’s filtration system finally began dissipating the thick black smoke. The crew reported some eye irritation, but no lingering damage was found from smoke inhalation, although filtration masks were still worn for a few days afterwards as a precaution. The faulty canister was stored in the Soyuz TM24 Descent Module for return to Earth and post-flight examination. Both EO-22 cosmonauts made the return journey with German cosmonaut Ewald.

Milestones

191st manned space flight

83rd Russian manned space flight

76th manned Soyuz mission

23rd manned Soyuz TM mission

29th Russian and 63rd flight with EVA operations

4th French long-duration mission (16 days)

Подпись:

Подпись: STS-79
Подпись: 1996-057A 16 September 1996 Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 26 September 1996 Runway 15, Shuttle Landing Facility, KSC, Florida OV-104 Atlantis/ET-82/SRB BI-083/SSME #1 2012; #2 2031; #3 2033 10 days 3 hrs 18 min 26 sec Blaha 128 days 5hrs 27 min 55 sec (landed on STS-81) Atlantis 4th Shuttle-Mir docking mission; delivery of the NASA-3 Mir EO-22 crew member (Blaha) and return of NASA-2 Mir EO-21 crew member (Lucid)

Flight Crew

READDY, William Francis, 44, civilian, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-42 (1992); STS-51 (1993)

WILCUTT, Terrence Wade, 46, USMC, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-68 (1994)

APT, Jerome “Jay”, 47, civilian, mission specialist 1, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-37 (1991); STS-47 (1992); STS-59 (1994)

AKERS, Thomas Dale, 45, USAF, mission specialist 2, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-41 (1990); STS-49 (1992); STS-61 (1993)

WALZ, Carl Erwin, 41, USAF, mission specialist 3, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-51 (1993); STS-65 (1994)

NASA-3 Mir crew member up only:

BLAHA, John Elmer, 54, USAF, mission specialist 4, EO-22 cosmonaut researcher, NASA board engineer 3, 5th mission

Previous missions: STS-29 (1989); STS-33 (1989); STS-43 (1991); STS-58 (1993) NASA-2 Mir crew member down only:

LUCID, Shannon Wells, 53, civilian PhD, mission specialist 4, EO-21 cosmonaut researcher, NASA board engineer 2, 5th mission Previous missions: STS 51-G (1985); STS-34 (1989); STS-43 (1991); STS-58 (1993)

Flight Log

During her six-month stay on Mir, Shannon Lucid had conducted research in advanced technology, Earth sciences, fundamental biology, human life sciences,

. SOYUZ TM24

Carl Walz totes a bag carrying an Orlan DMA Unit #18 spacesuit brought back to Earth for analysis. Other stowage bags and sample return are shown in the frame

microgravity research and space sciences. She also won admiration for keeping cheerful despite delays in getting her home, firstly for the technical problems with the SRBs, and then for weather problems with two hurricanes. She kept track of the time on Mir by wearing pink socks each Sunday, and relieved any boredom by reading several books. Her daughter had given her one novel, but she had not included the sequel, which was a little frustrating to the orbiting astronaut.

The original 31 July launch of STS-79 was delayed when the two SRBs were swapped as the adhesives used on them were the same as that on STS-78, where a hot – gas path into the J-joints on the motor field joints was discovered. The SRB set intended for STS-80, which used the older type of adhesive, was fitted to STS-79 while Atlantis was back in the VAB due to the weather threat from Hurricane Bertha. The new launch, set for 12 September, was further delayed to 16 September when Atlantis was rolled back to the VAB a second time due to the threat of Hurricane

Fran. The third launch attempt occurred on time, and though APU 2 powered down prematurely 13 minutes into the flight, mission management deemed it safe to continue with a nominal full-term mission.

The docking of STS-79 with Mir occurred on FD 3 (18 September) and a few hours after opening the hatches, Lucid and Blaha exchanged places, with Blaha becoming a member of the Mir resident crew (EO-22) and Lucid replacing him as MS4 on the Shuttle crew. During the five days of joint operations, over 1,600 kg of supplies were transferred to the space station, including food, water and three new experiments. About 900 kg of material was transferred back to the Shuttle, including experiment samples and unwanted equipment.

The crew also operated three experiments that remained in the Shuttle during their stay at Mir. One was an extreme translation furnace that allowed space-based processing up to 1,600°C. The second was a commercial protein crystal growth experiment, and the third was the Mechanics of Granular Materials experiment designed to study the behaviour of cohesionless granular material, which was par­ticularly applicable to understanding how the surface of the Earth responds during earthquakes and landslides. The vernier jets of Atlantis were used near the end of the mission to lower the Shuttle’s orbit slightly. This was another test of operations planned for the upcoming Hubble service mission planned for 1997, in which the jets could refine and raise the orbit of the telescope while it was still in the payload bay.

When Lucid was approached by the team assigned to carry her off the Shuttle after her six-month mission, she dismissed them, determining to walk of the vehicle herself. This she managed to do, walking (with some assistance) to the Crew Transfer Vehicle.

Milestones

192nd manned space flight

109th US manned space flight

79th Shuttle mission

17th flight of Atlantis

4th Shuttle-Mir docking

6th SpaceHab mission (1st double module)

1st US resident crew exchange

New female world space flight endurance record (Lucid) 1st double rollback to VAB

Подпись:

Подпись: STS-80
Подпись: 1996-065A 19 November 1996 Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 7 December 1996 Runway 33, Shuttle Landing Facility, KSC, Florida OV-102 Columbia/ET-80/SRB BI-084/SSME #1 2032; #2 2026; #3 2029 17 days 15hrs 53 min 18 sec Columbia Wake Shield Facility 3/ORFEUS-SPAS II

Flight Crew

COCKRELL, Kenneth Dale, 46, civilian, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-56 (1993); STS-69 (1995)

ROMINGER, Kent Vernon, 40, USN, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-73 (1995)

JERNIGAN, Tamara Elizabeth, 37, civilian, mission specialist 1, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-40 (1991); STS-52 (1992); STS-67 (1995)

JONES, Thomas David, 41, civilian, mission specialist 2, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-59 (1994); STS-68 (1994)

MUSGRAVE, Story Franklin, 61, civilian, mission specialist 3, 6th mission Previous missions: STS-6 (1983); STS 51-F (1985); STS-33 (1989); STS-44 (1991); STS-61 (1993)

Flight Log

The original launch date for this mission of 31 October was slipped to 8 November due both to the removal of its SRBs to the STS-79 mission, and as a precaution due to concerns over Hurricane Fran. Engineers wanted more time to analyse the booster nozzles from STS-79 and with a 13 November Atlas launch planned, STS-80 was rescheduled for 15 November. Although the Atlas launch was scrubbed, STS-80 actually slipped further, to 19 November, in order to clear the bad weather that was predicted to lie around the Cape for several days. A three-minute delay to the launch was caused by concerns over hydrogen conditions in the aft engine compart­ment and when the SRBs were examined post-retrieval, they indicated some erosion – although far less than on STS-79.

The mission was a successful demonstration of the deployment and retrieval of two separate free-flying research spacecraft. The ORFEUS-SPAS II was deployed on FD 1 and became a two-week independent mission before retrieval on FD 15. The mission of the satellite was devoted to astronomical observations at very short

. SOYUZ TM24

MS Tom Jones uses the controls at the aft flight deck of Columbia to conduct tests with the captured WSF, seen though the window on the end of the RMS at frame centre wavelengths, using three primary scientific instruments and a secondary payload. The primary instruments were the ORFEUS 2.4 m focal length telescope, the Far UV spectrograph and the Extreme UV Spectrograph. The secondary payload was the Interstellar Medium Absorption Profile Spectrograph. The objective was to investi­gate the nature of hot stellar atmospheres and the cooling mechanisms of white dwarf stars, to determine the nature of accretion disks around collapsed stars, to investigate supernova remnants and interstellar media, and to examine potential star-forming regions. During the two-week mission, no significant problems were reported and all mission goals were achieved. Some 422 observations of about 150 astronomical objects were conducted, including the Moon, nearby stars, distant stars in the Milky Way, stars in other galaxies, active galaxies and quasar 3C273. With more sensitive instruments giving better quality data, almost twice as much information and data was obtained than on the first ORFEUS flight.

On FD 4 the WSF-3 was deployed. This time it was highly successful and achieved the maximum seven growths of thin film semi-conductor material, with the satellite performing almost flawlessly. It was retrieved during FD 7 for return to Earth. As with most Shuttle missions, the flight also carried a range of mid-deck and payload bay experiments that formed part of the secondary payloads and objectives.

Two planned six-hour EVAs by Jernigan (EV1) and Jones (EV2), designed to gather further knowledge and experience in preparation for the ISS programme, had to be abandoned when a stuck EVA hatch thwarted attempts to leave the airlock during EVA 1. Despite crew attempts during the mission to discover the cause, it was not until Columbia was back on the ground that engineers discovered that a small screw had become loose in the internal assembly and had lodged in an actuator, the gearbox-type device that operated the linkage to secure the hatch. When a new actuator was installed, the hatch worked perfectly. Though unable to complete the EVAs, the crew did still manage to evaluate a new pistol grip tool – resembling a hand-held drill – in the mid-deck during the mission.

The two-day waive-off for landing due to weather conditions in Florida resulted in this mission becoming the longest in Shuttle history and gave the crew an extra opportunity to look at the view out of the window. For Musgrave, this was particu­larly poignant, as this would be his last flight. He was fully appreciative of the chance to take a leisurely view of the Earth from orbit, knowing he would not be returning for a seventh mission. A condition of his being able to fly this mission was that he would retire from the active flight list when it was over. Musgrave set a record of six space Shuttle flights (equalling John Young’s career space flight record of Gemini, Apollo and Shuttle flights) and became the oldest person in space at the age of 61. He also became the only astronaut to fly on each of the five Shuttles capable of orbital flight, including twice on Challenger.

Milestones

193rd manned space flight

110th US manned space flight

80th Shuttle mission

21st flight of Columbia

New Shuttle mission duration record

3rd flight of Wake Shield Facility

Musgrave becomes the oldest person in space, aged 61