Category Praxis Manned Spaceflight Log 1961-2006

STS-55

Int. Designation

1993-027A

Launched

26 April 1993

Launch Site

Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Landed

6th May 1993

Landing Site

Runway 22, Edwards AFB, California

Launch Vehicle

OV-102 Columbia/ET-56/SRB BI-057/SSME #1 3031; #2 2109; #3 2029

Duration

9 days 23 hrs 39 min 59 sec

Call sign

Columbia

Objective

Operation of the Spacelab D2 research programme located in the Long Module configuration

Flight Crew

NAGEL, Steven Ray, 47, USAF, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: STS 51-G (1985), STS 61-A (1985); STS-37 (1991) HENRICKS, Terence Thomas “Tom”, 41, USAF, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-44 (1991)

ROSS, Jerry Lynn, 45, USAF, mission specialist 1, payload commander, 4th mission

Previous missions: STS 61-B (1985); STS-27 (1988); STS-37 (1991) PRECOURT, Charles Joseph, 37, USAF, mission specialist 2 HARRIS Jr., Bernard Anthony, 36, civilian, mission specialist 3 WALTER, Ulrich, 38, civilian, German payload specialist 1 SCHLEGEL, Hans William, 41, civilian, German payload specialist

Flight Log

Getting STS-55 off the ground proved to be one of the more frustrating tasks of the Shuttle programme. The launch was originally set for late February 1993 but slipped back after problems arose with the turbine blade-tip seal retainers in the high-pressure oxidiser turbo pumps of the SSMEs. The option chosen was to replace the turbo­pumps at the pad, pushing the launch back to 14 March. This new launch date slipped when a hydraulic flex hose burst during a Flight Readiness Test. All twelve lines were removed and three of them had to be replaced before they could all be reinstalled. The revised 21 March launch was delayed by 24 hours due to a one-day delay in the launch of a preceding Delta II mission. Then, at T — 3 seconds on 22 March, the launch was aborted again by orbiter computers, this time because the #3 engine had failed to ignite. The third pad abort in the programme (the others being STS 41-D in 1984 and STS 51-F in 1985) was later traced to contamination during manufacture that had caused overpressure and precluded full engine ignition. All three engines were

STS-55

German PS Walter works at the fluid physics experiment in the Spacelab D-2 science module aboard Columbia

replaced with spare units. The next attempt, on 24 April, was scrubbed when one of three IMUs gave possibly faulty readings and a 48-hour delay was scheduled to allow the removal and replacement of the IMU. Finally, on 26 April, the launch proceeded without incident. Following the launch, Pad A was scheduled for a period of refurb­ishment and modification which would last until February 1994.

The second German Spacelab mission featured 88 experiments in materials and life sciences, technology applications, Earth observations, astronomy and atmo­spheric physics. The crew would work in two shifts. The Red Shift comprised Precourt, Harris and Schlegel, while Nagel, Ross, Henricks and Walter worked the Blue Shift. After all the dramas of getting the mission off the ground, the crew encountered further problems in orbit. An overheating orbiter refrigerator/freezer unit in the mid-deck necessitated the use of a back-up to store samples, while a leaking nitrogen link in the waste water systems had to be fixed by the crew. The mission also suffered from a loss of communications for about 90 minutes due to an errant command from Mission Control in Houston (MCC-H). Columbia flew in a gravity gradient mode for most of the flight, which meant that onboard consumables were used at a reduced level. The mission management team determined that there was sufficient electrical power available to extend the mission by a day, which also meant that at landing Columbia had logged sufficient duration to bring the cumulative total flight time across the fleet (Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, Atlantis and Endeavour) to 365 days 23 hours 48 minutes – just over one year in space on 55 missions. The landing of STS-55 was originally set for KSC, but was moved to Edwards due to cloud cover over the Shuttle Landing Facility area at the Cape.

Most of the experiments were provided by the German Space Agency and ESA, with a number being supplied by Japan and three by NASA. The French Space Agency, CNES, was also involved in the mission. This was the final “national” Spacelab mission from Germany, due in part to NASA’s reluctance to reduce the costs of flying such a large payload. Germany (and many other nations) decided that in future they would fly their experiments as part of International Spacelab missions. Despite this, valuable experience and information was gathered from the mission that would have relevance to the Columbus module that was being designed by ESA for the US space station (Freedom) programme.

Milestones

160th manned space flight

85th US manned space flight

55th Shuttle mission

14th flight of Columbia

8th Spacelab Long Module mission

2nd dedicated German Spacelab mission

Accumulated flight time for all Shuttles exceeds 1 year

Int. Designation

1995-030A

Launched

27 June 1995

Launch Site

Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Landed

7 July 1995

Landing Site

Runway 15, Shuttle Landing Facility, KSC, Florida

Launch Vehicle

OV-104 Atlantis/ET-70/SRB BI-072/SSME #1 2028; #2 2034; #3 2032

Duration

9 days 19 hrs 22 min 17 sec

Call sign

Atlantis

Objective

1st Mir docking mission; delivery of EO-19 crew; return of EO-18 crew including 1st US NASA Mir resident astronaut (Thagard)

Flight Crew

GIBSON, Robert Lee, 48, USN, commander, 5th mission Previous missions: STS 41-B (1984); STS 61-C (1986); STS-27 (1988);

STS-47 (1992)

PRECOURT, Charles Joseph, 39, USAF, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-55 (1993)

BAKER, Ellen Louise, 42, civilian, mission specialist 1, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-34 (1989); STS-50 (1992)

HARBAUGH, Gregory Jordan, 39, civilian, mission specialist 2, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-39 (1991); STS-54 (1993)

DUNBAR, Bonnie Jean, 46, civilian, mission specialist 4, 4th mission Previous missions: STS 61-A (1985); STS-32 (1990); STS-50 (1992)

Mir EO-19 crew up only:

SOLOVYOV, Anatoly Yakovlevich, 47, Russian Air Force,

Russian cosmonaut 1, commander EO-19, 4th mission

Previous missions: Soyuz TM5 (1988); Soyuz TM9 (1990); Soyuz TM15 (1992) BUDARIN, Nikolai Mikhailovich, 42, civilian, Russian cosmonaut 2, flight engineer EO-19

Mir EO-18 crew down only:

DEZHUROV, Vladimir Nikolayevich, 32, Russian Air Force,

Russian cosmonaut 1, commander EO-18

STREKALOV, Gennady Mikhailovich, 54, civilian, Russian cosmonaut 2, flight engineer EO-18, 5th mission

Previous missions: Soyuz T3 (1980); Soyuz T8 (1983); Soyuz T10-1 pad abort (1983); Soyuz T11 (1984); Soyuz TM10 (1990)

THAGARD, Norman Earl, 51, civilian, NASA-1 cosmonaut researcher Mir-18, mission specialist 5, 5th mission

Previous missions: STS-7 (1983); STS 51-B (1985); STS-30 (1989); STS-42 (1992)

Flight Log

The launch of STS-71 was originally scheduled for late May, but was delayed due to the late launch of Spektr and the series of Mir EVAs in support of relocating the new module. Launch attempts on 23 and 24 June were scrubbed due to weather concerns. The docking with Mir occurred on 29 June, using the Earth radius vector approach (R-Bar) in which the orbiter approached Mir from “below”. The Orbiter Docking System and an Androgynous Peripheral Docking System acted as the connection

STS-71

A historic handshake on 29 June 1995 between American astronaut Robert Gibson (STS-71 commander) and Russian cosmonaut Vladimir Dezhurov, Mir-18 commander in the first link­up of a Shuttle and the Mir space complex. This event took place two-and-a-half weeks prior to the 20th anniversary of a similar space greeting, during ASTP in July 1975

point between the Shuttle and the Kristall module. The same day, the EO-19 crew took over from the EO-18 crew as residents on the station.

Over the next five days (or 100 hours), a programme of joint biomedical inves­tigations and logistics transfer operations was conducted, the first such activity between US and Russian spacecraft and crews. In the Spacelab module, more than 15 biomedical and scientific investigations were conducted in seven different fields (cardiovascular and pulmonary functions; human metabolism; neuroscience; sanita­tion and radiation; hygiene; behavioural performance and biology; fundamental biology and microgravity research). Experiment samples from Mir were gathered and returned to Earth aboard Atlantis, including over 100 urine and saliva samples, 30 blood samples, 20 surface samples and 12 air samples. The returning EO-18 crew members also conducted a programme of exercise and prevention measures to help prepare them for the return to Earth after their three-month mission.

Transferred to Mir were 454 kg of water generated by the orbiter system, which would be used on the station for waste system flushing. Specially designed EVA tools were also transferred, as was a supply of oxygen and nitrogen from the Shuttle ECS to raise air pressure inside Mir and conserve the station’s own consumables. A broken Salyut 5-type computer was also returned to Earth aboard Atlantis. Undocking occurred on 3 July, shortly after the EO-19 crew had undocked their Soyuz TM and positioned the small spacecraft to photograph the departure of Atlantis. The Shuttle crew then recorded the re-docking of the Soyuz TM before departing for the return to Earth. The EO-18 crew lay supine in custom-made Russian seat liners to ease their readaptation to gravity due to returning on the Shuttle instead of a Soyuz Descent Module. The complement of eight crew members aboard Atlantis as it came home equalled the largest Shuttle crew in history, STS 61-A in October 1985. The runway was changed from No. 33 to No. 15 just twenty minutes before touchdown, due to concerns over clouds in the area obscuring landing aids.

Milestones

179th manned space flight 99th US manned space flight 69th Shuttle mission 14th flight by OV-104 Atlantis 1st Shuttle-Mir docking

1st space station crew exchange by US Shuttle

100th US human space launch from the Cape in Florida

11th Spacelab Long Module mission

1st and only Spacelab to be part of a Shuttle payload docked to a space station Largest spacecraft ever in orbit (225 tons)

1st on-orbit change of Shuttle crew

Precourt celebrated his 40th birthday in space (29 Jun)

Подпись:

Подпись: MIR EO-19
Подпись: N/A (launched on STS-71 landed via Soyuz TM-21) 27 Jun 1995 (see STS-71) Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 11 September 1995 (in Soyuz TM-21) 108 km north of Arkalyk STS-71 75 days 11 hrs 20 min 21 sec Rodnik (Spring) Mir 19 resident crew, launched on Shuttle but landed on Soyuz TM, part of Shuttle-Mir Phase 1 programme and domestic Mir programme

Flight Crew

SOLOVYOV, Anatoly Yakovlevich, 47, Russian Air Force, commander,

4th mission

Previous missions: Soyuz TM5 (1988); Soyuz TM9 (1990); Soyuz TM15 (1992) BUDARIN, Nikolai Mikhailovich, 42, civilian, flight engineer

Flight Log

The Mir EO-19 crew arrived at the space station via the American Shuttle during the STS-71 mission. The cosmonauts had received basic training on ascent operations (and emergency escape procedures) at NASA for the ascent to orbit, but it was planned for them to return to Earth in Soyuz TM21, so there was no need for them to conduct extensive Shuttle systems training. The EO-19 crew and their back-ups (Onufriyenko and Usachev) each received on average 70 hours training on Shuttle launch, entry and orbital operations, crew and Shuttle systems, and procedures. The two EO-18 cosmonauts, on the other hand, who would only complete re-entry aboard the Shuttle, received about 28.5 hours each.

After completing the hand-over procedures from the EO-18 cosmonauts, the EO-19 crew transferred their Soyuz seat liners into the Soyuz DM and officially became the resident crew members of the station. On 2 July, the EO-19 cosmonauts undocked their Soyuz TM21 spacecraft from the Kvant module to dock at the forward port, freeing the rear port to receive further Progress re-supply craft. This event also allowed them to photograph the undocking of Atlantis from the station with the returning EO-18 crew. Then the astronauts on Atlantis photographed the re-docking of the Soyuz at the front port of the station before departing to begin the return to Earth.

Safely back on Mir, the two cosmonauts began their short residency, which again was mainly focused on maintenance and repair although they managed to complete

STS-71

The 19th Mir resident crew consisted of the veteran Solovyov (left) and the rookie Budarin

some materials-processing operations. Three EVAs were conducted. The first on 14 July (5 hours 34 minutes) was used to inspect the —Z port where Kristall was to be relocated on 17 July. They found nothing to prevent the relocation, and also used the EVA to unfurl the Spektr arrays using a NASA-provided tool. Solovyov and Budarin also inspected an antenna and a malfunctioning solar array drive motor on the Kvant 2 module. The next EVA on 19 July (3 hours 8 minutes) included the retrieval of a US-provided detector and preparations for installing a joint Belgian/ French/Russian infrared spectrometer. A failed cooling system in Solovyov’s Orlan suit curtailed activities, forcing the cosmonaut to remain near the Kvant 2 hatch and use umbilical cooling supplied from the module instead of the integral backpack. After suit repair work inside Mir, the third EVA on 21 July (5 hours 50 minutes) was used to complete the tasks scheduled for the cancelled second excursion. It was during this EVA that Solovyov became the record-holder for total career EVA time, at 41 hours 49 minutes, surpassing that of Krikalev set in 1992.

Milestones

1st Russian space station crew launched by US Shuttle 1st primary crew flying as passengers on ascent

Подпись:

Подпись: STS-70
Подпись: 1995-035A 13 July 1995 Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 22 July 1995 Runway 33, Shuttle Landing Facility, KSC, Florida OV-103 Discovery/ET-71/SRB BI-073; SSME #1 2036; #2 2019; #3 2017 8 days 22 hrs 20 min 5 sec Discovery Objective Deployment of TDRS-G by IUS-26

Flight Crew

HENRICKS, Terence Thomas “Tom”, 43, USAF, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-44 (1991); STS-55 (1993)

KREGEL, Kevin Richard, 38, civilian, pilot

THOMAS, Donald Alan, 40, civilian, mission specialist 1, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-65 (1994)

CURRIE, Nancy Jane, 36, US Army, mission specialist 2, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-57 (1993)

WEBER, Mary Ellen, 32, civilian, mission specialist 3

Flight Log

STS-70 should have launched prior to STS-71. However, on 31 May, after northern flicker woodpeckers at Pad 39B had poked approximately 200 holes in the foam insulation of the ET, attempts to repair the damage at the pad were unsuccessful. The resulting rollback to the VAB for repairs forced the mission to be rescheduled after STS-71. The media coverage of the woodpecker activities (from the wildlife nature reserve around the Cape), prompted two JSC employees to design a comic STS-70 mission emblem, adding a smiling Woody Woodpecker cartoon character – a tongue – in-cheek joke that the flight crew enjoyed. They were also amused by the use of the Woody Woodpecker cartoon’s theme tune as a wake-up call on FD 2. The countdown to launch on 13 July proceeded relatively smoothly, with only a short, 55-second hold to verify range safety system signals from the destruct system on the ET. The lift-off marked the shortest time between the landing of one mission and the launch of the next (just 6 days) in the programme. However, post-flight inspection of the right-hand SRM nozzle revealed a gas path in internal joint number 3 that extended from the motor chamber up to, but not beyond, the primary O-ring. A similar gas path had been noted on STS-71 and had been revealed on other missions, but the incidents on STS-71 and STS-70 were the first to show a slight heat effect on the primary O-ring.

STS-71

Tom Henricks on the aft flight deck of Discovery aims towards a site on Earth with the TV camera and other hardware for the HERCULES-B system. For this third-generation space – based geolocation system, a Xybion multispectral camera was integrated with the Hercules geolocation hardware. Previously, a NASA electronic still camera was used on HERCULES-A, flown on STS-53 and STS-56

The problem would require investigation and repair on future SRB/SRMs scheduled for flight (see STS-69).

The launch of STS-70 included the first flight of a new Block ISSME (# 2036) that featured improvements to increase the reliability and safety margins of the engines. The first use of three Block I improved engines was scheduled for STS-73. Some six hours into the mission, the crew deployed the final TDRS satellite, which would act as an on-orbit operational spare. With the completion of the primary task, the crew spent the remainder of their mission working on a range of mid-deck experiments.

These focused on plant growth and development, the hormone system of insects, the performance of a bioreactor in microgravity for the growth of individual cells, and a range of experiments aimed at studying the effects of space flight on mammalian development. The crew also conducted commercial protein crystal growth experi­ments, research into space tissue loss, tests of hand-held space-based geolocation systems, the production of pharmaceuticals in weightlessness, examinations of the effects of ships on the marine environment, radiation monitoring and experiments to understand the chemistry and dynamics of thruster emissions, outgassing and other debris on the Shuttle’s exterior hardware and surfaces.

The mission was also to be run from the new upgraded Mission Control Room in Building 30 at the JSC facility near Houston, Texas. Following the deployment of TDRS, the controllers on the next shift operated from the new MCC (called the White Flight Control Room – FCR, pronounced “flicker”). The old room had been used since Gemini 4 in June 1965 and became famous as the Apollo mission control room during the lunar landing missions. It would be turned into a national monument and tourist attraction at JSC. Orbital operations continued in the new room, but landing operations were handled from the old room. Until early 1996, all Shuttle launch and landing phases would still be controlled from the old FCR, but would gradually be moved into the new room.

The first landing opportunity for STS-70, on 21 July at KSC, was waived off due to fog and low visibility, as was the first attempt on 22 July. Following the landing, Discovery was prepared for shipment to California for a period of refurbishment and modifications. It was due to return to duty in the summer of 1996, to prepare for the second Hubble service mission planned for early 1997 (STS-82).

Milestones

180th manned space flight

100th US manned space flight

70th Shuttle mission

21st flight of Discovery

7th and final TDRS deployment mission

1st use of new MCC in Houston, JSC

Quickest turnaround from landing (STS-71) to launch (STS-70) between missions – 6 days

STS-86

Int. Designation

1997-055A

Launched

25 September 1997

Launch Site

Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Landed

6 October 1997

Landing Site

Runway 15, Shuttle Landing Facility, KSC, Florida

Launch Vehicle

OV-104 Atlantis/ET-88/SRB BI-090/SSME #1 2012; #2 2040; #3 2019

Duration

10 days 19 hrs 20 min 50 sec

Wolf 127 days 20hrs 0min 50 sec (landing on STS-89)

Call sign

Atlantis

Objective

7th Shuttle-Mir docking; delivery of NASA 6 (Wolf) crew member; return of NASA 5 (Foale) crew member

Flight Crew

WETHERBEE, James Donald, 44, USN, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-32 (1990); STS-52 (1992); STS-63 (1995) BLOOMFIELD, Michael John, 38, USAF, pilot

TITOV, Vladimir Georgievich, 50, Russian Air Force, mission specialist 1, 4th mission

Previous missions: Soyuz T8 (1983); Soyuz T10 abort (1983); Soyuz TM4 (1987); STS-63 (1995)

PARAZYNSKI, Scott Edward, 36, civilian, mission specialist 2, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-66 (1994)

CHRETIEN, Jean-Loup Jacques Marie, 59, French Air Force,

mission specialist 3, 3rd mission

Previous missions: Soyuz T6 (1982); Soyuz TM7 (1988)

LAWRENCE, Wendy Barrien, 38, USN, mission specialist 4, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-67 (1995)

NASA 6 Mir crew member up only:

WOLF, David Alan, 41, civilian, mission specialist 5, Mir EO-24 cosmonaut researcher, NASA board engineer 6, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-58 (1993)

NASA 5 Mir crew member down only:

FOALE, Colin Michael, 40, civilian, mission specialist 5, Mir EO-23 cosmonaut researcher, NASA board engineer 5, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-45 (1992); STS-56 (1993); STS-63 (1995)

STS-86

This image of Mir taken by the crew of STS-86 clearly shows the damaged Spektr module and arrays following the collision with a Progress re-supply vessel

Flight Log

Both Scott Parazynski and Wendy Lawrence were originally in line for long flights on the Mir space station. Parazynski had been removed from long-duration training due to the fact that he was too tall to fit in the Soyuz contour seat if he needed to use one for emergency landing (he would have been launched to and from the Mir on the Shuttle under normal circumstances). Lawrence would have followed Foale on Mir, but was deemed too short to fit into an Orlan suit, a requirement introduced after the Progress collision in order to allow American astronauts to support EVA operations to repair the station should the need arise. Lawrence had never completed Orlan EVA training, as it was not part of her original programme to perform an EVA. However, she still remained part of the STS-86 Shuttle crew to visit Mir. In addition, by way of compensation for losing the duration flight she had trained so long for, she was also guaranteed a flight on the STS-89 mission that would exchange Wolf with the final US

astronaut, Andy Thomas. For some time, the three astronauts were known as Scott “Too Tall” Parazynski, Wendy “Too Short” Lawrence and Dave “Just Right” Wolf.

Regular reviews of Shuttle-Mir operations occurred prior to each docking mis­sion, but after a fire and a collision in the space of four months, an independent and internal safety assessment was completed before NASA Administrator Dan Goldin would authorise the flight and exchange of NASA crew members. His authorisation came only an hour before the launch of STS-86. The events at Mir had seriously affected Foale’s science programme, as most of his equipment had been left in the sealed-off Spektr module. But his contribution to the recovery of the station both during and immediately after the collision had earned him high praise from Russian space officials.

Atlantis docked to Mir for the seventh (and the orbiter’s final) time on 27 Sep­tember, with the exchange between Foale and Wolf accomplished the following day. During the six days of docked operations, the crew moved over four tons of material from SpaceHab/Atlantis to the space station, including over 770 kg of water, plus specimens and hardware for ISS risk mitigation experiments that would monitor the health and safety of the resident crew. A gyrodyne, batteries, three air pressurisation units, an attitude control computer and a range of other logistical items were also transferred to Mir. Coming the other way for the return to Earth were experiment samples and hardware and an old Elektron oxygen generator.

On 1 October, Parazynski (EV1) and Titov (EV2) completed a joint US/Russian EVA, a forerunner to those planned for ISS operations. During the EVA, they attached a 55-kg Solar Array Cap to the Docking Module for a future Russian EVA crew to seal off a suspected leak in Spektr’s hull. They also retrieved four Mir Environmental Effects Payloads and continued testing the SAFER units.

After undocking on 3 October, Atlantis completed a fly-around to conduct a visual inspection of the station. This included allowing air into the Spektr module to see if the Atlantis crew could detect seepage or debris particles that would help to locate the breach in the module’s hull. Particles were seen but they could not conclusively be deemed to have originated from Spektr. Two landing opportunities were waived on 5 October due to low clouds. This was the last flight of Atlantis before a planned maintenance down period, after which the vehicle would participate in the early construction flights of ISS.

Milestones

202nd manned space flight

117th US manned space flight

87th Shuttle mission

20th flight of Atlantis

7th Shuttle-Mir docking

38th US and 67th flight with EVA operations

9th SpaceHab mission (4th double module)

Подпись:

Подпись: STS-87
Подпись: 1997-073A 19 November 1997 Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 5 December 1997 Runway 33, Shuttle Landing Facility, KSC, Florida OV-102 Columbia/ET-89/SRB BI-092/SSME #1 2031; #2 2039; #3 2037 15 days 16hrs 34 min 4 sec Columbia USMP-4; SPARTAN 201-04

Flight Crew

KREGEL, Kevin Richard, 41, civilian, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-70 (1995); STS-78 (1996)

LINDSEY, Steven Wayne, 37, USAF, pilot CHAWLA, Kalpana, 34, civilian, mission specialist 1 SCOTT, Winston Elliott, 47, USN, mission specialist 2, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-72 (1996)

DOI, Takao, 43, civilian, mission specialist 3

KADENYUK, Leonid Konstantinovich, 46, Ukraine Air Force, payload specialist 1

Flight Log

Completing a sixth on-time launch for the year and ending the second year in which eight flights had been completed (the first being 1992), this was a flight of mixed fortunes. The USMP-4 payload performed well, with experiments focusing on materials science, combustion science and fundamental physics. There were other secondary and mid-deck experiments flown as well, including the Collaborative Ukrainian Experiment, which featured ten planet biology experiments.

SPARTAN 201 was on its fourth mission and this time, its experiment pro­gramme was geared towards investigating the physical conditions and processes of the hot outer layers of the sun’s atmosphere – the Solar Corona. The SPARTAN was also to gather information on the solar wind. Originally, SPARTAN was to be deployed on FD 2, but a companion spacecraft, the Solar and Hemispheric Observa­tory (SOHO), had a temporary power problem and so the deployment was delayed by 24 hours. On FD 3, the RMS was used to lift the SPARTAN out of the bay, but the spacecraft failed to initiate a pirouette manoeuvre. This indicated a problem with the attitude control system, which would be required for finer pointing towards solar targets. During an attempted recapture, the RMS did not secure a firm grip and when

STS-86

Winston Scott releases a prototype free-flying experiment, the Autonomous EVA Robotic Camera (AEROCam) Sprint. The EVA was also the first by a Japanese astronaut (Doi – out of frame) and included the capture of the Spartan satellite seen to the right of Scott

it was retracted, it imparted a small rotational spin on the satellite of about 2 degrees per second. The crew tried to match this rotation by firing the orbiter’s thrusters for a second grapple attempt, but this was called off by the flight controllers. Instead, a plan was devised for the EVA crew to capture the satellite by hand allowing it to be stowed back into the payload bay.

The original plan for the EVA was amended to include the SPAS capture, which was achieved on 24 November. Scott (EV1) and Doi (EV2) manually grappled the satellite, allowing Chawla to use the RMS to grab the satellite and gently lower it into the payload bay. A review of further operations with SPARTAN would be conducted by mission management prior to trying to release it a second time. After the satellite was secured, the EVA crew continued with their planned programme of activities, designed to support forthcoming ISS assembly missions. This included working with a crane which was installed on the port side of the payload bay. The EVA lasted 7 hours 3 minutes.

After completing most of their experiment programme, the crew received the news that a second EVA would be added to the flight, but the SPARTAN would not be released again. The risk of being unable to retrieve the unit again was too great and the orbiter’s fuel reserves were insufficient to support all contingencies. SPARTAN 201-04 therefore would not free-fly again on this mission, though it was later raised on the end of the RMS to test the video and laser sensors of the Automated Rendezvous and Capture System. The EVA crew also deployed the AEROCam Sprint, a prototype free-flying TV camera that could be utilised for remote inspections of the exterior of ISS and for visual inspections of hazardous locations which would be difficult for a suited EVA astronaut to safely reach. This second EVA, on 3 December, lasted 4 hours 59 minutes.

Milestones

203rd manned space flight

118th US manned space flight

88th Shuttle mission

24th flight of Columbia

39th US and 68th flight with EVA operations

1st Japanese to perform EVA (Doi)

4th flight of USMP payload

12th EDO mission

1st EVAs from Columbia

 

Подпись:2001-035A

10 August 2001

Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 22 August 2001

Runway 15, Shuttle Landing Facility, KSC, Florida OV-103 Discovery/ET-100/SRB BI-109/SSME #1 2052; #2 2044; #3 2045

11 days 21 hrs 13 min 52 sec Discovery

ISS assembly flight 7A.1; MPLM-1 logistics mission; delivery of ISS-3 crew; return of ISS-2 crew

Flight Crew

HOROWITZ, Scott Jay, 44, USAF, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-75 (1996); STS-82 (1997); STS-101 (2000)

STURCKOW, Frederick Wilford, 41, USMC, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-88 (1998)

FORRESTER, Patrick Graham, 44, USAF, mission specialist 1 BARRY, Daniel Thomas, 47, civilian, mission specialist 2, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-72 (1996); STS-96 (1999)

ISS-3 crew up only:

CULBERTSON Jr., Frank Lee, 52, civilian, mission specialist 3, ISS-3

commander, 3rd mission

Previous missions: STS-38 (1990); STS-51 (1993)

TYURIN, Mikhail Vladislavovich, 41, civilian, Russian mission specialist 4, ISS-3 flight engineer

DEZHUROV, Vladimir Nikolayevich, 39, Russian Air Force, mission specialist 5, ISS-3 Soyuz commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: Soyuz TM21 (1995)

ISS-2 crew down only:

VOSS, James Shelton, 51, US Army, ISS-2 flight engineer 1, mission specialist 3, 5th mission

Previous missions: STS-44 (1991); STS-53 (1992); STS-69 (1995); STS-101 (2000) HELMS, Susan Jane, 42, USAF, ISS-2 flight engineer 2, mission specialist 4, 5th mission

Previous missions: STS-54 (1993); STS-64 (1994); STS-78 (1996); STS-101 (2000) USACHEV, Yuri Vladimirovich, 42, civilian, Russian ISS-2 and Soyuz commander, mission specialist 5, 4th mission

Previous missions: Soyuz TM18 (1994); Soyuz TM23 (1996); STS-101 (2000)

STS-105

Inside Destiny, the crews of STS-105 and Expeditions 2 and 3 pose for a traditional in-flight joint crew portrait. On the left is the outgoing ISS-2 crew, in the centre is the STS-105 crew and to the right the incoming ISS-3 crew. From bottom right going clockwise: Sturckow and Forrester (both STS-105), Usachev, Voss and Helms (ISS-2 crew), Horowitz and Barry (both STS-105), and Tyurin, Dezhurov and Culbertson (ISS-3 crew)

Flight Log

Lightning and thick cloud, together with the risk of showers led to the original launch attempt on 9 August being scrubbed. The threat of bad weather the next day meant the launch window was opened five minutes earlier and the mission launched without incident. Docking with ISS took place on FD 3 and Discovery would remain linked to the station for 188 hours. The Leonardo MPLM was moved across to ISS on FD 4, where it would be unloaded over several days. The cargo included 3,000 kg of equipment, supplies and material. There were 12 racks of experiments and equipment in the module, six of which were Re-supply Stowage Racks that carried equipment, clothing, food and supplies. There were also four Storage Re-supply Platforms for logistics supplies and hardware, and two Express Racks that included smaller pay­loads for delivery to the station. Old hardware and used equipment was moved back to Leonardo for the trip back to Earth. On this flight, the ISS-2 crew’s belongings were part of the return cargo. In total, some 1,360 kg of material was brought back to Earth.

Two EVAs (by Barry – EV1 and Forrester – EV2) were completed (16 Aug for 6 hours 16 minutes and 18 August for 5 hours 29 minutes), during which the Shuttle EVA crew installed the Early Ammonia Servicer (EAS), which included spare ammo­nia for use in the station’s coolant system if required. During the second EVA, the crew prepared for the delivery of the S0 Truss (planned for 2002) by installing heater cables and handrails on both sides of the Destiny lab. During FD 5, Discovery took over control of ISS while Zvezda received upgraded software from Russian flight control. The command of the station reverted to Zvezda when the new software had been loaded and checked.

Official hand-over between ISS-2 and ISS-3 crew members took place on FD 6 (17 Aug), which included a series of briefings and exchange of Soyuz seat liners in Soyuz TM32. Discovery undocked from ISS on 20 August and after the usual fly – around and separation manoeuvre, the Shuttle crew released a small science satellite, called Simplesat, by means of spring ejection from a GAS canister in the payload bay. The orbiter landed on the second of two Florida opportunities, with the first having been waived off due to bad weather.

Milestones

227th manned space flight

136th US manned space flight

106th Shuttle mission

30th flight of Discovery

50th US and 83rd flight with EVA operations

11th STS ISS mission

4th Discovery ISS mission

3rd MPLM flight

2nd MPLM 01 Leonardo flight

2nd Shuttle ISS resident crew exchange mission

Int. Designation

2005-026A

Launched

26 July 2005

Launch Site

Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Landed

9 August 2005

Landing Site

Runway 22, Edwards AFB, California

Launch Vehicle

OV-103 Discovery /ET-121/SRB BI-125/SSME #1 2057;

#2 2054; #3 2056

Duration

13 days 21 hrs 32 min 48 sec

Call sign

Discovery

Objective

ISS mission LF-1; return-to-flight; MPLM logistics mission

Flight Crew

COLLINS, Eileen Marie, 48, USAF, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-63 (1995); STS-84 (1997); STS-93 (1999)

KELLY, James McNeal, 41, USAF, pilot, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-102 (2001)

NOGUCHI, Soichi, 40, civilian, Japanese mission specialist 1 ROBINSON, Stephen Kern, 49, civilian, mission specialist 2, 3rd mission Previous missions: STS-85 (1997); STS-95 (1998)

THOMAS, Andrew Sydney Withiel, 53, civilian, mission specialist 3,

4th mission

Previous missions: STS-77 (1996); STS-89/91 (1996); STS-102 (2001) LAWRENCE, Wendy Barrien, 46, USN, mission specialist 4, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-67 (1995); STS-86 (1997); STS-91 (1998) CAMARDA, Charles Joseph, 53, civilian, mission specialist 5

Flight Log

It was almost 30 months between the loss of Columbia and the launch of Discovery. During this time, apart from the investigation into the probable cause of the accident and the steps taken to reduce the risk of it happening again, the whole Shuttle programme had been evaluated and a new long-term goal established. After clearing the Shuttle for flight operations, it would be used to complete the construction of ISS by 2010. After that, the fleet would be retired and replaced by a Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). The CEV would be able to visit the station, but its primary role would be to return America to the Moon, hopefully by 2019 (the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11). American commitments to ISS would be met by 2016. Exactly what their in­volvement with the station would be after that is still to be decided.

The first launch attempt for STS-114 on 13 July was cancelled when an ET fuel sensor failed. Extensive troubleshooting delayed the mission, but the 26 July launch

STS-114

Performing the first EVA beneath the belly of a Shuttle orbiter, astronaut Stephen Robinson, on the end of the ISS robotic arm Canadarm2 (out of frame), works to remove gap fillers protruding from the heat-shielding tiles of Discovery during the mission’s third EVA

occurred on time and was the most extensively documented launch into space in history. A myriad of ground-based and high-altitude aircraft-borne cameras, ground radar systems, sensors and lasers on the ascending Shuttle and a TV system on the ET, all recorded spectacular shots of the ascent from the pad, SRB separation and Orbiter/ ET separation. They also recorded the loss of some foam from the ET once more, which caused grave concern on the ground.

Discovery docked with ISS on 28 July. Prior to docking, Collins performed the first Rendezvous Pitch Manoeuvre some 183 metres from the station, at a rate of 0.75°/second, to allow the ISS-11 crew to photo-document the underside of the Discovery and its protective tiles. Analysis of the images revealed a little tile and foam damage, but the most serious problem appeared to be two protruding tile gap fillers, which might cause hot spots on entry. Several options were discussed and evaluated before the final solution was reached as the crew worked aboard the ISS. It was decided to allow the EVA crew to manually extract the fillers.

During the first EVA (30 Jul for 6 hours 50 minutes), Robinson (EV1) and Noguchi (EV2) worked with intentionally damaged tiles that had been brought up

to space for the purpose of evaluating new repair procedures and equipment. They also installed a base and cabling for a stowage platform and rerouted power cables to CMG-2, one of the four gyroscopes that orientate the station. The second EVA (1 Aug for 7 hours 14 minutes) saw the removal of the failed CMG-1 and its replacement with a new unit, restoring ISS to four functioning units. The added third EVA (3rd Aug for 6 hours 1 minute) saw Robinson ride the RMS over the side of Discovery to remove the two gap fillers with his gloved hand, which was much easier than first thought. This was the first time that an astronaut had ventured underneath the Shuttle during an EVA. The final EVA also included installation of an external stowage platform on ISS and the deployment of a materials experiment package for long-term exposure to the harsh conditions of space.

During their 9 days of docked activities, the crew transferred significant logistics to the station. MPLM Raffaello was relocated to the side of Destiny on 29 July and unloaded over several days. It carried 1,710kg of supplies and cargo, including the Human Research Facility 2 and the new CMG that was installed during EVA 2. Returned items included the 3.5 tons of material accumulated and stored since 2002, creating much welcomed volume inside the Zvezda when the waste had been relocated into Raffaello.

Discovery undocked from the station and performed a fly around, with both crews photographing each other’s spacecraft before the Shuttle crew prepared for the much anticipated return from orbit. To add to the tension both on Earth and in orbit, the landing was delayed by two days after four opportunities to land at Florida were cancelled by bad weather. Much to everyone’s relief, Discovery made a safe entry and landing at Edwards AFB. The mission had returned the fleet to space after the loss of Columbia, but there were still questions about the integrity of the foam fixtures. As a result, the next Shuttle mission would be delayed until the problems of foam coming off the ET were better understood.

Milestones

244th manned space flight

144th US manned space flight

114th Shuttle mission

31st flight of Discovery

57th US and 94th flight with EVA operations

17th Shuttle ISS mission

5th Discovery ISS mission

6th MPLM flight

3rd flight of MPLM-2 Raffaello

Launch sites

Manned space flights have thus far been launched from Pad 1 – “The Gagarin Pad” – at Site 5 or Pad 31 at Site 6 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan (Russian launches); Pads 5, 14, 19 and 34 at Cape Canaveral and Pads A and B of Launch Complex 39 at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida (American launches); and most recently at Jiuquan in China (Chinese launches).

The USAF test pilot base at Edwards Air Force Base (AFB) in California was the home of the X-15 rocket plane, which made “astroflights”, while Mojave Airport,

Launch sites

One of several pad facilities at Cape Canaveral

Launch sites

Pad 1 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan

California was the home base for the Spaceship One “space tourism” test flights. Mojave may also be the home base for the Virgin Galactic Spaceship Two tourist vehicle. Vandenberg AFB, California was proposed as the Space Shuttle’s west coast base for military (polar orbit) missions, but the first mission was cancelled after the Challenger accident in 1986 and the Shuttle never flew from Vandenberg.

THE X-PRIZE – THE DAWN OF PRIVATE SPACEFLIGHT

Test pilot and private astronaut Brian Binnie created history on 4 October 2004, the 47th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik 1. He was the pilot of Spaceship One on the second of two flights to exceed an altitude of 320,000 feet twice within 14 days, thereby claiming the $10 million Ansari X-Prize. In doing so, Spaceship One became the first private manned spacecraft to fly above 100 km altitude and briefly enter space. The flights of Spaceship One were part of the Tier One private manned space programme operated by Scaled Composites.

The X-Prize challenge

The X-Prize was created in 1996 with the challenge of placing the same privately funded manned spacecraft in space on a sub-orbital trajectory twice within two weeks. The X-Prize was modelled on the Orteig Prize, which was won by Charles Lindbergh in 1927 by flying solo non-stop across the Atlantic Ocean.

THE X-PRIZE - THE DAWN OF PRIVATE SPACEFLIGHT

First captive flight of White Knight and Spaceship One. © 2004 Mojave Aerospace Ventures LLC, photographed by Scaled Composites. Spaceship One is a Paul G. Allen Project. Used with permission.

The idea of privately funded manned space flights instead of government spon­sored ones was attractive to commercial and entrepreneurial organisations across the globe and has its routes in classic science fiction stories of the 1940s and 1950s, and in attempts to get a private citizen into space as early as the 1980s. The original X-Prize was proposed in order to advance the goal of manned space flight by private flights, using private contributions, entrance fees from teams and user fees from a proposed X – Prize credit card. By May 1998 fourteen teams had entered the competition. There were ten American entrants, three from England and one from Argentina.

The programme and its success also boosted support for the idea of “space tourism” and, coupled with the flights of “space flight participants”, or “space tourists” on Soyuz flights, has seen a growth in interest in the idea of private citizens making flights into space in recent years. In 2004, the X-Prize was renamed the Ansari X-Prize when Anousheh Ansari and her brother-in-law contributed a “significant donation” to the foundation on 5 May 2004. Ansari of course became the fourth “space tourist” on a Soyuz mission to ISS in September 2006, and is the last entry in this edition of the log. A future edition is highly likely to include many more orbital space flights by private citizens in the coming years.

VOSTOK 2

Int. Designation

1961 tau 1

Launched

6 August 1961

Launch Site

Pad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan

Landed

7 August 1961

Landing Site

724 km southeast of Moscow, near to the village of Krasny Kut, close to where Gagarin had landed

Launch Vehicle

R7 (8K72K serial #E103-17); spacecraft serial number (11F63/3KA) #4

Duration

1 day 1 hr 18 min

Callsign

Oryel (Eagle)

Objective

Seventeen-orbit manned mission – 24 hours

Flight Crew

TITOV, Gherman Stepanovich, 25, Soviet Air Force, pilot

Flight Log

Titov was in his flight cabin at 09:30 hours and waited for the planned lift-off at 11: 00 hours Baikonur time. Vostok 2 was inserted into a 64.9° inclination orbit, with an apogee of 232 km (144 miles). Soon afterwards, Titov began to feel sick, as weightlessness impaired the otolithic functions of his inner ear. His nausea became quite uncomfortable and meant that several experiments planned for the 24-hour mission could not be operated. The cosmonaut did, however, manage to sleep and found it quite disconcerting to wake with his arms outstretched, almost touching the controls. He later operated those same controls to perform manual changes to the spacecraft’s orientation, using the attitude control system thrusters. Despite all this, however, he enjoyed the view through a porthole which magnified the Earth.

Vostok 2’s descent module also did not separate cleanly from the retro section but the connections were finally severed to allow a safe entry. Titov became the first cosmonaut officially to land separately from his spacecraft, as Gagarin’s planned exit had remained a secret to ensure that the pioneering Vostok flight could enter the international record books. The relatively enormous leap from Gagarin’s flight to a 24-hour flight for Vostok 2 was dictated by the need to land in the prime recovery zone, which was overflown only every 16-17 orbits, or 24 hours.

VOSTOK 2

Titov undergoes his pre-flight medical check prior to Vostok 2

Milestones

4th manned space flight 2nd Soviet manned space flight 2nd Vostok manned flight

1st manned space flight to last more than one day

Aged 25 years 10 months 27 days, Titov became the youngest person to fly in space, a record he held for over 45 years

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Подпись:

Подпись: APOLLO 14
Подпись: 1971-008A 31 January 1971 Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 9 February 1971 Pacific Ocean Saturn V AS-509; spacecraft serial numbers: CSM-110; LM-8 9 days 0 hrs 1 min 57 sec CSM - Kittyhawk; LM - Antares Third manned lunar landing (H-3); obtain photography of candidate exploration sites

Flight Crew

SHEPARD, Alan Bartlett Jr., 47, USN, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: Mercury-Redstone 3 (1961)

ROOSA, Stuart Allen, 37, USAF, command module pilot MITCHELL, Edgar Dean, 40, USN, lunar module pilot

Flight Log

Apollo 14 was originally targeted for Taurus-Littrow but was diverted by the Apollo 13 abort to Fra Mauro. The mission was delayed for forty minutes by weather re­sembling the conditions for Apollo 12, and it surprised some observers to see the lift­off going ahead in very murky skies at 16: 03 hrs local time. The parking orbit was 186 km (116 miles) and 32.4° inclination. The all-rookie crew in terms of orbital space flight, with only commander Alan Shepard having any space flight experience (a mere sub-orbital lob in 1961), were placed on their trans-lunar coast with no difficulty. CMP Stuart Roosa closed in for the transposition and docking but couldn’t dock. A drama unfolded as Roosa tried six times, at last succeeding after 106 minutes. If the docking mechanism was faulty, the Moon landing would have to be cancelled. Once the Lunar Module Antares and Command Module Kitty Hawk were joined up, Shepard and his crew inspected the docking probe, but could not explain the earlier difficulty. NASA deliberated for a while before announcing that the Moon landing attempt would proceed.

Apollo 14 entered lunar orbit quietly, lowering its perilune to the lowest ever for the complete Apollo combination at just 16 km (10 miles). Manned by the steely-eyed Shepard and burly Edgar Mitchell, Antares separated and just before the PDI burn hit trouble. First, a short circuit in the LM computer abort switch meant the computer could not be persuaded not to abort the landing attempt. The crew just finished reprogramming themselves out of this problem when the landing radar failed. With an

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

A1 Shepard proudly displays the US flag, standing on the Moon almost a decade after becoming America’s first astronaut in space.

abort just seconds away, at which point the PDI could not bring them into the landing site, Mitchell’s desperate switch flicking succeeded. Shepard brought Antares on to Fra Mauro with 40 seconds of fuel left, some 26.5 m (87 ft) off target, and at a tilt angle of 6°, at 30°40’27" south 17°27’58" west.

On 5 February, Shepard set foot on the Moon at T + 114 hours 31 minutes and was joined by Mitchell. The television camera was pointed at the sloping LM, with the sun very low in the sky, and it was not possible to follow the crew all the time as they set to work laying out the ALSEP instruments and collecting samples using the Modular Equipment Transporter. This was a lunar “wheelbarrow”, which some of the less interested press reports suggested was to carry the aging Shepard when he got tired. The EVA lasted 4 hours 49 minutes and the second, on 6 February, lasted 4 hours 35 minutes and featured a thwarted and tetchy attempt to climb the 45 m (147.5 ft) high rim of Cone Crater. Although Shepard was convinced that they were nowhere near the rim and decided to abort the attempt, Mitchell had in fact been right in his assertion that they had nearly reached it. Shepard won the argument.

During the EVAs the crew had travelled about 2.72 km (2 miles) on foot, and at the end of the second EVA Shepard played his famous televised game of lunar golf, using a proper ball and a club made from the head of a 6-iron with an attachment to fit the handle of the contingency sample collector A passionate golfer, Shepard drew the ball out of his suit leg pocket and dropped it on the surface. Being limited in his mobility he sliced more lunar soil than ball in his first one handed “swing” barely moving the ball (something he was ribbed about back at the Astronaut Office after the mission). For the second attempt, a new ball was taken from the suit pocket and this time he hit it into a crater about 15 metres away. Not to be out done in this demon­stration of lunar sports, Mitchell threw the staff from the solar wind composition experiment into the same crater. After 33 hours 39 minutes on the Moon, Antares lifted off and docked with Kitty Hawk, which itself leapt out of lunar orbit after a stay of 66 hours 39 minutes. The Command Module came home 6.4 km (4 miles) from the recovery ship USS New Orleans in the Pacific Ocean at 27° south 172° west at T + 9 days 0 hours 1 minutes 57 seconds – the most accurate splashdown, 600 m (1950 ft) from the predicted target. The crew was the last to have to endure the quarantine container.

Milestones

40th manned space flight

24th US manned space flight

8th Apollo manned space flight

8th Apollo CSM manned flight

6th Apollo LM manned flight

6th manned flight to the Moon

5th manned flight to orbit the Moon

3rd manned Moon landing and walk

1st wheeled vehicle on the Moon

9th US and 11th flight with EVA operations

Подпись:

Подпись: SOYUZ 10
Подпись: 1971-034A 23 April 1971 Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 25 April 1971 120 km northwest of Karaganda R7 (11A511 - #25); spacecraft serial number (7K-T) #31 1 day 23 hrs 45 min 54 sec Granit (Granite) Intended EO-1 resident crew for Salyut 1 (1971-032A)

Flight Crew

SHATALOV, Vladimir Aleksandrovich, 43, Soviet Air Force, commander,

3rd mission

Previous missions: Soyuz 4 (1969); Soyuz 8 (1969)

YELISEYEV, Aleksey Stanislavovich, 36, civilian, flight engineer, 3rd mission Previous missions: Soyuz 5 (1969); Soyuz 8 (1969)

RUKAVISHNIKOV, Nikolay, Nikolayevich, 38, civilian, test engineer

Flight Log

On 19 April, the Soviets finally succeeded in placing a space station into orbit; the 18,900 kg (41,675 lb) Salyut. Originally to be called Zarya (“Dawn”), the name was changed when it was revealed that the Chinese had used the same name for one oftheir satellites. Salyut was chosen as a “salute” to the 10th anniversary of Gagarin’s mission, but it was too late to repaint the side of the station, which still bore the named “Zarya”. The first attempt at launching a crew to the station on 22 April was aborted at T — 1 minute when one of the launch masts failed to retract. Three, three- person crews were prepared for resident stays on the station (known as EO in Russian), aimed at stealing some of the headlines from the Apollo lunar missions and in creating a the world’s first station in space two years before America launched their Skylab workshop. However, just two days later all these plans seemed to be in doubt. Soyuz 10, crewed by Shatalov and Yeliseyev, the first Russians to make three space flights, plus new man Nikolay Rukavishnikov, took off on 23 April at 04: 54 hrs local time and entered an orbit with an inclination of 51.6° and an apogee of 256 km (159 miles). About a day later, the rendezvous sequence – which also involved manoeuvres by Salyut 1 – ended with Soyuz 10 about 180 m (590 ft) away.

Shatalov jockeyed Soyuz (DOS-1) towards Salyut, and at 06: 47 hrs Baikonur time docked with the space station. A 20- to 30-day stay aboard was in the offing and all seemed fine. The crew, however, never went on board. Shatalov had successfully soft-docked to Salyut but could not hard dock. With a 9 cm gap between them,

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Shatalov, Yeliseyev and Rukavishnikov exit a Soyuz Volga simulator after a training session prior to their Soyuz 10 mission to Salyut

Shatalov tried firing the manoeuvring engines on Soyuz to push the spacecraft together, but to no avail. After six hours (four orbits), Shatalov was ordered to undock and try again. When he tried to do so, he found his Soyuz would not release from the Salyut, indicating a serious problem. The crew could have entered the OM and dismantled the docking device from the Soyuz side or jettisoned the OM, but either option would have rendered the single-ported Salyut useless for further opera­tions. With onboard power supplies running out on the Soyuz (it would have been powered down during the occupation of the Salyut), Shatalov tried again and this time Soyuz slipped from her moorings, much to the relief of ground controllers and the crew. Other missions would be able to visit the Salyut. At 12: 17hrs Baikonur time, Soyuz 10 undocked and left Salyut uninhabited. The manned spacecraft flew in formation with Salyut for about 5 hours 30 minutes before making an emergency landing, at night for the first time and narrowly missing becoming the first Soviet splashdown missing a lake by a mere 50 metres, at T + 1 day 23 hours 45 minutes 54 seconds. It was left to Soyuz 11 to check in at the “space hotel”.

On 10 May, the investigation team reported their findings. With the docking system lost in the re-entry of the OM, examination of flight hardware was impossible,

but interpreting the data revealed that following the soft docking, the thrusters on Soyuz continued to fire for 30 seconds, causing a violent swing with a force equal to 160-200 kg on the docking mechanism shock absorbers. Ground tests found that the system could accept no more than 130 kg (60 per cent beyond design limits). This seemed to have buckled the docking system preventing the hard docking of the capture latches. Recommendations included strengthening the shock absorbers to twice the upper limit (260 kg) and additional controls for the commander to manually retract the probe.

Milestones

41st manned space flight

17th Soviet manned space flight

9th Soyuz manned space flight

1st Soyuz space ferry flight

1st manned space flight to land at night

1st manned space flight to be launched and to land at night

Подпись: Int. Designation Launched Launch Site Landed Landing Site Launch Vehicle Duration Callsign Objective

Подпись: SOYUZ 11
Подпись: 1971-053A 6 June 1971 Pad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 30 June 1971 200 km east of Dzhezkazgan R7 (11A511); spacecraft serial number (7K-T) #32 23 days 18 hrs 21 min 43 sec Yantar (Amber) Abbreviated occupation of first space station

Flight Crew

DOBROVOLSKY, Georgy Timofeyevich, 43, Soviet Air Force, commander VOLKOV, Vladislav Nikolayevich, 35, civilian, flight engineer, 2nd mission Previous mission: Soyuz 7 (1969)

PATSAYEV, Viktor Ivanovich, 38, civilian, test engineer

Flight Log

The Soyuz 11 prime crew comprised Aleksey Leonov, Valery Kubasov and rookie Pyotr Kolodin. A week before the launch a spot was discovered on Kubasov’s lung and it was decided to replace the whole crew with their back-ups, Georgy Dobrovolsky, Vladislav Volkov and Viktor Patsayev, who took to the skies above Baikonur at 09: 55 hrs. At 12: 24 hrs the following day, the rendezvous was completed, and at a distance of about 150 m (492 ft), Dobrovolsky moved Soyuz 11 at about 0.9m/sec (3ft/sec) towards the docking port of Salyut 1. Would Soyuz 11 get a hard dock? Soyuz slowed to 0.3m/sec (1ft/sec) 60 m (196 ft) away and soft docking was completed at 12: 49 hrs, with hard docking made at 12: 55 hrs. The hatch was opened and the crew checked in at what Western press termed a “space hotel’’ for an expected six-week stay. The Soviets, however, had decided not to mount a 30-day flight but one of no more than 25 days. After surpassing the Soyuz 9 record of 18 days by the required ten per cent, they ended their mission on the 23rd day.

Manoeuvres on Salyut placed it at a maximum altitude of 282 km (175 miles) in the 51° orbit. The Soviets boasted that the size of the Soyuz/Salyut complex was 20.11 m (66 ft) long with workspace of 99.05 m3 (3,500 ft3) but at about 25 tonnes, it was far less than the combined Apollo modules. The crew conducted a highly successful mission, using telescopes to observe the stars, monitoring the weather, taking remote sensing photographs of the Earth, growing crops (including flax), hatching frogs’ eggs, studying the atmosphere, conducting genetic experiments on fruit flies, using elasticated “Penguin” suits for exercising, and carrying out intensive biomedical work. On the surface Soyuz 11 was becoming the most successful mission

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

The ill-fated Soyuz 11 crew inside a Soyuz DM during training. From left, Dobrovolsky, Patsayev, Volkov

in Soviet history with TV pictures showing them clearly enjoying themselves, but there were moments of tension aboard the station. Personality clashes, probably due to the lack of previous flight experience for such a challenging mission (only Volkov had flown before), and their abbreviated training to make the flight they should only have supported, were contributing factors. The fear of an onboard fire on 16 June was triggered by the strong odour of smoke. Evacuating the station for Soyuz in case they had to make an emergency return to Earth, the atmosphere of Salyut was tested and found safe, with the crew returning to the station. The crew were also reluctant to follow their exercise programme, which was intended to maintain their physical condition to make the readaptation to gravity (and the stress of re-entry) much easier.

At 23: 15hrs Baikonur time on 29 June, the cosmonauts were back inside Soyuz 11, wearing their woollen flight suits and flight helmets. During preparation for undocking, a “hatch open” light indicated that the hatch between the DM and the OM was not sealed properly. Recycling the switch extinguished the light and the undocking was completed. Soyuz 11 undocked from Salyut thirteen minutes later, and retro-fire was completed at 03: 35 hrs Baikonur time on 30 June. As programmed, the Soyuz separated into three parts: the Service Module, Descent Module and Orbital Module, to allow the Descent Module to continue its stable re-entry path. As this occurred, a pressure equalisation valve opened prematurely in the Descent Module and the crew’s life-giving air began to be sucked into the vacuum of space. Patsayev and Dobrovolsky apparently tried to hand operate a pump to retain the cabin atmosphere but the crew succumbed to asphyxia. Soyuz 11, meanwhile, continued down automatically, landing safely at 04: 17 hrs Baikonur time, just before sunrise, at T + 23 days 18 hours 21 minutes 43 seconds, the longest mission by far. Rescue teams rushed to the capsule to greet the crew but found three bodies slumped in their seats, as if sleeping peacefully. The Soviet space programme was grounded and one decision made immediately: to equip future Soviet cosmonauts with the obvious uniform – a spacesuit. Nine days after the loss of the Soyuz 11 cosmonauts, all crews assigned to Salyut were stood down. In October, the station re-entered the atmosphere, breaking up in a fiery descent.

Milestones

42nd manned space flight

18th Soviet manned space flight

10th Soyuz manned space flight

1st manned occupation of a space station

New duration record of 23 days 18 hours

1st birthday celebrated in space – (Patsayev’s 38th on 19 June)

1st crew to die during entry phase

Подпись:

Подпись: APOLLO 15
Подпись: 1971-063A 26 July 1971 Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 7 August 1971 Pacific Ocean Saturn V AS-510; spacecraft serial numbers: CSM-112; LM-10; LRV-1 12 days 7hrs 11 min 53 sec CSM - Endeavour; LM - Falcon Fourth manned lunar landing mission (J1), first of three extended missions with expanded scientific objectives; first use of lunar roving vehicle

Flight Crew

SCOTT, David Randolph, 39, USAF, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: Gemini 8 (1966); Apollo 9 (1969)

WORDEN, Alfred Merrill, 39, USAF, command module pilot IRWIN, James Benson, 41, USAF, lunar module pilot

Flight Log

A picture-perfect lift-off at 09: 34hrs began what was described by NASA as “the most complex and carefully planned scientific expedition in the history of explora­tion.” From its 173 km (108 miles), 32.5° parking orbit, Apollo 15’s S-IVB achieved not only TLI but also insertion into the required hybrid trajectory to the Moon. This was accompanied by three concerns: a potentially serious short-circuit in the SPS, which required a short test burst to ensure everything was functioning properly; a broken instrument cover in the Lunar Module which showered the interior with pieces of glass; and a leaking water pipe. These combined to cause a certain amount of tetchiness in the commander, Dave Scott.

After lunar orbit insertion, eventually lowered by 92.8 km (58 miles) to 12.8 km (8 miles), Command Module Endeavour separated from Lunar Module Falcon, and the great expedition reached the high point, with a steep 26° descent over the Appenine Mountains to a landing site close to the spectacular Hadley Rille. After poking his head out of the top of Falcon’s docking port for a unique lunar stand-up EVA, Scott, playing the explorer part to perfection, set foot on Hadley Base on 31 July. He and his LMP, Jim Irwin, pulled the first lunar roving vehicle from the side of Falcon, and with the aid of lanyards, the rover unfurled. Soon the two crewmen were taking television viewers for spectacular rides to the edge of Hadley Rille, the TV camera on the rover being controlled by an engineer on the ground.

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

View of the Apollo 15 Hadley-Appenine landing area showing Hadley Rille

Three moonwalks (31 July, 1 and 2 August, lasting 6 hours 14 minutes, 6 hours 55 minutes and 4 hours 27 minutes respectively) and drives featured the deployment of the ALSEP array of instruments, drilling core samples up to 3 m (10 ft) deep, travelling a total of 27 km (17 miles) around the Moon and collecting 79 kg (174 lb) of lunar samples. The astronauts provided excellent descriptions of the surface geology and photographic documentation of the area. Towards the end of the final surface EVA, Scott proved the theory of Italian scientist, inventor and astronomer, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) by dropping a hammer and a falcon feather. They fell and hit the surface at the same time in the one-sixth gravity and vacuum environment of the Moon, just as Galileo had predicted they would. Re-parking the Rover for the TV camera to record the lunar lift-off, Scott placed a plaque in the soil together with a statue of a “fallen astronaut”. On the plaque were the names of eight astronauts and six cosmonauts (known at that time) who had died in while on active status.

With a spectacular finale seen live on television via the camera on the rover, after 66 hours 55 minutes on the Moon, with 17 hours 36 minutes of the period on the surface, Scott and Irwin lifted off in Falcon in a shower of multicoloured sparks. After docking with Endeavour, another Apollo 15 first was the deployment of the Particles

and Fields Sub-satellite into lunar orbit, from the SIM bay on the side of the Service Module. This was packed with 16 scientific experiments, which kept CMP Al Worden busy operating while his colleagues were on the surface.

Endeavour broke out of lunar orbit after 74 orbits in 6 days 1 hour 18 minutes and sailed for home. During this return journey, Worden performed the first trans-Earth EVA, lasting 34 minutes, 318,400 km (197,854 miles) from Earth, retrieving experi­ments and samples from the side of the Service Module. Endeavour splashed down close to USS Okinawa at T + 12 days 7 hours 11 minutes 53 seconds, but at a speed of 33.6 kph (21mph) rather than the planned 30.4 kph (19mph), because one of the spacecraft’s three parachutes failed to deploy. Apollo 15 was undoubtedly the max­imum that human effort has achieved in exploration, though by some it is still rather sadly remembered more for the unauthorised commemorative first day covers carried during the mission than the science return or achievements by a hard working and dedicated crew.

Milestones

43rd manned space flight 25th US manned space flight 9th Apollo manned space flight 9th Apollo CSM manned flight 7th Apollo LM manned flight 7th manned flight to the Moon 6th manned flight to orbit the Moon 4th manned lunar landing and walk 1st two-day lunar stay 1st motorised vehicle on the Moon

1st manned mission with four EVAs and three moonwalks 1st manned space flight to deploy active sub-satellite 1st manned mission featuring trans-Earth spacewalk 1st televised lift-off from the Moon 10th US and 12th flight with EVA operations

Подпись:

Подпись: APOLLO 16
Подпись: 1972-031A 16 April 1972 Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 27 April 1972 Pacific Ocean Saturn V AS-511; spacecraft serial numbers: CSM-113; LM-11; LRV-2 11 days 1 hr 51 min 25 sec CSM - Casper; LM - Orion Fifth manned lunar landing mission (J2)

Flight Crew

YOUNG, John Watts, 41, USN, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: Gemini 3 (1965); Gemini 10 (1966); Apollo 10 (1969) MATTINGLY, Thomas Kenneth II, 36, USN, command module pilot DUKE, Charles Moss Jr., 36, USAF, lunar module pilot

Flight Log

Apollo 16 lifted off from KSC at 12: 54 hrs local time and the public only pricked up their ears when Apollo 16 was in lunar orbit and the crew in the LM. Orion’s landing was delayed because the back-up yaw gimbal servo loop on the CM Casper SPS engine failed and had to be restored before the CM – in 109 km by 19 km (68 miles by 12 miles) DOI orbit – could move into a high orbit with the assurance that the engine was workable for the rest of the mission. Given the go for landing after a frustrating and worrying 5 hours 43 minutes, astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke, piloting the heaviest Lunar Module to land on the Moon, came into Descartes Base like gangbusters.

Their high-spirited antics on the Moon later delighted the public at a time when walking on the Moon no longer attracted leading headlines. Frustratingly, Young, with his peripheral vision limited in the suit and unaware that his foot was snagged around a power cable, ruined a heat flow experiment by pulling the cable out of the instrument. The enthusiastic duo made three successful EVAs around their 8°69" south 15°30" east landing site, driving for 26 km (16 miles) and collecting 96.61 kg (218 lb) of moonrock. Young also drove the lunar rover at a record speed of 18 kph (11 mph) in a “lunar grand prix’’ demonstration of its ability in one-sixth gravity vacuum conditions. The moonwalks on 20-22 April lasted 7 hours 11 minutes, 7 hours 23 minutes and 5 hours 40 minutes. The third had been curtailed due to the late landing, but they had visited one of the largest boulders found on the Moon, which was dubbed “House Rock’’. In saluting the flag, Young leaped off the surface for the

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Duke walks past the LRV during the first EVA of Apollo 16

cameras. When Duke tried to do this as well, out of the view of the camera, he forgot the mass of his backpack and came crashing down on his back on the surface, receiving a typically dry rebuke from Young. After the 20 hours of EVA and 71 hours 2 minutes on the Moon, Orion took off, again watched live on TV, to dock with Mattingly, who had flown the longest manned solo spaceflight of 81 hours 40 minutes. Another sub-satellite was deployed, and after 64 orbits in 125 hours 53 minutes, Casper lit its engine, one day earlier than planned, and headed home. En route, Mattingly made a 1 hour 24 minute EVA, before Casper landed about 2 km (1 mile) from USS Ticonderoga at T + 11 days 1 hr 51 minutes 25 seconds. They were on deck in 37 minutes, another record.

Milestones

44th manned space flight

26th US manned space flight

10th Apollo manned space flight

10th Apollo manned CSM flight

8th Apollo manned LM flight

2nd LRV operations

8th manned flight to the Moon

7th manned flight into lunar orbit

5th manned lunar landing and walk

11th US and 13th flight with EVA operations

2nd flight with trans-Earth EVA

Подпись:

Подпись: APOLLO 17
Подпись: 1972-096A 7 December 1972 Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 19 December 1972 Pacific Ocean Saturn V AS-512; spacecraft serial numbers: CSM-114; LM-12; LRV-3 12 days 13hrs 51 min 59 sec CSM - America; LM - Challenger Sixth and final Apollo lunar landing mission (J3)

Flight Crew

CERNAN, Eugene Andrew, 38, USN, commander, 3rd mission Previous missions: Gemini 9 (1966); Apollo 10 (1969)

EVANS, Ronald Ellwin, 39, USN, command module pilot SCHMITT, Harrison Hagen “Jack”, 37, civilian, lunar module pilot

Flight Log

Because Apollo 17 became the final Moon landing mission as a result of budget cuts, LMP Joe Engle was dropped and replaced by the only mission trained geologist in the astronaut corps, Jack Schmitt, who had been down to fly Apollo 18. A computer malfunction delayed the first night launch in the US space programme by 2 hours 40 minutes to 12: 33hrs local time, when the Saturn V turned night into day amid a cataclysmic blast-off. Earth parking orbit was 178 km (111 miles) apogee, 32.5° and the lunar orbital DOI parameters were 25 km by 109 km (16 miles by 68 miles). A safe journey moonwards ended with Lunar Module Challenger making a perfect landing at the Taurus-Littrow landing site, at 20°10” north 30°45" east, with two minutes of fuel left.

A broken fender on the lunar rover made driving rather difficult, since it churned up piles of tacky moondust. The fender was ingeniously mended in situ and the rover featured in three highly successful moonwalks, highlighted by geologist Schmitt discovering orange soil. For a time, he and scientists on the ground believed, mis­takenly, that this may have indicated recent volcanic activity and water on the Moon. TV pictures were spectacular and lunar surface activity ended with some ceremonial speeches by Cernan, marking the last steps on the Moon in the twentieth century.

Apollo 17 clocked up many firsts on the Moon – the longest EVA at 7 hours 37 minutes; longest EVA activity at 22 hours 5 minutes; longest distance travelled with the lunar rover at 33 km (21 miles); most samples collected during EVA 2; and furthest travelled from the LM at 7.3 km (5 miles), also during EVA 2. The times of EVAs 1

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

The Apollo lunar programme comes to an end as Apollo 17 spashes down

and 3 were 7 hours 12 minutes and 7 hours 16 minutes. Challenger lifted off and docked with Command Module America, which remained in lunar orbit for a record 147 hours 48 minutes. CMP Ron Evans made the customary trans-Earth EVA lasting 1 hour 6 minutes and the Apollo programme ended with a splashdown at T + 12 days 13 hours 51 minutes 59 seconds, near USS Ticonderoga, of the heaviest Command Module on landing. Another 110.22 kg (68 lb) of the Moon was on the Earth.

Milestones

45th manned space flight

27th US manned space flight

11th Apollo manned space flight

11th Apollo CSM manned flight

9th Apollo LM manned flight

9th manned flight to the Moon

8th manned flight into lunar orbit

6th manned lunar landing and walk

1st manned spacecraft to spend three days on the Moon

12th US and 14th flight with EVA operations

3rd flight with trans-Earth EVA

Подпись:

Подпись: SKYLAB 2
Подпись: 1973-032A 25 May 1973 Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 22 June 1973 Pacific Ocean Saturn 1B SA-206; spacecraft serial number CSM 116 28 days 0 hrs 49 min 49 sec Skylab First Skylab resident crew (28 days)

Flight Crew

CONRAD, Charles “Pete” Jr., 42, USN, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: Gemini 5 (1965); Gemini 11 (1966); Apollo 12 (1969) KERWIN, Joseph Peter, 41, USN, science pilot WEITZ, Paul Joseph, 40, USN, pilot

Flight Log

Early in the Apollo programme, when it became obvious to NASA that funding for a large space station to follow the Moon landings was unlikely to be forthcoming before the landing on the Moon had been achieved, the agency came up with an ingenious plan of using leftover Apollo hardware to build a smaller space station. The pro­gramme became known as the Apollo Applications Program, then in 1970, Skylab. By then it was clear that the agency could only support one Skylab space station with little prospect of the larger, 50-man space stations suggested only a few years before. The core space station, later named Skylab 1, was basically an empty S-IVB Saturn V third stage, internally converted on the ground into a manned orbital workshop. It was equipped with two large solar panels, a multiple docking adaptor, airlock and the Apollo Solar Telescope Mount (originally a modified LM), and equipped with four solar panels. The station would be launched unmanned and would house three, three- person crews for missions lasting 28, 56 and 56 days respectively. Inside and outside the 368 m3 (13,000 ft3) space station, these crews were to conduct the most detailed science programme ever attempted: 270 experiments in life sciences, solar physics, Earth observation, astrophysics, materials processing, engineering and technology.

The first step was to get Skylab 1 into orbit. The final two-stage Saturn V, AS-513 , carried the 74,796 kg (164,925 lb) Skylab into space, but en route its micrometeoroid thermal shield was torn loose, together with one solar panel. Even worse, the other solar panel failed to deploy. Skylab (1973-027A) was the heaviest object in space but a useless one. Skylab 2, the manned flight of an Apollo Command and Service Module, launched on a Saturn 1B, was to have followed on 15 May, the day after Skylab 1, but

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

The Skylab Orbital Workshop in orbit, showing its one remaining solar panel and the parasol sunshield

was delayed until 25 May so that salvage procedures and tools could be devised. Equipment was being packed into Skylab 2 two hours before its launch at 09:05 hrs local time, from a uniquely configured Pad 39B, with a pedestal making the Saturn 1B tall enough to use some of the same pad and tower facilities as a Saturn 5.

The ebullient Conrad made a rendezvous with the crippled Skylab. The first salvage attempt was carried out by Paul Weitz, who stood on his seat in the Command Module, with science pilot Joe Kerwin desperately hanging on to his ankles. Weitz

tried to pull the jammed solar panel free using a hooked pole, during a 37 minute stand-up EVA. This failed, then Skylab 2 failed to dock with the station. Finally, after eight attempts in two hours, Skylab 1 and 2 became one. The crew made Skylab, orbiting at 50°, 442 km (275 miles) apogee, habitable within four days by poking a parasol sun shield out of a small instrument airlock. On the twelfth day of the mission, 7 June, Conrad and Kerwin made the bravest and most hazardous EVA in history, lasting 3 hours 30 minutes. Using wirecutters, Conrad manually pulled out the errant solar panel, saving the mission and the whole programme.

The remarkable Skylab 2 mission lasted a total of 28 days 0 hours 49 minutes 49 seconds, during which time the astronauts completed 46 of the planed 55 experi­ments, working on them for 392 hours. Each astronaut performed one EVA, Weitz and Conrad having been outside on 19 June for 1 hr 44 minutes. Their exercise routine and lifestyle aboard enabled them to return to Earth feeling remarkably well, on board the recovery ship, USS Ticonderoga.

Milestones

46th manned space flight

28th US manned space flight

12th Apollo CSM manned space flight

1st US space station mission

New duration record – 28 days 0 hours

1st spacecraft salvage and repair mission

13th US and 15th flight with EVA operations

Conrad celebrates his 43rd birthday in space (2 June)

Подпись:

Подпись: SKYLAB 3
Подпись: 1973-050A 28 July 1973 Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 25 September 1973 Pacific Ocean Saturn 1B 207; spacecraft serial number CSM-117 59 days 11 hrs 9 min 4 sec Skylab Second Skylab resident crew (59 days)

Flight Crew

BEAN, Alan LaVern, 41, USN, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: Apollo 12 (1969)

GARRIOTT, Owen Kay, 42, civilian, science pilot LOUSMA, Jack Robert, 37, USMC, pilot

Flight Log

Skylab 3 was pressed into service earlier than planned because of worries about the integrity of the project, particularly its thermal protection qualities. It was launched at 07: 11 hrs local time with the three astronauts, equipment and two spiders, Anita and Arabella, aboard. Docking was flawless and within hours the three crewmen Al Bean, Jack Lousma and Owen Garriott were floating inside the space station, 442 km (275 miles) up at an inclination of 50°. Space adaptation syndrome, or space sickness, hit them, particularly Lousma, and impaired their early activities.

When an RCS thruster quad on the Service Module of Skylab 3 was seen leaking and another quad showed signs of doing so, NASA put an emergency plan into action should the spacecraft be disabled. They would launch Skylab Rescue 1, with astro­nauts Vance Brand and Don Lind, to dock with the other port on Skylab and bring the three crew home, crammed together in the Command Module of the rescue vehicle. In the end, Brand and Lind’s unique maiden space flight was not required.

The Skylab 3 crew endeared themselves to the ground, operating without his­trionics and highly effectively. Bean and Lousma tested a prototype of a manned manoeuvring unit inside Skylab (as did an untrained Garriott, demonstrating how easy it was to “fly”) and all three went for spacewalks to retrieve, observe and repair. On 6 August, Garriott and Lousma were outside for 6 hours 29 minutes, and on 24 August for 4 hours 30 minutes, while on 22 September Bean and Garriott made a 2 hour 45 minute EVA. They deployed two new parasols, and replaced gyros and nine other pieces of equipment.

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

This Apollo spacecraft carried the Skylab 3 crew, and two spiders, up to the station

Mission goals were exceeded by 50 per cent, with 305 man hours out of the total 1,081 hours of experimentation being spent on the Apollo Telescope Mount performing solar observations. The spiders spun webs in zero gravity. Altogether it was a rewarding flight, which ended at T + 59 days 11 hours 9 minutes 4 seconds, near the USS New Orleans, southwest of San Diego.

Milestones

47th manned space flight

29th US manned space flight

13th Apollo CSM manned space flight

1st manned space station re-occupation mission

1st manned space flight to exceed 50 days

New duration record – 59 days 11 hours

14th US and 16th flight with EVA operations

Подпись:

Подпись: SOYUZ 12
Подпись: 1973-067A 27 September 1973 Pad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 29 September 1973 396 km southwest of Karaganda R7 (11A511); spacecraft serial number (7K-T) #37 1 day 23 hrs 15 min 32 sec Ural (Urals) Manned test flight of Soyuz space station ferry without solar arrays

Flight Crew

LAZAREV, Vasily Grigoryevich, 45, Soviet Air Force, commander MAKAROV, Oleg Grigoryevich, 40, civilian, flight engineer

Flight Log

After the Salyut 1/Soyuz 11 disaster, the Soviets redesigned the Soyuz vehicle and attempted to launch new Salyuts without much success. A new Soyuz ferry was designed to carry just two crewmen, not three, this time wearing the obviously necessary pressure suits, with additional life support systems. Another innovation was the removal of solar panels and the reliance on batteries to sustain the craft during a two-day independent flight and rendezvous and docking with a Salyut.

Cosmos 496 was a test flight of this new Soyuz ferry vehicle in June 1972 and the first manned space flights to a new Salyut 2 were readied, only for the intended Salyut 2 (DOS-2) to fail to orbit in July that year. A military version of a Salyut (Almaz-1), also called Salyut 2 (1973-017A), actually got into orbit in April 1973, only to break apart and decay. Then the following month the third attempted Salyut, which could have been called Salyut 3 (DOS-3), became Cosmos 557 (1973-026A) when it, too, failed. The Soyuz ferry was tested again as Cosmos 573 in June 1973.

Without a Salyut to fly to, the Soviets decided to fly the ferry vehicle anyway, as Soyuz 12, crewed by Vasily Lazarev and Oleg Makarov, who were originally to have stayed aboard a Salyut. Their two-day flight (restricted to prevent low battery power making it impossible to attempt a re-entry) was announced as such beforehand to prevent western news reports of a Soviet manned flight meeting a “premature” end. Launch from Baikonur at 17: 18 hrs was followed by orbital manoeuvres in the 51° orbit, mimicking those that would have been made to reach a Salyut. Maximum altitude attained was 344 km (214 miles). Lazarev and Makarov were hardly stretched and Earth resources photography seemed the high point. The capsule landed about 396 km (246 miles) south west of Karaganda after a flight lasting only 1 day 23 hours

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Makarov (left) and Lazarev discuss their preparations for their upcoming mission with Georgi Beregovoy

15 minutes 32 seconds. But at least the Soviets had launched men into space again, for the first time in 27 months, re-qualifying Soyuz for further operational use.

Milestones

48th manned space flight

19th Soviet manned space flight

11th Soyuz manned space flight

1st Soviet announcement of planned mission duration

Подпись:

Подпись: SKYLAB 4
Подпись: 1973-090A 16 November 1973 Pad 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 8 February 1974 Pacific Ocean Saturn 1B 208; spacecraft serial number CSM-118 84 days 1 hr 15 min 37 sec Skylab Third and final Skylab resident crew (84 days)

Flight Crew

CARR, Gerald Paul, 41, USMC, commander GIBSON, Edward George, 37, civilian, science pilot POGUE, William Reid, 43, USAF, pilot

Flight Log

This open-ended mission was extended from 56 to 84 days to make the best of the final mission to the station. The launch of Skylab 4 was also delayed for ten days because hairline cracks were found in the tail fins of the Saturn 1B booster, built in 1964. The delay was convenient in that it gave the astronauts an opportunity to observe Comet Kohoutek when it was at its “best”. The comet, heralded as the Comet of the Century by some astronomers, proved to be an anticlimax. The first all-rookie American crew since Gemini 8 took off at 09: 01hrs into extremely clear skies and headed for a rendezvous with Skylab, in its 50°, 442 km (275 miles) orbit. Gerry Carr, Ed Gibson and Bill Pogue docked at the second attempt but before Pogue had time to enter Skylab, he vomited into a sick bag, which the crew dumped “secretly” into the space station’s garbage storage system.

Data storage tapes recorded their conversations and when these were played back to the ground, it caused much ill feeling. The commander, Carr, apologised for his error and the crew got down to work, but not without elements of complaint, giving them the erroneous reputation of being almost mutinous. This resulted from totally frank and private comments they were invited to make about the Skylab systems and work regime by ground control being made known to some press, who unfairly labelled the crew as particularly difficult. They did insist on a reduced workload at one point early in the mission when they thought they needed a rest. This prompted the media to label them the first crew to “strike” in space, which again was not totally correct.

However, Skylab 4 was a very impressive mission – America’s longest to date and for some time afterwards at 84 days. The crew conducted 56 experiments, 26 science

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

The Skylab 4 crew after recovery. (L to r) Gibson, Pogue and Carr

demonstrations, and studied the sun for 338 hours. They photographed and observed the elusive Comet Kohoutek during one of several spacewalks, on Christmas Day 1973, which gave Carr, with 15 hours 18 minutes, the most EVA experience on Skylab. Gibson and Pogue made a 6 hour 33 minute EVA on 22 November; Carr and Pogue’s Christmas excursion lasted 7 hours 1 minute; Carr and Gibson went outside on 29 December for 3 hours 28 minutes; and again on 3 February for 5 hours 19 minutes.

Skylab was abandoned and Carr made a manual re-entry after noticing a mis­alignment of the Command Module, splashing down near USS New Orleans, the first US crew not to come home watched by live television. Their mission of 84 days 1 hour 15 minutes 31 seconds remained America’s longest until the flight of Norman Thagard aboard the Russian Mir station in 1995 – some 21 years later. Plans for Skylab 5 were abandoned, as were the hopes of flying a Skylab В workshop in 1976. For some years, it was hoped that a Shuttle might have visited the station in the late 1970s, but an increase in solar activity increased the atmospheric drag on the station, and delays in the Shuttle programme meant this plan was not practical. Skylab made an ignomi­nious exit from the scene, making a spectacular re-entry during orbit 34,981 over Australia in 1979, with some of its debris surviving re-entry. The debris footprint was about 65 km x 3,860 km, with debris found east and north west of the town of Perth, and the largest piece being 82 kg of aluminium – thought to be the door of one of the film vaults.

Milestones

49th manned space flight

30th US manned space flight

14th Apollo CSM manned space flight

New duration record – 84 days 1 hour

15th US and 17th flight with EVA operations

Pogue celebrates his 44th birthday in space (23 January)

Подпись:

Подпись: SOYUZ 13
Подпись: 1973-103A 18 December 1973 Pad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 26 December 1973 198 km southwest of Karaganda R7 (11A511); spacecraft serial number (7K-T) #33 7 days 20hrs 55 min 35 sec Kavkaz (Caucasus) Astrophysical and biological research scientific solo Soyuz mission

Flight Crew

KLIMUK, Pyotr Illich, 31, Soviet Air Force, commander LEBEDEV, Valentin Vitalyevich, 31, civilian, flight engineer

Flight Log

The first Soviet manned space flight dedicated to science, Soyuz 13, uniquely con­figured with an array of Orion 2 celestial telescopes at the front of the Orbital Module in place of a docking system, was launched at 16: 35hrs local time into a 51° orbit, which would have a maximum altitude of 256 km (159 miles). The Orion telescope mount and the Oasis 2 protein manufacturing unit on board Soyuz 13 should have been flown on a Salyut. Comet Kohoutek’s appearance may also have been irresistible. This and the recent decision to dock a Soyuz with an American Apollo in 1975, seemed the raison d’etre for flying an independent mission of what was, essentially, a Soyuz 10/11-type spacecraft on a useful mission to bolster US confidence in the Soyuz. However, it was the loss of the Salyut that initiated the Soviet decision to fly the solo Soyuz, rather than demonstrating their ability to the Americans after the Soyuz 11 tragedy. A Soyuz was specially built for the mission. The original prime crew consisted of Commander Lev Vorobyov and Flight Engineer Valeri Yazdovsky, with back-ups Pyotr Klimuk and Vitaly Sevastyanov (who was soon replaced when medical problems affected his flying status). An all-rookie team prepared for the mission, with Valentin Lebedev replacing Sevastyanov. However, just three or four days before launch, the prime crew were deemed incompatible for working together in space and were replaced by the back-ups. They flew the mission without a new back­up team assigned. This caused bitterness, as both original crewmembers were very principled men, often speaking their mind and making “enemies’’ of the very people who selected crews to fly, resulting in their removal so close to the launch date.

The young Soyuz 13 crew, Pyotr Klimuk and Valentin Lebedev, joined the Skylab 4 crew in space, on the first occasion that US and Soviets were in orbit together

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Inside the cramped Soyuz 13 module, Klimuk (left) and Lebedev pose for one of the few on – orbit images taken and released in connection with the astrophysical solo Soyuz mission

– although they did not rendezvous or communicate with each other. The Orion 2 took interesting ultraviolet images of planetary nebulae close to the star Capella, down to a stellar magnitude of 13. The closed-loop Oasis system bred two types of bacteria in a test of the practicalities of food production in space colonies.

For the first time, the Soviets announced that a mission was at its half-way stage, but did not announce its end at T + 7 days 20 hours 55 minutes 35 seconds, 198 km (123 miles) southwest of Karaganda until an hour after space monitor Geoffrey Perry of the Kettering Grammar School’s remarkable team.

Milestones

50th manned space flight 20th Soviet manned space flight 12th Soyuz manned space flight

1st time both US and Soviet spacemen in orbit at the same time

Подпись: Int. Designation Launched Launch Site Landed Landing Site Launch Vehicle Duration Callsign Objective

Подпись: SOYUZ 14
Подпись: 1974-051A 3 July 1974 Pad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 19 July 1974 Southeast of Dzhezkazgan R7 (11A511); spacecraft serial number (7K-TA) #62 15 days 17hrs 30 min 28 sec Berkut (Golden Eagle) First Almaz military space station resident crew programme

Flight Crew

POPOVICH, Pavel Romanovich, 43, Soviet Air Force, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: Vostok 4 (1962)

ARTYUKHIN, Yuri Petrovich, 44, Soviet Air Force, flight engineer

Flight Log

On 24 June 1974, the replacement for the first Almaz military space station (desig­nated Salyut 2 to mask its real purpose and which was never manned because it tumbled out of orbit in 1973), was launched by a Proton from Baikonur. As with Salyut 2, transmissions from the Salyut 3 (Almaz-2) space station as it manoeuvred itself into the operating orbit were on a military frequency, the first indications that manned military space operations were to follow. This seemed to be confirmed when Soyuz 14 was launched into orbit at 23: 51 hrs local time from Baikonur, into a 51° orbit which would attain a maximum altitude of 273 km (170 miles).

On board were Vostok veteran Pavel Popovich, a blast from the past indeed, and military flight engineer, Lt-Col. Yuri Artyukhin. A day and two hours after launch, Popovich had docked at the rear port of the station, which had a recoverable capsule at its front. Salyut 3’s main instrument appears to have been a 10 m (33 ft) focal length reconnaissance telescope. According to the many reports about the regime of the crew, Popovich and Artyukhin worked to a strict eight hourly routine: work for eight hours, relaxation and exercise, then sleep. They used special elasticated exercise suits, called Atlet and Penguin, harnessed to a treadmill to maintain their cardiovascular condition.

The crew’s announced schedule of activities focused on medical experiments but it is clear that they were much busier conducting classified reconnaissance work. Equip­ment used included the Polimnon-2M, Rezeda-5, Levkoi-3 and Amak-3 medical units. There was a scare when a massive solar storm sent a worrying amount of radiation towards Salyut, threatening to abort the mission, whose planned 14 day duration was

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Popovich (left) and Artyukhin wearing Sokol suits during a break in training

confirmed by the Soviets when they announced that it was at its half-way point. Soyuz 14 landed south east of Dzhezkazgan at T + 15 days 14 hours 30 minutes 28 seconds. Salyut 3, its recoverable capsule still attached, remained to receive another manned crew. The military nature of Soyuz 14 overshadowed the fact that it was the Soviets’ first successful space station mission.

Milestones

51st manned space flight

21st Soviet manned space flight

13th Soyuz manned space flight

1st dedicated manned military space flight

Подпись:

Подпись: SOYUZ 15
Подпись: 1974-067A 26 August 1974 Pad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 28 August 1974 48 km southwest of Tselininograd R7 (11A511); spacecraft serial number (7K-TA) #63 2 days 0hrs 12 min 11 sec Dunay (Danube) Second Salyut 3 resident crew programme

Flight Crew

SARAFANOV, Gennady Vasilyevich, 32, Soviet Air Force, commander DEMIN, Lev, 48, Soviet Air Force, flight engineer

Flight Log

The second manned occupation of Salyut 3 was to be made by Soyuz 15, which made a routine exit from Baikonur at 00: 58 hrs on 26 August. Docking was scheduled to be made on the sixteenth orbit about a day later. However, Soyuz 15 approached Salyut far too quickly, closing in at a speed of about 10m/sec (33 ft/sec) due to excessive and uncontrollable burns, from a distance of about 48 m (157 ft) during what was planned to be a manual approach and docking. As a result it missed the station, and by the time docking was to have been achieved, Soyuz 15 was 112 km (70 miles) ahead of Salyut. The crew reported that the spacecraft’s manoeuvring controls were operating in reverse, thus braking firings led to an increase in velocity and vice versa.

The automatic rendezvous system Igla failed, though this was not immediately acknowledged by engineers from NPO Energiya, who pushed the blame on to the crew. For some time there were suggestions that the failure was due to human error, although the cosmonauts reportedly made some attempt to re-establish a compatible orbit and approach though it is not clear whether they attempted manual docking. Indeed, the youthful Gennady Sarafanov and the elderly Lev Demin, at 48 the oldest man in space at that time, never made another flight. The battery power and propellant levels on the spacecraft approached the limits of the mission and the flight had to be abandoned with an emergency retro-fire out of its maximum altitude 236 km (147 miles), 5° inclination orbit, and a night landing 48 km (30 miles) southwest of Tselininograd at T + 2 days 0 hours 12 minutes 11 seconds.

The Soviets, presumably mindful of their responsibilities with the Soyuz-Apollo link planned for the following year, attempted to write off the Soyuz 15 mission as a unique manned test of an unmanned re-supply vessel, a test of a totally automatic docking which would have ended with the crew coming home after two days anyway.

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Soyuz 15 prime crew, left Sarafanov, right Demin

It was even claimed that the night landing was a deliberate plan, too! As it turned out, the flight of Soyuz 15 would be far from unique. In 1999, it was finally revealed that the Igla system had failed and was issuing false commands to the orientation and manoeuvring system. Thus, when Soyuz 15 was only 350 metres from Salyut, Igla “thought” it was 20 km away and initiated a long range engine burn. Despite evidence to the contrary, the inexperience of the crew did not help their case and they were tarnished with an official reprimand, even though it was not their fault. Salyut 3 could have supported another crew but there were no Soyuz vehicles ready for a launch and on 23 September, its programme was completed with the recovery of a small capsule containing exposed film. On 24 January 1975, less than a month after Salyut 4 was safely in orbit and with a crew aboard, Salyut 3 was commanded to a destructive re­entry over the Pacific Ocean.

Milestones

52nd manned space flight 22nd Soviet manned space flight 14th Soyuz manned space flight 1st grandfather in space (Demin)

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

1974-096A 2 December 1974

Подпись: Int. Designation Launched Launch Site Landed Landing Site Launch Vehicle Duration Callsign ObjectivePad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan

8 December 1974

30 km north of Dzhezkazgan

R7 (11A511U); spacecraft serial number (7K-TM) #73 5 days 22hrs 23 min 35 sec Buran (Snowstorm)

Soviet ASTP manned test-flight

Flight Crew

FILIPCHENKO, Anatoly Vasilyevich, 46, Soviet Air Force, commander, 2nd mission

Previous mission: Soyuz 7 (1969)

RUKAVISHNIKOV, Nikolay Nikolayevich, 42, civilian, flight engineer, 2nd mission

Previous mission: Soyuz 10 (1971)

Flight Log

Following three years of discussions which featured a Soyuz docking with a Skylab, or an Apollo docking with a Salyut, the first international manned space mission was agreed. The climax of detente between the USA and the Soviet Union in 1972 was marked by the agreement between President Richard Nixon and Premier Leonid Brezhnev for a joint flight between Apollo and Soyuz spacecraft in July 1975. The Apollo would be fitted with a docking module with an androgynous docking ring adapter, which would mate with a similar docking ring adapter on the front of the Orbital Module of the Soyuz. The resulting Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, ASTP, was a remarkable example of international cooperation and a fusion of technology and communications. To ensure that they had everything working well, the Soviets conducted two unmanned tests of the newly configured Soyuz as Cosmos 638 and 672, and followed this up with a manned flight of Soyuz 16, which would make a simulated rendezvous and docking with an imaginary Apollo.

Despite the close cooperation, the US was caught by surprise when the Soviets announced, without warning, that they had launched Soyuz 16, with Anatoly Filipchenko and Nikolay Rukavishnikov, at 14: 40 hrs local time from Baikonur, and that it was already in orbit. At first, the Soyuz was placed into a 51° orbit with an apogee of 291km (181 miles), too high for a real ASTP mission. Soyuz, however, moved into a more compatible orbit for an evaluation of the Soyuz guidance and manoeuvring system.

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Filipchenko inside the OM during the Soyuz 16 ASTP dress rehearsal mission

The docking system had an imitation Apollo docking ring fixed to it and the cosmonauts used this to simulate various docking modes. They also changed the cabin atmosphere to an oxygen-nitrogen mix as used in Apollo. Soyuz conducted further orbital manoeuvring tests, including a circularisation burn, and signalled to the Apollo team to conduct a mock Apollo launch and to start important tracking tests. All in all, it was pretty unspectacular but highly successful, giving the US more confidence in the Soviet system after its Salyut and Soyuz 15 failures.

Filipchenko and Rukavishnikov landed in the cold steppe land at T + 5 days 22 hours 23 minutes 35 seconds and were immediately wrapped in thick overcoats.

Milestones

53rd manned space flight 23rd Soviet manned space flight 15th Soyuz manned space flight

1st manned use of R7/Soyuz U (11A511U) launch vehicle

1975-001A 11 January 1975

Подпись:Pad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan

9 February 1975

110 km northeast of Tselinograd

R7 (11A511); spacecraft serial number (7K-T) #38

29 days 13hrs 19 min 45 sec

Zenit (Zenith)

First Salyut 4 resident crew programme

Flight Crew

GUBAREV, Aleksey Aleksandrovich, 42, Soviet Air Force, commander GRECHKO, Georgy Mikhailovich, 42, civilian, flight engineer

Flight Log

The Soviet’s next space station, the civilian (DOS-4) Salyut 4 (1974-104A), was launched on 26 December 1974. It was basically the same as Salyut 1, but instead of two pairs of solar panels it had three steerable panels mounted centrally. Soyuz 17, the first visitor to Salyut 4, with rookie cosmonauts Aleksey Gubarev and Georgy Grechko aboard, was launched at 02: 43 hrs local time from Baikonur and entered a 51° orbit which had a maximum altitude of 354 km (220 miles). Docking with Salyut’s front port took place about a day later. The crew – who had found a notice telling them to wipe their feet! – entered Salyut and freshened its air and powered it up.

Salyut 4, equipped with a new Delta automatic navigation system, was dedicated to science, carrying seven astronomical, eight medical and at least six other techno­logical experiments. The crew was kept so busy that it was estimated that Grechko covered 4.8 weightless km (3 miles) a day moving from instrument to instrument. They used a bicycle ergonometer, operated a solar telescope, grew plants in a space garden, observed a supernova, and tried out different muscle loading suits. The crew was quiet and methodical and was described as the least demonstrative ever flown.

The flight was so quietly followed that it came as some surprise that when Soyuz 17 landed it had flown the longest Soviet space flight – T + 29 days 13 hours 19 minutes 45 seconds – and had exceeded the flight time of the first US Skylab mission. Gubarev and Grechko came through cloud only 240 m (787 ft) high and landed in gusts of wind of up to 70kph (43mph), 110 km (68 miles) northeast of Tselinograd.

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Grechko (left) and Gubarev evaluating the restraint harness on the Salyut 4 mock-up at TsPK

 

Milestones

 

54th manned space flight 24th Soviet manned space flight 16th Soyuz manned space flight

 

None – failed to reach orbit 5 April 1975

Подпись: Int. Designation Launched Launch Site Landed Landing Site Launch Vehicle Duration Callsign Objective Pad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 5 April 1975

Southwest of Gorno-Altaisk, Western Siberia, 1,200 metres up on the slope of the Teremok-3 mountain R7 (11A511); spacecraft serial number (7K-T) #39 21 min 27 sec Ural (Urals)

Intended second Salyut 4 resident crew

Flight Crew

LAZAREV, Vasily Grigoryevich, 47, Soviet Air Force, commander,

2nd mission

Previous mission: Soyuz 12 (1973)

MAKAROV, Oleg Grigoryevich, 42, civilian, flight engineer, 2nd mission Previous mission: Soyuz 12 (1973)

Flight Log

The task of the Soyuz 18 cosmonauts, Vasily Lazarev and Oleg Makarov, given a Salyut mission at last, was to extend the Soviet manned duration record to about 60 days. They were launched at 16: 02hrs local time from Baikonur. The strap-on boosters of the SL-4 shut down as planned, the core stage shut down and all seemed to be going well as the staging process began. The second stage ignited and spewed its exhaust through the lattice-like framework attaching the core and second stage. These stages were to be separated by firing two sets of six pyrotechnic latches, one set at the top and the other at the bottom of the lattice structure.

Three of the upper latches fired prematurely, partially separating the upper stage on one side of its circumference. The flight of Soyuz 18 was in deep trouble and the crew was powerless to do anything during this automatic phase of the mission. With separation incomplete the second stage was now dragging a spent core stage. Soyuz veered 10° off course before the abort system gyroscopes detected the lack of control. Soyuz itself fired its engine to separate from the strangely configured, errant rocket. The Orbital Module and Instrument Module were jettisoned and the Descent Module was positioned for its low-speed, high-G re-entry from a height of 192 km (119 miles). The crew experienced only 400 seconds of weightlessness instead of their planned 60 days!

The crew, being subjected to as much as 20.6-G, were extremely concerned that they were heading for a landing in China, as relations between the two countries

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

Lazarev and Makarov perform one of many Soviet pre-flight traditions. Unfortunately, these did not help them complete their mission as planned

were not good at the time. In the event, they missed the border by 320 km (199 miles), landing 1,574 km (978 miles) downrange from Baikonur, at T + 21 minutes 27 seconds – the longest sub-orbital manned space flight, the shortest Soviet manned space flight, and the shortest two-person manned space flight. The capsule apparently landed on a mountain and had been rolling down before its parachute became snarled on a tree.

Rescue teams spotted them 30 minutes later and they were recovered some time later that day. Detailed accounts of the launch abort have been released over the years, including recollections from the two cosmonauts themselves. However, it is doubtful whether any announcement would have been made at the time had it not been for the fact that ASTP was looming. As it was, the worried USA officials were told that Soyuz 18 was launched on an old booster and that the Soyuz intended for the joint mission would use the uprated version first used to launch a crew on Soyuz 16, the ASTP dress-rehearsal mission the previous December.

Milestones

55th manned space flight

25th Soviet manned space flight

17th Soyuz manned space flight (1st sub-orbital)

1st aborted launch and emergency landing

1975-044A 24 May 1975

Подпись: Int. Designation Launched Launch Site Landed Landing Site Launch Vehicle Duration Callsign ObjectivePad 1, Site 5, Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan 26 July 1975

54 km northeast of Arkalyk R7 (11A511); spacecraft serial number (7K-T) #40 62 days 23 hrs 20 min 08 sec Kavkas (Caucasus)

Second (originally 3rd) Salyut 4 resident crew programme

Flight Crew

KLIMUK, Pyotr Ilyich, 32, Soviet Air Force, commander, 2nd mission Previous mission: Soyuz 13 (1973)

SEVASTYANOV, Vitaly Ivanovich, 39, civilian, flight engineer, 2nd mission Previous mission: Soyuz 9 (1970)

Flight Log

It didn’t take the determined Soviet space team long to recover from the Soyuz 18-1 abort. Soyuz 18 was launched at 19: 58 hrs local time with the original back-up crew, which duly docked with Salyut 4 in the standard one day. Cosmonauts Klimuk and Sevastyanov began a work regime which involved detailed work on one experiment before moving on to another. This single discipline approach was illustrated by the multi-spectral photography session lasting from 8 to 11 June. The crew, which reached a maximum altitude of 361 km (224 miles) during the mission, took over 2,000 remote­sensing photographs, and Sevastyanov claimed that as a result the whereabouts of even the smallest ore deposit in the Soviet Union was known.

The crew repaired a cosmic ray detector and took over 600 pictures of the sun with the OTS solar telescope. One of the crew’s X-ray photographs indicated that the celestial object Cygnus X-1 was a black hole. Thirteen days were spent on astro­physics, six on technical and ten on medical experiments. The crew also spent ten days of relaxation and two days were taken up with packing and unpacking equipment, the Soviets estimated. On 15 July, there came a “symbolic rendezvous” with the ASTP crews, when the spacecraft came to within 320 km (199 miles) of each other. It has been reported that such were their struggles with the space station’s environmental control system towards the end of the mission that it was impossible to see out of the windows and the walls of the station became mouldy.

There was considerable interest about how the crew would feel after the flight of over 60 days. Soyuz 18 came home to a televised landing 54 km (34 miles) northeast of Arkalyk at T + 62 days 23 hours 20 minutes 20 seconds, 59 days of which were spent

The Second Decade: 1971-1980

The second crew to reside aboard Salyut 4, left Sevastyanov and Klimuk

making 900 orbits aboard Salyut 4. Doctors wanted to carry the crew from the spacecraft but Klimuk emotionally insisted that the crew egress on their own. They both admitted that re-adaptation to gravity took some time. Indeed, Klimuk once awoke to see Sevastyanov sleeping in his terrestrial bed with his arms raised in the air as if floating in weightlessness.

Salyut 4 supported a further mission, the unmanned Soyuz 20 in November. This was used to test, in part, the planned Progress re-supply mission profile that would begin with Salyut 6 in 1978. The station re-entered the atmosphere in February 1977.

Milestones

56th manned space flight 26th Soviet manned space flight 18th Soyuz manned space flight

Sevastyanov celebrates his 40th birthday in space (8 July) Klimuk celebrates his 33rd birthday in space (10 July)

STS 41-G

Int. Designation

1984-108A

Launched

4 October 1984

Launch Site

Pad 39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Landed

13 October 1984

Landing Site

Runway 33 North, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Launch Vehicle

OV-099 Challenger/ET-15/SRB A63; A64/SSME #1 2023; #2 2020; #3 2021

Duration

8 days 5 hrs 23 min 38 sec

Callsign

Challenger

Objective

Satellite deployment mission; Space Imaging Radar experiments; satellite refuelling demonstration

Flight Crew

CRIPPEN, Robert Laurel, 47, USN, commander, 4th mission Previous missions: STS-1 (1981); STS-7 (1983); STS 41-C (1984) MCBRIDE, Jon Andrew, 41, USN, pilot

RIDE, Sally Kristen, 33, civilian, mission specialist 1, 2nd mission Previous mission: STS-7 (1983)

SULLIVAN, Kathryn Dwyer, 32, civilian, mission specialist 2 LEESTMA, David Cornell, 35, USN, mission specialist 3 SCULLY-POWER, Paul Desmond, 40, USN, payload specialist 1 GARNEAU, Marc, 35, Canadian Navy, payload specialist 2

Flight Log

Bob Crippen, the first astronaut to fly four Shuttle missions, was specially selected to command this mission to evaluate the effectiveness of flying two missions close together (he had commanded STS 41-C six months before). The main reason was to determine the feasibility of recycling complete Shuttle flight crews to minimise training time and free up limited simulators and resources as Shuttle flight rates increased. Delayed from 1 October, the launch at 07: 03 hrs on 4 October was early enough to create spectacular colour schemes as Challenger punched a hole in the cloud-filled sky as it headed for its 57° orbit and a maximum altitude of 304 km (189 miles). The scientific mission was almost thrown into disarray immediately when the satellite part of the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment project, ERBE, misbehaved prior to deployment. Computer software errors and the failure of the satellite’s solar panels combined to foil the mission specialists, until Ride got hold of ERBE with the RMS robot arm and shook it. The panel unfolded and the satellite was deployed to begin its work.

STS 41-G

Clockwise from top left, the STS 41-G crew of McBride, Garneau, Leestma, Ride, Sullivan, Crippen and Scully-Power heads for the launch pad

Then a Shuttle Imaging Radar, SIR-B, antenna panel failed to deploy and Chal­lenger’s Ku-band antenna failed to lock into position, making it impossible to send SIR data real-time. The crew performed some electronic troubleshooting, locking the antenna into one position, enabling about 40 per cent of SIR data to be relayed in real­time. These images were of such clarity that many were impounded temporarily by the Department of Defense. During their 3 hour 27 minute EVA on 11 October, Leestma (EV1) and Sullivan (EV2) practised an in-orbit refuelling technique, preparing the transfer of highly dangerous hydrazine propellant between two containers before entering the orbiter to monitor events from relative safety.

The first Canadian in space, Marc Garneau, operated a suite of ten experiments, labelled CANEX (Canadian Experiments), that focused on space technology, Earth and space sciences. Australian born, and US naturalized oceanographer Paul Scully – Power was flying for the US Navy to conduct real-time observations of ocean phenomena from space.

After a re-entry over the east coast of the USA for the first time, Challenger made a 384 kph (239 mph) landing at runway 33 North at the Kennedy Space Center, with main gear touchdown at 8 days 5 hours 23 minutes 33 seconds, and a 3,220 m (10,564 ft) 59-second rollout. After the mission, the longest by seven crew, it was found that Challenger could have met with disaster during re-entry. Over 4,000 heatshield tiles were found to be loose, their adhesive weakened by a new injection waterproofing technique.

Milestones

101st manned space flight

44th US manned space flight

13th Shuttle mission

6th flight of Challenger

1st flight with seven crew members

1st manned space flight by a Canadian

1st flight with two female crew members

1st US male-female EVA

19th US and 28th flight with EVA operations