Category AN AIRIINE AN0 ITS AIRCRAFT

Wide-Bodied Era

Подпись: Fleet Number Reg. MSN Delivery Date Remarks and Disposal Series 131 17101 N93101 19667 18 Aug 70 Sold to Boeing, 4 Mar 75. Converted to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. 17102 N93102 19668 31 Dec 69 City of Paris. Sold to Boeing, 14 Nov 75. Converted to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. 17103 N93103 19669 8 Oct 70 Sold to Boeing, 2 Dec 75. Converted to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. 17104 N93104 19670 20 Feb 70 Leased to Tower Air, 10 Dec 90 to 15 Apr 91. Sold to Jet-Away Aviation Services, 30 Jun 97. 17105 N93105 19671 7 Mar 70 Stored Kansas City, Dec 96. 17106 N93106 19672 3 Apr 70 Sold to JBB Leasing Inc., 22 Dec 89, leased back and returned, 25 Mar 92. 17107 N93107 19673 29 Apr 70 Sold to Pacific Aircorp 747 Inc., 1 Nov 93, leased back. 17108 N93108 19674 7 May 70 Star of Madrid. Sold to Pacific Aircorp 747 Inc., 1 Nov 93, leased back. 17109 N93109 19675 23 May 70 Sold to CIT Leasing Corporation, 7 Mar 95, leased back. 17115 N93115 20320 20 May 71 Leased from First Chicago Leasing Corp., 20 May 70 to 1 Jun 86. Coverted to 747-131(F) for Evergreen Inti. Airlines. 17116 N53116 20321 21 May 71 Leased from GATX Leasing Corporation, 21 May 71 to 1 Jun 86. Leased again from 1 May 87. Bought 15 Dec 93. Sold to CIT Leasing Corporation, 7 Mar 95, leased back. 17117 N93117 20322 24 May 71 Leased from GATX Leasing Corporation, 25 May 71 to 1 Jun 86. Leased from Citicorp North America Inc., 5 Dec 88, returned 30 Nov 92. Series 125/131 (Eastern Air Lines, not taken up) 17113 N93113 20080 22 Oct 70 Sold to Boeing, 31 Mar 75. Converted to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. 17114 N93114 20081 2 Nov 70 Sold to Boeing, 3 Nov 75. Converted to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. 17118 N93118 20082 2 Sep 71 Sold to Boeing, 13 Nov 75. Converted to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. 17119 N93119 20083 27 Oct 71 Sold to Boeing, 15 Dec 75 for conversion to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. Bought from Boeing, 16 Dec 76. Crashed into Atlantic Ocean off Long Island, NY., 17 Jul 96. Series 131 17110 N53110 19676 10 Aug 70 WFU Feb 98. 17111 N53111 19677 26 Sep 70 Sold to Boeing, 15 Oct 75. Converted to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. 17112 N53112 19678 4 Oct 70 Sold to Boeing, 14 Mar 75. Converted to 747-131(F) for Iranian Air Force. Series 136 17125 N17125 20271 25 Mar 81 1 Ex-B0AC/BA. Sold to JBB Leasing Inc., 26 Dec 89, 17126 N126TW 20273 30 Mar 81 J leased back and returned, 28 Mar 91. Series 143 17128 N17010 19729 12 Jul 96 Ex-Alitalia, Hav/aii Express, Flying Tiger Line, People Express/Continental Air Lines. Re-registered N128TW. Series 156 17133 N133TW 19957 1 May 80 Ex-Iberia. 17134 N134TW 19958 17 Feb 81 Ex-Iberia. Stored, Jan 97. Series 238B 17307 N3071W 20009 30 May 96 Ex-Qantas, Air New Zealand, Air Lanka. Stored Marana, AZ., Jan 97. Sold to First Security Bank, 30 May 97, leased back. Подпись:

The Big Boeing

Just as it had done in 1955, when Pan American ordered 45 jet airliners, to launch the Jet Age in earnest, Juan Trippe did it again in 1965, by persuading the Seattle manufacturer to build the Boeing 747, another airliner that was twice as big as its predecessor. Paradoxically, Pan Am was to acquire too many 747s too quickly, but having been persuaded, Boeing went on to build more than a thousand “Jumbo Jets”—and is still building them 35 years later, an amazing tribute to a great design.

On 2 September 1966 T. W.A. placed a large order for Boeing aircraft and this included 12 747s. At the time, like most large airlines, confidence was high. During that summer, service had been resumed to Bangkok, and extended to Hong Kong. On 6 April 1967 the last Constellation was retired from domestic service and on 11 May the very last of that famous airliner was withdrawn from overseas routes. T. W.A. was the first major U. S. domestic airline to become all-jet. In the same year, riding high, it acquired the Hilton Hotel chain on 9 May, and placed another multi-million dollar Boeing order on 18 October, to augment the 747 fleet to 34. T. W.A.’s Jumbo Jets entered service on 25 February 1970, on the premier transcontinental route, Los Angeles – New York, and on 18 March on the world’s most prestigious intercontinental route, New York-London.

Pacific Interlude

For several years, the Civil Aeronautics Board had been wrestling with two important issues, the trans-Pacific and the associated Hawaii Route Cases. The U. S.trans-Pacific traffic had hitherto been shared between Pan American and North­west to Asia, Pan Am only to Australasia, and Pan Am, North­west, and United to Hawaii. Now, other airlines wanted a piece of this lucrative cake, and T. W.A. was one of them. President Johnson signed the Pacific Route Case on 19 December 1968 and the Hawaii Case on 4 January 1969, just before he left office. The incoming President Nixon promptly amended the choice of airlines and routes, but T. W.A. never­theless received its share, and opened service on 1 August 1969. This enabled the airline to complete a round-the-world service, with Boeing 707s, on 31 October 1971.

The route was not as successful as expected because of strong competition and the consequent excessive capacity offered. Accordingly, T. W.A. and Pan American entered into a route standardization agi’eement on 16 October 1974, and T. W.A. suspended its Pacific route on 2 March 1975.

Capacity Sharing

The Pacific agreement with Pan Am was symptomatic of a problem that had resulted from the enormous increase in the capacity offered world-wide by the influx of the 360-seat 747s, augmented by the 270-seat Douglas DC-10 and Lock­heed L-1011 tri-jets. The problem was also acute in the U. S.A., where, for example, three airlines all offered a 9 a. m. departure from New York to Los Angeles—all at a disastrous 35% or so load factor.

On the initiative of Mel Brenner, T. W.A.’s advocate for common sense in a strictly regulated environment which was supposed to encourage competition, the C. A.B. and the Justice Department agreed, on 21 December 1970, to a capacity scheduling agreement, so that the airlines could continue to compete without cutting each other’s throats. This sensible T. W.A. initiative was appreciated on all sides, and was a har­binger of an even more liberal approach to the problem, one that was solved by the Airline Deregulation Act, signed by President Carter on 24 October 1978. T. W.A. would, in years to come, face fresh challenges, fierce competition, and threats to its very existence.(p. 90)

Curtiss Condor CO

18 seats • 120 mph

 

The Model 53 CO was an early attempt to create a passenger air­craft from a military bomber. More modern examples include the Boeing Stratocruiser (from the B-29/B-50), and the Russian Tupolev Tu-I14 (from the Tu-20 “Bear”).

 

Engines

Curtiss GV-1570 Conqueror (625 hp) x 2

MGTOW

17,900 lb.

Range

500 miles

Length

58 feet

Span

92 feet

Height

16 feet

 

Curtiss Condor COCurtiss Condor CO

Подпись: mmПодпись: Т.А.Т. 's Condors operated briefly between Columbus and Waynoka, but never went into regular service. Tommy Tomlinson called it an “aerodynamic monstrosity. ”Curtiss Condor COПодпись:

The Condor

The Curtiss Condor was the last large biplane built in the United States. T. A.T. put it into service early in 1929, and until the Douglas DC-2 came along, it supplemented the Fords on routes where the traffic demand was high. It was much bigger, weighing nine tons against the Ford’s six, and could carry more people with a more attractive cabin. But it was not much faster, and its life span with the United States airlines was only about three years. T. AT.’s Condor COs (also designated the Condor 18, the B-18 or the B-20) were N185H, N725K, and N726K (manufacturer’s serial numbers G-l, G-2, and G-4, respectively).

A later version, the T-32, went into service with Ameri­can Airlines and Eastern Air Lines in 1934 as a much-publi­cized sleeper transport; but by all accounts, the passengers did not get much sleep. The low-altitude flying tended to be a little rocky, and the segments were too short. In any case, the modern airliners would soon be outlasting the obsolescent Condor design. Biplanes were becoming a thing of the past.

Подпись: Air Mail Scandal

The NlcNary-Watres Act

The spur to the spectacular growth of air transport in the United States in the early 1930s was the result of imaginative legislation, enacted after substantial persuasion by the Post­master General, Walter F. Brown. The Third Amendment to the Air Mail Act, named after its Congressional sponsors, was approved on 29 April 1930. Its far-reaching provisions gave permanence to the contracted operators, paid them according to space offered, not by the weight of mail carried, and gave Brown powers to extend or consolidate routes to improve the system. This encouraged the airlines to invest in larger aircraft, which were more economical to operate; and gave Brown almost unlimited authority to draw the airline map as he pleased.

The "Spoils Conferences"

Things went mainly according to Brown’s plan, which was to fashion a rational system of air routes that would not suffer from the excessive fragmentation he had observed in the railroad system. No single railroad, for example, ran from coast to coast. Brown’s pressure and advice to the incumbent air mail carriers resulted in three transcontinental airlines that followed different routes, but offered opportunities for competition between the main traffic-generating areas: California and the Northeast.

But to do this, he sometimes overstepped the mark in what was perceived to be selective manipulation of the exact intentions of the Air Mail Act, and even, it was alleged, a cer­tain degree of favoritism. This led to an investigation of the circumstances of a series of meetings that he had held with the airlines between 15 May and 9 June 1930, and which became known as the Spoils Conferences.

The Air Mail Scandal

Many of the small airlines felt that they had been by-passed deliberately; and although their case was not well docu­mented and of doubtful legality, it was intensively publi­cized—so effectively, in fact, that, responding to political pressure, the Senate set up a Special Committee. Its adverse report resulted in President Roosevelt taking the unprece­dented step, on 9 February 1934, of cancelling all the air mail contracts and asking the Army Air Corps to carry the mail. This it did, with remarkable success, bearing in mind the extreme difficulties of weather and inexperience with which it was faced. But some pilots were killed, mostly in training, and this led to a national outrage that forced Roosevelt to retract his decision.

A New Life

Подпись: Douglas 0-38 observation plane, used by the Army Air Corps in March 1934 to carry the mail. Подпись:Подпись:On 30 March 1934, the Post Office Department invited the airlines to submit new bids, and these were duly accepted by the new Postmaster General, James A. Farley, on 20 April. During the two months during which the Army carried the mail, the airlines struggled on the best they could. Drastic measures had to be taken, as the revenues from passengers and express were insignificant compared with the mail pay­ments—effectively a life-sustaining subsidy. In the case of T. W.A., President Richard W. Robbins sent a letter to all the staff, which began: “Effective February 28th, 1934, the entire personnel of T.& W. A. is furloughed.”

Curtiss Condor CO

Postmaster-General Walter Folger Brown was the czar of the U. S. air transport industry in the early 1930s. By awarding air mail contracts for specific routes (with­out which no airline could operate profitably), he laid the foundation for a nationwide airline network.

DC-3 Replacement

Post-war Problems

When the Second World War ended, the leading airlines rushed to put into service the new longer-ranged airliners that had been stimulated by technical advances during the war, as well as by the commercial pre-war design innovations that had been frustrated by wartime needs. T. W.A.’s Stratoliners were recalled from the military, and the C-69 Constellations and C-54 Skymasters were quickly refurbished with comfortable seating layouts. The emphasis was on the main inter-city routes; but the networks dated back to the 1930s, and with the “grandfather” route certificates in 1938, the airlines had sought, and the C. A.B. had granted, full service con­tracts to serve almost every city in the U. S.A. that was big enough to have an airport.

The problem was that many of the cities—and there were dozens of these—were too small to generate enough passengers, mail, or freight to justify service by such mainliners as the Con­stellation. Other cities were able to generate the traffic, but did not have the airfields to cope with the four-engined types. Also the airlines themselves chose to deploy their best equipment on the prestige routes, which generated the highest revenues. And so the veteran Douglas DC-3, obtain­able as conversions from military C-47s, C-53s, and other DC-3 variants, and which could land or take off almost anywhere, was in great demand to back up their newer brethren in the fleet.

Life in the Old Dog

The old Douglas DC-3 “Gooney Bird” was the obvious choice, as there were thousands of them. T. W.A. alone had 96 altogether—a large fleet during that period. Under the C. A.B. man­date, and like the other trunk airlines, it had to serve the smaller points, or lose its certificate for the whole route. Exemptions were sometimes granted, but every’ one had to be argued sep­arately, in an often protracted series of meetings in Washington. Later, during the 1950s, the Local Service airlines were established, and these provided the answer to the problem for sev­eral decades, relieving the trunk airlines from the obligation of providing “whistle stops” on prestigious point-to-point services.

But this took time, and this is why T. W.A. continued to keep the old DC-3s in service. Bill Halliday recalls that in 1947 “T. W.A. was flying so many DC-3s that as we approached Amar­illo to turn westward to Albuquerque (at night) we could see the flight ahead of us headed west and after we had completed our turn, we could look back and see the flight behind us.”

DC-3 Replacement

While Douglas, Lockheed, and Boeing were concerned with providing the front-line fleets, it was left to other manufacturers to come up with a formula for a modem airliner to replace the DC-3s which, even if they were not too old, were regarded by air travelers as old-fashioned and obsolescent. Postwar airliners needed, at the very least, a pressurized cabin, tricycle landing gear, on-board amenities such as ample luggage and coat space, good lavatories, and above all, faster speed. Two manufacturers came to the fore to meet this requirement: Martin, with its Model 202, and Convair, with its Model 240.

At the Martin plant in Baltimore, Allan Roshkind and his team started work on the Martin 202 (at first called the Mercury) immediately after Japan surrendered. But this 36-seat design was unpressurized, and its first customer, American Airlines, changed its mind and ordered Convair-Liners instead. Nevertheless, by the end of 1945, Martin had orders for 155 aircraft and the 202 made its first flight on 22 November 1946, four months ahead of the Convair-Liner. United had ordered a pressurized version, the Model 303, but this was cancelled.

DC-3 Replacement

This Martin 404, Skyliner Louisville, displays its registration number unusually, reading downwards on

the vertical stabilizer.

DC-3 Replacement

The Martin 202A went into service on 1 September 1950, to relieve the DC-3s on T. W.A. ’s shorter routes.
It carried 36 passengers, had a З-man crew, and cruised at 220 mph. Its built-in boarding stairs, includ-
ing a ventral access at the rear, accelerated boarding and disembarking at the “whistle-stops. ” This pic-
ture is of Skyliner San Francisco.

Boeing 747-131

342-433 seats • 590 mph

Boeing 747-131

Engines

*Pratt & Whitney JT9D-3 (43,500 lb) x 4 Length

232 feet

MGT0W

734,000 lb Span

196 feet

Range

4,000 miles Height

63 feet

^Initially, later JT9D-7A (46,9501b)

Подпись: This Boeing 747, landing at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport, carries the airline’s revised “outline” TRANS WORLD paint scheme, (photo: Roger Bentley) The Boeing 747, called the “Jumbo Jet” from the time it first went into service in 1970, has already served the airlines for three decades, and will probably still be in front-line flagship service for for many more years yet. This will be as long as all the generations of airliners before 1970, at least from the debut of the first DC-3. Its reign covers half of the proverbial three-score years and ten—quite a lifetime. When they started service, the 747s cost $21 mil­lion each. Now, a Series -400 would cost about $140 million.

In mixed class seating layout, it accommodates between 350 and 390 passengers; but in Japan, where a special short-haul version is used to connect the majoi centers of population, the airlines put in 530 seats, or the capacity of an average-sized London theater. Like all the trans-Atlantic jets, it makes a round-trip between Europe and the United States within 24 hours, and its productivity is thus about five times higher than that of an ocean liner such as the Queen Man. At least two of T. W.A.’s 747s were retired only after no less than 100,000 hours of flight time, a truly impressive record of aeronautical achievement.

Подпись:Подпись:

Historic Prototype

The World’s First Modern Airliner

In 1933, the Boeing Aircraft Company had produced a twin – engined aircraft that most authorities, notably Britain’s Peter W. Brooks, considered to be the world’s first modern airliner, in that its monocoque fuselage and stressed skin wing, par­tially retractable landing gear, engines faired into the wing, together with other improvements, marked a big technical advance over the steel framework and heavy wing spar design of aircraft like the Ford Tri-Motor. The resultant superior aerodynamics gave the Boeing 247 a 60% speed improve­ment over the Ford, reducing the transcontinental flying time to about 18 hours, or less than a day.

 

TRANSCOnYiNENTAL a WESTERN AlR INC

 

General Performance Specifications
Transport Plane

 

1Xtt* All metal trlnotored oonoplane preferred but combination structure or biplane would be considered.

Mo. in internal structure mist be natal.

Power» Three engines of 500 to 650 h. p. (Wasps with 1Э-1 auperohmxgerj 6*1 compression O. K.),

 

Historic Prototype
Historic Prototype

lao be made for oomplate instruments,

_ Г~Гlying equipment, fuel oapaoity for oruiaiag range of 1000 miles at ISO a. p.h., orew of two, at leaat 12 pee – aengera with oomfortabie aaata and ample room, and the usual mieoallaneoua equipment oerried on a passenger plane of this type. Payload should be at leaat 2,300 lba. with full equip* sent and fuel for maxtixim range.

Perfonamnce

Top (peed tea level (minimus) 185 a. p.h.

Cruising speed aea level – 79 % top apeed 148 o. p.h. plus і-єга-и ng apeed not more than 65 a. p.h.

Rate of olloh aea level (mlnlnaim) 1200 ft. p. a.

Barrios celling (minimus) 21000 ft.

Serwioe oelling any two engines 10000 ft.

 

Transcontinental & Western Air ii interested in purchasing tan or eore trlaotorad tram port plena*.

X ta ettaohlng our general perforaenee ipeolflcatlont, ooTorlng this equipment and would appreciate your a d ті * і ng whether your Company la interested in thla mamif soturing Job.

If ao, approximately how long would It take to turn out the Гіг at plane for service teataT

 

Vary truly youra,

 

The Jock Frye Letter

At the time (before the Black-McKellar Air Mail Act of 1934) aircraft manufacturers were allowed to own airlines, and Boeing Air Transport had been the foundation of United Air Lines. When Jack Frye wanted to place an order for the superior 247, he was politely told that United had booked the first 60 aircraft off the line, and that he would have to wait.

Frye’s exact reaction is not recorded; but it did result in a letter which he circulated to five other manufacturers, in which he set out a specification for a tri-motor that, in effect, was ten percent better than the 247 in every respect: size, speed, airfield performance, and comfort.

His wish was granted. The Douglas Aircraft Company, of Santa Monica, California, not only met all the require­ments, but did so with a twin-engined design that eliminated the shortcomings of the fuselage-mounted center engine: noise, vibration, and pilot visibility.

 

Historic Prototype

Jack Frye’s role in specifying
the basic design of the Douglas
DC-1 (by his famous letter to the
manufacturers in 1933) was a
landmark of inspired leadership.
On 30 April 1935, he broke the
transcontinental speed record
by delivering the mail from
Los Angeles to New York in
11 hr. 30 m.

 

Thia plane, fully loaded, oajst melee satisfactory telce-offs under good oontrol at any TWA airport on any combination of two angina a.

 

jt/os

 

Please oonaider thia inforamtion confidential and return ipeolfioatIona if you are not interested.

 

Aeneas City, Missouri. August 2nd, 1932

 

This is a copy of the two-page “Jack Frye Letter” that laid down the specification for the aircraft that emerged as the first of the Douglas twin-engined series, DC-1, DC-2, and DC-3. It changed the course

of airline history.

 

This photograph, of the Douglas DC-1 at the Grand Central Air Terminal, Glendale, epitomizes the maturing air transport industry in the United States. T. W.A. ’s line of twin-engined Douglases eclipsed all others for a decade.

 

The Boeing 247 was the first passenger transport airplane that could be described as a modern
airliner, flying some 60% faster than the Ford Tri-Motors that it replaced.

 

Historic PrototypeHistoric PrototypeHistoric Prototype

Martin 202

Problems with the 202

The launch customer for the Martin 202 had been Northwest Airlines, which had picked up the first-in-line privilege when Pennsylvania-Central had to withdraw because of financial stringency. The Minneapolis airline opened service by October, but was to regret the choice. It had a series of accidents, some of which were caused by a weakness in the wing structure. After the first one, on 29 August 1948, the 202 was grounded by the C. A.A.; and thereafter, in 1950 and early 1951, more accidents (not all attributed to the aircraft) resulted in the Northwest pilots refusing to fly them again.

T. W.A/s Choice

The competition between Martin and Convair was intense, as orders for hundreds of aircraft were in their sights. The performance characteristics between the two types (Martin had upgraded the first design with pressurization) were very similar. During 1949, Howard Hughes himself, together with his new president, Ralph Damon, and Bob Rummel, newly – promoted to chief engineer, conducted exhaustive tests on both the Martin 404 and the Con­vair 240. Hughes liked the Martin better, telephoned Eddie Rickenbacker of Eastern Air Lines, and ordered 100 404s. 60 were for Eastern (whose route structure was ideal for the 40- seater) and 40 for T. W.A. Hughes took one for himself. T. W.A.’s contract was signed on 22 February 1950. Pending deliveries, which would take a couple of years, Hughes leased a dozen of the earlier, 202s, modified as Martin 202A. During its service life through the 1950s, only one 404 was lost (see fleet list, page 62), and the reason could hardly be blamed on the manu­facturer. The 404s followed into service on lONovember 1951, and served T. W.A. well, in the shadow of the Constellations, for a whole decade.

Martin 202

The Martin 404, with one more row of seats than the 202, served T. W.A. throughout the 1950s, starting service on 10 November 1951. This is a picture of Skyliner Baltimore, recognizing the city where it was built.

Martin 202

Ralph Damon joined T. W.A. on 1 January 1949. A veteran airline administrator, he had been president of Curtiss-Wright in 1932, and became vice-president and later general manager and president of American Airlines for 13 years. He was ‘drafted’ in 1941 and for two years supervised production at Republic Aviation. In 1953, President Eisenhower appointed him to the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, but he did not complete the five-year term. For six years he was the ideal partner for Howard Hughes, complementing, with his managerial experience, the intuition and enterprise of his mercurial chief. During the festive season after Christmas, 1955, he attended a ceremony in Times Square, New York, in bad winter weather. This was to exhibit a huge T. W.A. Constellation replica, floodlit, and with its own lights. He caught pneumonia and died on 4 January 1956. His death was a great loss not only for T. W.A., but for the U. S. airline industry as a whole.

More Range

The Need for Non-Stops

Airline passengers as a rule wish to take their journeys with­out the inconvenience of having to stop en route. They simply wish to reach their destinations as quickly as possible. Thus, during the best years of the piston-engined era, the airliner manufacturers were able to develop their products so that the Douglas DC-7s and the Lockheed Constellation series could offer first, non-stop transcontinental range in the U. S.A. (about 2,500 miles), then non-stop trans-Atlantic (about 3,500 miles). Later improvements brought non-stop U. S. west coast to Europe, and, in the 1970s, California-Japan.

New York – Tokyo

The Boeing 747 could accomplish all these missions with ease. But Pan American Airways wanted something more: no less than New York to Tokyo non-stop, a distance of 6,754 statute miles, with a full payload. The Boeing Company obliged with a special version of its Jumbo Jet, the Special Performance variant, or the Boeing 747SP. This was achieved by providing extra tankage and more powerful engines, but mainly by shortening the fuselage to lighten the all-up weight.

Pan American opened its New York-Tokyo route on 25 April 1976; but quite surprisingly, the airline world did not rush to Seattle to join the long-range club. Even Japan Air Lines, which would have been expected to react with match­ing non-stop service, chose not to; and — perhaps wisely— waited for the expected development of the standard 747 series.

Limited Demand

The main reason, however, why the SP did not shake up the procurement patterns (and much to the satisfaction of Doug­las, which found difficulty on matching such range with its DC-10s) was because the market was inadequate to justify large fleets of extremely long-ranged airliners. Transport economists and forecasters are acutely aware of the “gravity model” or theory which, in general principle, states—quite reasonably— that the greater the population, the greater the demand. More people, more traffic. But also, the further people are apart from each other, the less they are likely to travel; and this applies to business and leisure travel alike, the influencing factors being mainly time and cost.

The Boeing 747SP was a victim of the gravity theory. Lines drawn on a world map to link big cities that were far apart from each other were found to be optimistic in terms of potential traffic demand, because of the gravity model. Aus­
tralia’s population, for example, is less than that of New York or California, so the potential traffic for non-stop routes, although measurable, was not enough to justify an airline fleet. And the traffic across the Atlantic still concentrated on the major destinations in northwest Europe, and did not need Special Performance.

Today, a quarter of a century after the Boeing 747SP opened service, the urban populations all over the world have grown considerably, to bring one element of the gravity model up to acceptance level for fleet forecasting purposes. Southern and eastern Asia, especially, contain many cities, each with more than ten million inhabitants, and with strong commercial travelling requirements. But special versions of the world’s leading airliner types are no longer needed. The basic versions can all fulfill the most demanding ranges required by all the intercontinental airlines.

Were the 747SP to be reintroduced today, the market need would no doubt generate greater sales than in the 1970s. But today’s front-line flagships can all fly ranges sufficient for all the trans-ocean city pairs. The Airbus A340, the Boeing 767, and the Boeing 777 can theoretically encircle the world at the temperate zone latitudes with only one stop.

More Range

In addition to its shortened fuselage, the 747SP had a taller vertical fin and ‘clean’ wing trailing edges, devoid of ‘canoe’flap track faring s as seen on the 747-100 (see page 83).

 

More Range

Подпись: Engines Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7A (50,000 lb.) x 4 Length 185 feet MGTOW 630-700,000 lb Span 196 feet Range 7,500 miles Height 65 feet Подпись:More Range

More Range

THE EARLY BOEING 747S COMPARED

Trans World Airlines did not join the initial rush to buy the Boeing 747SP. But on 17 October 1978, it ordered 3 aircraft for direct routes to the Middle East. They were operated for only a few years. Aside from the limitations imposed by the gravity theory, the new Boeing 767 was on its way, and the performance and potential of the new generation of this wide-bodied twin airliner usuiped the merits of the SP.

Start of a New Era

Start of a New Era

This is a rare colored photograph of a Douglas DC-2 during the mid-1930s. (Charles Baptie)

 

Start of a New Era

In addition to its superior performance, the Douglas DC-1 offered a comfortable cabin, upholstered seats, and an aisle that was uncluttered by the wing spar crossing it, as in the Boeing 247.

 

Start of a New Era

This beautiful picture was taken in the 1970s, when T. W.A. contrived to relive a glorious past. Although the Douglas DC-3 was to gain everlasting fame as the pre-eminent airliner of the latter 1930s, its progenitor, the DC-2, was the one that established the superiority of the basic design. It was (as T. W.A. president, Jack Frye, had specified) faster, bigger, more comfortable, and more economical to operate, than the Boeing 247.

 

Подпись: Engines Wright SGR-1820 Cyclone (710 hp) x 2 MGT0W 18,200 lb. Range 800 miles Length 62 feet Span 85 feet T.W.A. DOUGLAS ІС-2 FLEET Подпись:Start of a New EraПодпись:Подпись:Start of a New Era

The Second Line

MARTIN 202A FLEET MARTIN 404 FIEET

Fleet

No.

Regn.

MSN

Date into Service

Name

Disposal and Remarks

401

N40401

14101

20 Feb 52

Skyliner Baltimore

First T. W.A. aircraft with Hughes Ter­rain Warning indicator. Sold to Pied­mont Airlines 9 Jan 62. Written off at Wilmington, Delaware, 22 Aug 62

402

N40402

14102

2 Feb 52

Skyliner Indianapolis, later Skyliner Chicago

Sold to East Coast Flying Service, 28 Jun 61. Then to Piedmont, 1 Feb 65; Mark Aero. St. Louis, 1972-74. Scrapped 1 Jul 76.

403

N40403

14103

10 Nov 51

Skyliner Pittsburgh

Crashed Pittsburgh, 1 Apr 56

404

N40404

14104

30 Nov 51

Skyliner Philadelphia

Crashed Las Vegas, 15 Nov 56

405

N40405

14105

6 Dec 51

Skyliner New York

Sold to Piedmont Airlines, 2 Feb 62. With Piedmont until 1969. Several owners

406

N40406

14106

13 Dec 51

Skyliner Washington Dt

Sold to California Airmotive 15 Feb 60. Leased to Hughes Tool Co. for radar testing. 18 Feb 60—Feb 61. With Piedmont Airlines, 2 Feb 65-Dec 69. Atlantic Southeast Airlines 1972.

407

N40407

14107

14 Dec 51

Skyliner Indianapolis

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. South­east, May 72; Provincetown – Boston/Naples Airlines, 6 Jan 76

408

N40408

14108

25 Dec 51

Skyliner Columbus

Sold to Pacific Air Lines, 26 Sep 60. Then to Piedmont 9 Apr 66-Mar 73. Several owners, inc. Valley Marlin, Inc., cropdusting

409

N40409

14113

28 Dec 51

Skyliner Dayton

Leased to Pacific, 24 Apr 60 and then sold to Pacific 30 Jun 60. With U. S. Atomic Commission, Las Vegas, 1967­76. In 1996, fuselage trucked to Fresno for "haunted house" attraction

410

N40410

14114

3 Jan 52

Skyliner Cincinnati

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. With Piedmont until 1968

411

N40411

14115

15 Jan 52

Skyliner St. Louis

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. With Piedmont until 1970

412

N40412

14116

27 Jan 52

Skyliner Wheeling

Sold to California Airmotive, 11 Mar 60. Montex Drilling Co. 12 Mar 60. Several owners. Crashed, Atlanta, 30 May 70.

413

N40413

14117

22 May 52

Skyliner Louisville

Sold to Piedmont 12 Nov 62. PBA/Naples, 1976

414

N40414

14118

1 Jun 52

Skyliner Boston, later Skyliner Dayton

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. Several owners after 1972. Used for fire drill at St. Louis, 1988

415

N40415

14119

2 Jun 52

Skyliner Albany

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. Several owners after 1973, inc. PBA/Naples 1976

416

N40416

14120

2 Jun 52

Skyliner Binghamton

Crashed on Sandia Mountain, Albu­querque, 19 Feb 55

417

N40417

14123

3 Jun 52

Skyliner Williamsport

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. Several owners after 1968, inc. Atlantic South­east

418

N40418

14124

3 Jun 52

Skyliner Newark

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. Several owners after 1968, inc. Frontier Air­ways, in California, as cropduster.

 

Fleet

No.

Regn.

MSN

Date into Service

Name

Disposal and Remarks

419

N40419

14125

13 Jun 52

Skyliner Wilmington

Used by Martin, 5-10 Jun 52, for gross weight testing. Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. Several owners after 1972, and registered in Haiti

420

N40420

14126

7 Jun 52

Skyliner Allentown

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. Several owners after Apr 69

421

N40421

14127

14Jun 52

Skyliner Harrisburg, later Skyliner Washington

Sold to Piedmont, 31 Jul 61. After Nov 69 with U. S. Aircraft Sales and Atlantic Southeast. In 1988 reportedly used for smuggling in Bahamas

422

N40422

14128

19 Jun 52

Skyliner Kansas City

Sold to Pacific Air Lines, 26 Sep 60. Several owners after 1968

423

N40423

14129

20 Jun 52

Skyliner Reading

Sold to Piedmont Airlines, 31 Jul 61. Several ov/ners after 1972, inc. PBA/Naples and San­tiago Freighters (HI-501)

424

N40424

14130

20 Jun 52

Skyliner Toledo

Sold to Piedmont Airliens, 31 Jul 61. Several owners after Jul 68, inc. Southeast and PBA/Naples, Nov 75

425

N40425

14131

28Jun 52

Skyliner Zanesville, later Skyliner Easton

Sold to California Airmotive, 24 Mar 59; then to Houston Lumber, before Piedmont Airlines Moy 66—Apr 69. Several owners, inc. South­east and PBA/Naples. 1972-1978, then to Beringuen Air Leasing.

426

N40426

14132

4 Jul 52

Skyliner Mansfield, later Skyliner Bethlehem

Sold to Remmert Werner (Beldex Corp.) 11 Feb 59, then to Kewanee Oil Co. From 1972 to 1976 with Danny Davis and the Nashville Brass band. In 1988 with Dade County Public School System, as instructional airframe.

427

N40427

14133

12 Jul 52

Skyliner Fort Wayne

Leased to Pacific Air Lines, 25 Apr 60 and sold to Pacific 30 Jun 60. Several subsequent owners. Crashed 1 Sep 74, Norfolk, VA

428

N40428

14134

16 Jul 52

Skyliner South Bend

Sold to Outboard Marine Corp., Milwaukee. Travel club in 1970. Several owners. Reported with CAMBA, Bolivia (CP-1318) 1988

429

N40429

14135

17 Jul 52

Skyliner Peoria

Sold to California Airmotive, 10 Mar 59. Sev­eral owners, inc. Sun and Wind Co., 1988 U. S. Aircraft Sales Dec 68. Atlantic Southeast, 1972

430

N40430

14136

21 Jul 52

Skyliner Quincy later Skyliner Oklahoma City

Sold to Piedmont Airlines, 31 Jul 61. U. S. Air­craft Sales Dec 68. Atlantic Southeast, 1972.

431

N40431

14166

23 Jul 52

Skyliner Terre Haute

Sold to California Airmotive, 4 Aug 59. With Piedmont Airlines, Nov 64—Sep 68. Several owners, inc. Atlantic Southeast, 1972

432

N40432

14167

25 Jul 52

Skyliner Detroit

Leased to Pacific Airlines, 12 Nov 59, and sold to Pacific 30 Jun 60. Several owners, inc. CAMBA, Bolivia, 1988 (CP-1570)

433

N40433

14168

14 Aug 52

Skyliner Cleveland

Sold to Piedmont Airliens, 31 Jul 61

434

N40434

14169

20 Aug 52

Skyliner Topeka

Sold To Essex Productions (Frank Sinatra) (N710E) 11 Jun 61. Several subsequent owners. Scrapped at St. Louis, Jul 76

435

N40435

14170

21 Aug 52

Skyliner Wichita

Sold to Pan-Air Trading for СОРА, Panama, 2 Feb 61 (HP-302). Then to Piedmont Airlines, Oct 65. Crashed, New Bern, NC, 20 Nov 66

436

N40436

14171

29 Aug 52

Skyliner Wilkes-Barre later Skyliner Scranton

Leased to Pacific Air Lines, 18 Jan 60, and sold to Pacific 30 Jun 60. Several subsequent owners.

 

The Second Line

MARTIN 202 FLEET

 

N93049

N93047

9132

9233

Acquired on 30 Jun 60 from Southwest Airways (later Pacific Air Lines) in trade

N93056

9146

for Martin 404s. Never operated by T. W.A. 9131-9149 sold to Martin Air Leas-

N93060

9149

ing, Inc., 17 Nov 61; 9162 sold to Delta Aircraft & Engine Company, 8 Sep 60

N93041

9162

 

 

LOCKHEED TRISTAR FLEET

 

Delayed Debut (or the L-1011

The advent of the Boeing 747 wide-bodied airliner stimulated a surge of airline traffic growth throughout the world and across the United States. The potential market encouraged other man­ufacturers to add more wide-bodied types (8-10 abreast seating instead of 6). For the short-haul, the twin-engined European Airbus was to make its mark, and the traditional adversaries of piston-engined times entered the field. Douglas and Lockheed both offered tri-jet candidates that were quite similar in design. The former was quickly off the mark, and its DC-10 went into service with American Airlines on 5 August 1971.

 

Fleet

Number

Reg.

MSN

Delivery

Date

Remarks and Disposal

Model

L-1011-385-

1 TriStar

і

N309EA

1010

Leased from Eastern Air Lines Apr 72 – Oct 73, Apr 74 – Oct 74.

11001

N31001

1013

9 May 72

25 Jun 72,7W177 inaugural flight STL-LAX. Leased from and

returned to ING Aviation Lease, 20 May 95.

11002

N11002

1014

4 Jul 72

Destroyed by fire after aborted take-off JFK, NY., 30 Jul 92.

11003

N11003

1015

12 Aug 72

Stored Kingman, AZ., Jul 97.

11004

N11004

1016

30 Aug 72

Sold to Air Atlanta, Iceland, 25 Feb 98.

11005

N11005

1017

27 Sep 72

11006

N11006

1018

26 Sep 72

Eastern Air Lines leased 22 Nov 72 to 23 May 73.

11007

N31007

1026

7 Apr 73

Destroyed by ground fire, Boston, 19 Apr 74.

11008

N31008

1028

21 Apr 73

Stored Kingman, AZ., Jan 97.

11009

N31009

1029

16 May 73

Leased, returned to First Security Bank of Utah, 24 Nov 92.

11010

N31010

1030

29 May 73

Leased, returned to ING Aviation Lease, 19 Nov 92.

non

N31011

1031

1 Jun 73

Leased, returned to Interface Group Inc., 19 Dec 92.

11012

N41012

1034

20 Jun 73

Shepherd II. Leased, returned to Interface Group Inc.,

19 Dec 92.

11013

N31013

1035

4 Jul 73

Sold to GP Aer Lease Limited, 15 Nov 97.

11014

N31014

1036

4 Jul 73

Sold to Air Transat, 30 May 96.

11325

N325EA

1051

Leased from Eastern Air Lines Apr 75 – Oct 75.

N326EA

1054

Leased from Eastern Air Lines Apr 74 – Oct 74.

11015

N31015

1059

23 Jan 74

Leased, returned to First Security Bank of Utah, 7 Dec 93.

11016

N41016

1060

1 Feb 74

Leased, returned to Pegasus Aircraft Partners, 28 Apr 97.

11017

N15017

1063

23 Feb 74

Big Apple Express. Sold to Elmo Ventures Ltd., 31 Mar 98.

11032

N31032

1124

24 Feb 76

Sold to Saudi Arabian Airlines, 25 Feb 76.

11033

N31033

1130

23 Feb 76

Sold to Saudi Arabian Airlines, 24 Feb 76.

 

The Big Tri-Jet

The L-10U TriStar, N31001, shows the revised ‘outlined’ TRANS WORLD marking.

 

The Big Tri-JetThe Big Tri-Jet

The Big Tri-JetThe Big Tri-Jet

Подпись: Engines Rolls-Royce 211 RB-22B (42,000 lb) x 3 Length 178 feet N1GT0W 430,000 lb Span 155 feet Range 2,600 miles Height 55 feet The Big Tri-Jet

Подпись: MGTOW (lb) Sample TWA Seating TriStar 1 TriStar 50 TriStar 100 430.000 450.000 474.000 F28/C48/Y199 FI 8/C40/Y214 FI 8/C40/Y214 Otherwise the performance and dimensions of the different series were the same.

Lockheed was handicapped by its engine manufacturer, Rolls-Royce, coming face-to-face with financial ruin (its shares dropped briefly to one penny) and was saved from oblivion only by intervention by the British government. Production of the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar was in abeyance for many months. Then, on 29 March 1968, the program was launched in grand style, with a total order book for 144 aircraft, of which T. W.A.’s share was 44, but the uncertainties were such that the eventual firm order date was 7 May 1971. T. W.A. TriStar service started on 25 June 1972.

The Big Tri-Jet

COMPARISON OF L-1011 VARIANTS UP BY TWA