Category Mig

1-231 / 2D

OKB engineers were desperately tiying to find a successor to the MiG – 3. In 1943 they thought they had hit on something when a new engine, the AM-39 A, became available Its takeoff power reached 1,325 kW (1,800 ch), and it was rated at 1,104 kW (1,500 ch) at 5,850 m (19,190 feet). The engine was installed in an airframe almost similar to that of the 1-230 with the same armament (two 20-mm ShVAK cannons above the engine with 160 rpg).

The 1-231 prototype was completed and test-flown in 1943 with Yu A. Antipov and later P. M. Stefanovskiy at the controls, but it was destroyed as a result of a mislanding. It could have been a chance mishap, the aircraft having shown great capabilities justifying its mass production. But once more a shortage of engines put an end to what would be the final attempt to extend the life of the MiG-3: series pro­duction of the AM-39 had to be stopped a short time after it began. Also, no production unit had the capacity to manufacture the 1-231 They were all busy, day and night, turning out Yakovlev and Lav­ochkin fighters.

Specifications

Span, 10 2 m (33 ft 5 6 in); length, 8.62 m (28 ft 3.4 in); height in level flight position, 3.275 m (10 ft 8 9 in); wheel track, 2.78 m (9 ft 1.4 in); wheel base, 5.426 m (17 ft 9.6 in); wing area, 17.44 m2 (187.7 sq ft); empty weight, 2,583 kg (5,693 lb); takeoff weight, 3,287 kg (7,245 lb); fuel, 333 kg (734 lb); oil, 34 kg (75 lb), wing loading, 188.5 kg/m2 (38 6 Ib/sq ft); max operating limit load factor, 8

Performance

Max speed, 707 km/h at 7,100 m (382 kt at 23,290 ft); climb to 5,000 m (16,400 ft) in 4.5 min, service ceiling, 11,400 m (37,400 ft)

1-211 / Ye

As mentioned earlier, this program was a direct result of the 1-210 tests in one of the full-scale TsAGI wind tunnels. The goal was still to pro­long the MiG-3 series with an updated product. But to improve the level and climbing speeds of the aircraft, it was necessary to find a more powerful engine than the M-82A and to reduce its takeoff weight significantly. The only available engine alternative was the M-82F, delivering 1,362 kW (1,850 ch) at takeoff and 979 kW (1,330 ch) at

image41

image42

The 1-211 marked a new attempt to match a radial engine with the MiG-3 airframe. This time it was a complete success. But, strangely enough, the project was not pur­sued, and Lavochkin inherited most of the technical innovations tested with this machine.

5,400 m (17,700 feet). The 1-211 differed from the 1-210 in several other respects as well. The front fuselage cross section was increased to make the junction of the engine cowling and the fuselage smoother, and the adjustable flaps of the engine exhaust outlet were moved to the sides of the fuselage. The cockpit was moved 245 mm (9.64 inches) back and the fin chord was extended forward, increasing its area and improving the aircraft’s yaw stability. The oil cooler air inlets were moved into the wing root fairings. The shape of the engine cowling was carefully designed to cope with the problem of airtightness and to achieve the best junction possible with the fuselage. All of these modi­fications resulted in an outstanding increase in the aircraft’s speed. In 1942 most of these technical innovations (engine cowling design and airtightness, proper positioning of the engine itself, and the 1-210 wing leading edge slats) were passed on—at the order of the Narkomavprom (state commissariat of the aviation industry)—to the Lavochkin OKB, which adapted them successfully to the La-5, a mass-produced fighter.

The armament was also modified: the 1-210’s machine guns were replaced by two synchronized 20-mm ShVAK cannons at the bottom of engine cowling. Assembly of the 1-211 begai in December 1942 and finished in August 1943. Golofastov was the first pilot to fly it. Two pro­totypes were built, followed by eight preproduction aircraft. The short­comings of the first 1-210 and its engine became nothing more than a bad memory, and the 1-211 proved to be the best Russian fighter of the time. Compared with the 1942 version of the La-5, its level speed was 40 to 166 km/h (21 to 90 kt) higher, depending on the altitude. Com­pared with the 1942 version of the Yak-9, it was 65 to 73 km/h (35 to 39 kt) faster. To climb to 5,000 m (16,400 feet), the La-5 took 1.4 to 2.2 minutes longer, and the Yak-9 0.9 to 1.5 minutes longer. After the pro­totypes passed the factory flight tests, ten preproduction 1-21 Is were delivered to the VVS to prove themselves in combat. They engaged successfully in air battles over the northwestern front near Kalinin. Air force pilots and Nil WS test pilots spoke out in favor of adding the 1-211 to the WS fleet. But in spite of their recommendations and the aircraft’s remarkable flying qualities, the GKO (defense state commit­tee) gave up mass-producing the aircraft because two factories were already building the La-5FN (an La-5 with an ASh-82FN engine)

Specifications

Span, 10.2 m (33 ft 5.6 in); length, 7.954 m (26 ft 1.1 in); height, 3.63 m (11 ft 10.9 in); wheel track, 2.78 m (9 ft 1.4 in); wheel base, 5 015 m (16 ft 5.4 in); wing area, 17.44 m2 (187.7 sq ft); empty weight, 2,528 kg (5,572 lb); takeoff weight, 3,100 kg (6,830 lb); fuel + oil, 385 kg (848 lb); wing loading, 177.75 kg/m2 (36.38 lb/sq ft).

image43

Performance

Max speed, 670 krn/h at 7,000 m (362 kt at 22,960 ft); climb to 5,000 m (16,400 ft) in 4 min; service ceiling, 11,300 m (37,065 ft); range, 1,140 km (710 mi).

PBSh-1 and PBSh-2 Series

PBSh-1

Throughout the 1930s the doctrines relating to the use of big armored units were completely reappraised. Because every new threat demand­ed an immediate answer, a new type of aircraft appeared in the USSR: the shturmovik, or assault aircraft. Several of the best-known aircraft manufacturers worked on this new weapon. At the start of the decade Tupolev proposed two heavy shturmoviks, the ANT-17 and ANT-18, but they were never built. The TsKB (central construction bureau) built four aircraft designed by D. P. Grigorovich, the LSh-1, TSh-1, TSh-

image44

The PBSh-1 main gear was directly inspired by that of the I 200.

2, and ShON. In 1933 a design brigade under the leadership of S. A. Kocherigin—and assisted by the forty-one-year-old M. I. Guryevich, Mikoyan’s future right-hand man—built the TSh-3, also called the TsKB-4. N. N. Polikarpov, for its part, developed the R-ZSh.

All of these attempts led in 1936 to the Ivanov program (“Ivanov” was Stalin’s cable address), an air force initiative that resulted in the construction of such prototypes as the KhAI-5 (R-10) and KhAI-52, designed by Nyeman, winner of the contest; and the ANT-51 and ShB, both designed by Sukhoi. But in the end the true winner was a relative­ly unknown outsider, S. V. Ilyushin. More than 40,000 of its BSh-2s, renamed the 11-2 in 1940, were built because of the war.

Mikoyan and Guryevich started the preliminary design of their first assault aircraft in 1940. The PBSh-1 (Pushechniy Bronirovaniy Shtur – movik. armored assault aircraft with cannons) was a single-seater designed to attack frontline ground targets such as troops, strong points, and armored vehicles. It had a cantilever inverted gull wing and was to be powered by a 1,178 kW (1,600 ch) Mikulin AM-38 engine. Sensitive parts, the engine, and the cockpit would be protected by armor plating. But the weight of the armor alone was 1,390 kg (3,065 pounds), or 30 percent of the aircraft’s takeoff weight. The design had tc be completely reconsidered to integrate the armor into the stressed structure. It was to be equipped with two 23-mm cannons in fairings beneath the wing (96 rpg) and six 7.62-mm ShKAS machine guns on the wing leading edge (750 rpg). All of these weapons would fire out­side the propeller disc.

image45

image46

The bomber version of the aircraft was to carry in its fuselage either 24 10-kg (22-pound) FAB-10 or 24 8-kg (17.6-pound) FAB-8 bombs and either 280 2.5-kg (5.5-pound) FAB-2.5 or 120 1-kg (2.2-pound) ZAB – 1 bombs. (FAB indicates demolition bombs, while ZAB refers to incen­diary bombs. The number after the acronym reflects the bomb’s weight.) For dive-bombing missions, two FABs ranging in weight from 25 to 250 kg (55 to 550 pounds) could be added beneath the wings.

The preliminary design by N. Z. Matyuk, chief of the aerodynamic design department, was approved on 24 July 1940 by OKO chief engi­neer Mikoyan, his assistant Guryevich, and P. V. Dementyev, manager of Aviakhim factory no. 1. The OKO started work on a full-scale model of the aircraft in the fall. But as soon as the Ilyushin 11-2 was approved for series production, О KB engineers halted all work on the PBSh-1 and started in immediately on the preliminary design for the PBSh-2.

In some OKB documents the PBSh-1 is referred to as the MiG-4.

Specifications

Span, 13.5 m (44 ft 3.5 in); length, 10.145 m (33 ft 3.4 in); height, 3.2 m (10 ft 6 in); wheel track, 2.9 m (9 ft 10 in); wheel base, 6.6 m (21 ft 7.9 in); wing area, 30.5 rrF (328.3 sq ft); takeoff weight, 4,850 kg (10,690 lb); max takeoff weight, 6,024 kg (13,277 lb); wing loading, 159 kg/m2 (32.6 lb/sq ft).

Design Performance

Max speed, 441 km/h at 5,000 m (238 kt at 16,400 ft); max ground speed, 449 km/h (242 kt); range, 900 km (560 mi); service ceiling, 7,600 m (25,690 ft).

PBSh-2

A note came with the PBSh-2 preliminary design created by the factory no. 1 OKO in July 1940. It said: "Considering that hedge-hopping flying in a highly wing-loaded aircraft is rather demanding and moreover that monoplanes seldom forgive pilots’ mistakes at very low altitudes, we have chosen the biplane configuration for the PBSh-2, even though it has been designed to carry out the same missions as the PBSh-1. Biplanes are much easier to fly. They have far better stability and maneuverability."

The PBSh-2 silhouette was quite unusual. Areas of the two wings of this biplane were quite different. The smaller upper wing had a for­ward sweep angle of 12 degrees and no ailerons. A light dihedral was applied to the lower wing outer panels. The whole trailing edge was

image47

The unorthodox PBSh-2 was no more successful than the PBSh-1. The VVS chose instead the Ilyushin shturmovik, the 11-2.

occupied by large ailerons and two-segment flaps. The wings were braced by I-type struts.

Like the PBSh-1, the engine was to be a 1,178 kW (1,600 ch) AM-38 protected (along with the fuel tanks and cockpit) by case-hardening homogenized armor plates whose thickness varied from 7.5 to 15.5 mm. The planned armament was similar to that of the PBSh-1: two 23- mm cannons and six 7.62-mm machine guns.

The center section of the lower wing contained two bays for 1- to 10-kg (2.2- to 22-pound) bombs. As with the PBSh-1, the 25- to 250-kg (65- to 550-pound) bombs were strapped beneath the wings for dive – bombing missions, whatever the diving angle might be. But because 11- 2 production was stepped up at several factories, all work on the PBSh – 2 stopped by the end of 1940.

In some OKB documents the PBSh-2 is referred to as the MiG-6.

Specifications

Span, 8.6/12.4 m (28 ft 2.6 in/40 ft 8.2 in); length, 8.85 m (29 ft 0.4 in); height, 3.5 m (11 ft 5.8 in); wheel track, 2.97 m (9 ft 8.9 in); wheel base, 5.23 m (17 ft 1.9 in); wing area, 10.26/22.14 m2 (110.44/238.3 sq ft); takeoff weight, 4,828 kg (10,641 lb); wing loading, 149 kg/m2 (30.5 lb/sq ft).

Design Performance

Max speed at sea level, 426 km/h (230 kt); range, 740 km (460 mi); range with two 100-1 (26.4-US gal) auxiliary tanks, 929 km (577 mi).

image48

The DIS-200 (T) is sometimes referred to as the DIS 2AM-37 because of its power plant. The engine exhaust pipes extend above the wing’s upper surface.

DIS-200 Series

DIS 200/Т

At the end of the 1930s the VVS could operate a fleet of long-range heavy bombers and tactical medium-range bombers but did not have the escort fighters needed to protect them. As early as 1940, the newly formed design bureau had tackled the development of a long-range escort fighter capable of performing high-speed reconnaissance, light bombing, and torpedoing roles. In the preliminary design it was planned to use new, efficient diesel engines developed by A. D. Charomskii, the M-40 and M-30, which would give the aircraft a much greater range because of their low specific fuel consumption.

But neither of these diesels were as yet reliable, so it was decided to equip the prototype—whose factory code letter was T—with two liq­uid-cooled in-line 1,030 kW (1,400 ch) AM-37s driving three-bladed vari­able-pitch propellers. The exhaust collectors were bent and extended above the wing upper surface. Fuel was distributed into six tanks, four in the wing center section and two behind the cockpit. Two oil coolers were located on each side of the engine cowlings as on the MiG-3. The glycol was cooled by two air scoops placed on each side of the cowl­ings, and the corresponding outlets were located beneath the trailing

image49

The air scoops of the engine coolant radiators on the DIS-200 (T) are on each side of both engine nacelles. The corresponding outlets were placed just under the wing’s trailing edge.

edge of the wing. The engine supercharger inlets were located in the leading edge.

The single-seat, twin-engine T prototype had a low wing, a twin fin configuration, and a structure composed primarily of wood rather than scarce light alloys. The flight tests led to the installation of slats on the wing leading edge. On the trailing edge, to complement the two-seg­ment flaps, high lift was augmented by specially designed ailerons, which could be symmetrically lowered to 20 degrees. The latter feature was a great novelty at the time; today they are known as flaperons. The main gear (950 x 300 tires) retracted into the engine nacelles and the tail wheel into the fuselage, and both were pneumatically operated—a first in the USSR.

The cockpit was equipped for instrument flying, and the pilot had an oxygen dispenser and a radio receiver at his disposal. The sliding aft canopy could be jettisoned. The front, rear, sides, and underside of pilot’s seat were protected by armored plates, and the lower part of the fuselage nose was glazed to give the pilot some downward vision.

The DIS-200 T fighter variant was especially powerful, with one 23- mm VYa cannon in a removable fairing under the nose to complement two 12.7-mm BS and four 7.62-mm ShKAS machine guns on the leading edge of the wing. The cannon fairing could be replaced by a 1,000-kg (2,200-pound) bomb or a torpedo.

The T started its taxiing tests on 15 May 1941 and made its first flight at the end of the month, with A. I. Zhukov at the controls. Flight tests went on all summer at the Khodinka airfield near Moscow and were conducted by Zhukov and V. N. Savkin, an Nil WS test pilot.

image50

Series production of the T was to have taken place at factory no. 1, but the Germans invaded just as the first tests got under way. The air­craft was moved to Kazan, and flight tests were not continued.

In some OKB documents the fighter version is referred to as the MiG-5 and the bomber version as the MiG-2. DIS stands for Dalniy Istrebityel Soprovozhdeniya: long-range escort fighter. The DIS-200 had three competitors: the Tairov Ta-3 (OKO-6bis), the Polikarpov TIS, and the Grushin Gr-1.

Specifications

Span, 15.1 m (49 ft 6.5 in); length, 10.875 m (35 ft 8.1 in); wheel track, 4.6 m (15 ft 1.1 in); wing area, 38.9 m2 (418.7 sq ft); empty weight, 6,140 kg (13,530 lb); takeoff weight, 8,060 kg (17,765 lb); fuel, 1,920 kg (4,230 lb); wing loading, 207.2 kg/m2 (42.4 lb/sq ft).

Performance

Max speed, 610 km/h at 6,800 m (329 kt at 22,300 ft); service ceiling, 10,800 m (35,425 ft); range, 2,280 km (1,415 mi); endurance, 5 h; climb to 5,000 m (16,400 ft) in 5.5 min.

DIS 200 / IT

Because neither Charomskii diesels nor Mikulin AM-37 engines were ready for use, the DIS-200 second prototype was powered by an M-82F, a mass-produced radial engine that could afford 1,250 kW (1,700 ch) at takeoff and 957 kW (1,300 ch) at 6,500 m (21,300 feet). The aircraft – built in Kuybyshev, where factory no. 1 and the OKB had relocated in October 1941 — was first called the IT (factory code).

Both T and IT prototypes had the same structure. The only differ­ence, except for the engines, concerned the heavier armament: four 7.62-mm ShKAS and two 12.7-mm BS machine guns plus two 23-mm VYa-23 cannons. The T could carry either a 1,000-kg (2,200-pound) bomb or a torpedo of the same weight, depending on mission require­ments. The IT rolled out of the factory in January 1942 and made its first flight later that month with G. M. Shiyakov (an LII pilot) at the controls. It was then transferred from Kuybyshev to Kazan, where it was test-flown. Meanwhile, the experience of the war demonstrated that escort missions could be handled successfully by frontal fighters, making the development of a special type of aircraft unnecessary. The IT flight tests were consequently terminated.

image51

DIS-200 (IT) (MiG О KB three-view drawing)

image52

The DIS-200 (IT) or DIS-2M-82F was the second and final prototype of this program. Because long-range escort fighters were no longer needed, flight tests were terminated in 1942.

Specifications

Span, 15.1 m (49 ft 6.5 in); length, 12.14 m (39 ft 9.9 in); height, 3.4 m (11 ft 1.8 in); wheel track, 4.6 m (15 ft 1.1 in); wing area, 38.9 m2 (418.7 sq ft); takeoff weight, 8,000 kg (17,630 lh); fuel, 1,920 kg (4,230 lb); wing loading, 205.7 kg/m2 (42.11 lb/sq ft).

Performance

Max speed, 604 km/h at 5,000 m (326 kt at 16,400 ft); climb to 5,000 m (16,400 ft) in 6.3 min; service ceiling, 9,800 m (32,140 ft); range, 2,500 km (1,550 mi).

Д Series

1-220 / A / MiG-11

In 1942 the ОКБ began to build a string of high-altitude interceptor prototypes (the A series) meant to oppose the Luftwaffe’s photo recon­naissance aircraft, which were able to operate with complete impunity because of their high operational ceiling. These Soviet aircraft were in fact updated remakes of the MiG-3.

image53

The 1-220 no. 01 was first powered by the AM-38F engine at 1.250 kW (1,700 ch).

The first project was assigned the letter A and the designation 1-220. It was a low-wing single-seater of mixed construction. For the first time the ОКБ designers departed from the MiG-3 layout. All of their previous models had had the exact same span and wing area. The 1-220 was different: the radiator was moved to the wing center section (with air intakes in the leading edge and a variable shutter on the wing’s upper surface), the main gear legs were given a levered suspen­sion system, its firepower was increased. Two prototypes were built. The 1-220 no. 01 received an AM-38F, which was later replaced by an AM-39. The AM-38F generated 1,251 kW (1,700 ch) at takeoff and 1,104 kW (1,500 ch) at rated altitude, while the AM-39 generated 1,325 kW (1,800 ch) at takeoff and 1,104 kW (1,500 ch) at rated altitude. Its arma­ment included two synchronized 20-mm ShVAK (SP-20) cannons above the engine with 150 rpg.

Because flight tests and the development of the AM-39 took longer than expected, the 1-220 no. 02 received an engine that was not certi­fied and could not yet be mass produced. Its armament was also differ­ent. It was the first Soviet fighter fitted with four synchronized 20-mm ShVAK (SP-20) cannons with 100 rpg and the first to have a whip anten­na for its radio set.

The 1-220 no. 01 with AM-38F engine was rolled out in June 1943 and made its first flight in July with A. P. Yakimov in the cockpit. Tests continued through August and involved pilot P. A. Zhuravlyev. The 1-220 no. 01 with AM-39 engine was rolled out in January 1944 and

image54

All air intakes—engine cooling, oil cooling, heat exchanger—are grouped together in the wing’s leading edge of the 1-220.

 

image55

The 1-220 no. 01 was reengined in 1943 with the AM-39 at 1,325 kW (1,800 ch).

 

image56

The 1-220 no. 02, powered by an AM-39, was rolled out in August 1944, but the high – altitude engine ratings were rather disappointing.

underwent flight tests between then and August. The 1-220 no. 02 with AM-39 engine left the factory in August 1944 and was first flown by 1.1. Shelnest in September.

Development of a suitable engine for a high-altitude interceptor intended for PVO regiments proceeded concurrently with the prelimi­nary design of the 1-220 and continued until the test flights ended in 1944. In the meantime, the notorious inadequacies of available engines at the edge of the stratosphere greatly complicated the work of the ОКБ. The wing loading of the 1-220 was relatively moderate and marked a significant improvement over the MiG-3 in terms of both maneuverability and rate of climb. But because no existing engine could provide the needed power, the design ceiling—the raison d’etre of this program—was never reached. At low and medium altitudes, however, the aircraft proved to be superior to the Yak and La “frontal" fighters then in use. For ground speed the 1-220 nos. 01 and 02 were between 30 and 70 km/h (16 and 38 kt) faster than the Yak-9. At 7,000 m (22,960 feet) the no. 02 was 50 to 95 km/h (27 to 51 kt) faster than the La-5. If the 1-220 had been mass-produced, it would have been called the MiG-11.

The following details refer to the 1-220 no 01 with the AM-38F engine/with the AM-39 engine.

image57

Specifications

Span, 11 m (36 ft 1 in); length, 9.603 m (31 ft 6.1 in); height, 3.16 m (10 ft 4.4 in); wheel track, 3.652 m (11 ft 11.8 in); wheel base, 5.85 m (19 ft

2.3 in); wing area, 20.38 mz (219.37 sq ft); empty weight, 2,936/3,013 kg (6,471/6,641 lb); takeoff weight, 3,574/3,835 kg (7,877/8,452 lb); fuel, 335 kg (738 lb); oil, 45 kg (99 lb); wing loading, 175.4/188 2 kg/mz (35.9/38.5 Ib/sq ft).

Performance

Max speed, 630/668 km/h at 7,000 m (340/361 kt at 22,960 ft); max speed at sea level, 572/550 km/h (309/297 kt); climb to 6,000 m (19,680 ft) with AM-39 in 4.5 min; service ceiling with AM-38F, 9,500 m (31,160 ft); range, 960/630 km (595/390 mi).

The following details refer to the 1-220 no. 02 with the AM-39 engine.

Specifications

Span, 11 m (36 ft 1 in); length, 9.603 m (31 ft 6.1 in); height, 3.16 m (10 ft 4.4 in); wheel track, 3.652 m (11 ft 11.8 in); wheel base, 5.85 m (19 ft

2.3 in); wing area, 20.38 mz (219.37 sq ft); empty weight, 3,101 kg (6,835 lb); takeoff weight, 3,647 kg (8,038 lb); fuel, 335 kg (738 lb); oil, 45 kg (99 lb); wing loading, 178.8 kg/mz (36.7 lb/sq ft).

Performance

Max speed, 697 km/h at 7,000 m (376 kt at 22,960 ft); max speed at sea level, 571 km/h (308 kt); climb to 6,000 m (19,680 ft) in 4.5 min; ser­vice ceiling, 11,000 m (36,080 ft); range, 630 km (390 mi).

1225/ 5A

The 1-225—last model of the A series, coded 5A—was the heaviest and most powerful experimental interceptor of the family. Its preliminary design was drawn up by a team of engineers headed by A. G. Brunov, project manager. Two I-225s were built in a back-to-basics formula: they had the same dimensions and wing area as the 1-220, the family’s progenitor. The 1-225 no. 01 was powered by an AM-42B engine, the no. 02 by an AM-42FB. The latter power plant provided 1,472 kW (2,000 ch) at takeoff or 1,288 kW (1,750 ch) at rated altitude and also at 7,500 m (24,600 feet). There was a TK-300B exhaust-driven turbo­supercharger on its right side, and it drove a three-bladed AV-5A-22V propeller 3.6 m (11 feet, 9.7 inches) in diameter. The problems that plagued the 1-222 and 1-224 pressurized cockpit were solved, and the

image58

image59

Two l-225s were built (our photographs show no. 01). The exhaust-driven turbo­supercharger was located on the right side of the engine. These aircraft were pow­ered by the most powerful Soviet engine: the AM-42B, delivering 1,470 kW (2,000 ch) at takeoff.

size of the heat exchanger placed under the back of the engine was reduced.

Protection for the pilot was enhanced by the addition of 9-mra thick armor plate to the back of the seat, and the front and rear parts of the canopy were fitted with 64-mm thick bulletproof glass. The cockpit was equipped for instrument flying and had an ultrashort – wave transceiver.

The armament on both prototypes comprised four synchronized 20-mm ShVAK SP-20 cannons (100 rpg), two mounted above the engine and one fitted on each side. The 1-225 no. 01 built in June 1941 was a direct descendant of the 1-220 and made its first flight on 21 July 1944 with A. P. Yakimov at the controls. According to design calculations the aircraft ought to have reached 729 km/h at 8,520 m (394 kt at 27,945 feet) at engine combat rating and 721 km/h at 8,850 m (389 kt at 29,030 feet) at rated power. On 7 August 1944 Yakimov clocked up 707 km/h at 8,500 m (382 kt at 27,880 feet) at rated power. Two days later, on its fifteenth flight, the plane experienced engine failure near the ground and crashed, damaged beyond repair.

A second prototype was ordered. However, by the time the 1-225 no. 02 commenced flight tests on 14 March 1945 the MiG ОКБ had turned its attention to the 1-220 (N) and its motokompressor. In tests the 1-225 no. 02 earned the title of second-fastest Soviet piston-engine fight­ers at 720 km/h (389 kt)—unable to beat the record established on 19 December 1944 by the much lighter Yak-3U (2,830 kg/6,235 lb) pow­ered by a 1,325 kW (1,800 ch) Klimov VK-108.

The 1-225 ended all attempts to design a successor for the MiG-3 based on a single layout or structural design. Every member of the MiG fighter family from the 1-200 to the 1-225 fell victim to endless troubles with its power plant. Besides, after five years of continuous develop­ment the maximum speed of this aircraft type had increased by only 80 km/h (43 kt).

Specifications

Span, 11 m (36 ft 1 in); length, 9.603 m (31 ft 6.1 in); height in level flight position, 3.7 m (12 ft 1.7 in); wheel track, 3.652 m (11 ft 11.8 in); wheel base, 5.85 m (19 ft 2.3 in); wing area, 20.38 mz (219.37 sq ft); empty weight, 3,010 kg (6,635 lb); takeoff weight, 3,900 kg (8,595 lb); fuel, 350 kg (770 lb); oil, 41 kg (90 lb); wing loading, 191.2 kg/m2 (39.18 lh/sq ft); max operating limit load factor, 8.

Performance

Max speed, 720 km/h at 8,500 m (389 kt at 27,880 ft); max speed at sea level, 590/617 km/h (319/333 kt); climb to 5,000 m (16,400 ft) in 4.5 min; service ceiling, 12,600 m (41,330 ft); landing speed, 134 km/h (72

image60

kt); range, 1,300 km (810 mi); takeoff roll, 257 m (843 ft); landing roll, 450 m (1,475 ft).

Interview: Birth of a Design Bureau

IIIS INTERVIEW WITH U. A. BELYAKOV was conducted and recorded by

Jacques Marmain in Moscow on 6 March 1991.

The MiG OKB celebrated its fiftieth anniversary some months ago. Today you hold the collective memory of this big enterprise, founded at the very moment that World War II broke out. This event having overshadowed the circumstances surrounding the birth of the OKB, can you tell us how all this started?

In early 1939 the threat of war loomed large over Europe and the USSR knew that it would not be spared. Having to face the growing power of Nazi Germany, the Party and the government implemented measures necessary to reinforce the Soviet Army, of which the VVS (air force) was a major component. At this time the lighters in service with our squadrons, the Polikarpov 1-153s and l-16s, were greatly out­classed by the Bf 109Es built by Messerschmitt. There was no time to waste. To create a competitive spirit, several design bureaus were asked to develop and build prototypes. The one with the best flying qualities and combat capabilities was to be mass-produced. Simulta­neously, the NKAP (Commissariat of the People for the Aviation Indus­try) urged the creation of an experimental construction bureau able to attract young, talented specialists.

Which manufacturers were involved in the new program?

There were nine of them: Polikarpov, Yakovlev, and Lavochkin, assisted by Gorbunov and Gudkov, Sukhoi, Borovkov and Florov, Shevchenko, Kozlov, Yatsenko, and Pashinin. All these engineers had to report on their projects personally to Stalin, who was following this program closely. This is why N. N. Polikarpov, chief constructor, P. A. Voronin, manager of the Polikarpov production plant, and P. V. Dementyev, chief engineer, were summoned to the Kremlin in the summer of 1939. The talks were heated. Voronin and Dementyev, supported by Stalin, wanted to give priority to the monoplane, while Polikarpov preferred the biplane for its handling qualities. A work crew was formed within the Polikarpov OKB to create a preliminary design (coded Kh). The crew was composed of a structure specialist, Ya. I. Selyetskiy, an airframe constructor, N. I. Andrianov, and an aerodynamicist, N. Z. Matyuk. These three men are still alive: Selyet­skiy is today an assistant to G. Ye. Lozino-Lozinskiy in the space shut­tle program, Andrianov is retired, and Matyouk is one of my faithful assistants as chief constructor. The three went to the Kremlin, where Stalin approved the project in the absence of Polikarpov, who was

image3

Mikhail Iosifovich Guryevich (1892-1976), Hero of Socialist Labor (1945), doctor of technical sciences (1964), and winner of the Lenin Prize and the USSR State Prize on several occasions.

 

then in Germany. You will notice that the name of Mikoyan has not come up yet. There is a very good reason for this: he was not aware of any of these developments. At that time Mikoyan, who was the VVS representative at Polikarpov, was in charge of producing and upgrading the 1-153.

Voronin and Dementyev were the first to believe that Mikoyan was the right man to manage the new team. They confided their thoughts to Stalin, who at first snarled and said, “What! Anastas’s brother!” and then finally agreed—"OK. It’s up to you." The two men did not choose Mikoyan at random. To them, he offered many advantages. They had noticed his spirit, his mind for organization, and his popularity in the VVS and the NKAP, and he was the brother of Anastas Ivanovich Mikoyan, member of the Politburo since 1935 and people’s commissar in various economic commissariats since 1926. But they still had to per­suade the surprised Artyom Ivanovich Mikoyan, who finally agreed to this unexpected proposal on one condition: that he could take on his old friend Guryevich as his assistant.

In the meantime, several other engineers had joined the team in November 1939. They all came from the Polikarpov ОКБ: V. A. Romodin, A. G. Brunov, D. N. Kutguzov, and one or two others whose names I have forgotten.

How did the new team succeed in winning its autonomy?

Simply by government decree. But it was quite an event because, with the blessing of the authorities, Voronin and Dementyev exploded the Polikarpov system. The ОКБ, factory no. 1, and the new team were assembled in an OKO, or design and experiment section. A. I. Mikoyan was put in charge of this OKO, assisted by M. I. Guryevich and V. A. Romodin. In November-December 1939 the new OKO attained full strength and submitted the final design of the Kh project renamed the 1-200, which was planned initially with a AM-37 engine. The 1-200 pre­liminary design was quickly approved by the central committee of the Communist party, the people’s commissariat of the aircraft industry, and the air force. The existence of the OKO was formalized on 8 December 1939.

Could you tell us more about Mikoyan, a man whose name is famous all over the world? We do not really know much about him.

Artyom Ivanovich Mikoyan was born on 5 August 1905 in Sanain, a small Armenian village. His father was a carpenter. He learned to read and write at the village school and then was sent to Tbilisi high school m Georgia.

In 1923 he was admitted to the training school of the Krasniy Aksai factory in Rostov, and the following year he was hired as a mechanic by the railway workshop in the same town. In 1925, still a mechanic, he was employed at the Dynamo factory in Moscow. In December 1928

image4

Rostislav Apollosovich Belyakov (1919- ), winner of the Lenin Prize (1972), doctor of technical sciences (1973), member of the USSR Academy of Science (1981), recipient of the A. N. Tupolev Gold Medal (1988), two-time Hero of Socialist Labor, and two – time winner of the USSR State Prize.

he left the factory to do his national service. Discharged two years later, he returned to Moscow and found work at the Kompressor facto­ry He entered the air force academy named after N. Ye. Zhukoskiy in 1931. There things became much more difficult, but young Artyom Ivanovich stuck with it, became keen on parachuting, and learned to fly. In 1935 he and two fellow students used a 22-horsepower American engine to build a light sport aircraft dubbed Oktyabryonok, which apparently was quite a good flier In 1937 he passed his exams at the academy with flying colors and, his first-grade diploma in the bag, found himself representing the military client (in this case, the WS) at the no. 1 Aviakhim factory. The Polikarpov design bureau was located inside this factory, which produced the 1-153 Chaika (seagull) fighters. Mikoyan was in charge of the acceptance checks on behalf of the VYS and then was appointed the permanent representative of the customer within the desrgn bureau. He was therefore in regular contact with Polikarpov, head of the design bureau.

Less than two years later, in March 1939, Polikarpov asked Mikoy­an to help him organize and update the Chaika production line. That is where Voronin and Dementyev noticed him. You know what followed.

How was the OKB organized during the first months of its existence?

In the beginning, everybody worked like hell at producing all of the drawings for the 1-200 and preparing the assembly of three proto­types. In December 1940 the aircraft received its production designa­tion: MiG-1. The actual assembly of the prototypes began in January 1940, and fewer than a hundred days later, on 30 March, the first machine was moved to the airfield. The first MtG took off on 4 April

In the meantime, in March, Mikoyan was appointed chief con­structor at the no. 1 Aviakhim factory, and Guryevich was named deputy chief constructor. The careers of both men developed along the same lines. On 16 March 1942, by decree of the State Commissariat of Defense, the OKO was reorganized within the no. 155 factory, in Moscow—that is, in the very place where we are talking today. Mikoy­an became manager and then chref constructor of the new OKB. On 20 December 1956 Mikoyan was appointed general designer, a position that he held until 27 May 1969, when he was struck down by a myocar­dial infarction. For his part, Guryevich was appointed chief construc­tor, a position that he retained until he retired in 1964.

Guryevich had by then become no. 2 in the OKB hierarchy. Could you tell us more about his career?

Mikhail Iosrfovich Guryevrch was born in 1892 in Kharkov, a big Ukrainian city. His father worked in a distillery. After finishing high school he entered the advanced mathematics program at Kharkov Uni­versity but was expelled for taking part in a student revolutionary movement. In 1913 he left for France to study math at Montpellier Uni-

image5

This photograph of the Mikoyan family has never been published before. Right to left: Artyom Ivanovich Mikoyan; Ovanes, his son; Svetlana, his daughter; Talida Otarovna, his mother; Zoya Ivanovna, his wife; and Natasha, his eldest daughter.

versify. After the October Revolution he returned to the USSR and resumed his studies at the technological institute in Kharkov. He orga­nized a group of students there into an aeronautics circle that soon became a formal faculty of aviation, and he left in 1925 with a diploma. After working here and there for four years without finding what he was after, he decided to devote all his energies to aviation (his first love), either in a factory or in a design bureau. He spent time in the OKB managed by P. E. Richard, a French engineer who had been invit­ed by the Soviet government to work in the USSR, and in the one head­ed by S. A. Kocherigin.

In 1937 Mikhail Iosifovich was sent to the United States to negoti­ate a manufacturing license for the Douglas DC-3 airliner. When he returned to the USSR a year later he took an active part in the prepara­tion of the production line for this aircraft (known here as the PS-84 or Li-2) and the development of new manufacturing techniques. Toward the end of 1938 he joined the Polikarpov design bureau to take charge of the study project department. And that is where Mikoyan noticed him. The loop was looped, and the couple who were to many their ini­tials—MiG—was formed.

If we can trust the morphology of their faces, Mikoyan and Guryevich undoubtedly had very different natures. Could you tell us about these two men as individuals?

You are right. They had very different personalities—but often they complemented one another. Mikoyan was as open, outspoken, and convivial as Guryevich was modest, even unassuming. Mikoyan

took good care of himself; for Guryevich, clothes were the least of his worries. Mikoyan had no experience in aircraft construction. He learned on the job. Because of his great knowledge of common manu­facturing problems, he was able to assess a project quickly—and better still, to submit one of his own. Guryevich was erudite, the math expert, the mastermind, who because of his experience and the wide range of his technical knowledge had a talent for drawing up preliminary designs. Without Guryevich, Mikoyan probably would not have suc­ceeded—but the reverse is also true. Guryevich was an engaging per­son, enamored with literature, always shocked by impurity, impolite­ness, and coarseness. He wouldn’t have hurt a fly and was never angry or cross with anyone. He was a married man with no children. Every­one at the design bureau was fond of him, and he proved to be a good social negotiator. Little was heard of him toward the end of his profes­sional life because he was handed responsibility for the “set of themes B,” an innocent name for one of the most secret OKB activities: the development of winged missiles. He retired in 1964 and died of old age in 1976 in Leningrad.

Mikoyan was married and had three children, one son and two daughters. His wife Zoya Ivanovna is still alive. His son, Ovanes Arty­omovich, worked at the OKB as an engineer for a long time; he has a passion for sport aircraft and now belongs to the team of Lozino – Lozinskiy.

Some examples of Mikoyan’s other traits are now coming back to me—I offer them to you in a jumble. For instance, he waited on his pilots hand and foot. He loved to take care of people. When the woman in charge of the workers’ council drew his attention to the poor health of the design bureau’s engineers during the war—at this time we sel­dom got enough to eat—he decided to send us to the country. That is how circumstances led me to make hay, when others organized fishing competitions. We were all able to regain some strength. Mikoyan also liked to fall in with his Armenian friends such as Marshal Bagramian and Tumanyan, Anastas’s brother-in-law. He also struck up friendships with other general designers, including Ilyushin, Tupolev, Yakovlev, and Tumanskiy, an engine specialist who was also a cultured and inter­esting man.

Mikoyan had a cardiac defect, an abnormal thickness of the peri­cardium, that caused a lot of problems toward the end of his life. He was strongly affected by the accidental death in 1968 of Gagarin, who was thirty-six at the time, and by the death in April 1969 of Kadomtsev, the PVO commander-in-chief, a man whom he knew well, in a MiG-25 crash. One month later, on 27 May 1969, Mikoyan suffered a stroke that forced him to retire. On 9 December 1970 he had to be sent to the hospital and died on the operating table.

image6

Mikoyan was a friertd of Tupolev, another famous aircraft manufacturer. They are together here during an air show in July 1949. Right, Zoya Ivanovna, Mikoyan’s wife.

That very day, you were assigned the heavy responsibility of tak­ing over under difficult conditions. I’m sorry to ask, but you must tell us a little about yourself.

[t is always much easier to talk about others, but as you wish to know every detail, I would have you know that Rostislav Apollosovich Belyakov was bom on 4 March 1919 in Murom, in the Vladimir region. My father was a civil servant. After graduating in 1936 I entered the Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI) named after S. Orjonikidze, where I was taught by such prestigious professors as Yuryev and Zhu – ravchenko. I left with a diploma in 1941 and became an engineer at the MiG OKB. My first task was to work on updating the armament of the MiG-3 under the leadership of Volkov, a weapons specialist of great repute. Soon Mikoyan asked me to work with him and put me in

image7

In June 1965 Mikoyan quietly visited the Dassault factory in Talence, France. In the company of Paul Deplante technical manager of the Merignac Dassault factory Mikoyan examines the spot-facing of a Mystere 20 wing socket.

charge of the high-lift devices department. In 1955 I was made director of the research department, in 1957 deputy to the chief constructor, and in 1962 first deputy to the general designer. In 1971, a few weeks after Mikoyan’s death, I was named general designer.

As an engineer and a scientist, what are your favorite activities?

I have devoted much of my time and energies to fluid mechanics, aeroelasticity, problems of strength, flight control modes and conse­quently to flying controls, design of aircraft-plus-missiles systems, power plants, airborne systems, aircraft design, and all advanced aero­nautical technologies. I also pay special attention to materials and sur­vival equipment. As a general designer I coordinate the work of the several design bureaus and research centers involved in the creation of a new prototype.

Could we return briefly to 1971? Tell us how you took over for Mikoyan and how you managed to preserve the spirit of initiative that prevailed in the OKB.

I succeeded in taking over without much trouble. After all, I had grown up within the OKB and had worked in practically every depart­ment. Do not forget that since 1957 I had been working with Mikoyan, in charge of the gears, flying controls, and various other systems and devices, and that since 1962 I had been his first deputy. One day Mikoyan told me, "You will have to decide on everything for yourself.

image8

з

 

image9

image10

On 16 March 1942, by government decree, the OKB managed by Mikoyan was reorganized within the no. 155 factory area in Moscow. The area was in fact a wasteland near the Leningrad causeway that held a few crumbling huts, several barracks, an antiquated boiler room, and a small one-story building. It was in the latter that the design bureau set up shop on a primitive level in April 1942 after its return from Kuybyshev, to which it had been evacuated the year before. Quite rapidly, crit­ical restoration and construction projects were completed (1) The site after initial repairs in 1942. (2) The first assembly workshop. (3) Construction of the building planned to accommodate the design bureau. (4) The site in 1943.

image11

її

image12

This photograph was taken in March 1969, a few weeks before Mikoyan suffered the stroke that ended his career. He hands R. A. Belyakov a present for his fiftieth birth­day: a sculpture symbolizing Belyakov’s two passions, aviation and skiing.

So keep calm.” If I had doubts about something, I could always knock at his door. I took part in all important meetings—Mikoyan, who was prone to headaches, abhorred business meetings and frequently sent me in his place, many times at the last minute. Because of my different activities, I was well known in all the departments. As you can see, I was in the best position to take over.

WieZZ then, is aviation the one and only passion in the life of Ros­tislav Apollosovich?

Of course not. When I was a student I loved skiing, especially Alpine skiing and ski jumping. I was a five-time champion in the USSR, once in ski jumping and four times in downhill racing, and I am quite proud of that. With one of my professors, Zhuravchenko, I even ‘’test­ed" a man in a wind tunnel to calculate the best descent attitudes. In 1940 I skied down the eastern side of the Elbrus, which reaches some 5,600 meters (18,600 feet) at its highest point. But I should not forget my wife, Ludmilla Nikolayevna. I met her in Kuybyshev, a port on the Volga River where the OKB withdrew in 1941 at the time of the Ger­man breakthrough. I returned to Moscow with our engineering office staff in 1942, but my wife-to-be did not return until later. We got mar­ried in 1945. She is now retired from her career as a television engineer specializing in large screens. And while I was at MAI I of course learned to fly—either on a Polikarpov Po-2 or a Yakovlev UT-2. I have also made parachute jumps.

You wish to know my shortcomings? I do not know how to relax, how to keep away from my work and think of something else. I like classical music, but I never have time to go to a concert. Besides, I have always regretted not knowing how to play an instrument. I never learned a foreign language either. In my everyday life, I go out for the newspaper and my dog takes me for a walk twice a day. That’s all. There are two great sources of satisfaction in my life: Sergei, my son, who is thirty-nine years old and an engineer at MiG (previously in the automation department, today in the external economic relations department), and Olga Sergeievna, my granddaughter, who is a student at MAI. As you can see, my succession is already assured!

image13

1221 / 2A

The second series-A high-altitude interceptor was assigned the provi­sional designation of 1-221. There was not much difference between the structures of the 1-220 and the 1-221 beyond the wing, whose over-

image61

The AM-39B-1 engine of the 1-222 drove at first a three-bladed propeller. The TK-300B exhaust-driven turbo-supercharger is clearly visible on the left side of the engine.

 

image62

all span was raised from 11 m to 13 m (36 feet, 1 inch to 42 feet, 7.8 inches), and the rear fuselage, which on the later model was fashioned out of dural The cockpit was not only pressurized but also air-condi – tioned (a first on a Soviet fighter). The heat exchanger was located under the pilot’s seat and was interconnected with the air-conditioning system following a sequencing cycle

The AM-39A offered 1,141 kW (1,550 ch) at takeoff and was fitted with two TK-2B turbo-superchargers that enabled it to maintain its maximum rated output up to 13,000 m (42,650 feet) At 5,200 m (17,055 feet) the engine put out 1,251 kW (1,700 ch) The armament on the 1-221 consisted of two synchronized 20-mm ShVAK cannons flanking the engine The prototype made its first flight on 2 December 1943 with P. A Zhuravlyev in the cockpit, and flight tests were conducted by A P Yakimov, an LII pilot. The test program came to a sudden halt early on when a valve push-rod broke in flight The engine failed, and the pilot had to bail out.