RELIABILITY

So, just how reliable are Chinese rockets? Tables 3.7 and 3.8 list the record of Chinese launch failures and stranded satellites since the start of the program. Table 3.8 lists failures by rocket type, dividing them into failures to reach Earth orbit and failures to reach final geostationary orbit (strandings).

Table 3.7. Chinese launch failures.

Launch failures

18 Sep 1973

Feng Bao

Ji Shu Shiyan Weixing

Second-stage failure

14 Jul 1974

Feng Bao

Ji Shu Shiyan Weixing

Second-stage failure

5 Nov 1974

CZ – 2A

FSW

First-stage failure

10 Nov 1976

Feng Bao

Ji Shu Shiyan Weixing

Second-stage failure

28 Jul 1979

Feng Bao

Shi Jian

Second-stage failure

21 Dec 1992

CZ – 2E

Optus B-2

Satellite broke up at 51 sec

25 Jan 1995

CZ – 2E

Apstar 2

Exploded at 70 sec

14 Feb 1996

CZ – 3B

Intelsat 708

Failed at 2 sec

18 Aug 2011

CZ-2C

Shi Jian 11-4

Second-stage failure

Stranded satellites

29 Jan 1984

CZ-3

Shiyan Weixing

Loss of thrust at 3 sec

28 Dec 1991

CZ-3

Shiyong Tongbu Tongxin Weixing 5

Third-stage failure at 58 sec

29 Nov 1994

CZ-3A

Zhongxing 6 or 6A

PKM failure, reached GEO, abandoned

18 Aug 1996

CZ-3

Zhongxing 7

Third-stage failure

Table 3.8. Chinese launch failures by rocket type.

Totals Fails

Reliability Notes

FB

8

4

50%

CZ-1

2

0

CZ-2A

1

1

0% First mission failure, redesigned as CZ-2C

CZ-2C

36

1

97% First loss, 2011

CZ-2D

16

0

CZ-2E

7

2

81%

CZ-2F

10

0

CZ-3

13

0

Three stranded on third stage

CZ-3A

24

0

One stranded on third stage

CZ-3B

20

1

95% First launch loss

CZ-3C

8

0

CZ-4A

2

0

CZ-4B

20

0

CZ-4C

6

0

To 30 June 2012. Launchers still in service appear in italics.

There has always been a strong emphasis on quality control in the Chinese space

program.

Thus, over the period from 1970 to 2011, China had nine outright launch failures out of 173 attempts (giving an overall 95% reliability rate); but there were four further instances in which the insertion into geosynchronous orbit was either wholly or partially unsuccessful. As may be seen, five of the launch failures took place during the first 10 years of the program, when incidents of this kind were most likely. The two Long March 2E failures of 1992 and 1995 were contentious, with the customer insisting on using his own final stage, which may have contributed to the accident. Three rockets were lost on their maiden flights – the Long March 2A, the Feng Bao, and the Long March 3B – and maiden flight losses generally account for a third of all first-time launching failures worldwide, so this outcome is well within international norms. Indeed, India continued to experience problems in introducing its Geo Stationary Launch Vehicle (GSLV), with two failures in 2010. What is more relevant in judging rehability is reliability in recent years: from 1996 to 2011, China had 106 straight launch successes in a row, in Une with the best performance of its leading rivals (e. g. Europe’s Ariane 5).

The most likely failure point is not a rocket blowing up in the early stage of a

mission, but in the final stage of reaching 24-hr orbit – a feature of other space programs. It has still frustrated the Chinese that these problems have emerged in a program that has always had a strong commitment to quality control and testing. Because Chinese space budgets are restricted, the program can afford exploding rockets and satellites breaking down much less than others. Each launch costs at least ¥10m, leaving aside the value of the payload. Accordingly, there is a strong emphasis on quahty control and rigorous ground testing, considerable resources being so invested. The Chinese have introduced a “testing pyramid” of checking individual components, combined parts, and each system as a whole.